CHD chromatin remodelling enzymes and the DNA damage response

Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis

Volumn 750, Issue 1-2, 2013, Pages 31-44

  Stanley, Fintan K T ^a   Moore, Shaun ^a   Goodarzi, Aaron A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

Author keywords

CHD3; CHD4; CHD5; CHD6; Chromatin remodelling; DNA double strand break response

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASE; ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 3; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 4; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 5; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 6; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 7; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 8; CHROMODOMAIN HELICASE DNA BINDING PROTEIN 9; DNA; HISTONE H3; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSYLTRANSFERASE; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; PROTEIN P53; PROTEIN SMARCA5; PROTEIN SWI; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR SNF; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CANCER INHIBITION; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENETIC STABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; HYDROLYSIS; IONIZING RADIATION; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CHD3; CHD4; CHD5; CHD6; CHROMATIN REMODELLING; DNA DOUBLE STRAND BREAK RESPONSE;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA HELICASES; DNA REPAIR; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84886946145     PISSN: 00275107     EISSN: 09218262     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.07.008     Document Type: Review

References (168)

1. Ciccia A., Elledge S.J. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:179-204.
2. Goodarzi A.A., Jeggo P.A. The heterochromatic barrier to DNA double strand break repair: how to get the entry visa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13:11844-11860.
3. Chapman J.R., Taylor M.R., Boulton S.J. Playing the end game: DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 2012, 47:497-510.
4. Price B.D., D'Andrea A.D. Chromatin remodeling at DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 2013, 152:1344-1354.
5. Dion V., Gasser S.M. Chromatin movement in the maintenance of genome stability. Cell 2013, 152:1355-1364.
6. Goodarzi A.A., Jeggo P.A. The repair and signaling responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Adv. Genet. 2013, 82:1-45.
7. Abraham R.T. PI 3-kinase related kinases: 'big' players in stress-induced signaling pathways. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004, 3:883-887.
8. Bekker-Jensen S., Mailand N. Assembly and function of DNA double-strand break repair foci in mammalian cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010, 9:1219-1228.
9. Kim J.A., Kruhlak M., Dotiwala F., et al. Heterochromatin is refractory to gamma-H2AX modification in yeast and mammals. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 178:209-218.
10. Bergink S., Jentsch S. Principles of ubiquitin and SUMO modifications in DNA repair. Nature 2009, 458:461-467.
11. Luijsterburg M.S., van Attikum H. Chromatin and the DNA damage response: the cancer connection. Mol. Oncol. 2011, 5:349-367.
12. Noon A.T., Goodarzi A.A. 53BP1-mediated DNA double strand break repair: insert bad pun here. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011, 10:1071-1076.
13. Chapman J.R., Jackson S.P. Phospho-dependent interactions between NBS1 and MDC1 mediate chromatin retention of the MRN complex at sites of DNA damage. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9:795-801.
14. Spycher C., Miller E.S., Townsend K., et al. Constitutive phosphorylation of MDC1 physically links the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex to damaged chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:227-240.
15. Melander F., Bekker-Jensen S., Falck J., et al. Phosphorylation of SDT repeats in the MDC1 N terminus triggers retention of NBS1 at the DNA damage-modified chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 181:213-226.
16. Noon A.T., Shibata A., Rief N., et al. 53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:177-184.
17. Lee J.H., Goodarzi A.A., Jeggo P.A., et al. 53BP1 promotes ATM activity through direct interactions with the MRN complex. EMBO J. 2010, 29(3):574-585.
18. Poulsen M., Lukas C., Lukas J., et al. Human RNF169 is a negative regulator of the ubiquitin-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197:189-199.
19. Chen J., Feng W., Jiang J., et al. Ring finger protein RNF169 antagonizes the ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:27715-27722.
20. Danielsen J.R., Povlsen L.K., Villumsen B.H., et al. DNA damage-inducible SUMOylation of HERC2 promotes RNF8 binding via a novel SUMO-binding Zinc finger. J. Cell Biol. 2012, 197:179-187.
21. Bekker-Jensen S., Rendtlew Danielsen J., Fugger K., et al. HERC2 coordinates ubiquitin-dependent assembly of DNA repair factors on damaged chromosomes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:80-86. sup pp 1-12.
