Long-range heterochromatin association is mediated by silencing and double-strand DNA break repair proteins

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 201, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 809-826

  Kirkland, Jacob G ^a   Kamakaka, Rohinton T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; GAMMA HISTONE H2A; HISTONE H2A; PROTEIN; SCC2 PROTEIN; SMC PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DNA TRANSFER; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE CLUSTER; GENE LOCUS; GENE SILENCING; HETEROCHROMATIN; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TELOMERE;

CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA BREAKS; DNA REPAIR; GENE SILENCING; GENES, MATING TYPE, FUNGAL; HETEROCHROMATIN; HISTONES; HSP70 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; TELOMERE;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84880015137     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201211105     Document Type: Article

References (120)

1. Admire, A., L. Shanks, N. Danzl, M. Wang, U. Weier, W. Stevens, E. Hunt, and T. Weinert. 2006. Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. Genes Dev. 20:159-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1392506
2. Aguilera, A., and B. Gómez-González. 2008. Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9:204-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2268
3. Ahmed, S., and J.H. Brickner. 2007. Regulation and epigenetic control of transcription at the nuclear periphery. Trends Genet. 23:396-402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.05.009
4. Ampatzidou, E., A. Irmisch, M.J. O'Connell, and J.M. Murray. 2006. Smc5/6 is required for repair at collapsed replication forks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:9387-9401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01335-06
5. Antoniacci, L.M., M.A. Kenna, and R.V. Skibbens. 2007. The nuclear envelope and spindle pole body-associated Mps3 protein bind telomere regulators and function in telomere clustering. Cell Cycle. 6:75-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.6.1.3647
6. Aylon, Y., and M. Kupiec. 2004. DSB repair: the yeast paradigm. DNA Repair (Amst.). 3:797-815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.04.013
7. Azvolinsky, A., S. Dunaway, J.Z. Torres, J.B. Bessler, and V.A. Zakian. 2006. The S. cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase moves with the replication fork and affects replication of all yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev. 20:3104-3116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1478906
8. Azvolinsky, A., P.G. Giresi, J.D. Lieb, and V.A. Zakian. 2009. Highly transcribed RNA polymerase II genes are impediments to replication fork progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. 34:722-734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.022
9. Barlow, J.H., R.B. Faryabi, E. Callén, N. Wong, A. Malhowski, H.T. Chen, G. Gutierrez-Cruz, H.W. Sun, P. McKinnon, G. Wright, et al. 2013. Identification of early replicating fragile sites that contribute to genome instability. Cell. 152:620-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.006
10. Bose, T., and J.L. Gerton. 2010. Cohesinopathies, gene expression, and chromatin organization. J. Cell Biol. 189:201-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200912129
11. Branzei, D., and M. Foiani. 2008. Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:297-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2351
12. Branzei, D., and M. Foiani. 2010. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:208-219. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1038/nrm2852
13. Brickner, J.H. 2009. Transcriptional memory at the nuclear periphery. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21:127-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb .2009.01.007
14. Bupp, J.M., A.E. Martin, E.S. Stensrud, and S.L. Jaspersen. 2007. Telomere anchoring at the nuclear periphery requires the budding yeast Sad1-UNC-84 domain protein Mps3. J. Cell Biol. 179:845-854. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1083/jcb.200706040
15. Bystricky, K., T. Laroche, G. van Houwe, M. Blaszczyk, and S.M. Gasser. 2005. Chromosome looping in yeast: telomere pairing and coordinated movement reflect anchoring efficiency and territorial organization. J. Cell Biol. 168:375-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200409091
16. Bystricky, K., H. Van Attikum, M.D. Montiel, V. Dion, L. Gehlen, and S.M. Gasser. 2009. Regulation of nuclear positioning and dynamics of the silent mating type loci by the yeast Ku70/Ku80 complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29:835-848. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01009-08
17. Chikashige, Y., C. Tsutsumi, M. Yamane, K. Okamasa, T. Haraguchi, and Y. Hiraoka. 2006. Meiotic proteins bqt1 and bqt2 tether telomeres to form the bouquet arrangement of chromosomes. Cell. 125:59-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.048
18. Ciosk, R., M. Shirayama, A. Shevchenko, T. Tanaka, A. Toth, A. Shevchenko, and K. Nasmyth. 2000. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell. 5:243-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80420-7
