Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 352, Issue 1358, 1997, Pages 1203-1219

  Biederman, Irving ^a   Kalocsai, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031590149     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0103     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Baylis, G. C., Rolls, E. T. & Leonard, C. M. 1987 Functional subdivisions of the temporal lobe neocortex. J. Neurosci. 7, 330-342.
2. Behrmann, M., Winocur, G. & Moscovitch, M. 1992 Dissociation between mental imagery and object recognition in a brain-damaged patient. Nuture 359, 636-637.
3. Biederman, I. 1987 Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Rev. 94, 115-147.
4. Biederman, I. & Bar, M. 1995 One-shot viewpoint invariance with nonsense objects. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, November 1995, Los Angeles.
5. Biederman, I. & Cooper, E. E. 1991 Priming contour-deleted images: evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognit. Psychol. 23, 393-419.
6. Biederman, I. & Gerhardstein, P. C. 1993 Recognizing depthrotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J. Exptl Psychol.: Human, Perception and Performance 19(6), 1162-1182.
7. Biederman, I. & Subramaniam, S. 1997 Predicting the shape similarity of objects without distinguishing viewpoint invariant properties (VIPs) or parts. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 38, 998.
8. Biederman, I., Gerhardstein, P. C., Cooper, E. E. & Nelson C. A. 1997 High level object recognition without an anterior inferior temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 35, 271-287.
9. Biederman, I., Subramaniam, S., Kalocsai, P. & Bar, M. 1997 Viewpoint-invariant information in subordinate-level object classification. In Attention and performance XVII. Cognitive regulation of performance: interaction of theory and applications (ed. D. Gopher & A. Koriat). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (In the press.)
10. Bruce, V. 1988 Recognizing faces. Hove and London, UK: Erlbaum.
11. Bruce, V. & Humphreys, G. W. 1994 Recognizing objects and faces. Visual Cognition 1, 141-180.
12. Carey, S. 1992 Becoming a face expert. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Loud. B. 335, 95-103.
13. Gesa, I. L. 1994 Of attractive librarians and lop-sided faces: development and testing of a training procedure for improving the accuracy of eyewitnesses. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Psychology, University of Southern California.
14. Cooper, E. E. & Biederman, I. 1993 Metric versus viewpoint-invariant shape differences in visual object recognition, Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 34, 1080.
15. Cooper, E. E. & Wojan.T. J. 1996 Differences in the coding of spatial relations in faces and objects. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 37, 177.
16. Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H. & Van Hoesen, G. E. 1992 Prosopagnosia: anatomic basis and behavioural mechanisms. Neuropsychologia 2, 237-246.
17. Davidoff, J. B. 1988 Prosopagnosia: a disorder of rapid spatial integration. In Perspectives on cognitive neuropsychology (ed. G. Denes, C. Semenza & P. Bisiachi), pp. 297-309. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Desimone, R. & Ungerleider, L. G. 1989 Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. In Handbook of neuropsychology, vol. 2 (ed. F. Boller & J. Grafman), ch. 14, pp. 267-299. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
19. Edelman, S. 1995 Representation of similarity in 3D object discrimination. Neural Computation 7, 407-422.
20. Enns, J. T. & Shore, D. I. 1997 Separate influences of orientation and lighting in the inverted-face effect. Perception Psychophysics 59, 2331.
21. Farah, M. J. 1990 Visual agnosia: disorders of object recognition and what they tell us about normalvision. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
22. Fiser, J., Biederman, I. & Cooper, E. E. 1997 To what extent can matching algorithms based on direct outputs of spatial filters account for human shape recognition? Spatial Vision 10, 237-271.
23. Garner, W. R. 1966 To perceive is to know. American Psychologists 31, 11-19.
24. Gauthier, I. & Tarr, M. J. 1997 Becoming a 'greeble' expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Spatial Vision. (In the press.)
25. Gibson, J. J. 1947 Motion picture testing and research. Rep. No. 7, Army Air Forces Aviation Psychology Program Research Reports, pp. 113-168.