22. Galanty Y., Belotserkovskaya R., Coates J., et al. RNF4, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase, promotes DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:1179-1195.
23. Yin Y., Seifert A., Chua J.S., et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin E3 ligase RNF4 is required for the response of human cells to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:1196-1208.
24. Galanty Y., Belotserkovskaya R., Coates J., et al. Mammalian SUMO E3-ligases PIAS1 and PIAS4 promote responses to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 2009, 462:935-939.
25. Chapman J.R., Barral P., Vannier J.B., et al. RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection. Mol. Cell 2013, 49:858-871.
26. Di Virgilio M., Callen E., Yamane A., et al. Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching. Science 2013, 339:711-715.
27. Zimmermann M., Lottersberger F., Buonomo S.B., et al. 53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5' end resection. Science 2013, 339:700-704.
28. Huen M.S., Huang J., Leung J.W., et al. Regulation of chromatin architecture by the PWWP domain-containing DNA damage-responsive factor EXPAND1/MUM1. Mol. Cell 2010, 37:854-864.
29. Goodarzi A.A., Jeggo P.A. Irradiation induced foci (IRIF) as a biomarker for radiosensitivity. Mutat. Res. 2012, 736:39-47.
30. Sanchez Y., Wong C., Thoma R.S., et al. Conservation of the Chk1 checkpoint pathway in mammals: linkage of DNA damage to Cdk regulation through Cdc25. Science 1997, 277:1497-1501.
31. Matsuoka S., Huang M., Elledge S.J. Linkage of ATM to cell cycle regulation by the Chk2 protein kinase. Science 1998, 282:1893-1897.
32. Xu B., Kim S.T., Lim D.S., et al. Two molecularly distinct G(2)/M checkpoints are induced by ionizing irradiation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 22:1049-1059.
33. Fernandez-Capetillo O., Chen H.T., Celeste A., et al. DNA damage-induced G2-M checkpoint activation by histone H2AX and 53BP1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002, 4:993-997.
34. Deckbar D., Stiff T., Koch B., et al. The limitations of the G1-S checkpoint. Cancer Res. 2010, 70:4412-4421.
35. Bartek J., Lukas J. Pathways governing G1/S transition and their response to DNA damage. FEBS Lett. 2001, 490:117-122.
36. Goodarzi A.A., Jeggo P., Lobrich M. The influence of heterochromatin on DNA double strand break repair: getting the strong, silent type to relax. DNA Rep. 2010, 9:1273-1282.
37. Symington L.S., Gautier J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45:247-271.
38. Riballo E., Kuhne M., Rief N., et al. A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:715-724.
39. Shibata A., Barton O., Noon A.T., et al. Role of ATM and the damage response mediator proteins 53BP1 and MDC1 in the maintenance of G(2)/M checkpoint arrest. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 30:3371-3383.
40. Shibata A., Conrad S., Birraux J., et al. Factors determining DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice in G2 phase. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1079-1092.
41. Beucher A., Birraux J., Tchouandong L., et al. ATM and Artemis promote homologous recombination of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in G2. EMBO J. 2009, 28:3413-3427.
42. Goodarzi A.A., Noon A.T., Deckbar D., et al. ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin. Mol. Cell 2008, 31:167-177.
43. Woodbine L., Brunton H., Goodarzi A.A., et al. Endogenously induced DNA double strand breaks arise in heterochromatic DNA regions and require ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Artemis for their repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39(16):6986-6997.
44. Ziv Y., Bielopolski D., Galanty Y., et al. Chromatin relaxation in response to DNA double-strand breaks is modulated by a novel ATM- and KAP-1 dependent pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:870-876.
45. Jakob B., Splinter J., Conrad S., et al. DNA double-strand breaks in heterochromatin elicit fast repair protein recruitment, histone H2AX phosphorylation and relocation to euchromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:6489-6499.
46. Cowell I.G., Sunter N.J., Singh P.B., et al. gammaH2AX Foci form preferentially in euchromatin after ionising-radiation. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e1057.
47. Falk M., Lukasova E., Kozubek S. Chromatin structure influences the sensitivity of DNA to gamma-radiation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1783:2398-2414.
