Impaired face processing in early monocular deprivation from enucleation

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 137-147

  Kelly, Krista R ^a,b   Gallie, Brenda L ^a,b   Steeves, Jennifer K E ^a,b  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cortical reorganization; Face processing; Monocular enucleation; Spatial vision; Visual deprivation

Indexed keywords

COMPOSITE FACES; CONGENITAL CATARACT; CORTICAL REORGANIZATION; MONOCULAR ENUCLEATION; SPATIAL VISION; VISUAL ABILITIES; VISUAL DEPRIVATION; VISUAL SYSTEMS; VISUAL TASKS;

VISION;

BINOCULARS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENUCLEATION; FACE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RETINA TUMOR; RETINOBLASTOMA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSORY DEPRIVATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EYE ENUCLEATION; FACE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; RETINAL NEOPLASMS; RETINOBLASTOMA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; VISION, MONOCULAR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84858159161     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318240488e     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Hess RF, Howell ER. The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: Evidence for a two type classification. Vision Res 1977;17:1049-55. (Pubitemid 8209916)
2. Rogers GL, Bremer DL, Leguire LE. The contrast sensitivity function and childhood amblyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;104:64-8. (Pubitemid 17088767)
3. Levi DM, Klein SA, Wang H. Amblyopic and peripheral vernier acuity: A test-pedestal approach. Vision Res 1994;34:3265-92. (Pubitemid 24338427)
4. Lewis TL, Maurer D, Brent HP. Development of grating acuity in children treated for unilateral or bilateral congenital cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:2080-95.
5. Ellemberg D, Lewis TL, Maurer D, Brent HP. Influence of monocular deprivation during infancy on the later development of spatial and temporal vision. Vision Res 2000;40:3283-95.
6. Levi DM, McKee SP, Movshon JA. Visual deficits in anisometropia. Vision Res 2011;51:48-57.
7. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cats lateral geniculate body. J Neurophysiol 1963;26:978-93.
8. Shatz CJ, Stryker MP. Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation. J Physiol 1978;281:267-83. (Pubitemid 9015885)
9. Vital-Durand F, Garey LJ, Blakemore C. Monocular and binocular deprivation in the monkey: Morphological effects and reversibility. Brain Res 1978;158:45-64. (Pubitemid 9059990)
10. LeVay S, Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys. J Comp Neurol 1980;191:1-51. (Pubitemid 10082178)
11. Horton JC, Hocking DR. Timing of the critical period for plasticity of ocular dominance columns in macaque striate cortex. J Neurosci 1997;17:3684-709. (Pubitemid 27200595)
12. Barnes GR, Li X, Thompson B, Singh KD, Dumoulin SO, Hess RF. Decreased gray matter concentration in the lateral geniculate nuclei in human amblyopes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:1432-8.
13. Goodyear BG, Nicolle DA, Menon RS. High resolution fMRI of ocular dominance columns within the visual cortex of human amblyopes. Strabismus 2002;10:129-36. (Pubitemid 35217616)
14. Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J Neurophysiol 1965;28:1029-40.
15. Lewis TL, Maurer D. Multiple sensitive periods in human visual development: Evidence from visually deprived children. Dev Psychobiol 2005;46:163-83. (Pubitemid 40592649)
16. Smith SL, Trachtenberg JT. Experience-dependent binocular competition in the visual cortex begins at eye opening. Nat Neurosci 2007;10:370-5.
17. Johnson CA, Post RB, Chalupa LM, Lee TJ. Monocular deprivation in humans: A study of identical twins. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1982;23:135-8. (Pubitemid 12089694)
18. Birch EE, Swanson WH, Stager DR, Woody M, Everett M. Outcome after very early treatment of dense congenital unilateral cataract. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993;34:3687-99. (Pubitemid 24012009)
19. Kandel GL, Grattan PE, Bedell HE. Are the dominant eyes of amblyopes normal? Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1980;57:1-6. (Pubitemid 10001673)
20. Woo GC, Irving E. The non-amblyopic eye of a unilateral amblyope: A unique entity. Clin Exp Optom 1991;74:1-5.
21. Lewis TL, Maurer D, Tytla ME, Bowering ER, Brent HP. Vision in the "good" eye of children treated for unilateral congenital cataract. Ophthalmology 1992;99:1013-7.
22. Reed MJ, Steeves JK, Steinbach MJ, Kraft S, Gallie B. Contrast letter thresholds in the non-affected eye of strabismic and unilateral eye enucleated subjects. Vision Res 1996;36:3011-8. (Pubitemid 26326611)
