The composite face illusion: A whole window into our understanding of holistic face perception

Visual Cognition

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 139-253

  Rossion, Bruno ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attention; Composite illusion; Congruency; Face inversion; Face perception

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; BRAIN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EYE FIXATION; FACE; FACE ASYMMETRY; FACE PERCEPTION; FACIES; GAZE; HUMAN; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; MENTAL TASK; NEUROIMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSOPAGNOSIA; RESPONSE TIME; REVIEW; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL ILLUSION;

EID: 84878568938     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2013.772929     Document Type: Review

References (309)

1. Abbas, Z.-A. and Duchaine, B. 2008. The role of holistic processing in judgments of facial attractiveness. Perception, 37: 1187 - 1196. doi: 10.1068/p5984
2. Altmann, C. F., Bülthoff, H. H. and Kourtzi, Z. 2003. Perceptual organization of local elements into global shapes in the human visual cortex. Current Biology, 13: 342 - 349. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00052-6
3. Amishav, R. and Kimchi, R. 2010. Perceptual integrality of componential and configural information in faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17: 743 - 748. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.5.743
4. Anaki, D., Nica, E. I. and Moscovitch, M. 2011. Automatic aspects in face perception: Evidence from mandatory processing of distractor facial components. Experimental Psychology, 58: 4 - 18. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000061
5. Andrews, T. J., Davies-Thompson, J., Kingstone, A. and Young, A. W. 2010. Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 30: 3544 - 3552. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4863-09.2010
6. Ashby, F. G. and Townsend, J. T. 1986. Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93: 154 - 179. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.154
7. Avidan, G., Tanzer, M. and Behrmann, M. 2011. Impaired holistic processing in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 49: 2541 - 2552. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.002
8. Bartlett, J. C., Searcy, J. H. and Abdi, H. 2003. " What are the routes to face recognition? ". In Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes, Edited by: Peterson, M. and Rhodes, G. 21 - 52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Barton, J. J., Press, D. Z., Keenan, J. P. and O'Connor, M. 2002. Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology, 58: 71 - 78. doi: 10.1212/WNL.58.1.71
10. Barton, J. J., Zhao, J. and Keenan, J. P. 2003. Perception of global facial geometry in the inversion effect and prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 41: 1703 - 1711. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00115-5
11. Baudouin, J.-Y. and Humphreys, G. W. 2006. Configural information in gender categorisation. Perception, 35: 531 - 540. doi: 10.1068/p3403
12. Behrmann, M. and Avidan, G. 2005. Congenital prosopagnosia: Face-blind from birth. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9: 180 - 187. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.011
13. Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E. and McCarthy, G. 1996. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8: 551 - 565. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
14. Biederman, I. 1987. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94: 115 - 147. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.115
15. Biederman, I. and Kalocsai, P. 1997. Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 352B: 1203 - 1219. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0103
16. Bindemann, M., Scheepers, C. and Burton, A. M. 2009. Viewpoint and center of gravity affect eye movements to human faces. Journal of Vision, 9: 1 - 16. doi: 10.1167/9.2.7
17. Bodamer, J. 1947. Die Prosop-Agnosie (Die Agnosie des Physiognomieerkennens). Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 179: 6 - 54. doi: 10.1007/BF00352849
18. Boutsen, L., Humphreys, G. W., Praamstra, P. and Warbrick, T. 2006. Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the Thatcher illusion. Neuroimage, 32: 352 - 367. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.023
19. Bowles, D. C., McKone, E., Dawel, A., Duchaine, B., Palermo, R., Schmalzl, L. and Yovel, G. 2009. Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant-stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26: 423 - 455. doi: 10.1080/02643290903343149
20. Bruce, V. and Young, A. W. 2012. Face perception, London: Psychology Press.
21. Bruyer, R. 2011. Configural face processing: A meta-analytic survey. Perception, 40: 1478 - 1490. doi: 10.1068/p6928
22. Bukach, C. M., Bub, D. M., Gauthier, I. and Tarr, M. J. 2006. Perceptual expertise effects are not all or none: Local perceptual expertise for faces in a case of prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18: 48 - 63. doi: 10.1162/089892906775250094
23. Bukach, C. M., Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Kadlec, H., Barth, S., Ryan, E. and Bub, D.N. 2012. Does acquisition of Greeble expertise in prosopagnosia rule out a domain-general deficit?. Neuropsychologia, 50: 289 - 304. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.023
24. Bukach, C. M., Phillips, W. S. and Gauthier, I. 2010. Limits of generalization between categories and implications for theories of category specificity. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72: 1865 - 1874. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1865
25. Busigny, T., Joubert, S., Felician, O., Ceccaldi, M. and Rossion, B. 2010. Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: Evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 48: 4057 - 4092. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.017
26. Busigny, T., Van Belle, G., Jemel, B., Hosein, A., Joubert, S., Bub, D., Tanaka, J.W. and Rossion, B. Face-specific impairment in holistic perception following focal lesion to the right anterior temporal lobe. submitted
27. Busigny, T., Van Belle, G., Jemel, B., Hosein, A., & Rossion, B. 2012. The neuropsychology of the right anterior temporal lobe: A perceptual involvement in face recognition. Manuscript in preparation.