48. Schuster-Bockler B., Lehner B. Chromatin organization is a major influence on regional mutation rates in human cancer cells. Nature 2012, 488:504-507.
49. Saha A., Wittmeyer J., Cairns B.R. Chromatin remodelling: the industrial revolution of DNA around histones. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:437-447.
50. Dumont S., Cheng W., Serebrov V., et al. RNA translocation and unwinding mechanism of HCV NS3 helicase and its coordination by ATP. Nature 2006, 439:105-108.
51. Henikoff J.G., Belsky J.A., Krassovsky K., et al. Epigenome characterization at single base-pair resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:18318-18323.
52. Fyodorov D.V., Blower M.D., Karpen G.H., et al. Acf1 confers unique activities to ACF/CHRAC and promotes the formation rather than disruption of chromatin in vivo. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:170-183.
53. Yudkovsky N., Logie C., Hahn S., et al. Recruitment of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex by transcriptional activators. Genes Dev. 1999, 13:2369-2374.
54. Zhou X., O'Shea E.K. Integrated approaches reveal determinants of genome-wide binding and function of the transcription factor Pho4. Mol. Cell 2011, 42:826-836.
55. Valouev A., Johnson S.M., Boyd S.D., et al. Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature 2011, 474:516-520.
56. Gaffney D.J., McVicker G., Pai A.A., et al. Controls of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1003036.
57. Sharma V.M., Li B., Reese J.C. SWI/SNF-dependent chromatin remodeling of RNR3 requires TAF(II)s and the general transcription machinery. Genes Dev. 2003, 17:502-515.
58. Moreira J.M., Holmberg S. Transcriptional repression of the yeast CHA1 gene requires the chromatin-remodeling complex RSC. EMBO J. 1999, 18:2836-2844.
59. Chai B., Huang J., Cairns B.R., et al. Distinct roles for the RSC and Swi/Snf ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:1656-1661.
60. Shim E.Y., Ma J.L., Oum J.H., et al. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25:3934-3944.
61. Shim E.Y., Hong S.J., Oum J.H., et al. RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 27:1602-1613.
62. Liang B., Qiu J., Ratnakumar K., et al. RSC functions as an early double-strand-break sensor in the cell's response to DNA damage. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1432-1437.
63. Chambers A.L., Downs J.A. The RSC and INO80 chromatin-remodeling complexes in DNA double-strand break repair. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2012, 110:229-261.
64. Lee H.S., Park J.H., Kim S.J., et al. A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, gamma-H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double-strand break repair. EMBO J. 2010, 29:1434-1445.
65. Bochar D.A., Wang L., Beniya H., et al. BRCA1 is associated with a human SWI/SNF-related complex: linking chromatin remodeling to breast cancer. Cell 2000, 102:257-265.
66. Naidu S.R., Love I.M., Imbalzano A.N., et al. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling subunit BRG1 is a critical regulator of p53 necessary for proliferation of malignant cells. Oncogene 2009, 28:2492-2501.
67. Peng G., Yim E.K., Dai H., et al. BRIT1/MCPH1 links chromatin remodelling to DNA damage response. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:865-872.
68. Collins N., Poot R.A., Kukimoto I., et al. An ACF1-ISWI chromatin-remodeling complex is required for DNA replication through heterochromatin. Nat. Genet. 2002, 32:627-632.
69. Kukimoto I., Elderkin S., Grimaldi M., et al. The histone-fold protein complex CHRAC-15/17 enhances nucleosome sliding and assembly mediated by ACF. Mol. Cell 2004, 13:265-277.
70. Perpelescu M., Nozaki N., Obuse C., et al. Active establishment of centromeric CENP-A chromatin by RSF complex. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 185:397-407.
71. Xiao A., Li H., Shechter D., et al. WSTF regulates the H2A.X. DNA damage response via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Nature 2009, 457:57-62.
72. Strohner R., Nemeth A., Jansa P., et al. NoRC-a novel member of mammalian ISWI-containing chromatin remodeling machines. EMBO J. 2001, 20:4892-4900.
73. Li J., Santoro R., Koberna K., et al. The chromatin remodeling complex NoRC controls replication timing of rRNA genes. EMBO J. 2005, 24:120-127.