23. Chatzistefanou KI, Theodossiadis GP, Damanakis AG, Ladas ID, Moschos MN, Chimonidou E. Contrast sensitivity in amblyopia: The fellow eye of untreated and successfully treated amblyopes. J AAPOS 2005;9:468-74. (Pubitemid 41423673)
24. Murphy KM, Mitchell DE. Reduced visual acuity in both eyes of monocularly deprived kittens following a short or long period of reverse occlusion. J Neurosci 1987;7:1526-36.
25. Baker DH, Meese TS, Mansouri B, Hess RF. Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:5332-8. (Pubitemid 351260948)
26. Blakemore C, Garey LJ, Vital-Durand F. The physiological effects ofmonocular deprivation and their reversal in the monkey's visual cortex. J Physiol 1978;283:223-62. (Pubitemid 9048107)
27. Pardhan S, Gilchrist J. Binocular contrast summation and inhibition in amblyopia. The influence of the interocular difference on binocular contrast sensitivity. Doc Ophthalmol 1992;82:239-48.
28. Reed MJ, Steeves JK, Steinbach MJ. A comparison of contrast letter thresholds in unilateral eye enucleated subjects and binocular and monocular control subjects. Vision Res 1997;37:2465-9. (Pubitemid 27355045)
29. Nicholas JJ, Heywood CA, Cowey A. Contrast sensitivity in one-eyed subjects. Vision Res 1996;36:175-80. (Pubitemid 126755362)
30. González EG, Steeves JK, Kraft SP, Gallie BL, Steinbach MJ. Foveal and eccentric acuity in one-eyed observers. Behav Brain Res 2002; 128:71-80. (Pubitemid 34033636)
31. Steeves JK, Gonzalez EG, Gallie BL, Steinbach MJ. Early unilateral enucleation disrupts motion processing. Vision Res 2002;42:143-50. (Pubitemid 34135929)
32. Steeves JK, Gonzalez EG, Steinbach MJ. Vision with one eye: A review of visual function following unilateral enucleation. Spat Vis 2008;21:509-29.
33. Lund RD, Land PW, Boles J. Normal and abnormal uncrossed retinotectal pathways in rats: An HRP study in adults. J Comp Neurol 1980;189:711-20. (Pubitemid 10105679)
34. Faguet J, Maranhao B, Smith SL, Trachtenberg JT. Ipsilateral eye cortical maps are uniquely sensitive to binocular plasticity. J Neurophysiol 2009;101:855-61.
35. Horton JC, Hocking DR. Effect of early monocular enucleation upon ocular dominance columns and cytochrome oxidase activity in monkey and human visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 1998;15: 289-303. (Pubitemid 28140192)
36. Rakic P. Development of visual centers in the primate brain depends on binocular competition before birth. Science 1981;214:928-31. (Pubitemid 12220098)
37. Barb SM, Rodriguez-Galindo C, Wilson MW, Phillips NS, Zou P, Scoggins MA, Li Y, Qaddoumi I, Helton KJ, Bikhazi G, Haik BG, Ogg RJ. Functional neuroimaging to characterize visual system development in children with retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:2619-26.
38. Steeves JK, Wilkinson F, Gonzalez EG, Wilson HR, Steinbach MJ. Global shape discrimination at reduced contrast in enucleated observers. Vision Res 2004;44:943-9. (Pubitemid 38264476)
39. Wilkinson F, James TW, Wilson HR, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings. Curr Biol 2000; 10:1455-8. (Pubitemid 32692876)
40. Hess RF, Wang YZ, Demanins R, Wilkinson F, Wilson HR. A deficit in strabismic amblyopia for global shape detection. Vision Res 1999; 39:901-14. (Pubitemid 29049171)
41. Lewis TL, Ellemberg D, Maurer D, Wilkinson F, Wilson HR, Dirks M, Brent HP. Sensitivity to global form in glass patterns after early visual deprivation in humans. Vision Res 2002;42:939-48. (Pubitemid 34270520)
42. Yin RK. Looking at upside-down faces. J Exper Psychol 1969;81: 141-5.
43. Kanwisher N, McDermott J, Chun MM. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J Neurosci 1997;17:4302-11. (Pubitemid 27220621)
44. Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Moylan J, Skudlarski P, Gore JC, Anderson AW. The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. J Cogn Neurosci 2000;12:495-504. (Pubitemid 30410288)
45. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2000;4:223-33. (Pubitemid 30332148)
46. Le Grand R, Cooper PA, Mondloch CJ, Lewis TL, Sagiv N, de Gelder B, Maurer D. What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia? Brain Cogn 2006;61:139-58. (Pubitemid 43775979)
47. Geldart S, Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, de Schonen S, Brent HP. The effect of early visual deprivation on the development of face processing. Dev Sci 2002;5:490-501.
48. Mondloch CJ, Le Grand R, Maurer D. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing. Perception 2002; 31:553-66.
49. Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, Brent HP. Expert face processing requires visual input to the right hemisphere during infancy. Nat Neurosci 2003;6:1108-12. (Pubitemid 37186204)