28. Cabeza, R. and Kato, T. 2000. Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science, 11: 419 - 433. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00283
29. Caldara, R., Schyns, P., Mayer, E., Smith, M., Gosselin, F. and Rossion, B. 2005. Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out from faces? Evidence for a defect in the use of diagnostic facial information in a brain-damaged patient. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17: 1652 - 1666. doi: 10.1162/089892905774597254
30. Calder, A. J., Young, A. W., Keane, J. and Dean, M. J. 2000. Configural information in facial expression perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26: 527 - 551. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.527
31. Carbon, C. C., Schweinberger, S. R., Kaufmann, J. M. and Leder, H. 2005. The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: An event-related brain potentials study. Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research, 24: 544 - 555. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.03.008
32. Carbon, C. C., Grüter, T., Weber, J. E. and Lueschow, A. 2007. Faces as objects of non-expertise: processing of thatcherised faces in congenital prosopagnosia. Perception, 36: 1635 - 1645. doi: 10.1068/p5467
33. Carey, S. 1992. Becoming a face expert. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 335B: 95 - 103. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1992.0012
34. Carey, S. and Diamond, R. 1977. From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces. Science, 195: 312 - 314. doi: 10.1126/science.831281
35. Carey, S. and Diamond, R. 1994. Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?. Visual Cognition, 1: 253 - 274. doi: 10.1080/13506289408402302
36. Chaudhuri, A. and Albright, T. D. 1997. Neuronal responses to edges defined by luminance vs. temporal texture in macaque area V1. Visual Neuroscience, 14: 949 - 962. doi: 10.1017/S0952523800011664
37. Chen, Z. 2012. Object-based attention: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74: 784 - 802. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0322-z
38. Cheung, O. S., Richler, J. J., Palmeri, T. J. and Gauthier, I. 2008. Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34: 1327 - 1336. doi: 10.1037/a0011752
39. Cornes, K., Donnelly, N., Godwin, H. and Wenger, M.J. 2011. Perceptual and decisional factors influencing the discrimination of inversion in the Thatcher illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37: 645 - 668. doi: 10.1037/a0020985
40. Crookes, K. and McKone, E. 2009. Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face-encoding, or face-space. Cognition, 111: 219 - 247. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.004
41. Curby, K. M., Goldstein, R. R. and Blacker, K. 2013. Disrupting perceptual grouping of face parts impairs holistic face processing. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 75 (1): 83 - 91. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0386-9
42. Dahl, C. D., Logothetis, N. K. and Hoffman, K. L. 2007. Individuation and holistic processing of faces in rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 274B: 2069 - 2076. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0477
43. Dalrymple-Alford, E. C. and Budayr, B. 1966. Examination of some aspects of the Stroop Color-Word Test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23: 1211 - 1214. doi: 10.2466/pms.1966.23.3f.1211
44. Davidoff, J. and Donnelly, N. 1990. Object superiority effects: Complete versus part probes. Acta Psychologica, 73: 225 - 243. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90024-A
45. Davies, G., Ellis, H. and Shepherd, J. 1977. Cue saliency in faces as assessed by the "photofit" technique. Perception, 6: 263 - 269. doi: 10.1068/p060263
46. DeGutis, J., Wilmer, J., Mercado, R. J. and Cohan, S. 2013. Using regression to measure holistic face processing reveals a strong link with face recognition ability. Cognition, 126: 87 - 100. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.09.004
47. de Haan, E. H. F., Young, A. W. and Newcombe, F. 1987. Face recognition without awareness. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4: 385 - 415. doi: 10.1080/02643298708252045
48. de Heering, A., Aljuhanay, A., Rossion, B. and Pascalis, O. 2012. Early deafness increases the face inversion effect but does not modulate the composite face effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 3: 124 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00124
49. de Heering, A., Houthuys, S. and Rossion, B. 2007. Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: Evidence from the composite face effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96: 57 - 70. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.07.001
50. de Heering, A., & Maurer, D. 2012. Face memory deficits in patients deprived of early visual input by bilateral congenital cataracts. Developmental Psychobiology. unpublished
51. de Heering, A. and Rossion, B. 2008. Prolonged visual experience in adulthood modulates holistic face perception. PLOS One, 3: e2317 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002317
52. de Heering, A., Rossion, B., Turati, C. and Simion, F. 2008. Holistic face processing can be independent of gaze behaviour: Evidence from the face composite effect. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2: 183 - 195. doi: 10.1348/174866407X251694
53. de Heering, A., Wallis, J. and Maurer, D. 2012. The composite face effect survives asymmetric face distortions. Perception, 41: 707 - 716. doi: 10.1068/p7212
54. Dennett, H. W., McKone, E., Tavashmi, R., Hall, A., Pidcock, M., Edwards, M. and Duchaine, B. 2011. The Cambridge Car Memory Test: A task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects. Behavior Research Methods, 44: 587 - 605. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0160-2
55. Donnelly, N. and Davidoff, J. 1999. The mental representations of faces and houses: Issues concerning parts and wholes. Visual Cognition, 6: 319 - 343. doi: 10.1080/135062899395000
56. Duchaine, B. C. and Nakayama, K. 2006a. Developmental prosopagnosia: A window to content-specific face processing. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 16: 166 - 173. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.003
57. Duchaine, B. C. and Nakayama, K. 2006b. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44: 576 - 585. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001
58. Edmonds, A. J. and Lewis, M. B. 2007. The effect of rotation on configural encoding in a face-matching task. Perception, 36: 446 - 460. doi: 10.1068/p5530
59. Ellis, H. D. and Florence, M. 1990. Bodamer's (1947) paper on prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7: 81 - 105. doi: 10.1080/02643299008253437
60. Eriksen, B. A. and Eriksen, C. W. 1974. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16: 143 - 149. doi: 10.3758/BF03203267
61. Eriksen, C. W. 1995. The Flankers Task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems. Visual Cognition, 2: 101 - 118. doi: 10.1080/13506289508401726
62. Farah, M. J., Klein, K. L. and Levinson, K. L. 1995. Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 33: 661 - 674. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00002-K
63. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M. and Tanaka, J. W. 1998. What is "special" about face perception?. Psychological Review, 105: 482 - 498. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.482
64. Freire, A., Lee, K. and Symons, L. A. 2000. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29: 159 - 170. doi: 10.1068/p3012
65. Freiwald, W. A., Tsao, D. Y. and Livingstone, M. S. 2009. A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 12: 1187 - 1196. doi: 10.1038/nn.2363
66. Galton, F. 1883. Inquiries into human faculty and its development, London: Macmillan.
67. Gao, Z., Flevaris, A. V., Robertson, L. C. and Bentin, S. 2011. Priming global and local processing of composite faces: Revisiting the processing-bias effect on face perception. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 73: 1477 - 1486. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0109-7
68. Garner, W. R. 1974. The processing of information and structure, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Garner, W. R. 1988. Facilitation and interference with a separable redundant dimension in stimulus comparison. Perception & Psychophysics, 44: 321 - 330. doi: 10.3758/BF03210413
70. Gauthier, I. and Bukach, C. M. 2007. Should we reject the expertise hypothesis?. Cognition, 103: 322 - 330. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.003
71. Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K. M. and Collins, D. 2003. Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6: 428 - 432. doi: 10.1038/nn1029
72. Gauthier, I., Klaiman, C. and Schultz, R. T. 2009. Face composite effects reveal abnormal face processing in Autism Spectrum Disorders. Vision Research, 49: 470 - 478. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.007
73. Gauthier, I. and Tarr, M. J. 2002. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behaviour. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28: 431 - 466. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.28.2.431
74. Gauthier, I., Williams, P., Tarr, M. J. and Tanaka, J. W. 1998. Training "greeble" experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research, 38: 2401 - 2428. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00442-2
75. Germine, L. T., Duchaine, B. and Nakayama, K. 2011. Where cognitive development and aging meet: Face learning ability peaks after age 30. Cognition, 118: 201 - 210. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.11.002
76. Ginsburg, A. P. 1978. Visual information processing based on spatial filters constrained by biological data (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK.
