The effect of rotation on configural encoding in a face-matching task

Perception

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 445-460

  Edmonds, Andrew J ^a,b   Lewis, Michael B ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FACE; HUMAN; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; ROTATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FACE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROTATION;

EID: 34247527202     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p5530     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bartlett J C, Searcy J, 1993 "Inversion and configuration effaces" Cognitive Psychology 25 281-316
2. Boutsen L, Humphreys G W, 2003 "The effect of inversion on the encoding of normal and Thatcherized' faces" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 56 955-975
3. Carbon C C, Leder H, 2005 "When feature information comes first! Early processing of inverted faces" Perception 34 1117-1134
4. Carbon C C, Schweinberger S R, Kaufmann J M, Leder H, 2005 "The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: An event-related brain potentials study" Cognitive Brain Research 24 544-555
5. Carey S, Diamond R, 1977 "From piecemeal to configurational representation of faces" Science 195 312-314
6. Corballis M C, Zbrodoff N J, Shetzer L I, Butler P B, 1978 "Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits" Memory & Cognition 6 98-107
7. Diamond R, Carey S, 1986 "Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise" Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 107-117
8. Lewis M B, 2001 "The Lady's not for turning. Rotation of the Thatcher illusion" Perception 30 769-774
9. Lewis M B, Glenister T E, 2003 "A sideways look at configural encoding: Two different effects of face rotation" Perception 32 7-14
10. Lewis M B, Johnston R A, 1997 "The Thatcher illusion as a test of configural disruption" Perception 26 225-227
11. Murray J E, Yong E, Rhodes G, 2000 "Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces" Psychological Science 11 498-502
12. Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson A P, 1993 "What's lost in inverted faces?" Cognition 47 25-57
13. Rock I, 1973 Orientation and Form (San Diego, CA: Academic Press)
14. Schwaninger A, Mast F W, 2005 "The face-inversion effect can be explained by the capacity limitations of an orientation normalization mechanism" Japanese Psychological Research 47 216-222
15. Searcy J H, Bartlett J C, 1996 "Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces" Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Perception and Performance 22 904-915
16. Sergent J, 1984 "An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception" British Journal of Psychology 75 221-242
17. Shepard R N, Metzler J, 1971 "Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects" Science 171 701-703
18. Sturzel F, Spillmann L, 2000 "Thatcher illusion: Dependence on angle of rotation" Perception 29 937-942
19. Thompson P, 1980 "Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion" Perception 9 483-484
20. Valentine T, Bruce V, 1988 "Mental rotation of faces" Memory & Cognition 16 556-566
21. Yin R K, 1969 "Looking at upside-down faces" Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 141-145