19. Cortés-Ledesma, F., G. de Piccoli, J.E. Haber, L. Aragón, and A. Aguilera. 2007. SMC proteins, new players in the maintenance of genomic stability. Cell Cycle. 6:914-918. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.6.8.4107
20. D'Ambrosio, C., C.K. Schmidt, Y. Katou, G. Kelly, T. Itoh, K. Shirahige, and F. Uhlmann. 2008. Identification of cis-acting sites for condensin loading onto budding yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev. 22:2215-2227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1675708
21. Deem, A.K., X. Li, and J.K. Tyler. 2012. Epigenetic regulation of genomic integrity. Chromosoma. 121:131-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00412-011-0358-1
22. De Piccoli, G., J. Torres-Rosell, and L. Aragón. 2009. The unnamed complex: what do we know about Smc5-Smc6? Chromosome Res. 17:251-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-008-9016-8
23. Deshpande, A.M., and C.S. Newlon. 0996. DNA replication fork pause sites dependent on transcription. Science. 272:1030-1033. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5264.1030
24. Dhillon, N., J. Raab, J. Guzzo, S.J. Szyjka, S. Gangadharan, O.M. Aparicio, B. Andrews, and R.T. Kamakaka. 2009. DNA polymerase epsilon, acetylases and remodellers cooperate to form a specialized chromatin structure at a tRNA insulator. EMBO J. 28:2583-2600. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1038/emboj.2009.098
25. Dion, M.F., T. Kaplan, M. Kim, S. Buratowski, N. Friedman, and O.J. Rando. 2007. Dynamics of replication-independent histone turnover in budding yeast. Science. 315:1405-1408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1134053
26. Dion, V., V. Kalck, C. Horigome, B.D. Towbin, and S.M. Gasser. 2012. Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nat. Cell Biol. 14:502-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2465
27. Donze, D., and R.T. Kamakaka. 2001. RNA polymerase III and RNA polymerase II promoter complexes are heterochromatin barriers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 20:520-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/20.3.520
28. Donze, D., C.R. Adams, J. Rine, and R.T. Kamakaka. 0999. The boundaries of the silenced HMR domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 13:698-708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.6.698
29. Downs, J.A., N.F. Lowndes, and S.P. Jackson. 2000. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature. 408:1001-1004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35050000
30. Dubarry, M., I. Loïodice, C.L. Chen, C. Thermes, and A. Taddei. 2011. Tight protein-DNA interactions favor gene silencing. Genes Dev. 25:1365-1370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.611011
31. Dubey, R.N., and M.R. Gartenberg. 2007. A tDNA establishes cohesion of a neighboring silent chromatin domain. Genes Dev. 21:2150-2160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1583807
32. Flott, S., C. Alabert, G.W. Toh, R. Toth, N. Sugawara, D.G. Campbell, J.E. Haber, P. Pasero, and J. Rouse. 2007. Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mec1 and Tel1 regulates the single-strand annealing mode of DNA repair in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6433-6445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00135-07
33. Gard, S., W. Light, B. Xiong, T. Bose, A.J. McNairn, B. Harris, B. Fleharty, C. Seidel, J.H. Brickner, and J.L. Gerton. 2009. Cohesinopathy mutations disrupt the subnuclear organization of chromatin. J. Cell Biol. 187:455-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200906075
34. Glynn, E.F., P.C. Megee, H.G. Yu, C. Mistrot, E. Unal, D.E. Koshland, J.L. DeRisi, and J.L. Gerton. 2004. Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2:E259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0020259
35. Gotta, M., T. Laroche, A. Formenton, L. Maillet, H. Scherthan, and S.M. Gasser. 0996. The clustering of telomeres and colocalization with Rap1, Sir3, and Sir4 proteins in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 134:1349-1363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.134.6.1349
36. Gotta, M., S. Strahl-Bolsinger, H. Renauld, T. Laroche, B.K. Kennedy, M. Grunstein, and S.M. Gasser. 0997. Localization of Sir2p: the nucleolus as a compartment for silent information regulators. EMBO J. 16:3243-3255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.11.3243
37. Grund, S.E., T. Fischer, G.G. Cabal, O. Antúnez, J.E. Pérez-Ortín, and E. Hurt. 2008. The inner nuclear membrane protein Src1 associates with subtelomeric genes and alters their regulated gene expression. J. Cell Biol. 182:897-910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200803098
38. Haber, J.E. 1998. Mating-type gene switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32:561-599. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.32 .1.561
39. Haber, J.E. 2012. Mating-type genes and MAT switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 191:33-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111 .134577