26. Grüsser, O.-J. & Landis,T. 1991 Visual agnosias and other disturbances of visual perception and cognition. Boca Raton: CRC.
27. Hosie, J. A., Ellis, H. D. & Haig, N. D. 1988 The effect of feature displacement on the perception of well-known faces. Perception 17, 461-474.
28. Hummel, J. E. & Biederman, I. 1992 Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol. Rev. 99, 480-517.
29. Johnston, A., Hill, H. & Carman, N. 1992 Recognizing faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception 21, 365-375.
30. Jolicoeur, P. 1985 The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory Cognition 13, 289-303.
31. Kalocsai, P., Biederman, I. & Cooper, E. E. 1994 To what extent can the recognition of unfamiliar faces be accounted for by a representation of the direct output of simple cells. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 35, 1626.
32. Kanwisher, N., Chun, M. M. & McDermott, J. 1996 fMRI in individual subjects reveals loci in extrastriate cortex differentially sensitive to faces and objects. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 37, 193.
33. Kobatake, E. & Tanaka, K. 1994 Neuronal selectivities to complex object features in the ventral visual pathway of the macaque cerebral cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 71, 856-867.
34. Lades, M., Vortbrüggen, J. C., Buhmann, J., Lange, J., von der Malsburg, C., Würtz, R. P. & Konen, W. 1993 Distortion invariant object recognition in the dynamic link architecture. IEEE Trans. Computers 42, 300-311.
35. Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. 1994 View-dependent object recognition by monkeys. Current Biol. 4, 401-414.
36. Phillips, P. J. & Rauss, P. 1997 The face recognition technology (FERET.) program. Proc of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, CTAC Int. Technol. Symp (In the press.)
37. Rhodes, G. & Tremewan, T. 1994 Understanding face recognition: caricature effects, inversion, and the homogeneity problem. Visual Cognition 1, 275-311.
38. Rolls, E. T. 1992 Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Land. B 335, 11-21.
39. Rumiati, R. I., Humphreys, G. W., Riddoch, M. J. & Bateman, A. 1994 Visual object agnosia without prosopagnosia or alexia: evidence for hierarchical theories of visual object recognition. Visual Cognition 1, 181-225.
40. Sergent, J., Ohta, S. & MacDonald, B. 1992 Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing: a PET study. Brain 115, 15-29.
41. Sergent, J., Ohta, S., MacDonald, B. & Zuck, E. 1994 Segregated processing of facial identity and emotion in the human brain: a PET study. Visual Cognition 1 349-369.
42. Shepard, R. N. 1964 Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. J. Math. Psychol. 1, 54-87.
43. Shepard, R. N. & Cermak, G. W. 1973 Perceptual-cognitive explorations of a toroidal set of free-from stimuli. Cognit. Psychol. 4, 351-377.
44. Subramaniam, S. & Biederman, I. 1997 Does contrast reversal affect object identification. Investigative Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 38, 998.
45. Tanaka, J. W. & Farah, M. J. 1993 Parts and wholes in face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 46A, 225-245.
46. Tootell, R. B. H., Dale, A. M., Sereno, M. I. & Malach, R. 1996 New images from human visual cortex. Trends Neural Sci. 19, 481-489.
47. Tversky, B. & Hemenway, K. 1984 Objects, parts, and categories. J. Exp. Psychol.: General 113, 169-193.
48. Wiskott, L., Fellous, J.-M., Krüger, N. & von der Malsburg, C. 1997 Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching. PAMI. (In the press.)
49. Yin, R. K. 1969 Looking at upside down faces. J. Exp. Psychol. 81, 141-145.
50. Young, M. P. & Yamane, S. 1992 Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. Science 256, 1327-1331.
51. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D. & Hay, D. C. 1987 Configural information in face perception. Perception 16, 747-759.
52. Young, A. W., Hay, D. C., McWeeny, K. H., Finde, B. M. & Ellis, A. W. 1985 Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception 14, 737-746.