77. Goffaux, V. 2009. Spatial interactions in upright and inverted faces: Re-exploration of spatial scale influence. Vision Research, 49: 774 - 781. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.009
78. Goffaux, V. 2012. The discriminability of local cues determines the strength of holistic face processing. Vision Research, 64: 17 - 22. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.022
79. Goffaux, V. and Rossion, B. 2006. Faces are "spatial"-Holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32: 1023 - 1039. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1023
80. Goffaux, V. and Rossion, B. 2007. Face inversion disproportionately impairs the perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33: 995 - 1002. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.995
81. Gold, J., Mundy, P. and Tjan, B. 2012. The perception of a face is no more than the sum of its parts. Psychological Science, 23: 427 - 434. doi: 10.1177/0956797611427407
82. Goldfarb, L. and Henik, A. 2006. New data analysis of the Stroop matching task calls for a reevaluation of theory. Psychological Science, 17: 96 - 100. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01670.x
83. Goldstein, A. G. and Chance, J. E. 1980. Memory for faces and schema theory. Journal of Psychology, 105: 47 - 59. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1980.9915131
84. Gorea, A. and Julesz, B. 1990. Context superiority in a detection task with line-element stimuli: A low-level effect. Perception, 19: 5 - 16. doi: 10.1068/p190005
85. Gosselin, F. and Schyns, P. G. 2001. Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research, 41: 2261 - 2271. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00097-9
86. Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. 1966. Signal detection theory and psychophysics, New York, NY: Wiley.
87. Gregory, R. L. 1997. Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 352B: 1121 - 1128. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0095
88. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R. and Martin, A. 2006. Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends in Cognitive Science, 10: 14 - 23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
89. Grill-Spector, K. and Malach, R. 2001. fMR-adaptation: A tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107: 293 - 321. doi: 10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00019-1
90. Haig, N. D. 1984. The effect of feature displacement on face recognition. Perception, 13: 502 - 512. doi: 10.1068/p130505
91. Haig, N. D. 1985. How faces differ: A new comparative technique. Perception, 14: 601 - 615. doi: 10.1068/p140601
92. Haig, N. D. 1986. " Investigating face recognition with an image processing computer ". In Aspects of face processing, Edited by: Ellis, H. D., Jeeves, M. A., Newcombe, F. and Young, A. W. 410 - 425. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhof.
93. Harris, A. and Aguirre, G. K. 2008. The representation of parts and wholes in face-selective cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20: 863 - 878. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20509
94. Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A. and Gobbini, M. I. 2000. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4: 223 - 233. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01482-0
95. Hochberg, J. and Galper, R. E. 1967. Recognition of faces: I. An exploratory study. Psychonomic Science, 9: 619 - 620.
96. Hole, G. and George, P. 2011. Evidence for holistic processing of facial age. Visual Cognition, 19: 585 - 615. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2011.562076
97. Hole, G. J. 1994. Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23: 65 - 74. doi: 10.1068/p230065
98. Hole, G. J., George, P. A. and Dunsmore, V. 1999. Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives. Perception, 28: 341 - 359. doi: 10.1068/p2622
99. Homa, D., Haver, B. and Schwartz, T. 1976. Perceptibility of schematic face stimuli: Evidence for a perceptual Gestalt. Memory and Cognition, 4: 176 - 185. doi: 10.3758/BF03213162
100. Hommel, B. 1997. Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research, 59: 248 - 260. doi: 10.1007/BF00439302
101. Hsiao, J. H. and Cottrell, G. 2008. Two fixations suffice in face recognition. Psychological Science, 19: 998 - 1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02191.x
102. Hsiao, J. H. and Cottrell, G. W. 2009. Not all visual expertise is holistic, but it may be leftist: The case of Chinese character recognition. Psychological Science, 20: 455 - 463. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02315.x
103. Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N. 1962. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat visual cortex. Journal of Physiology (London), 160: 106 - 154.
104. Hugenberg, K. and Corneille, O. 2009. Holistic processing is tuned for in-group faces. Cognitive Science, 33: 1173 - 1181. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01048.x
105. Hulten, P. 1987. The Arcimboldo effect, London: Thames & Hudson.
106. Itti, L. and Koch, C. 2000. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40: 1489 - 1506. doi: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00163-7
107. Jacques, C., d'Arripe, O., & Rossion, B. 2007. The time course of the face inversion effect during individual face discrimination. Journal of Vision, 7, 1 - 9. doi: 10.1167/7.8.3
108. Jacques, C. and Rossion, B. 2009. The initial representation of individual faces in the right occipito-temporal cortex is holistic: Electrophysiological evidence from the composite face illusion. Journal of Vision, 11 (9): 1 - 16.
109. Jacques, C. and Rossion, B. 2010. Misaligning face halves increases and delays the N170 specifically for upright faces: Implications for the nature of early face representations. Brain Research, 1318: 96 - 109. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.12.070
110. Jacobs, A. M. 1986. Eye-movement control in visual search: How direct is visual span control?. Perception and Psychophysics, 39: 47 - 58. doi: 10.3758/BF03207583
111. Jiang, F., Blanz, V. and Rossion, B. 2011. Holistic processing of shape cues in face identification: Evidence from face inversion, composite faces and acquired prosopagnosia. Visual Cognition, 19: 1003 - 1034. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2011.604360
112. Jung, R. and Spillmann, L. 1970. " Receptive-field estimation and perceptual integration in human vision ". In Early experience and visual information processing in perceptual and reading disorders, Edited by: Young, F. A. and Lindsley, D. B. 181 - 197. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
113. Jung, R., von Baumgarten, R. and Baumgartner, G. 1952. Mikroableitungen von einzelneç n Nervenzellen im optischen Cortex der Katze: Die lichtaktivierten B-Neurone. Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 189: 521 - 539. doi: 10.1007/BF00394865
114. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J. and Chun, M. M. 1997. The fusiform face area, a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17: 4302 - 4311.
115. Kastner, S., De Weerd, P., Desimone, R. and Ungerleider, L. G. 2000. Texture segregation in human extrastriate cortex: A fMRI study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83: 2453 - 2457.