40. Haeusler, R.A., M. Pratt-Hyatt, P.D. Good, T.A. Gipson, and D.R. Engelke. 2008. Clustering of yeast tRNA genes is mediated by specific association of condensin with tRNA gene transcription complexes. Genes Dev. 22:2204-2214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1675908
41. Hediger, F., F.R. Neumann, G. Van Houwe, K. Dubrana, and S.M. Gasser. 2002. Live imaging of telomeres: yKu and Sir proteins define redundant telomere-anchoring pathways in yeast. Curr. Biol. 12:2076-2089. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01338-6
42. Heyer, W.D., X. Li, M. Rolfsmeier, and X.P. Zhang. 2006. Rad54: the Swiss Army knife of homologous recombination? Nucleic Acids Res. 34:4115-4125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl481
43. Heyer, W.D., K.T. Ehmsen, and J. Liu. 2010. Regulation of homologous recombination in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 44:113-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-051710-150955
44. Hicks, W.M., M. Yamaguchi, and J.E. Haber. 2011. Real-time analysis of double-strand DNA break repair by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108:3108-3115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas .1009660108
45. Hiraga, S., S. Botsios, and A.D. Donaldson. 2008. Histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation by Rtt109 is crucial for chromosome positioning. J. Cell Biol. 183:641-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200806065
46. Holmes, A.M., and J.E. Haber. 1999. Double-strand break repair in yeast requires both leading and lagging strand DNA polymerases. Cell. 96:415-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80554-1
47. Hudson, D.F., K.M. Marshall, and W.C. Earnshaw. 2009. Condensin: Architect of mitotic chromosomes. Chromosome Res. 17:131-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-008-9009-7
48. Ivessa, A.S., J.Q. Zhou, V.P. Schulz, E.K. Monson, and V.A. Zakian. 2002. Saccharomyces Rrm3p, a 5? to 3? DNA helicase that promotes replication fork progression through telomeric and subtelomeric DNA. Genes Dev. 16:1383-1396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.982902
49. Iwasaki, O., A. Tanaka, H. Tanizawa, S.I. Grewal, and K. Noma. 2010. Centromeric localization of dispersed Pol III genes in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 21:254-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E09-09-0790
50. Jin, Q., E. Trelles-Sticken, H. Scherthan, and J. Loidl. 1998. Yeast nuclei display prominent centromere clustering that is reduced in nondividing cells and in meiotic prophase. J. Cell Biol. 141:21-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.141.1.21
51. Jin, Q.W., J. Fuchs, and J. Loidl. 2000. Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. J. Cell Sci. 113: 1903-0912.
52. Keogh, M.C., J.A. Kim, M. Downey, J. Fillingham, D. Chowdhury, J.C. Harrison, M. Onishi, N. Datta, S. Galicia, A. Emili, et al. 2006. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates gammaH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature. 439:497-501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04384
53. Kim, J.A., M. Kruhlak, F. Dotiwala, A. Nussenzweig, and J.E. Haber. 2007. Heterochromatin is refractory to γ-H2AX modification in yeast and mammals. J. Cell Biol. 178:209-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb .200612031
54. Kinoshita, E., E. van der Linden, H. Sanchez, and C. Wyman. 2009. RAD50, an SMC family member with multiple roles in DNA break repair: how does ATP affect function? Chromosome Res. 17:277-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10577-008-9018-6
55. Kitada, T., T. Schleker, A.S. Sperling, W. Xie, S.M. Gasser, and M. Grunstein. 2011. ?H2A is a component of yeast heterochromatin required for telomere elongation. Cell Cycle. 10:293-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.10.2.14536
56. Kogut, I., J. Wang, V. Guacci, R.K. Mistry, and P.C. Megee. 2009. The Scc2/Scc4 cohesin loader determines the distribution of cohesin on budding yeast chromosomes. Genes Dev. 23:2345-2357. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1101/gad.1809409
57. Laroche, T., S.G. Martin, M. Gotta, H.C. Gorham, F.E. Pryde, E.J. Louis, and S.M. Gasser. 1998. Mutation of yeast Ku genes disrupts the subnuclear organization of telomeres. Curr. Biol. 8:653-656. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70252-0
58. Laroche, T., S.G. Martin, M. Tsai-Pflugfelder, and S.M. Gasser. 2000. The dynamics of yeast telomeres and silencing proteins through the cell cycle. J. Struct. Biol. 129:159-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.2000 .4240
59. Lemoine, F.J., N.P. Degtyareva, K. Lobachev, and T.D. Petes. 2005. Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell. 120:587-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.039
60. Lengronne, A., Y. Katou, S. Mori, S. Yokobayashi, G.P. Kelly, T. Itoh, Y. Watanabe, K. Shirahige, and F. Uhlmann. 2004. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature. 430:573-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02742
61. Lichten, M., and J.E. Haber. 1989. Position effects in ectopic and allelic mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 123:261-268.
