Nuclear organization in genome stability: SUMO connections

Cell Research

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 474-485

  Nagai, Shigeki ^a,b   Davoodi, Niloofar ^a   Gasser, Susan M ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH MIESCHER INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (Switzerland)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA damage; nuclear organization; repair; STUbL; SUMO; ubiquitin

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; SUMO PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; DNA REPAIR; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; METABOLISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; DNA REPAIR; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; NUCLEAR ENVELOPE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 79952538034     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2011.31     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Akhtar A, Gasser SM. The nuclear envelope and transcriptional control. Nat Rev Genet 2007;8:507-517. (Pubitemid 46955211)
2. Palladino F, Laroche T, Gilson E, et al. SIR3 and SIR4 proteins are required for the positioning and integrity of yeast telomeres. Cell 1993;75:543-555. (Pubitemid 23335079)
3. Gotta M, Laroche T, Formenton A, et al. The clustering of telomeres and colocalization with Rap1, Sir3, and Sir4 proteins in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 1996;134:1349-1363. (Pubitemid 26318010)
4. Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E, et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008;453:948-951. (Pubitemid 351832561)
5. Kumaran RI, Spector DL. A genetic locus targeted to the nuclear periphery in living cells maintains its transcriptional competence. J Cell Biol 2008;180:51-65.
6. Reddy KL, Zullo JM, Bertolino E, Singh H. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 2008;452:243-247. (Pubitemid 351380248)
7. Finlan LE, Sproul D, Thomson I, et al. Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet 2008;4:e1000039.
8. Andrulis ED, Neiman AM, Zappulla DC, Sternglanz R. Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing. Nature 1998;394:592-595. (Pubitemid 28366836)
9. Taddei A, Van Houwe G, Nagai S, et al. The functional importance of telomere clustering: Global changes in gene expression result from SIR factor dispersion. Genome Res 2009;19:611-625.
10. Blobel G. Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985;82:8527-8529. (Pubitemid 16105094)
11. Dieppois G, Iglesias N, Stutz F. Cotranscriptional recruitment to the mRNA export receptor Mex67p contributes to nuclear pore anchoring of activated genes. Mol Cell Biol 2006;26:7858-7870. (Pubitemid 44630987)
12. Mendjan S, Taipale M, Kind J, et al. Nuclear pore components are involved in the transcriptional regulation of dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol Cell 2006;21:811-823. (Pubitemid 43376131)
13. Rodriguez-Navarro S, Fischer T, Luo MJ, et al. Sus1, a functional component of the SAGA histone acetylase complex and the nuclear pore-associated mRNA export machinery. Cell 2004;116:75-86. (Pubitemid 38156185)
14. Cabal GG, Genovesio A, Rodriguez-Navarro S, et al. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 2006;441:770-773. (Pubitemid 43865225)
15. Taddei A, Van Houwe G, Hediger F, et al. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 2006;441:774-778. (Pubitemid 43865226)
16. Ishii K, Arib G, Lin C, Van Houwe G, Laemmli UK. Chromatin boundaries in budding yeast. The nuclear pore connection. Cell 2002;109:551-562. (Pubitemid 34628719)
17. Casolari JM, Brown CR, Komili S, et al. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 2004;117:427-439. (Pubitemid 38610229)
18. Yoshida T, Shimada K, Oma Y, et al. Actin-related protein Arp6 influences H2A. Z-dependent and-independent gene expression and links ribosomal protein genes to nuclear pores. PLoS Genet 2010;6:e1000910.
19. Brickner JH, Walter P. Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol 2004;2:e342.
20. Bernardi R, Pandolfi PP. Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007;8:1006-1016. (Pubitemid 350174636)
21. Potts PR, Yu H. The SMC5/6 complex maintains telomere length in ALT cancer cells through SUMOylation of telomere-binding proteins. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007;14:581-590. (Pubitemid 47037066)
22. Torres-Rosell J, Sunjevaric I, De Piccoli G, et al. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nat Cell Biol 2007;9:923-931. (Pubitemid 47190447)
23. Kawabe Y, Seki M, Seki T, et al. Covalent modification of the Werner's syndrome gene product with the ubiquitin-related protein, SUMO-1. J Biol Chem 2000;275:20963-20966. (Pubitemid 30481783)
24. Eladad S, Ye TZ, Hu P, et al. Intra-nuclear trafficking of the BLM helicase to DNA damage-induced foci is regulated by SUMO modification. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14:1351-1365. (Pubitemid 40744493)
25. Burgess RC, Rahman S, Lisby M, Rothstein R, Zhao X. The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination. Mol Cell Biol 2007;27:6153-6162. (Pubitemid 47326702)
26. Sacher M, Pfander B, Hoege C, Jentsch S. Control of Rad52 recombination activity by double-strand break-induced SUMO modification. Nat Cell Biol 2006;8:1284-1290. (Pubitemid 44660594)
27. Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, et al. Ubc9-and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 2006;127:509-522. (Pubitemid 44647424)
28. Hoege C, Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Pyrowolakis G, Jentsch S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 2002;419:135-141. (Pubitemid 35025438)