116. Kelly, K. R., Gallie, B. L. and Steeves, J. K. 2012. Impaired face processing in early monocular deprivation from enucleation. Optometry and Vision Science, 89: 137 - 147. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318240488e
117. Khurana, B., Carter, R. M., Watanabe, K. and Nijhawan, R. 2006. Flash-lag chimeras: The role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect. Vision Research, 46: 2757 - 2772. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.001
118. Kimchi, R. 1992. Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112: 24 - 38. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.24
119. Kimchi, R. 2009. Perceptual organization and visual attention. Progress in Brain Research, 176: 15 - 33.
120. Kimchi, R., Behrmann, M., & Olson, C. R. 2003. Perceptual organization in vision: Behavioral and neural perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
121. Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F. and Cohen, D. 2002. Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59: 809 - 816. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.9.809
122. Kobatake, E. and Tanaka, K. 1994. Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 71: 856 - 867.
123. Koffka, K. 1963. Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. (Original work published 1935)
124. Köhler, W. 1929. Gestalt psychology, New York, NY: Liveright.
125. Konar, Y., Bennett, P. J. and Sekuler, A. B. 2010. Holistic processing is not correlated with face-identification accuracy. Psychological Science, 21: 38 - 43. doi: 10.1177/0956797609356508
126. Kramer, A. F. and Jacobson, A. 1991. Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 50: 267 - 284. doi: 10.3758/BF03206750
127. Kuefner, D., Jacques, C., Prieto, E. A. and Rossion, B. 2010. Electrophysiological correlates of the composite face illusion: Disentangling perceptual and decisional components of holistic face processing in the human brain. Brain and Cognition, 74: 225 - 238. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2010.08.001
128. Kuefner, D., Macchi Cassia, V., Vescovo, E. and Picozzi, M. 2010. Natural experience acquired in adulthood enhances holistic processing of other-age faces. Visual Cognition, 18: 11 - 25. doi: 10.1080/13506280802396507
129. Laguesse, R. and Rossion, B. 2011. The composite face illusion and its disappearance with misaligned faces: An effect of metric distance or part separation? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 11 (11): 617 doi: 10.1167/11.11.617
130. Laurence, S. and Hole, G. 2012. Identity specific adaptation with composite faces. Visual Cognition, 20: 109 - 120. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2012.655805
131. Leder, H. and Bruce, V. 2000. When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A: 513 - 536.
132. Lee, K. and Freire, A. 1999. Effects of face configuration change on shape perception: A new illusion. Perception, 28: 1217 - 1226. doi: 10.1068/p2972
133. Le Grand, R., Cooper, P. A., Mondloch, C. J., Lewis, T. L., Sagiv, N., de Gelder, B. and Maurer, D. 2006. What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia?. Brain and Cognition, 61: 139 - 158. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.11.005
134. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D. and Brent, H. P. 2004. Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychological Science, 15: 762 - 768. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00753.x
135. Letourneau, S. M. and Mitchell, T. V. 2008. Behavioural and ERP measures of holistic face processing in a composite task. Brain and Cognition, 67: 234 - 245. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.007
136. Levine, D. N. and Calvanio, R. 1989. Prosopagnosia: A defect in visual configural processing. Brain and Cognition, 10: 149 - 147. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(89)90051-1
137. Lewis, M. B. 2001. The Lady's not for turning: Rotation of the Thatcher illusion. Perception, 30: 769 - 774. doi: 10.1068/p3174
138. Lewis, M. B. and Johnston, R. A. 1997. The Thatcher illusion as a test of configural disruption. Perception, 26: 225 - 227. doi: 10.1068/p260225
139. Lowe, D. G. 1985. Perceptual organization and visual recognition, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
140. Luck, S. J. 2005. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
141. Luo, C. R. 1999. Semantic competition as the basis of Stroop interference: Evidence from color-word matching tasks. Psychological Science, 10: 35 - 40. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00103
142. Macchi Cassia, V., Picozzi, M., Kuefner, D., Bricolo, E. and Turati, C. 2009. Holistic processing for faces and cars in preschool-aged children and adults: Evidence from the composite effect. Developmental Science, 12: 236 - 248. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00765.x
143. Mach, E. 1865. Über die Wirkung der räummlichen Verthelung des Lich- treizes auf die Netzhaut. Akad Wiss Lit Abh Math-Natwiss KL (Mainz), 52: 303 - 322.
144. Mack, M. L., Richler, J. J., Gauthier, I. and Palmeri, T. J. 2011. Indecision on decisional separability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18: 1 - 9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0017-1
145. MacLeod, C. M. 1991. Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109: 163 - 203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
146. Malpass, R. S. and Kravitz, J. 1969. Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13: 330 - 334. doi: 10.1037/h0028434
147. Martini, P., McKone, E. and Nakayama, K. 2001. Orientation tuning of human face processing estimated by contrast matching in transparency displays. Journal of Vision, 1: 335
148. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R. and Mondloch, C. J. 2002. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 255 - 260. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4
149. McConkie, G. W. and Rayner, K. 1975. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception and Psychophysics, 17: 578 - 586. doi: 10.3758/BF03203972
150. McKone, E. 2004. Isolating the special component of face recognition: Peripheral identification and a Mooney face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30: 181 - 197. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.181
151. McKone, E. 2008. Configural processing and face viewpoint. Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34: 310 - 327. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.310
152. McKone, E. 2009. Holistic processing for faces operates over a wide range of sizes but is strongest at identification rather than conversational distances. Vision Research, 49: 268 - 283. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.020
153. McKone, E., Martini, P. and Nakayama, K. 2001. Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 27: 573 - 599.
154. McKone, E., Martini, P. and Nakayama, K. 2003. " Isolating holistic processing in faces (and perhaps objects) ". In Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes, Edited by: Peterson, M. A. and Rhodes, G. 92 - 119. New York: Oxford University Press.
