Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology

Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005: The Next 10 Years - Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, CSCL 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 125-134

  Dönmez, Pinar ^a   Rosé, Carolyn ^a   Stegmann, Karsten ^b   Weinberger, Armin ^c   Fischer, Frank ^c  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^c KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Automatic text processing techniques; Corpus analysis

Indexed keywords

PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; TEXT PROCESSING;

ARGUMENTATION; AUTOMATIC TEXT PROCESSING; COLLABORATIVE LEARNING PROCESS; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; CORPUS ANALYSIS; INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT; MULTI-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS; PROCESS ANALYSIS;

E-LEARNING;

EID: 84857048373     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1149293.1149310     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker & D. Suthers (Eds.), Arguing to learn: confronting cognitions in computersupported collaborative learning environments (Vol. 1, pp. 1-25). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
2. Chan, C. K. K., Burtis, P. J., & Bereiter, C. (1997). Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 15(1), 1-40. (Pubitemid 127360695)
3. Chu-Carroll, J. A statistical model for discourse act recognition in dialogue interactions. In Applying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing: 1998 AAAI Spring Symposium, 12-17.
4. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In S. D. Teasley (Ed.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington: American Psychologist Association.
5. Cohen, W. (2004). Minorthird: Methods for Identifying Names and Ontological Relations in Text using Heuristics for Inducing Regularities from Data, http://minorthird.sourceforge.net.
6. Cohen, W. and Singer, Y. (1996). Context -sentsitive learning methods for text categorization, In SIGIR-96: Proc. 19th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 307-315.
7. Dillenbourg, P. (2004). "Split Where Interaction Should Happen", a model for designing CSCL scripts. In P. Gerjets, P. A. Kirschner, J. Elen & R. Joiner (Eds.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer- supported learning. Proceedings of the first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computers (CD-ROM). Tuebingen: Knowledge Media Reseach Center.
8. Doise, W., & Mugny, G. (1984). The Social Development of the Intellect. Oxford: Pergamon.
9. Dumais, S., Platt, J., Heckerman, D. and Sahami, M. (1998). Inductive Learning Algorithms and Representations for Text Categorization, Technical Report, Microsoft Research.
10. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232.
11. Flammia, G., Zue, V. Empirical evaluation of human performance and agreement in parsing discourse constituents in spoken dialogue. Proc. Eurospeech-95, 1965-1968.
12. Goodman, B., Linton, F., Gaimari, R., Hitzeman, J., Ross, H., & Zarrella, J. (to appear). Using Dialogue Features to Predict Trouble During Collaborative Learning, to appear in the Journal of User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction.
13. Joachims, T. (1998). Text categorization with support vector machines: Learning with many relevant features, In Proc. 10th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML), Springer Verlag, 1998.
14. Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2004). Internal and external cooperation scripts in web-based collaborative inquiry learning. In P. Gerjets, P. A. Kirschner, J. Elen & R. Joiner (Eds.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer- supported learning. Proceedings of the first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computers (CD-ROM). Tuebingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
15. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (submitted). Computer-supported cooperation scripts - a conceptual analysis.
16. Lally, Vic and De Laat, Maarten F. (2002) Cracking the code:Learning to collaborate and collaborating to learn in a networked environment. In, CSCL, University of Colorado, Boulder, USA, 7-11 January, 2002.
17. Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332-360.
18. Lewis, D. and Ringuette, R. (1994). A Comparison of teo learning algorithms for text classification, In Third Annual Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, pp. 81-93.
19. McKelvie, D., Isard, A., Mengel, A., Moller, M., Grosse, M., & Klein, M. The MATE Workbench - an annotation tool for XML coded speech corpora. Speech Communication, 33(1-2):97-112.
20. Nastasi, B. K., & Clements, D. H. (1992). Social-cognitive behaviors and higher-order thinking in educational computer environments. Learning and Instruction, 2, 215-238.
21. Reithinger, N., Klessen, M. Dialogue act classification using language models. Proc. EuroSpeech-97, 2235-2238.
22. Richards, L. (1999). Using NVivo in Qualitative Research. Bundoora, Victoria, Australia: Qualitative Solutions and Research.
23. Rocchio, J. (1971). Relevance feedback in information retrieval, In The SMART Retrival System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pp. 313-323, Prentice Hall Inc.
24. Rosé, C. P., Gweon, G., Wittwer, J., Nueckles, M. (submitted). An Adaptive Interface that Facilitates Reliable Analysis of Corpus Data, submitted to INTERACT -05.
25. Soller, A. & Lesgold, A. (2000). Modeling the Process of Collaborative Learning, Proceedings of the International Workshop on New Technologies in Collaborative Learning, Awaiji-Yumebutai, Japan.
26. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2004). Scripting Argumentation in computer-supported learning environments. In P. Gerjets, P. A. Kirschner, J. Elen & R. Joiner (Eds.), Instructional design for effective and enjoyable computer- supported learning. Proceedings of the first joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with Computers (CD-ROM) (pp. 320-330). Tuebingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
27. Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2004, April). Can Computer-Supported Collaboration Scripts Facilitate Argumentative Knowledge Construction? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association 2004, San Diego.
28. Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361-384). Berlin: Springer.
29. Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge Universty Press.
30. Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillian Publishing.
31. Weinberger, A. (2003). Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Effects of social and epistemic cooperation scripts on collaborative knowledge construction, from http://edoc.ub.unimuenchen.de/archive/00001120/01/ Weinberger-Armin.pdf
32. Weinberger, A. & Fischer, F. (in press). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education.
33. Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (submitted). Collaboration scripts to facilitate knowledge convergence in computer-mediated learning environments.
34. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (in press). Problem-based collaborative knowledge construction online: Effects of multiple argumentative script components in text -based communication. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge - cognitive, computational and educational perspectives.
35. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548-573.
36. Wiener, E., Pedersen, J. and Weigend, S. (1993). A neural network approach to topic spotting, In Proc. 4th annual symposium on document analysis and information retrieval, pp. 22-34, 1993.
37. Weiss, S., Apte, C. and Damerau, F. (1999). Maximizing Text -Mining Performance, Proceedings of IEEE Intelligent Systems.
38. Yang, Y. and Pedersen, J. (1997). Feature selection in statistical learning of text categorization, In the 14th Int. Conf. on Machine Learning, pp 412-420.