50. Le Grand R, Mondloch CJ, Maurer D, Brent HP. Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychol Sci 2004;15:762-8. (Pubitemid 39557992)
51. Steeves JK, Culham JC, Duchaine BC, Pratesi CC, Valyear KF, Schindler I, Humphrey GK, Milner AD, Goodale MA. The fusiform face area is not sufficient for face recognition: Evidence from a patient with dense prosopagnosia and no occipital face area. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:594-609. (Pubitemid 43113383)
52. Or CC, Wilson HR. Face recognition: Are viewpoint and identity processed after face detection? Vision Res 2010;50:1581-9.
53. Gilchrist A, McKone E. Early maturity of face processing in children: Local and relational distinctiveness effects in 7-year-olds. Vis Cogn 2003;10:769-93. (Pubitemid 37304110)
54. de Heering A, Houthuys S, Rossion B. Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: Evidence from the composite face effect. J Exp Child Psychol 2007;96:57-70. (Pubitemid 44742748)
55. Freire A, Lee K, Symons LA. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception 2000;29:159-70.
56. Leder H, Bruce V. When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A 2000; 53:513-36.
57. Mondloch CJ, Robbins R, Maurer D. Discrimination of facial features by adults, 10-year-olds, and cataract-reversal patients. Perception 2010;39:184-94.
58. McKone E, Yovel G. Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing. Psychon Bull Rev 2009;16:778-97.
59. Maurer D, Grand RL, Mondloch CJ. The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn Sci 2002;6:255-60. (Pubitemid 34597233)
60. Bombari D, Mast FW, Lobmaier JS. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns. Perception 2009;38:1508-21.
61. Tanaka JW, Farah MJ. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q J Exp Psychol A 1993;46:225-45.
62. Young AW, Hellawell D, Day DC. Configural information in face perception. Perception 1987;16:747-59.
63. Farah MJ, Wilson KD, Drain M, Tanaka JN. What is "special" about face perception? Psychol Rev 1998;105:482-98.
64. Gao Z, Flevaris AV, Robertson LC, Bentin S. Priming global and local processing of composite faces: Revisiting the processing-bias effect on face perception. Atten Percept Psychophys 2011;73: 1477-86.
65. Barton JJ, Radcliffe N, Cherkasova MV, Edelman J, Intriligator JM. Information processing during face recognition: The effects of familiarity, inversion, and morphing on scanning fixations. Perception 2006;35:1089-105. (Pubitemid 44619145)
66. Malcolm GL, Lanyon LJ, Fugard AJ, Barton JJ. Scan patterns during the processing of facial expression versus identity: An exploration of task-driven and stimulus-driven effects. J Vis 2008;8:21-9.
67. Macmillan NA, Creelman CD. Detection Theory: A User's Guide, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Assoc.; 2005.
68. Patel A, Maurer D, Lewis TL. The development of spatial frequency discrimination. J Vis 2010;10:pii: 41.
69. Robbins RA, Shergill Y, Maurer D, Lewis TL. Development of sensitivity to spacing versus feature changes in pictures of houses: Evidence for slow development of a general spacing detection mechanism? J Exp Child Psychol 2011;109:371-82.
70. Robbins RA, Nishimura M, Mondloch CJ, Lewis TL, Maurer D. Deficits in sensitivity to spacing after early visual deprivation in humans: A comparison of human faces, monkey faces, and houses. Dev Psychobiol 2010;52:775-81.
71. Rosa MG, Schmid LM, Calford MB. Responsiveness of cat area 17 after monocular inactivation: Limitation of topographic plasticity in adult cortex. J Physiol 1995;482(Pt 3):589-608.
72. Bisti S, Trimarchi C, Turlejski K. Prenatal monocular enucleation induces a selective loss of low-spatial-frequency cortical responses to the remaining eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:3908-12.
73. Steeves JK, Gray R, Steinbach MJ, Regan D. Accuracy of estimating time to collision using only monocular information in unilaterally enucleated observers and monocularly viewing normal controls. Vision Res 2000;40:3783-9.
74. Tootell RB, Reppas JB, Kwong KK, Malach R, Born RT, Brady TJ, Rosen BR, Belliveau JW. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1995;15:3215-30.
75. Smith AT, Greenlee MW, Singh KD, Kraemer FM, Hennig J. The processing of first-and second-order motion in human visual cortex assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). J Neurosci 1998;18:3816-30. (Pubitemid 28225688)
76. Liu CH, Collin CA, Chaudhuri A. Does face recognition rely on encoding of 3-D surface? Examining the role of shape-from-shading and shape-from-stereo. Perception 2000;29:729-43.
77. Liu CH, Ward J, Young AW. Transfer between two-and threedimensional representations of faces. Vis Cogn 2006;13:51-64. (Pubitemid 43135838)