155. McKone, E. and Robbins, R. 2007. The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: Reply to Gauthier & Bukach. Cognition, 103: 331 - 336. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.014
156. McKone, E. and Robbins, R. 2011. " Are faces special? ". In Oxford handbook of face perception, Edited by: Calder, A. J., Rhodes, G., Haxby, J. V. and Johnson, M. H. 149 - 176. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
157. McKone, E. and Yovel, G. 2009. Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16: 778 - 797. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.778
158. Megreya, A. M. and Burton, A. M. 2006. Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory and Cognition, 34: 865 - 876. doi: 10.3758/BF03193433
159. Meinhardt-Injac, B., Persike, M. and Meinhardt, G. 2010. The time course of face matching by internal and external features: Effects of context and inversion. Vision Research, 50: 1598 - 1611. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.018
160. Meinhardt-Injac, B., Persike, M. and Meinhardt, G. 2011. The context effect in face matching: Effects of feedback. Vision Research, 51: 2121 - 2131. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.08.004
161. Meissner, C. A. and Brigham, J. C. 2001. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analysis review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7: 3 - 35. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.7.1.3
162. Mermelstein, R., Banks, W. and Prinzmetal, W. 1979. Figural goodness effects in perception and memory. Perception and Psychophysics, 26: 472 - 480. doi: 10.3758/BF03204287
163. Michel, C., Caldara, R. and Rossion, B. 2006. Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. Visual Cognition, 14: 55 - 73. doi: 10.1080/13506280500158761
164. Michel, C., Corneille, O. and Rossion, B. 2007. Race categorization modulates holistic encoding. Cognitive Science, 31: 911 - 924. doi: 10.1080/03640210701530805
165. Michel, C., Corneille, O. and Rossion, B. 2010. Holistic face encoding is modulated by perceived face race: Evidence from perceptual adaptation. Visual Cognition, 18: 434 - 455. doi: 10.1080/13506280902819697
166. Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C. H. and Caldara, R. 2006. Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race. Psychological Science, 17: 608 - 615. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x
167. Miller, J. 1991. The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions. Perception and Psychophysics, 49: 270 - 288. doi: 10.3758/BF03214311
168. Mondloch, C. J., Elms, N., Maurer, D., Rhodes, G., Hayward, W. G., Tanaka, J. W. and Zhou, G. 2010. Processes underlying the cross-race effect: An investigation of holistic, featural, and relational processing of own-race versus other-race faces. Perception, 39: 1065 - 1085. doi: 10.1068/p6608
169. Mondloch, C. J. and Maurer, D. 2008. The effect of face orientation on holistic processing. Perception, 37: 1175 - 1186. doi: 10.1068/p6048
170. Mondloch, C. J., Pathman, T., Maurer, D., Le Grand, R. and de Schonen, S. 2007. The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence for adult-like holistic processing. Visual Cognition, 15: 564 - 577. doi: 10.1080/13506280600859383
171. Mooney, C. M. 1957. Age in the development of closure ability in children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 11: 219 - 226. doi: 10.1037/h0083717
172. Moore, C. and Cavanagh, P. 1998. Recovery of 3D volume from 2-tone images of novel objects. Cognition, 67: 45 - 71. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00014-6
173. Morikawa, K., Okumura, K., & Matsushita, S. 2012. Head size illusion: Head outlines are processed holistically too. Perception, 41, 5. (ECVP Abstract SUPPL.).
174. Morrison, D. J. and Schyns, P. G. 2001. Usage of spatial scales for the categorization of faces, objects, and scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8: 454 - 469. doi: 10.3758/BF03196180
175. Müller-Lyer, F. C. 1889. Optische Urteilstäuschungen. Archiv für Physiologie, SUPPL., 263 - 270.
176. Murray, J., Yong, E. and Rhodes, G. 2000. Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces. Psychological Science, 11: 492 - 496. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00294
177. Navon, D. 1977. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9: 353 - 383. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
178. Navon, D. 2003. What does a compound letter tell the psychologist's mind?. Acta Psychologica, 114: 273 - 309. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.06.002
179. Neri, P. and Levi, D. M. 2006. Receptive versus perceptive fields from the reverse-correlation viewpoint. Vision Research, 46: 2465 - 2474. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.002
180. Nishida, S. and Johnston, A. 1999. Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern. Nature, 397: 610 - 612. doi: 10.1038/17600
181. Nishimura, M., Rutherford, M. D. and Maurer, D. 2008. Converging evidence of configural processing of faces in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorders. Visual Cognition, 7: 859 - 891. doi: 10.1080/13506280701538514
182. Nothdurft, H. C., Gallant, J. L. and Van Essen, D. C. 2000. Response profiles to texture border patterns in area V1. Visual Neuroscience, 17: 421 - 436. doi: 10.1017/S0952523800173092
183. Orban de Xivry, J.-J., Ramon, M., Lefèvre, P. and Rossion, B. 2008. Reduced fixation on the upper area of personally familiar faces following acquired prosopagnosia. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2: 245 - 268. doi: 10.1348/174866407X260199
184. O'Toole, A. J. 2011. " Cognitive and computational approaches to face perception ". In Oxford handbook of face perception, Edited by: Calder, A., Rhodes, G., Johnson, M. and Haxby, J. V. 15 - 30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
185. Palermo, R., Willis, M. L., Rivolta, D., McKone, E., Wilson, C. E. and Calder, A. 2011. Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 49: 1226 - 1235. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.021
186. Pellicano, E. and Rhodes, G. 2003. Holistic processing of faces in preschool children and adults. Psychological Science, 14: 618 - 622. doi: 10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1474.x
187. Pitcher, D., Walsh, V., Yovel, G. and Duchaine, B. 2007. TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing. Current Biology, 17: 1568 - 1573. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.063
188. Pomerantz, J. R., Agrawal, A., Jewell, S. W., Jeong, M., Khan, H. and Lozano, S. C. 2003. Contour grouping inside and outside of facial contexts. Acta Psychologica, 114: 245 - 271. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.08.004
189. Pomerantz, J. R., Carson, C. E. and Feldman, E. M. 1994. " Interference effects in perceptual organization ". In Cognitive approaches to human perception, Edited by: Ballesteros, S. 123 - 152. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
190. Pomerantz, J. R. and Kubovy, M. 1986. " Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization ". In Handbook of perception and human performance, Edited by: Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L. and Thomas, J. Vol. 3, 3601 - 3646. New York, NY: Wiley.
191. Pomerantz, J. R. and Portillo, M. C. 2011. Grouping and emergent features in vision: Toward a theory of basic Gestalts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37: 1331 - 1349.