74. Banting G.S., Barak O., Ames T.M., et al. CECR2, a protein involved in neurulation, forms a novel chromatin remodeling complex with SNF2L. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005, 14:513-524.
75. He X., Fan H.Y., Narlikar G.J., et al. Human ACF1 alters the remodeling strategy of SNF2h. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:28636-28647.
76. Ito T., Levenstein M.E., Fyodorov D.V., et al. ACF consists of two subunits, Acf1 and ISWI, that function cooperatively in the ATP-dependent catalysis of chromatin assembly. Genes Dev. 1999, 13:1529-1539.
77. Lan L., Ui A., Nakajima S., et al. The ACF1 complex is required for DNA double-strand break repair in human cells. Mol. Cell 2010, 40:976-987.
78. Smeenk G., Wiegant W.W., Marteijn J.A., et al. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation links the chromatin remodeler SMARCA5/SNF2H to RNF168-dependent DNA damage signaling. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126(Pt 4):889-903.
79. Nakamura K., Kato A., Kobayashi J., et al. Regulation of homologous recombination by RNF20-dependent H2B ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 2011, 41:515-528.
80. Moyal L., Lerenthal Y., Gana-Weisz M., et al. Requirement of ATM-dependent monoubiquitylation of histone H2B for timely repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 2011, 41:529-542.
81. Wu S., Shi Y., Mulligan P., et al. A YY1-INO80 complex regulates genomic stability through homologous recombination-based repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:1165-1172.
82. Ruhl D.D., Jin J., Cai Y., et al. Purification of a human SRCAP complex that remodels chromatin by incorporating the histone variant H2A.Z. into nucleosomes. Biochemistry 2006, 45:5671-5677.
83. van Attikum H., Fritsch O., Gasser S.M. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 2007, 26:4113-4125.
84. Gospodinov A., Vaissiere T., Krastev D.B., et al. Mammalian Ino80 mediates double-strand break repair through its role in DNA end strand resection. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 31:4735-4745.
85. Costelloe T., Louge R., Tomimatsu N., et al. The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 2012, 489:581-584.
86. Rowbotham S.P., Barki L., Neves-Costa A., et al. Maintenance of silent chromatin through replication requires SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1. Mol. Cell 2011, 42:285-296.
87. Lu P.Y., Levesque N., Kobor M.S. NuA4 and SWR1-C: two chromatin-modifying complexes with overlapping functions and components. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2009, 87:799-815.
88. Xu Y., Ayrapetov M.K., Xu C., et al. Histone H2A.Z. controls a critical chromatin remodeling step required for DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 2012, 48:723-733.
89. Barlev N.A., Liu L., Chehab N.H., et al. Acetylation of p53 activates transcription through recruitment of coactivators/histone acetyltransferases. Mol. Cell 2001, 8:1243-1254.
90. Kobor M.S., Venkatasubrahmanyam S., Meneghini M.D., et al. A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A.Z. into euchromatin. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2:E131.
91. Auger A., Galarneau L., Altaf M., et al. Eaf1 is the platform for NuA4 molecular assembly that evolutionarily links chromatin acetylation to ATP-dependent exchange of histone H2A variants. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 28:2257-2270.
92. Altaf M., Auger A., Monnet-Saksouk J., et al. NuA4-dependent acetylation of nucleosomal histones H4 and H2A directly stimulates incorporation of H2A.Z. by the SWR1 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:15966-15977.
93. Keogh M.C., Mennella T.A., Sawa C., et al. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A variant Htz1 is acetylated by NuA4. Genes Dev. 2006, 20:660-665.
94. Downs J.A., Allard S., Jobin-Robitaille O., et al. Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol. Cell 2004, 16:979-990.
95. Kusch T., Florens L., Macdonald W.H., et al. Acetylation by Tip60 is required for selective histone variant exchange at DNA lesions. Science 2004, 306:2084-2087.
96. Ge Z., Nair D., Guan X., et al. Sites of acetylation on newly synthesized histone H4 are required for chromatin assembly and DNA damage response signaling. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 33(16):3286-3298.
97. Robert F., Hardy S., Nagy Z., et al. The transcriptional histone acetyltransferase cofactor TRRAP associates with the MRN repair complex and plays a role in DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26:402-412.
