Does response interference contribute to face composite effects?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 258-263

  Richler, Jennifer J ^a   Cheung, Olivia S ^a   Wong, Alan C N ^b   Gauthier, Isabel ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; REACTION TIME;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 66849141025     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.258     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ashby, F. G., & Townsend, J. T. (1986). Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179.
2. Cheung, O. S., Richler, J. J., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (2008). Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 1327-1336.
3. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
4. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
5. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. W. (1998). What is special about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498.
6. Gatti, S. V., & Egeth, H. E. (1978). Failure of spatial selectivity in vision. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 181-184.
7. Gauthier, I., & Bukach, C. (2007). Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? Cognition, 103, 322-330.
8. Gauthier, I., Curran, T., Curby, K. M., & Collins, D. (2003). Perless ceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 428-432.
9. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (2002). Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: Bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 431-446.
10. Goffaux, V., & Rossion, B. (2006). Faces are spatial-Holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. Journal of xperimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1023-1039.
11. Hole, G. J. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23, 65-74.
12. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. P. (2004). Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychological Science, 15, 762-768.
13. MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163-203.
14. MacLeod, C. M., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Training and Stroop-like interference: Evidence for a continuum of automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 126-135.
15. Mägiste, E. (1984). Stroop tasks and dichotic translation: The development of interference patterns in bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 304-315.
16. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
17. Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, C. S., & Caldera, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608-615.
18. Mondloch, C. J., Le Grand, R., & Maurer, D. (2002). Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception, 31, 553-566.
19. Richler, J. J., Bukach, C. M., & Gauthier, I. (2009). Context influences holistic processing of nonface objects in the composite task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 530-540.
20. Richler, J. J., Gauthier, I., Wenger, M. J., & Palmeri, T. J. (2008). Holistic processing of faces: Perceptual and decisional components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 328-342.
21. Richler, J. J., Tanaka, J. W., Brown, D. D., & Gauthier, I. (2008). Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1356-1368.
22. Robbins, R., & McKone, E. (2007). No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition, 10, 34-79.
23. Singer, M. H., Lappin, J. S., & Moore, L. P. (1975). The interference of various word parts on color naming in the Stroop test. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 191-193.
24. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
25. Troje, N., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
26. Wenger, M. J., & Ingvalson, E. M. (2002). A decisional component of holistic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 872-892.
27. Wong, A. C.-N., Palmeri, T. J., & Gauthier, I. (in press). Conditions for face-like expertise with objects: Becoming a Ziggerin expert-but which type? Psychological Science.
28. Young, A., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.