192. Pomerantz, J. R. and Pristach, E. A. 1989. Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15: 635 - 649. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.15.4.635
193. Pomerantz, J. R., Pristach, E. A. and Carson, C. E. 1989. " Attention and object perception ". In Object perception: Structure and process, Edited by: Shepp, B. and Ballesteros, S. 53 - 89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
194. Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C. and Stoever, R. J. 1977. Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3: 422 - 435. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.3.3.422
195. Rakover, S. S. 2012. A feature-inversion effect: Can an isolated feature show behaviour like the face-inversion effect?. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19 (4): 617 - 624. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0264-4
196. Rakover, S. S. and Teucher, B. 1997. Facial inversion effects: Parts and whole relationship. Perception and Psychophysics, 59: 752 - 761. doi: 10.3758/BF03206021
197. Ramon, M., Busigny, T. and Rossion, B. 2010. Impaired holistic processing of unfamiliar individual faces in acquired prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 48: 933 - 944. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.014
198. Ramon, M. and Rossion, B. 2012. Hemisphere-dependent holistic processing of familiar faces. Brain and Cognition, 78: 7 - 13.
199. Ratliff, F. 1965. Mach bands: Quantitative studies on neural networks in the retina, San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
200. Rayner, K. 1975. The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7: 65 - 81. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90005-5
201. Rayner, K. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124: 372 - 422. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372
202. Regan, D. 2000. Human perception of objects: Early visual processing of spatial form defined by luminance, color, texture, motion, and binocular disparity, Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
203. Reingold, E. M., Charness, N., Pomplun, M. and Stampe, D. M. 2001. Visual span in expert chess players: Evidence from eye movements. Psychological Science, 12: 49 - 56. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00309
204. Rezlescu, C., Pitcher, D. and Duchaine, B. 2012. Acquired prosopagnosia with spared within-class object recognition but impaired recognition of degraded basic-level objects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29: 325 - 347. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.749223
205. Rhodes, G. 1988. Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinates of facial appearance. Perception, 17: 43 - 63. doi: 10.1068/p170043
206. Rhodes, G., Brake, S. and Atkinson, A. P. 1993. What's lost in inverted faces?. Cognition, 47: 25 - 57. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90061-Y
207. Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., & Gauthier, I. 2011a. Beliefs alter holistic face processing... if response bias is not taken into account. Journal of Vision, 11, 13. doi: 10.1167/11.13.17
208. Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S. and Gauthier, I. 2011b. Holistic processing predicts face recognition. Psychological Science, 20: 464 - 471.
209. Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., Wong, A. C.-N. and Gauthier, I. 2009. Does response interference contribute to face composite effects?. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16: 258 - 263. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.258
210. Richler, J. J., Gauthier, I., Wenger, M. J. and Palmeri, T. J. 2008. Holistic processing of faces: Perceptual and decisional components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34: 328 - 342. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.328
211. Richler, J. J., Mack, M. L., Gauthier, I. and Palmeri, T. J. 2009. Holistic processing happens at a glance. Vision Research, 49: 2856 - 2861. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.025
212. Richler, J. J., Mack, M. L., Palmeri, T. J. and Gauthier, I. 2011. Inverted faces are (eventually) processed holistically. Vision Research, 51: 333 - 342. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.014
213. Richler, J. J., Tanaka, J. W., Brown, D. D. and Gauthier, I. 2008. Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34: 1356 - 1368. doi: 10.1037/a0013080
214. Richler, J. J., Wong, Y. K. and Gauthier, I. 2011. Perceptual expertise as a shift from strategic interference to automatic holistic processing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20: 129 - 134. doi: 10.1177/0963721411402472
215. Robbins, R. and McKone, E. 2003. Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?. Cognition, 88: 79 - 107. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00020-9
216. Robbins, R. and McKone, E. 2007. No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition, 103: 34 - 79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.008
217. Robbins, R. A. and Coltheart, M. 2012. Left-right holistic integration of human bodies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65: 1962 - 1974. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.674145
218. Rossion, B. 2008. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128: 274 - 289. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
219. Rossion, B. 2009. Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: The perceptual field hypothesis. Acta Psychologica, 132: 300 - 312. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.08.002
220. Rossion, B. and Boremanse, A. 2008. Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: Evidence from the face composite illusion. Journal of Vision, 8 (4): 1 - 13. doi: 10.1167/8.4.3
221. Rossion, B., Caldara, R., Seghier, M., Schuller, A.-M., Lazeyras, F. and Mayer, E. 2003. A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain, 126: 2381 - 2395. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg241
222. Rossion, B., Dricot, L., Goebel, R., & Busigny, T. 2011. Holistic face categorization in higher-level cortical visual areas of the normal and prosopagnosic brain: Towards a non-hierarchical view of face perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 225. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00225
223. Rossion, B., Hanseeuw, B. and Dricot, L. 2012. Defining face perception areas in the human brain: A large-scale factorial fMRI face localizer analysis. Brain and Cognition, 79: 138 - 157. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.01.001
224. Rossion, B. and Jacques, C. 2008. Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170. NeuroImage, 39: 1959 - 1979. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.011
225. Rossion, B. and Jacques, C. 2011. " The N170: Understanding the time-course of face perception in the human brain ". In The Oxford handbook of ERP components, Edited by: Luck, S. and Kappenman, E. 115 - 142. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
226. Rossion, B. and Michel, C. 2011. " An experienced-based holistic account of the other-race face effect ". In The Oxford handbook of face perception, Edited by: Calder, A., Rhodes, G., Haxby, J. V. and Johnson, M. 215 - 244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
227. Rossion, B., Kaiser, M. D., Bub, D. and Tanaka, J. W. 2009. Is the loss of diagnosticity of the eye region a common feature of acquired prosopagnosia?. Journal of Neuropsychology, 3: 69 - 78. doi: 10.1348/174866408X289944
228. Russell, R., Duchaine, B. and Nakayama, K. 2009. Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16: 252 - 257. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.252
229. Sadr, J., Jarudi, I. and Sinha, P. 2003. The role of eyebrows in face recognition. Perception, 32: 285 - 293. doi: 10.1068/p5027
230. Schiltz, C., Dricot, L., Goebel, R. and Rossion, B. 2010. Holistic perception of individual faces in the right middle fusiform gyrus as evidenced by the composite face illusion. Journal of Vision, 10 (2): 1 - 16. doi: 10.1167/10.2.25
231. Schiltz, C. and Rossion, B. 2006. Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 32: 1385 - 1394. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.05.037
232. Schmalzl, L., Palermo, R. and Coltheart, M. 2008. Cognitive heterogeneity in genetically based prosopagnosia: A family study. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2: 99 - 117. doi: 10.1348/174866407X256554
233. Schyns, P. G., Jentzsch, I., Johnson, M., Schweinberger, S. R. and Gosselin, F. 2003. A principled method for determining the functionality of brain responses. Neuroreport, 14: 1665 - 1669. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200309150-00002
234. Seitz, K. 2002. Parts and wholes in person recognition: Developmental trends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82: 367 - 381. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00106-6
235. Sekuler, A. B., Gaspar, C. M., Gold, J. M. and Bennett, P. J. 2004. Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Current Biology, 14: 391 - 396. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.028
236. Sekunova, A. and Barton, J. 2008. Long-range and short-range relations in the perception of the vertical position of the eyes in inverted faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34: 1129 - 1135. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1129
237. Sergent, J. 1984. An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology, 75: 221 - 242. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01895.x
238. Sergent, J. 1986. " Microgenesis of face perception ". In Aspects of face processing, Edited by: Ellis, H. D., Jeeves, M. A., Newcombe, F. and Young, A. M. 17 - 33. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
239. Sergent, J., Ohta, S. and Macdonald, B. 1992. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing-a positron emission tomography study. Brain, 115: 15 - 36. doi: 10.1093/brain/115.1.15
240. Sergent, J. and Villemure, J. G. 1989. Prosopagnosia in a right hemispherectomized patient. Brain, 112: 975 - 995. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.4.975
241. Sheperd, J., Davies, G. and Ellis, H. 1981. " Studies of cue saliency ". In Perceiving and remembering faces, Edited by: Davies, G., Ellis, H. and Sheperd, J. 105 - 131. London: Academic Press.
