The effect of face orientation on holistic processing

Perception

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1175-1186

  Mondloch, Catherine J ^a   Maurer, Daphne ^b  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54249110311     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p6048     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Barton J J S, Depak S, Malik N, 2003 "Attending to faces: change detection, familiarization, and inversion effects" Perception 32 15-28
2. Barton J J S, Keenan J P, Bass T, 2001 "Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration" British Journal of Psychology 92 527-549
3. Boutet I, Chaudhuri A, 2001 "Multistability of overlapped face stimuli is dependent upon orientation" Perception 30 743-753
4. Carey S, Diamond R, 1994 "Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children?" Visual Cognition 1 253-274
5. Collishaw S M, Hole G J, 2000 "Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity" Perception 29 893-909
6. Collishaw S M, Hole G J, 2002 "Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?" Perception 31 287-296
7. Diamond R, Carey S, 1986 "Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise" Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 107-117
8. Donnelly N, Hadwin J A, Cave K, Stevenage S, 2003 "Perceptual dominance of oriented faces mirrors the distribution of orientation tunings in inferotemporal neurons" Cognitive Brain Research 17 771-780
9. Edmonds A J, Lewis M B, 2007 "The effect of rotation on configural encoding in a face-matching task" Perception 36 446-460
10. Freire A, Lee K, Symons L A, 2000 "The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence" Perception 29 159-170
11. Gauthier I, Tarr M J, 2002 "Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behavior" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28 431-446
12. Heering A de, Houthuys S, Rossion B, 2007 "Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: Evidence from the composite face effect" Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 96 57-70
13. Hole G, 1994 "Configural factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces" Perception 23 65-74
14. Leder H, Bruce V, 2000 "When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 513-536
15. Le Grand R, Mondloch C J, Maurer D, Brent H, 2001 "Early visual experience and face processing" Nature 410 890. Correction: 2001 412 786.
16. Le Grand R, Mondloch C J, Maurer D, Brent H P, 2004 "Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation" Psychological Science 15 762-768
17. Lewis M, 2001 "The Lady's not for turning: Rotation of the Thatcher illusion" Perception 30 769-774
18. Lewis M B, Glenister T E, 2003 "A sideways look at configural encoding: Two different effects of face rotation" Perception 32 7-14
19. McKone E, Boyer B L, 2006 "Sensitivity of 4-year-olds to featural and second-order relational changes in face distinctiveness" Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 94 134-162
20. McKone E, Kanwisher N, Duchaine B, 2007 "Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?" Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 8-15
21. Malcolm G L, Leung C, Barton J J S, 2004 "Regional variation in the inversion effect for faces: Differential effects for feature shape, feature configuration, and external contour" Perception 33 1221-1231
22. Martini P, McKone E, Nakayama K, 2006 "Orientation tuning of human face processing estimate by contrast matching in transparency displays" Vision Research 46 2102-2109
23. Maurer D, Le Grand R, Mondloch C J, 2002 "The many faces of configural processing" Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 255-260
24. Michel C, Caldara R, Rossion B, 2006a "Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces" Visual Cognition 14 55-73
25. Michel C, Rossion R, Han J, Chung C, Caldara R, 2006b "Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race" Psychological Science 17 608-615
26. Mondloch C J, Le Grand R, Maurer D, 2002 "Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing" Perception 31 553-566
27. Mondloch C J, Le Grand R, Maurer D, 2003 "Early visual experience is necessary for the development of some - but not all - aspects of face processing", in The Development of Face Processing in Infancy and Early Childhood Eds O Pascalis, A Slater (New York: Nova) pp 99-117
28. Mondloch C J, Leis A, Maurer D, 2006 "Recognizing the face of Johnny, Suzy, and Me: Insensitivity to the spacing among features at 4 years of age" Child Development 77 234-243
29. Mondloch C J, Pathman T, Maurer D, Le Grand R, Schonen S de, 2007 "The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing" Visual Cognition 15 564-577
30. Mondloch C J, Thompson K, 2008, "Limitations in 4-year-old children's sensitivity to the spacing among facial features" Child Development 79 1514-1524
31. Murray J, Yong E, Rhodes G, 2000 "Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces" Psychological Science 11 492-496
32. Pellicano E, Rhodes G, 2003 "Holistic processing of faces in preschool children and adults" Psychological Science 14 618-622
33. Pellicano E, Rhodes G, Peters M, 2006 "Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces?" Developmental Science 9 270-277
34. Rhodes G, Brake S, Atkinson A P, 1993 "What's lost in inverted faces?" Cognition 47 25-57
35. Robbins R, McKone E, 2007 "No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks" Cognition 103 34-79
36. Schwaninger A, Mast F W, 2005 "The face-inversion effect can be explained by the capacity limitations of an orientation normalization mechanism" Japanese Psychological Research 47 216-222
37. Searcy J H, Bartlett J C, 1996 "Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces" Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 904-915
38. Stevenage S V, Osborne C D, 2006 "Making heads turn: The effect of familiarity and stimulus rotation on a gender-classification task" Perception 35 1485-1494
39. Stürzel F, Spillmann L, 2000 "Thatcher illusion: Dependence on angle of rotation" Perception 29 937-942
40. Tanaka J W, Farah M J, 1993 "Parts and wholes in face recognition" Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, Series A 46 225-245
41. Tanaka J W, Kay J B, Grinnell E, Stansfield B, Szechter T, 1998 "Face recognition in young children: When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" Visual Cognition 5 479-496
42. Tanaka J W, Kiefer M, Bukach C M, 2004 "A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study" Cognition 93 B1-B9
43. Tanaka J W, Sengo J A, 1997 "Features and their configuration in face recognition" Memory & Cognition 25 583-592
44. Thompson P, 1980 "Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion" Perception 9 483-484
45. Valentine T, 1988 "Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition" British Journal of Psychology 79 471-491
46. Valentine T, Bruce V, 1988 "Mental rotation of faces" Memory & Cognition 16 556-566
47. Yin R K, 1969 "Looking at upside-down faces" Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 141-145
48. Young A W, Hellawell D, Hay D C, 1987 "Configurational information in face perception" Perception 16 747-759
49. Yovel G, Kanwisher N, 2004 "Face perception: domain specific, not process specific" Neuron 44 889-898
50. Yovel G, Paller K, Levy J, 2005 "A whole face is more than the sum of its halves: Interactive processing in face perception" Visual Cognition 12 337-352