29. Melchior F. SUMO-nonclassical ubiquitin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2000;16:591-626.
30. Perry JJ, Tainer JA, Boddy MN. A SIM-ultaneous role for SUMO and ubiquitin. Trends Biochem Sci 2008;33:201-208.
31. Soutoglou E, Dorn JF, Sengupta K, et al. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007;9:675-682. (Pubitemid 47214730)
32. Kruhlak MJ, Celeste A, Dellaire G, et al. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J Cell Biol 2006;172:823-834.
33. Essers J, Houtsmuller AB, van Veelen L, et al. Nuclear dynamics of RAD52 group homologous recombination proteins in response to DNA damage. EMBO J 2002;21:2030-2037. (Pubitemid 34437200)
34. Lisby M, Mortensen UH, Rothstein R. Colocalization of multiple DNA double-strand breaks at a single Rad52 repair centre. Nat Cell Biol 2003;5:572-577. (Pubitemid 36781093)
35. Therizols P, Fairhead C, Cabal GG, Genovesio A, Olivo-Marin JC, Dujon B, Fabre E. Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region. J Cell Biol 2006, 172:189-199. (Pubitemid 43118360)
36. Potts PR, Porteus MH, Yu H. Human SMC5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid homologous recombination by recruiting the SMC1/3 cohesin complex to double-strand breaks. EMBO J 2006;25:3377-3388. (Pubitemid 44141795)
37. De Piccoli G, Cortes-Ledesma F, Ira G, et al. Smc5-Smc6 mediate DNA double-strand-break repair by promoting sister-chromatid recombination. Nat Cell Biol 2006;8:1032-1034. (Pubitemid 44314736)
38. Branzei D, Vanoli F, Foiani M. SUMOylation regulates Rad18-mediated template switch. Nature 2008;456:915-920.
39. Symington LS. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002;66:630-670. (Pubitemid 35425112)
40. Kadyk LC, Hartwell LH. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1992;132:387-402.
41. Ulrich HD. Regulating post-translational modifications of the eukaryotic replication clamp PCNA. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009;8:461-469.
42. Lindroos HB, Strom L, Itoh T, et al. Chromosomal association of the Smc5/6 complex reveals that it functions in differently regulated pathways. Mol Cell 2006;22:755-767.
43. Ampatzidou E, Irmisch A, O'Connell MJ, Murray JM. Smc5/6 is required for repair at collapsed replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 2006;26:9387-9401. (Pubitemid 44904432)
44. Papouli E, Chen S, Davies AA, et al. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol Cell 2005;19:123-133. (Pubitemid 40884663)
45. Pfander B, Moldovan GL, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 2005;436:428-433. (Pubitemid 41059056)
46. Mullen JR, Kaliraman V, Ibrahim SS, Brill SJ. Requirement for three novel protein complexes in the absence of the Sgs1 DNA helicase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2001;157:103-118.
47. Xie Y, Kerscher O, Kroetz MB, et al. The yeast Hex3. Slx8 heterodimer is a ubiquitin ligase stimulated by substrate sumoylation. J Biol Chem 2007;282:34176-34184. (Pubitemid 350159438)
48. Prudden J, Pebernard S, Raffa G, et al. SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability. EMBO J 2007;26:4089-4101. (Pubitemid 47462097)
49. Zhang C, Roberts TM, Yang J, Desai R, Brown GW. Suppression of genomic instability by SLX5 and SLX8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006;5:336-346. (Pubitemid 43247600)
50. Yang L, Mullen JR, Brill SJ. Purification of the yeast Slx5-Slx8 protein complex and characterization of its DNA-binding activity. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:5541-5551. (Pubitemid 44742442)
51. Wang Z, Jones GM, Prelich G. Genetic analysis connects SLX5 and SLX8 to the SUMO pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2006;172:1499-1509.
52. Collins SR, Kemmeren P, Zhao XC, et al. Toward a comprehensive atlas of the physical interactome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007;6:439-450. (Pubitemid 46554539)
53. Nagai S, Dubrana K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, et al. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SU-MO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 2008;322:597-602.
