Recovery of 3D volume from 2-tone images of novel objects

Cognition

Volumn 67, Issue 1-2, 1998, Pages 45-71

  Moore, Cassandra ^a,b   Cavanagh, Patrick ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Object recognition; Perceptual organization; Shadows; Two tone images

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LEARNING; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HUMANS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0032113481     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00014-6     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Albert, M., Hoffman, D., 1995. Genericity in spatial vision. In: Luce R.D. (Ed.), Geometric Representations of Perceptual Phenomena: Papers in honor of Tarow Indow on his 70th birthday. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 95-112.
2. Belhumeur, P.N., Yuille, A.L., Epstein, R., 1996. Learning and recognizing objects using illumination subspaces. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Object Representation for Computer Vision April, 1996.
3. Berbaum, K., Tharp, D., Mroczek, K., 1983a. Depth perception of surfaces in pictures: looking for conventions of depiction in Pandora's box. Perception 1-2, 5-20.
4. Berbaum, K., Bever, T., Chung, C.S., 1983b. Light source position in the perception of object shape. Perception 1-2, 411-416.
5. Biederman, I., 1985. Human image understanding: recent research and a theory. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 32, 29-73.
6. Biederman, I., Cooper, E.E., 1991. Size invariance in visual object priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 121-133.
7. Binford, T., 1971. Visual perception by computer. Proceedings, IEEE Conference on Systems Science and Cybernetics. Miami, FL.
8. Blum, H., 1973. Biological shape and visual science, Part 1. Journal of Theoretical Biology 38, 205-287.
9. Bregman, A.S., 1981. Asking the 'What For' question in auditory perception. In: Kubovy, M., Pomerantz, J. (Eds.), Perceptual Organization. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
10. Bregman, A.S., 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
11. Cavanagh, P., 1991. What's up in top-down processing? In: Gorea, A. (Ed.), Representations of Vision: Trends and Tacit Assumptions in Vision Research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
12. Cavanagh, P., Leclerc, Y.G., 1989. Shape from shadows. Journal of Experimental Psychology 15, 3-27.
13. Clowes, M.B., 1971. On seeing things. Artificial Intelligence 1, 79-116.
14. Dickinson, S.J., Pentland, A.P., Rosenfeld, A., 1992. From volumes to views: an approach to 3-D object recognition. CVGIP: Image Understanding 55 (2), 130-154.
15. Freeman, W.T., 1994. The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception. Nature 368 (6471), 542-545.
16. Galper, R.E., 1970. Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Sciences 194, 207-208.
17. Hayes, A., 1988. Identification of two-tone images; some implications for high- and low-spatial-frequency processes in human vision. Perception 174, 429-436.
18. Hoffman, D.D., Richards, W.A., 1985. Parts of recognition. Cognition 18, 65-96.
19. Huffman, D.A., 1971. Impossible objects as nonsense sentences. Machine Intelligence 5, 295-323.
20. Kennedy, J.M., 1974. A Psychology of Picture Perception: Images and Information. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
21. Koenderink, J.J., 1990. Solid Shape. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Lowe, D.G., 1985. Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition. Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA.
23. Lowe, D.G., Binford, T.O., 1981. The interpretation of three-dimensional structure from image curves. Proceedings of IJCAI-7 Vancouver, August, 613-618.
24. Malik, J., 1987. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. International Journal of Computer Vision 1, 73-107.
25. Marr, D., Nishihara, H.K., 1978. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society London 200, 269-294.
26. Mooney, C.M., 1957. Age in the development of closure ability in children. Canadian Journal of Psychology 114, 219-226.
27. Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S., Silverman, G.H., 1987. Stereoscopic occluding contours: a critical role in pattern recognition of background objects. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement 28, 365.
28. Perrett, D.I., Smith, P.A., Potter, D.D., Mistlin, A.J., Head, A.S., Milner, A.D., 1984. Neurons responsive to faces in the temporal cortex: studies of functional organization, sensitivity to identity, and relation to perception. Human Neurobiology 3, 197-208.
29. Peterson, M.A., Gibson, B.S., 1994. Must figure-ground organization precede object recognition? An assumption in peril. Psychological Science 5, 253-259.
30. Phillips, R.J., 1972. Why are faces hard to recognise in photographic negative? Perception and Psychophysics 12, 425-426.
31. Poggio, T.A., Hurlbert, A., 1994. Observations on cortical mechanisms for object recognition and learning. In: Koch, C., Davis J.L. (Eds.), Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Rock, I., 1984. Perception. W.H. Freeman, New York.
33. Shashua, A., 1997. On photometric issues in 3D visual recognition from a single 2D image. International Journal on Computer Vision 21 (1-2), 99-122.
34. Snodgrass, J.G., Feenan, K., 1990. Priming effects in picture fragment completion: support for the perceptual closure hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 119 (3), 276-296.
35. Srinivas, K., 1993. Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 19 (3), 582-602.
36. Stevens, K.A., 1981. The visual interpretation of surface contours. Artificial Intelligence 17, 47-74.
37. Street, R.F., 1931. A Gestalt completion test. PhD Thesis, Teachers College at Columbia University, New York.
38. Tarr, M.J., Bulthoff, H.H., 1995. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6, 1494-1505.
39. Waltz, D., 1975. Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In: Winston, P.H. (Ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, New York.
40. Witkin, A.P., Tenenbaum, J.M., 1983. On the role of structure in vision. In: Beck, J., Hope, B., Rosenfeld, A. (Eds.), Human and Machine Vision. Academic Press, New York.
41. Yonas, A., Kuskowski, M.A., Sternfels, S., 1979. The role of frames of reference in the development of responsiveness to shading information. Child Development 50, 495-500.
42. Yuille, A.L., 1991. Deformable templates for face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 31, 59-70.