98. Murr R., Loizou J.I., Yang Y.G., et al. Histone acetylation by Trrap-Tip60 modulates loading of repair proteins and repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:91-99.
99. Sun Y., Xu Y., Roy K., et al. DNA damage-induced acetylation of lysine 3016 of ATM activates ATM kinase activity. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 27:8502-8509.
100. Squatrito M., Gorrini C., Amati B. Tip60 in DNA damage response and growth control: many tricks in one HAT. Trends Cell Biol. 2006, 16:433-442.
101. Ayoub N., Jeyasekharan A.D., Venkitaraman A.R. Mobilization and recruitment of HP1: a bimodal response to DNA breakage. Cell Cycle 2009, 8:2945-2950.
102. Xu Y., Sun Y., Jiang X., et al. The p400 ATPase regulates nucleosome stability and chromatin ubiquitination during DNA repair. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:31-43.
103. Murawska M., Brehm A. CHD chromatin remodelers and the transcription cycle. Transcription 2011, 2:244-253.
104. Hall J.A., Georgel P.T. CHD proteins: a diverse family with strong ties. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 85:463-476.
105. Marfella C.G., Imbalzano A.N. The Chd family of chromatin remodelers. Mutat. Res. 2007, 618:30-40.
106. Paro R., Hogness D.S. The Polycomb protein shares a homologous domain with a heterochromatin-associated protein of Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991, 88:263-267.
107. Jacobs S.A., Khorasanizadeh S. Structure of HP1 chromodomain bound to a lysine 9-methylated histone H3 tail. Science 2002, 295:2080-2083.
108. Musselman C.A., Ramirez J., Sims J.K., et al. Bivalent recognition of nucleosomes by the tandem PHD fingers of the CHD4 ATPase is required for CHD4-mediated repression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:787-792.
109. Paul S., Kuo A., Schalch T., et al. Chd5 requires PHD-mediated histone 3 binding for tumor suppression. Cell Rep. 2013, 3:92-102.
110. Pray-Grant M.G., Daniel J.A., Schieltz D., et al. Chd1 chromodomain links histone H3 methylation with SAGA- and SLIK-dependent acetylation. Nature 2005, 433:434-438.
111. Burkhardt L., Fuchs S., Krohn A., et al. CHD1 is a 5q21 tumor suppressor required for ERG rearrangement in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2013, 73(9):2795-2805.
112. Nagarajan P., Onami T.M., Rajagopalan S., et al. Role of chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 2 in DNA damage response signaling and tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2009, 28:1053-1062.
113. Harada A., Okada S., Konno D., et al. Chd2 interacts with H3.3 to determine myogenic cell fate. EMBO J. 2012, 31:2994-3007.
114. Pegoraro G., Kubben N., Wickert U., et al. Ageing-related chromatin defects through loss of the NURD complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:1261-1267.
115. Potts R.C., Zhang P., Wurster A.L., et al. CHD5, a brain-specific paralog of Mi2 chromatin remodeling enzymes, regulates expression of neuronal genes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e24515.
116. Thompson P.M., Gotoh T., Kok M., et al. CHD5, a new member of the chromodomain gene family, is preferentially expressed in the nervous system. Oncogene 2003, 22:1002-1011.
117. Goodarzi A.A., Kurka T., Jeggo P.A. KAP-1 phosphorylation regulates CHD3 nucleosome remodeling during the DNA double-strand break response. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18:831-839.
118. Larsen D.H., Poinsignon C., Gudjonsson T., et al. The chromatin-remodeling factor CHD4 coordinates signaling and repair after DNA damage. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:731-740.
119. Seelig H.P., Renz M., Targoff I.N., et al. Two forms of the major antigenic protein of the dermatomyositis-specific Mi-2 autoantigen. Arthritis Rheum. 1996, 39:1769-1771.
120. Lemos T.A., Passos D.O., Nery F.C., et al. Characterization of a new family of proteins that interact with the C-terminal region of the chromatin-remodeling factor CHD-3. FEBS Lett. 2003, 533:14-20.
121. Nery F.C., Rui E., Kuniyoshi T.M., et al. Evidence for the interaction of the regulatory protein Ki-1/57 with p53 and its interacting proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 341:847-855.