62. Lindroos, H.B., L. Ström, T. Itoh, Y. Katou, K. Shirahige, and C. Sjögren. 2006. Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol. Cell. 22:755-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2006.05.014
63. Lisby, M., and R. Rothstein. 2004. DNA damage checkpoint and repair centers. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16:328-334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb .2004.03.011
64. Lisby, M., and R. Rothstein. 2009. Choreography of recombination proteins during the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst.). 8:1068-1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.007
65. Lisby, M., R. Rothstein, and U.H. Mortensen. 2001. Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:8276-8282. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.121006298
66. Lisby, M., A. Antúnez de Mayolo, U.H. Mortensen, and R. Rothstein. 2003. Cell cycle-regulated centers of DNA double-strand break repair. Cell Cycle. 2:477-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.2.5.483
67. Lopes, M., C. Cotta-Ramusino, A. Pellicioli, G. Liberi, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, C.S. Newlon, and M. Foiani. 2001. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature. 412:557-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35087613
68. Lukas, J., C. Lukas, and J. Bartek. 2011. More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance. Nat. Cell Biol. 13:1161-1169. http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/ncb2344
69. Madrid, A.S., J. Mancuso, W.Z. Cande, and K. Weis. 2006. The role of the integral membrane nucleoporins Ndc1p and Pom152p in nuclear pore complex assembly and function. J. Cell Biol. 173:361-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200506099
70. Maillet, L., C. Boscheron, M. Gotta, S. Marcand, E. Gilson, and S.M. Gasser. 1996. Evidence for silencing compartments within the yeast nucleus: a role for telomere proximity and Sir protein concentration in silencermediated repression. Genes Dev. 10:1796-1811. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1101/gad.10.14.1796
71. Maillet, L., F. Gaden, V. Brevet, G. Fourel, S.G. Martin, K. Dubrana, S.M. Gasser, and E. Gilson. 2001. Ku-deficient yeast strains exhibit alternative states of silencing competence. EMBO Rep. 2:203-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/embo-reports/kve044
72. Martin, S.G., T. Laroche, N. Suka, M. Grunstein, and S.M. Gasser. 1999. Relocalization of telomeric Ku and SIR proteins in response to DNA strand breaks in yeast. Cell. 97:621-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80773-4
73. Mekhail, K., and D. Moazed. 2010. The nuclear envelope in genome organization, expression and stability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:317-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2894
74. Miele, A., K. Bystricky, and J. Dekker. 2009. Yeast silent mating type loci form heterochromatic clusters through silencer protein-dependent long-range interactions. PLoS Genet. 5:e1000478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal .pgen.1000478
75. Mills, K.D., D.A. Sinclair, and L. Guarente. 1999. MEC1-dependent redistribution of the Sir3 silencing protein from telomeres to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell. 97:609-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80772-2
76. Miné-Hattab, J., and R. Rothstein. 2012. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 14:510-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2472
77. Mirkin, E.V., and S.M. Mirkin. 2007. Replication fork stalling at natural impediments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71:13-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00030-06
78. Mortensen, U.H., M. Lisby, and R. Rothstein. 2009. Rad52. Curr. Biol. 19:R676-R677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.06.001
79. Nagai, S., K. Dubrana, M. Tsai-Pflugfelder, M.B. Davidson, T.M. Roberts, G.W. Brown, E. Varela, F. Hediger, S.M. Gasser, and N.J. Krogan. 2008. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science. 322:597-602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1162790
80. Nagai, S., P. Heun, and S.M. Gasser. 2010. Roles for nuclear organization in the maintenance of genome stability. Epigenomics. 2:289-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/epi.09.49
81. Nagai, S., N. Davoodi, and S.M. Gasser. 2011. Nuclear organization in genome stability: SUMO connections. Cell Res. 21:474-485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cr.2011.31
