Hemisphere-dependent holistic processing of familiar faces

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-13

  Ramon, Meike ^a   Rossion, Bruno ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Composite face effect; Face perception; Hemispheric asymmetries; Holistic processing; Personal familiarity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE ASYMMETRY; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; MENTAL TASK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSORY STIMULATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD;

BRAIN; FACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 82455199104     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barton J.J.S., Press D.Z., Keenan J.P., O'Connor M. Lesions of the fusiform face area impair perception of facial configuration in prosopagnosia. Neurology 2002, 58:71-78.
2. Bentin S., Allison T., Puce A., Perez E., McCarthy G. Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1996, 8:551-565.
3. Bouvier S.E., Engel S.A. Behavioral deficits and cortical damage loci in cerebral achromatopsia. Cerebral Cortex 2006, 2:183-191.
4. Bruyer R., Brysbaert M. Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: Is the Inverse Efficiency Score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean Reaction Time (RT) and the Percentage of Errors (PE)?. Psychologica Belgica 2011, 51:5-13.
5. Busigny T., Joubert S., Felician O., Ceccaldi M., Rossion B. Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: Evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:4057-4092.
6. Carbon C.C. Famous faces as icons. The illusion of being an expert in the recognition of famous faces. Perception 2008, 37:801-806.
7. de Haan E.H., van Kollenburg E.N. Lateralised processing of the internal and the external facial features of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces: A visual half-field study. Cognitive Processing 2005, 6:189-195.
8. Dolan R.J., Fink G.R., Rolls E., Booth M., Holmes A., Frackowiak R.S., et al. How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context. Nature 1997, 389:596-599.
9. Ellis H.D., Shepherd J.W. Recognition of upright and inverted faces presented in the left and right visual fields. Cortex 1975, 11:3-7.
10. Hécaen H., Anguelergues R. Agnosia for faces (prosopagnosia). Archives of Neurology 1962, 7:92-100.
11. Hellige J.B., Jonsson J.E., Michimata C. Processing from LVF, RVF and BILATERAL presentations: Examinations of metacontrol and interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition 1988, 7:39-53.
12. Hillger L.A., Koenig O. Separable mechanisms in face processing: Evidence from hemispheric specialization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1991, 3:42-58.
13. Hole G.J. Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception 1994, 23:65-74.
14. Jacques, C., Rossion, B. (2009). The initial representation of individual faces in the right occipito-temporal cortex is holistic: Electrophysiological evidence from the composite face illusion. Journal of Vision 9(6), 1-16. <>. doi: doi:10.1167/9.6.8.
15. Kuefner D., Jacques C., Prieto E.A., Rossion B. Electrophysiological correlates of the composite face illusion: Disentangling perceptual and decisional components of holistic face processing in the human brain. Brain and Cognition 2010, 74:225-238.
16. Landis T., Regard M., Bliestle A., Kleihues P. Prosopagnosia and agnosia for noncanonical views. An autopsied case. Brain 1988, 111:1287-1297.
17. Leehey S., Carey S., Diamond R., Cahn A. Upright and inverted faces: The right hemisphere knows the difference. Cortex 1978, 14:411-419.
18. Levine D.N., Calvanio R. Prosopagnosia, a defect in visual configural processing. Brain and Cognition 1989, 10:149-170.
19. Levy J., Trevarthen C., Sperry R.W. Reception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric deconnexion. Brain 1972, 95:61-78.
20. Marsolek C.J. Abstract visual-form representations in the left cerebral hemisphere. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:375-386.
21. Maurer D., Grand R.L., Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:255-260.
22. McKone E., Martini P., Nakayama K. Isolating holistic processing in faces (and perhaps objects). Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes 2003, 92-119. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. M. Peterson, G. Rhodes (Eds.).
23. Megreya A.M., Burton A.M. Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:865-876.
24. Michel F., Poncet M., Signoret J.L. Are the lesions responsible for prosopagnosia always bilateral?. Revue Neurologique 1989, 145:764-770.
25. Mohr B., Landgrebe A., Schweinberger S.R. Interhemispheric cooperation for familiar but not unfamiliar face processing. Neuropsychologia 2002, 40:1841-1848.