122. Ivanov A.V., Peng H., Yurchenko V., et al. PHD domain-mediated E3 ligase activity directs intramolecular sumoylation of an adjacent bromodomain required for gene silencing. Mol. Cell 2007, 28:823-837.
123. Lee D.H., Goodarzi A.A., Adelmant G.O., et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals that PP4 dephosphorylates KAP-1 impacting the DNA damage response. EMBO J. 2012, 31(10):2403-2415.
124. Goodarzi A.A., Noon A.T., Jeggo P.A. The impact of heterochromatin on DSB repair. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2009, 37:569-576.
125. Chiolo I., Minoda A., Colmenares S.U., et al. Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair. Cell 2011, 144:732-744.
126. Brunton H., Goodarzi A.A., Noon A.T., et al. Analysis of human syndromes with disordered chromatin reveals the impact of heterochromatin on the efficacy of ATM-dependent G2/M checkpoint arrest. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 31(19):4022-4035.
127. Lai A.Y., Wade P.A. Cancer biology and NuRD: a multifaceted chromatin remodelling complex. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11:588-596.
128. Zhang Y., LeRoy G., Seelig H.P., et al. The dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell 1998, 95:279-289.
129. Wang H.B., Zhang Y. Mi2, an auto-antigen for dermatomyositis, is an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling factor. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29:2517-2521.
130. Pan M.R., Hsieh H.J., Dai H., et al. Chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4 (CHD4) regulates homologous recombination DNA repair, and its deficiency sensitizes cells to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor treatment. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:6764-6772.
131. Polo S.E., Kaidi A., Baskcomb L., et al. Regulation of DNA-damage responses and cell-cycle progression by the chromatin remodelling factor CHD4. EMBO J. 2010, 29(18):3130-3139.
132. Kim J., Sif S., Jones B., et al. Ikaros DNA-binding proteins direct formation of chromatin remodeling complexes in lymphocytes. Immunity 1999, 10:345-355.
133. von Zelewsky T., Palladino F., Brunschwig K., et al. The C. elegans Mi-2 chromatin-remodelling proteins function in vulval cell fate determination. Development 2000, 127:5277-5284.
134. Smeenk G., Wiegant W.W., Vrolijk H., et al. The NuRD chromatin-remodeling complex regulates signaling and repair of DNA damage. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190:741-749.
135. Chou D.M., Adamson B., Dephoure N.E., et al. A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:18475-18480.
136. Luijsterburg M.S., Acs K., Ackermann L., et al. A new non-catalytic role for ubiquitin ligase RNF8 in unfolding higher-order chromatin structure. EMBO J. 2012, 31:2511-2527.
137. Urquhart A.J., Gatei M., Richard D.J., et al. ATM mediated phosphorylation of CHD4 contributes to genome maintenance. Genome Integr. 2011, 2:1.
138. Wu X., Zhu Z., Li W., et al. Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 5 plays a tumor suppressor role in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012, 14:R73.
139. Wong R.R., Chan L.K., Tsang T.P., et al. CHD5 downregulation associated with poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest. 2011, 72:203-207.
140. Wang X., Lau K.K., So L.K., et al. CHD5 is down-regulated through promoter hypermethylation in gastric cancer. J. Biomed. Sci. 2009, 16:95.
141. Wang J., Chen H., Fu S., et al. The involvement of CHD5 hypermethylation in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2011, 47:601-608.
142. Robbins C.M., Tembe W.A., Baker A., et al. Copy number and targeted mutational analysis reveals novel somatic events in metastatic prostate tumors. Genome Res. 2011, 21:47-55.
143. Cai C., Ashktorab H., Pang X., et al. MicroRNA-211 expression promotes colorectal cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo by targeting tumor suppressor CHD5. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e29750.
144. Zhao R., Yan Q., Lv J., et al. CHD5, a tumor suppressor that is epigenetically silenced in lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2012, 76:324-331.
145. Lang J., Tobias E.S., Mackie R. Preliminary evidence for involvement of the tumour suppressor gene CHD5 in a family with cutaneous melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol. 2011, 164(5):1010-1016.
146. Mokarram P., Kumar K., Brim H., et al. Distinct high-profile methylated genes in colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e7012.