82. Ocampo-Hafalla, M.T., and F. Uhlmann. 2011. Cohesin loading and sliding. J. Cell Sci. 124:685-691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.073866
83. Oki, M., and R.T. Kamakaka. 2005. Barrier function at HMR. Mol. Cell. 19:707-716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2005.07.022
84. Onn, I., J.M. Heidinger-Pauli, V. Guacci, E. Unal, and D.E. Koshland. 2008. Sister chromatid cohesion: a simple concept with a complex reality. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 24:105-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev .cellbio.24.110707.175350
85. Oza, P., S.L. Jaspersen, A. Miele, J. Dekker, and C.L. Peterson. 2009. Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery. Genes Dev. 23:912-927. http://dx.doi.org/10 .1101/gad.1782209
86. Patterson, E.E., and C.A. Fox. 2008. The Ku complex in silencing the cryptic mating-type loci of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 180:771-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.091710
87. Pebernard, S., L. Schaffer, D. Campbell, S.R. Head, and M.N. Boddy. 2008. Localization of Smc5/6 to centromeres and telomeres requires heterochromatin and SUMO, respectively. EMBO J. 27:3011-3023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.220
88. Petermann, E., M.L. Orta, N. Issaeva, N. Schultz, and T. Helleday. 2010. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol. Cell. 37:492-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010 .01.021
89. Pillus, L., and J. Rine. 1989. Epigenetic inheritance of transcriptional states in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 59:637-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(89)90009-3
90. Polo, S.E., and S.P. Jackson. 2011. Dynamics of DNA damage response proteins at DNA breaks: a focus on protein modifications. Genes Dev. 25:409-433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.2021311
91. Rine, J., and I. Herskowitz. 1987. Four genes responsible for a position effect on expression from HML and HMR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 116:9-22.
92. Ritchie, K.B., J.C. Mallory, and T.D. Petes. 1999. Interactions of TLC1 (which encodes the RNA subunit of telomerase), TEL1, and MEC1 in regulating telomere length in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:6065-6075.
93. Rozenzhak, S., E. Mejía-Ramírez, J.S. Williams, L. Schaffer, J.A. Hammond, S.R. Head, and P. Russell. 2010. Rad3 decorates critical chromosomal domains with gammaH2A to protect genome integrity during S-Phase in fission yeast. PLoS Genet. 6:e1001032. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal .pgen.1001032
94. Ruben, G.J., J.G. Kirkland, T. MacDonough, M. Chen, R.N. Dubey, M.R. Gartenberg, and R.T. Kamakaka. 2011. Nucleoporin mediated nuclear positioning and silencing of HMR. PLoS ONE. 6:e20923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020923
95. Rufiange, A., P.E. Jacques, W. Bhat, F. Robert, and A. Nourani. 2007. Genomewide replication-independent histone H3 exchange occurs predominantly at promoters and implicates H3 K56 acetylation and Asf1. Mol. Cell. 27:393-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.07.011
96. Rusche, L.N., A.L. Kirchmaier, and J. Rine. 2003. The establishment, inheritance, and function of silenced chromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 72:481-516. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem .72.121801.161547
97. Schleker, T., S. Nagai, and S.M. Gasser. 2009. Posttranslational modifications of repair factors and histones in the cellular response to stalled replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst.). 8:1089-1100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.010
98. Schober, H., V. Kalck, M.A. Vega-Palas, G. Van Houwe, D. Sage, M. Unser, M.R. Gartenberg, and S.M. Gasser. 2008. Controlled exchange of chromosomal arms reveals principles driving telomere interactions in yeast. Genome Res. 18:261-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.6687808
99. Schober, H., H. Ferreira, V. Kalck, L.R. Gehlen, and S.M. Gasser. 2009. Yeast telomerase and the SUN domain protein Mps3 anchor telomeres and repress subtelomeric recombination. Genes Dev. 23:928-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1787509
100. Stracker, T.H., and J.H. Petrini. 2011. The MRE11 complex: starting from the ends. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12:90-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm3047
101. Sugawara, N., X. Wang, and J.E. Haber. 2003. In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell. 12: 209-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00269-7