242. Sichel, J. L. and Chandler, K. A. 1969. The color-word interference test: The effects of varied color-word combinations upon verbal response latency. Journal of Psychology, 72: 219 - 231. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1969.10543502
243. Sinico, M. 2003. On the foundations of experimental phenomenology. Gestalt Theory, 25: 111 - 120.
244. Sjoberg, W. and Windes, J. D. 1992. Recognition times for rotated normal and "Thatcher" faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75: 1176 - 1178.
245. Smith, M. L., Cottrell, G. W., Gosselin, F. and Schyns, P. G. 2005. Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychological Science, 16: 184 - 189. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00801.x
246. Smith, M. L., Gosselin, F. and Schyns, P. G. 2007. From a face to its category via a few information processing states in the brain. NeuroImage, 37: 974 - 984.
247. Soria Bauser, D. A., Suchan, B. and Daum, I. 2011. Differences between perception of human faces and body shapes: Evidence from the composite illusion. Vision Research, 51: 195 - 202. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.11.007
248. Spillmann, L. 1999. From elements to perception: Local and global processing in visual neurons. Perception, 28: 1461 - 1492. doi: 10.1068/p2763
249. Spillmann, L. 2009. Phenomenology and neurophysiological correlations: Two approaches to perception research. Vision Research, 49: 1507 - 1521. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.022
250. Spillmann, L. and Ehrenstein, W. H. 1996. " From neuron to Gestalt-mechanisms of visual perception ". In Comprehensive human physiology, Edited by: Greger, R. and Windhorst, U. 861 - 893. Heidelberg: Springer.
251. Spillmann, L., Ransom-Hogg, A. and Oehler, R. 1987. A comparison of perceptive and receptive fields in man and monkey. Human Neurobiology, 6: 51 - 62.
252. Stanislaw, H. and Todorov, N. 1999. Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31: 137 - 149. doi: 10.3758/BF03207704
253. Stroop, J. R. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18: 643 - 662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651
254. Stürzel, F. and Spillmann, L. 2002. Thatcher illusion: Dependence on angle rotation. Perception, 29: 937 - 942.
255. Sun, Y.-H., Ge, L., Quinn, P. C., Wang, Z., Xiao, N. G., Pascalis, O. and Lee, K. 2012. A new "fat face" illusion. Perception, 41: 117 - 120. doi: 10.1068/p6906
256. Susilo, T., Crookes, K., McKone, E. and Turner, H. 2009. The composite task reveals stronger holistic processing in children than adults for child faces. PLoS ONE, 4 (7): e6460 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006460
257. Suzuki, S. and Cavanagh, P. 1995. Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21: 901 - 913. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.21.4.901
258. Tanaka, J. and Gordon, I. 2011. " Featural, configural and holistic perception of faces ". In Handbook of face perception, Edited by: Calder, A., Haxby, J., Rhodes, G. and Johnson, M. 177 - 194. New York, NY: University Oxford Press.
259. Tanaka, J., Kay, J. B., Grinnell, E., Stansfield, B. and Szechter, L. 1998. Face recognition in young children: When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Visual Cognition, 5: 479 - 496. doi: 10.1080/713756795
260. Tanaka, J. W. and Farah, M. 1993. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46: 225 - 245.
261. Tanaka, J. W. and Farah, M. J. 2003. " The holistic representation of faces ". In Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes, Edited by: Peterson, M. A. and Rhodes, G. 53 - 74. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
262. Tanaka, J. W., Kaiser, M. D., Butler, S. and Le Grand, R. 2012. Mixed emotions: Holistic and analytic perception of facial expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 26: 961 - 977. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.630933
263. Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M. and Bukach, C. M. 2004. A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition, 93: B1 - B9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2003.09.011
264. Tanaka, J. W. and Sengco, J. A. 1997. Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25: 583 - 592. doi: 10.3758/BF03211301
265. Taubert, J. 2009. Chimpanzee faces are "special" to humans. Perception, 38: 343 - 356. doi: 10.1068/p6254
266. Taubert, J. 2010. Evidence of human-like, holistic face processing in spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 124: 57 - 65. doi: 10.1037/a0017704
267. Taubert, J. and Alais, D. 2009. The composite illusion requires composite face stimuli to be biologically plausible. Vision Research, 49: 1877 - 1885. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.025
268. Taubert, J. and Alais, D. 2011. Identity aftereffects, but not composite effects, are contingent on contrast polarity. Perception, 40: 422 - 436. doi: 10.1068/p6874
269. Taubert, J., Apthorp, D., Aagten-Murphy, D. and Alais, D. 2011. The role of holistic processing in face perception: Evidence from the face inversion effect. Vision Research, 51: 1273 - 1278. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2011.04.002
270. Taubert, J. and Parr, L. A. 2009. Visual expertise does not predict the composite effect across species: A comparison between spider (Ateles geoffroyi) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys. Brain and Cognition, 71: 187 - 195. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.002
271. Taubert, J., Qureshi, A. A., & Parr, L. A. 2012. The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Comparative Psychology, 126 4, 339 - 346.