147. Mulero-Navarro S., Esteller M. Chromatin remodeling factor CHD5 is silenced by promoter CpG island hypermethylation in human cancer. Epigenetics 2008, 3:210-215.
148. Bagchi A., Mills A.A. The quest for the 1p36 tumor suppressor. Cancer Res. 2008, 68:2551-2556.
149. Bagchi A., Papazoglu C., Wu Y., et al. CHD5 is a tumor suppressor at human 1p36. Cell 2007, 128:459-475.
150. Van Maerken T., Vandesompele J., Rihani A., et al. Escape from p53-mediated tumor surveillance in neuroblastoma: switching off the p14(ARF)-MDM2-p53 axis. Cell Death Differ. 2009, 16:1563-1572.
151. Daubresse G., Deuring R., Moore L., et al. The Drosophila kismet gene is related to chromatin-remodeling factors and is required for both segmentation and segment identity. Development 1999, 126:1175-1187.
152. Boyer L.A., Langer M.R., Crowley K.A., et al. Essential role for the SANT domain in the functioning of multiple chromatin remodeling enzymes. Mol. Cell 2002, 10:935-942.
153. Schuster E.F., Stoger R. CHD5 defines a new subfamily of chromodomain-SWI2/SNF2-like helicases. Mamm. Genome 2002, 13:117-119.
154. Lathrop M.J., Chakrabarti L., Eng J., et al. Deletion of the Chd6 exon 12 affects motor coordination. Mamm. Genome 2010, 21:130-142.
155. Nioi P., Nguyen T., Sherratt P.J., et al. The carboxy-terminal Neh3 domain of Nrf2 is required for transcriptional activation. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 25:10895-10906.
156. Wang H.P., Long X.H., Sun Z.Z., et al. Identification of differentially transcribed genes in human lymphoblastoid cells irradiated with 0.5 Gy of gamma-ray and the involvement of low dose radiation inducible CHD6 gene in cell proliferation and radiosensitivity. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2006, 82:181-190.
157. Palumbo O., Palumbo P., Stallone R., et al. 8q12.1q12.3 de novo microdeletion involving the CHD7 gene in a patient without the major features of CHARGE syndrome: case report and critical review of the literature. Gene 2013, 513:209-213.
158. Pleasance E.D., Stephens P.J., O'Meara S., et al. A small-cell lung cancer genome with complex signatures of tobacco exposure. Nature 2010, 463:184-190.
159. Schnetz M.P., Bartels C.F., Shastri K., et al. Genomic distribution of CHD7 on chromatin tracks H3K4 methylation patterns. Genome Res. 2009, 19:590-601.
160. Zentner G.E., Hurd E.A., Schnetz M.P., et al. CHD7 functions in the nucleolus as a positive regulator of ribosomal RNA biogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19:3491-3501.
161. Bajpai R., Chen D.A., Rada-Iglesias A., et al. CHD7 cooperates with PBAF to control multipotent neural crest formation. Nature 2010, 463:958-962.
162. Li W., Xiong Y., Shang C., et al. Brg1 governs distinct pathways to direct multiple aspects of mammalian neural crest cell development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:1738-1743.
163. Batsukh T., Pieper L., Koszucka A.M., et al. CHD8 interacts with CHD7, a protein which is mutated in CHARGE syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19:2858-2866.
164. Ishihara K., Oshimura M., Nakao M. CTCF-dependent chromatin insulator is linked to epigenetic remodeling. Mol. Cell 2006, 23:733-742.
165. Thompson B.A., Tremblay V., Lin G., et al. CHD8 is an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factor that regulates beta-catenin target genes. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 28:3894-3904.
166. Nishiyama M., Oshikawa K., Tsukada Y., et al. CHD8 suppresses p53-mediated apoptosis through histone H1 recruitment during early embryogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:172-182.
167. Kim M.S., Chung N.G., Kang M.R., et al. Genetic and expressional alterations of CHD genes in gastric and colorectal cancers. Histopathology 2011, 58:660-668.
168. Shur I., Socher R., Benayahu D. In vivo association of CReMM/CHD9 with promoters in osteogenic cells. J. Cell Physiol. 2006, 207:374-378.