102. Symington, L.S., and J. Gautier. 2011. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45:247-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132435
103. Szilard, R.K., P.E. Jacques, L. Laramée, B. Cheng, S. Galicia, A.R. Bataille, M. Yeung, M. Mendez, M. Bergeron, F. Robert, and D. Durocher. 2010. Systematic identification of fragile sites via genome-wide location analysis of gamma-H2AX. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:299-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1754
104. Taddei, A., G. Van Houwe, S. Nagai, I. Erb, E.J. van Nimwegen, and S.M. Gasser. 2009. The functional importance of telomere clustering: global changes in gene expression result from SIR factor dispersion. Genome Res. 19:611-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.083881.108
105. Taddei, A., H. Schober, and S.M. Gasser. 2010. The budding yeast nucleus. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2:a000612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect. a000612
106. Tamburini, B.A., and J.K. Tyler. 2005. Localized histone acetylation and deacetylation triggered by the homologous recombination pathway of double-strand DNA repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:4903-4913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.12.4903-4913.2005
107. Teixeira, M.T., B. Dujon, and E. Fabre. 2002. Genome-wide nuclear morphology screen identifies novel genes involved in nuclear architecture and gene-silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 321:551-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00652-6
108. Therizols, P., T. Duong, B. Dujon, C. Zimmer, and E. Fabre. 2010. Chromosome arm length and nuclear constraints determine the dynamic relationship of yeast subtelomeres. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 107:2025-2030. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914187107
109. Torres-Rosell, J., I. Sunjevaric, G. De Piccoli, M. Sacher, N. Eckert-Boulet, R. Reid, S. Jentsch, R. Rothstein, L. Aragón, and M. Lisby. 2007. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:923-931. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1609
110. Uhlmann, F., and K. Nasmyth. 1998. Cohesion between sister chromatids must be established during DNA replication. Curr. Biol. 8:1095-1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70463-4
111. Unal, E., A. Arbel-Eden, U. Sattler, R. Shroff, M. Lichten, J.E. Haber, and D. Koshland. 2004. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell. 16:991-1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.11.027
112. Valenzuela, L., N. Dhillon, and R.T. Kamakaka. 2009. Transcription independent insulation at TFIIIC-dependent insulators. Genetics. 183:131-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.106203
113. van Attikum, H., and S.M. Gasser. 2009. Crosstalk between histone modifications during the DNA damage response. Trends Cell Biol. 19:207-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.03.001
114. Vandre, C.L., R.T. Kamakaka, and D.H. Rivier. 2008. The DNA end-binding protein Ku regulates silencing at the internal HML and HMR loci in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 180:1407-1418. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.094490
115. Wang, X., G. Ira, J.A. Tercero, A.M. Holmes, J.F. Diffley, and J.E. Haber. 2004. Role of DNA replication proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:6891-6899. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.16.6891-6899.2004
116. Wang, Y., M. Vujcic, and D. Kowalski. 2001. DNA replication forks pause at silent origins near the HML locus in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:4938-4948. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.15.4938-4948.2001
117. Wood, A.J., A.F. Severson, and B.J. Meyer. 2010. Condensin and cohesin complexity: the expanding repertoire of functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11: 391-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg2794
118. Wu, L. 2008. Wrestling off RAD51: a novel role for RecQ helicases. Bioessays. 30:291-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20735
119. Zegerman, P., and J.F. Diffley. 2009. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst.). 8:1077-1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2009.04.023
120. Zimmer, C., and E. Fabre. 2011. Principles of chromosomal organization: lessons from yeast. J. Cell Biol. 192:723-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201010058