272. Thompson, P. 1980. Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9: 483 - 484. doi: 10.1068/p090483
273. Thompson, P. 2009. The Thatcher illusion 28 years on. Perception, 38: 921 - 922. doi: 10.1068/pmktho
274. Thompson, P. and Wilson, J. 2012. Why do most faces look thinner upside down?. Iperception, 3: 765 - 774.
275. Thompson, S. 1880. Optical illusions of motion. Brain, 3: 289 - 298. doi: 10.1093/brain/3.3.289
276. Todorov, A., Loehr, V. and Oosterhof, N. N. 2010. The obligatory nature of holistic processing of faces in social judgments. Perception, 39: 514 - 532. doi: 10.1068/p6501
277. Townsend, J. T. and Ashby, F. G. 1983. Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
278. Treisman, A. 1996. The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6: 171 - 178. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(96)80070-5
279. Turati, C., Di Giorgio, E., Bardi, L. and Simion, F. 2010. Holistic face processing in newborns, 3-month-old infants, and adults: Evidence from the composite face effect. Child Development, 81: 1894 - 1905. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01520.x
280. Turk, M. and Pentland, A. 1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3: 71 - 86. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71
281. Valentine, T. 1991. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A: 161 - 204.
282. Van Belle, G., Busigny, T., Lefèvre, P., Joubert, S., Felician, O., Gentile, F. and Rossion, B. 2011. Impairment of holistic face perception following right occipito-temporal damage in prosopagnosia: Converging evidence from gaze-contingency. Neuropsychologia, 49: 3145 - 3150. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.010
283. Van Belle, G., de Graef, P., Verfaillie, K., Busigny, T. and Rossion, B. 2010. Whole not hole: Expert face recognition requires holistic perception. Neuropsychologia, 48: 2609 - 2620. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.04.034
284. Van Belle, G., de Graef, P., Verfaillie, K., Rossion, B., & Lefèvre, P. 2010. Face inversion impairs holistic perception: Evidence from gaze-contingent stimulation. Journal of Vision, 10, 10. doi: 10.1167/10.5.10
285. Van Wezel, R. J. and Britten, K. H. 2002. Motion adaptation in area MT. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88: 3469 - 3476. doi: 10.1152/jn.00276.2002
286. Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. 2012. A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1172 - 1217.
287. Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., van der Helm, P. A., & van Leeuwen, C. 2012. A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1218 - 1252.
288. Wang, R., Li, J., Fang, H., Tian, M. and Liu, J. 2012. Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability. Psychological Science, 23: 169 - 177. doi: 10.1177/0956797611420575
289. Weiner, K. S. and Grill-Spector, K. 2010. Sparsely-distributed organization of face and limb activations in human ventral temporal cortex. NeuroImage, 52: 1559 - 1573. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.262
290. Wenger, M. J. and Ingvalson, E. M. 2002. A decisional component of holistic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28: 872 - 892. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.5.872
291. Wenger, M. J. and Ingvalson, E. M. 2003. Preserving informational separability and violating decisional separability in facial perception and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29: 1106 - 1118. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1106
292. Wertheimer, M. 1912. Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung [Experimental studies on seeing motion]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61: 161 - 265.
293. Wertheimer, M. 1967. Gestalt theory. In W. D. Ellis, A source book of Gestalt psychology 1 - 11. New York, NY: Humanities Press. (Original work published in 1925)
294. Wilmer, J. B. 2008. How to use individual differences to isolate functional organization, biology, and utility of visual functions; with illustrative proposals for stereopsis. Spatial Vision, 21: 561 - 579. doi: 10.1163/156856808786451408
295. Wilmer, J. B., Germine, L., Chabris, C. F., Chatterjee, G., Williams, M., Loken, E. and Duchaine, B. 2010. Human face recognition ability is specific and highly heritable. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA, 107: 5238 - 5241. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913053107
296. Wong, A. C.-N., Bukach, C. M., Hsiao, J., Greenspon, E., Ahern, E., Duan, Y. and Lui, K. G. H. 2012. Holistic processing as a hallmark of perceptual expertise for nonface categories including Chinese characters. Journal of Vision, 12 (7): 1 - 15. doi: 10.1167/12.7.1
297. Wong, A. C.-N., Bukach, C. M., Yuen, C., Yang, L., Leung, S. and Greenspon, E. 2011. Holistic processing of words modulated by reading experience. PLoS ONE, 6 (6): e20753 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020753
298. Wong, A. C.-N., Palmeri, T. J. and Gauthier, I. 2009. Conditions for facelike expertise with objects: Becoming a Ziggerin expert-but which type?. Psychological Science, 20: 1108 - 1117. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02430.x
299. Wong, Y. K., & Gauthier, I. 2010. Holistic processing of musical notation: Dissociating failures of selective attention in experts and novices. Cognitive and Affective Behavioural Neuroscience, 10, 541 - 551. doi: 10.3758/CABN.10.4.541
300. Wright, M. and Johnston, A. 1985. Invariant tuning of motion aftereffect. Vision Research, 25: 1947 - 1955. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90019-7
301. Wühr, P. and Waszak, F. 2003. Object-based attentional selection can modulate the Stroop effect. Memory and Cognition, 31: 983 - 994. doi: 10.3758/BF03196450
302. Xiao, N. G., Quinn, P. C., Ge, L. and Lee, K. 2012. Rigid facial motion influ-ences featural, but not holistic, face processing. Vision Research, 57: 26 - 34. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.015
303. Yin, R. K. 1969. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81: 141 - 145. doi: 10.1037/h0027474
304. Yip, A. and Sinha, P. 2002. Role of color in face recognition. Perception, 31: 995 - 1003. doi: 10.1068/p3376
305. Young, A. W., Ellis, A. W., Flude, B. M., McWeeny, K. H. and Hay, D. C. 1986. Face-name interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12: 466 - 475. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.12.4.466
306. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D. and Hay, D. C. 1987. Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16: 747 - 759. doi: 10.1068/p160747
307. Zhou, G., Cheng, Z., Zhang, X. and Wong, A. C. 2012. Smaller holistic processing of faces associated with face drawing experience. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19: 157 - 162. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0174-x
308. Zhou, H., Friedman, H. S. and von der Heydt, R. 2000. Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20: 6594 - 6611.
309. Zhu, Q., Song, Y., Hu, S., Li, X., Tian, M. and Zhen, Z. 2010. Heritability of the specific cognitive ability of face perception. Current Biology, 20: 137 - 142.