54. Kosoy A, Calonge TM, Outwin EA, O'Connell MJ. Fission yeast Rnf4 homologs are required for DNA repair. J Biol Chem 2007;282:20388-20394. (Pubitemid 47099981)
55. Stade K, Vogel F, Schwienhorst I, et al. A lack of SUMO conjugation affects cNLS-dependent nuclear protein import in yeast. J Biol Chem 2002;277:49554-49561. (Pubitemid 36014394)
56. Soustelle C, Vernis L, Freon K, et al. A new Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with a mutant Smt3-deconjugating Ulp1 protein is affected in DNA replication and requires Srs2 and homologous recombination for its viability. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:5130-5143. (Pubitemid 38738151)
57. Palancade B, Liu X, Garcia-Rubio M, et al. Nucleoporins prevent DNA damage accumulation by modulating Ulp1-dependent sumoylation processes. Mol Biol Cell 2007;18:2912-2923. (Pubitemid 47235299)
58. Zhao X, Wu CY, Blobel G. Mlp-dependent anchorage and stabilization of a desumoylating enzyme is required to prevent clonal lethality. J Cell Biol 2004;167:605-611. (Pubitemid 39565142)
59. Khadaroo B, Teixeira MT, Luciano P, et al. The DNA damage response at eroded telomeres and tethering to the nuclear pore complex. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:980-987.
60. Abdallah P, Luciano P, Runge KW, et al. A two-step model for senescence triggered by a single critically short telomere. Nat Cell Biol 2009;11:988-993.
61. Azam M, Lee J Y, Abraham V, et al. Evidence that the S.cerevisiae Sgs1 protein facilitates recombinational repair of telomeres during senescence. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:506-516. (Pubitemid 43240239)
62. McEachern MJ, Krauskopf A, Blackburn EH. Telomeres and their control. Annu Rev Genet 2000;34:331-358. (Pubitemid 32065925)
63. Garvik B, Carson M, Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specifc signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 1995;15:6128-6138.
64. Yeager TR, Neumann AA, Englezou A, et al. Telomerasenegative immortalized human cells contain a novel type of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) body. Cancer Res 1999;59:4175-4179. (Pubitemid 29418720)
65. Oza P, Jaspersen SL, Miele A, Dekker J, Peterson CL. Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery. Genes Dev 2009;23:912-927.
66. Kalocsay M, Hiller NJ, Jentsch S. Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading and SUMO-H2A. Z-dependent chromosome fxation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break. Mol Cell 2009;33:335-343.
67. Bystricky K, Van Attikum H, Montiel MD, et al. Regulation of nuclear positioning and dynamics of the silent mating type loci by the yeast Ku70/Ku80 complex. Mol Cell Biol 2009;29:835-848.
68. Schober H, Ferreira H, Kalck V, Gehlen LR, Gasser SM. Yeast telomerase and the SUN domain protein Mps3 anchor telomeres and repress subtelomeric recombination. Genes Dev 2009;23:928-938.
69. Mekhail K, Seebacher J, Gygi SP, Moazed D. Role for perinuclear chromosome tethering in maintenance of genome stability. Nature 2008;456:667-670.
70. Shen TH, Lin HK, Scaglioni PP, Yung TM, Pandolfi PP. The mechanisms of PML-nuclear body formation. Mol Cell 2006;24:331-339. (Pubitemid 44647906)
71. Batty E, Jensen K, Freemont P. PML nuclear bodies and their spatial relationships in the mammalian cell nucleus. Front Biosci 2009;14:1182-1196.
72. Duprez E, Saurin AJ, Desterro JM, et al. SUMO-1 modification of the acute promyelocytic leukaemia protein PML: implications for nuclear localisation. J Cell Sci 1999;112(Pt 3):381-393. (Pubitemid 29080660)
73. Kamitani T, Kito K, Nguyen HP, et al. Identification of three major sentrinization sites in PML. J Biol Chem 1998;273:26675-26682. (Pubitemid 28471682)
74. Sternsdorf T, Jensen K, Will H. Evidence for covalent modification of the nuclear dot-associated proteins PML and Sp100 by PIC1/SUMO-1. J Cell Biol 1997;139:1621-1634. (Pubitemid 28079228)
75. Muller S, Matunis MJ, Dejean A. Conjugation with the ubiquitin-related modifier SUMO-1 regulates the partitioning of PML within the nucleus. EMBO J 1998;17:61-70. (Pubitemid 28041048)
76. Lallemand-Breitenbach V, Zhu J, Puvion F, et al. Role of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) sumolation in nuclear body formation, 11S proteasome recruitment, and As2O3-induced PML or PML/retinoic acid receptor alpha degradation. J Exp Med 2001;193:1361-1371. (Pubitemid 32565965)
77. LaMorte VJ, Dyck JA, Ochs RL, Evans RM. Localization of nascent RNA and CREB binding protein with the PML-containing nuclear body. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:4991-4996.
78. Ishov AM, Sotnikov AG, Negorev D, et al. PML is critical for ND10 formation and recruits the PML-interacting protein daxx to this nuclear structure when modified by SUMO-1. J Cell Biol 1999;147:221-234.