26. Mooney C.M. Age in the development of closure ability in children. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1957, 11:219-226.
27. Moscovitch M. Afferent and efferent models of visual perceptual asymmetries: Theoretical and empirical implications. Neuropsychologia 1986, 24:91-114.
28. Newcombe F. Selective deficits after focal cerebral injury. Hemisphere function in the human brain 1974, 311-334. Halsted Press, New York. S.J. Dimond, J.G. Beaumont (Eds.).
29. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
30. Parkin A.J., Williamson P. Cerebral lateralisation at different stages of facial processing. Cortex 1987, 23:99-110.
31. Peirce J.W., Leigh A.E., Kendrick K.M. Configurational coding, familiarity and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition in sheep. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:475-483.
32. Ramon M., Busigny T., Rossion B. Impaired holistic processing of unfamiliar individual faces in acquired prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:933-944.
33. Ramon M., Rossion B. Impaired processing of relative distances between features and of the eye region in acquired prosopagnosia - two sides of the same holistic coin?. Cortex 2010, 46:374-389.
34. Richler J.J., Gauthier I., Wenger M.J., Palmeri T.J. Holistic processing of faces: Perceptual and decisional components. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:328-342.
35. Riddoch M.J., Johnston R.A., Bracewell R.M., Boutsen L., Humphreys G.W. Are faces special? A case of pure prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2008, 25:3-26.
36. Rizzolatti G., Umiltà C., Berlucchi G. Opposite superiorities of the right and left cerebral hemispheres in discriminative reaction time to physiognomical and alphabetical material. Brain 1971, 94:431-442.
37. Rossion B. Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica 2008, 128:274-289.
38. Rossion, B., Boremanse, A. (2008). Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: Evidence from the face composite illusion. Journal of Vision, 8(4), 1-13. <>. doi: doi:10.1167/8.4.3.
39. Rossion B., Dricot L., Devolder A., Bodart J.M., Crommelinck M., De Gelder B., et al. Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:793-802.
40. Rossion B., Dricot L., Goebel R., Busigny T. Holistic face categorization in higher order visual areas of the normal and prosopagnosic brain: Toward a non-hierarchical view of face perception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2011, 10(4):225.
41. Schiltz C., Rossion B. Faces are represented holistically in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuroimage 2006, 32:1385-1394.
42. Schweinberger S.R., Sommer W. Contributions of stimulus encoding and memory search to right hemisphere superiority in face recognition: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Neuropsychologia 1991, 29:389-413.
43. Sergent J. About face: Left-hemisphere involvement in processing physiognomies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1982, 8:1-14.
44. Sergent J. Configural processing of faces in the left and the right cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:554-572.
45. Sergent J. Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1985, 11:846-861.
46. Sergent J. Face perception and the right hemisphere. Thought without language 1988, 108-131. Clarendon Press, Oxford. L. Weisskrantz (Ed.).
47. Sergent J., Bindra D. Differential hemispheric processing of faces: Methodological considerations and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin 1981, 89:541-554.
48. Sergent J., Ohta S., MacDonald B. Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. Brain 1992, 115:15-36.
49. Sergent J., Signoret J.L. Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex 1992, 2:375-388.
50. Sergent J., Villemure J.G. Prosopagnosia in a right hemispherectomized patient. Brain 1989, 112:975-995.
51. Tanaka J.W., Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human experimental psychology 1993, 46:225-245.
52. Townsend J.T., Ashby F.G. Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. Cognitive theory 1978, 199-239. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. N.J. Castellan, F. Restle (Eds.).
53. Yin R. Looking at upside down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:141-145.
54. Young A.W., Hellawell D., Hay D.C. Configurational information in face perception. Perception 1987, 16:747-759.
55. Zangenehpour S., Chaudhuri A. Patchy organization and asymmetric distribution of the neural correlates of face processing in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Current Biology 2005, 15:993-1005.