79. Zhong S, Muller S, Ronchetti S, et al. Role of SUMO-1-modified PML in nuclear body formation. Blood 2000;95:2748-2752.
80. Kakizuka A, Miller WH Jr, Umesono K, et al. Chromosomal translocation t (15;17) in human acute promyelocytic leukemia fuses RAR alpha with a novel putative transcription factor, PML. Cell 1991;66:663-674. (Pubitemid 121001702)
81. Koken MH, Puvion-Dutilleul F, Guillemin MC, et al. The t (15;17) translocation alters a nuclear body in a retinoic acidreversible fashion. EMBO J 1994;13:1073-1083. (Pubitemid 24074714)
82. Weis K, Rambaud S, Lavau C, et al. Retinoic acid regulates aberrant nuclear localization of PML-RAR alpha in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Cell 1994;76:345-356. (Pubitemid 24046696)
83. Borden KL. Pondering the promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) puzzle: possible functions for PML nuclear bodies. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:5259-5269. (Pubitemid 34755740)
84. Jiang WQ, Zhong ZH, Henson JD, Reddel RR. Identification of candidate alternative lengthening of telomeres genes by methionine restriction and RNA interference. Oncogene 2007;26:4635-4647. (Pubitemid 47067407)
85. Takahashi Y, Lallemand-Breitenbach V, Zhu J, de Thé H. PML nuclear bodies and apoptosis. Oncogene 2004;23:2819-2824. (Pubitemid 38659528)
86. Dellaire G, Bazett-Jones DP. PML nuclear bodies: dynamic sensors of DNA damage and cellular stress. Bioessays 2004;26:963-977. (Pubitemid 39273070)
87. Zhong S, Salomoni P, Pandolfi PP. The transcriptional role of PML and the nuclear body. Nat Cell Biol 2000;2:E85-E90.
88. Everett RD, Chelbi-Alix MK. PML and PML nuclear bodies: implications in antiviral defence. Biochimie 2007;89:819-830. (Pubitemid 47008945)
89. Boe SO, Haave M, Jul-Larsen A, et al. Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies are predetermined processing sites for damaged DNA. J Cell Sci 2006;119(Pt 16):3284-3295. (Pubitemid 44405214)
90. Carbone R, Pearson M, Minucci S, Pelicci PG. PML NBs associate with the hMre11 complex and p53 at sites of irradiation induced DNA damage. Oncogene 2002;21:1633-1640. (Pubitemid 34259026)
91. Fasching CL, Neumann AA, Muntoni A, Yeager TR, Reddel RR. DNA damage induces alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) associated promyelocytic leukemia bodies that preferentially associate with linear telomeric DNA. Cancer Res 2007;67:7072-7077. (Pubitemid 47206531)
92. Varadaraj A, Dovey CL, Laredj L, et al. Evidence for the receipt of DNA damage stimuli by PML nuclear domains. J Pathol 2007;211:471-480. (Pubitemid 46332559)
93. Dellaire G, Ching RW, Ahmed K, et al. Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies behave as DNA damage sensors whose response to DNA double-strand breaks is regulated by NBS1 and the kinases ATM, Chk2, and ATR. J Cell Biol 2006;175:55-66. (Pubitemid 44537198)
94. Zhong S, Hu P, Ye TZ, Stan R, Ellis NA, Pandolfi PP. A role for PML and the nuclear body in genomic stability. Oncogene 1999;18:7941-7947. (Pubitemid 30050554)
95. Conlan LA, McNees CJ, Heierhorst J. Proteasome-dependent dispersal of PML nuclear bodies in response to alkylating DNA damage. Oncogene 2004;23:307-310. (Pubitemid 38142266)
96. Zhu J, Chen Z, Lallemand-Breitenbach V, de Thé H. How acute promyelocytic leukaemia revived arsenic. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:705-713. (Pubitemid 37328921)
97. Weisshaar SR, Keusekotten K, Krause A, et al. Arsenic trioxide stimulates SUMO-2/3 modification leading to RNF4-dependent proteolytic targeting of PML. FEBS Lett 2008;582:3174-3178.
98. Tatham MH, Geoffroy MC, Shen L, et al. RNF4 is a poly-SUMO-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase required for arsenicinduced PML degradation. Nat Cell Biol 2008;10:538-546. (Pubitemid 351627373)
99. Lallemand-Breitenbach V, Jeanne M, Benhenda S, et al. Arsenic degrades PML or PML-RARalpha through a SUMO-triggered RNF4/ubiquitin-mediated pathway. Nat Cell Biol 2008;10:547-555. (Pubitemid 351627374)
100. Geoffroy MC, Jaffray EG, Walker KJ, Hay RT. Arsenicinduced SUMO-dependent recruitment of RNF4 into PML nuclear bodies. Mol Biol Cell 2010;21:4227-4239.