Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces?

Cognition

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 79-107

  Robbins, Rachel ^a   McKone, Elinor ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Expertise; Holistic processing; Inverted faces; Learning

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; OBJECT RECOGNITION;

INVERTED FACES;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; GENDER IDENTITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

EID: 0037403480     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00020-9     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Bartlett J.C., Searcy J. Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology. 25:(3):1993;281-316.
2. Bradshaw J.L., Wallace G. Models for the processing and identification of faces. Perception and Psychophysics. 9:(5):1971;443-448.
3. Cohen J., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. PsyScope: an interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers. 25:1993;257-271.
4. de Gelder B., Rouw R. Beyond localisation: a dynamical dual route account of face recognition. Acta Psychologia. 107:(1-3):2001;183-207.
5. de Hann M., Humphreys K., Johnson M.H. Developing a brain specialised for face perception: a converging methods approach. Developmental Psychobiology. 40:2002;200-212.
6. Diamond R., Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 115:(2):1986;107-117.
7. Donovan J.D., Radosevich D.J. A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: now you see it, now you don't. Journal of Applied Psychology. 84:(5):1999;795-805.
8. Endo M., Masame K., Maruyama K. A limited use of configural information in the perception of inverted faces. Tohoku Psychologica Folia. 49:1990;114-125.
9. Fallshore M., Schooler J.W. Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 21:(6):1995;1608-1623.
10. Farah M.J., Rabinowitz C., Quinn G.E., Liu G.T. Early commitment of neural substrates for face recognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 17:(1-3):2000;117-123.
11. Gauthier I., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., Anderson A.W. Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience. 3:(2):2000;191-197.
12. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J. Becoming a "greeble" expert: exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research. 37:(12):1997;1673-1682.
13. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J. Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 28:(2):2002;431-446.
14. Gauthier I., Williams P., Tarr M.J., Tanaka J. Training 'greeble' experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research. 38:(15-16):1998;2401-2428.
15. Hole G.J. Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception. 23:(1):1994;65-74.
16. Johnson M.H., Dziurawiec S., Ellis H., Morton J. Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition. 40:(1-2):1991;1-19.
17. Jolicoeur P. The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory and Cognition. 13:(4):1985;289-303.
18. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience. 17:(11):1997;4302-4311.
19. Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J., Maurer D., Brent H.P. Early visual experience and face processing. Nature. 410:2001;890.
20. Martini, P., McKone, E., & Nakayama, K. Orientation tuning of human face processing estimated by contrast matching in transparency displays, in preparation.
21. Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6:2002;255-260.
22. McKone, E. (in press). Isolating the special component of face recognition: peripheral identification, and a Mooney face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
23. McKone E., Grenfell T. Orientation invariance in naming rotated objects: individual differences and repetition priming. Perception and Psychophysics. 61:(8):1999;1590-1603.
24. McKone E., Martini P., Nakayama K. Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 27:(3):2001;573-599.
25. Morton J., Johnson M.H. CONSPEC and CONLERN: a two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review. 98:(2):1991;164-181.
26. Mondloch C.J., Lewis T.L., Budreau D.R., Maurer D., Dannemiller J.L., Stephens B.R., Kleiner-Gathercoal K.A. Face perception during early infancy. Psychological Science. 10:(5):1999;419-422.
27. Moscovitch M., Winocur G., Behrmann M. What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 9:(5):1997;555-604.
28. Murray J.E., Yong E., Rhodes G. Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces. Psychological Science. 11:(6):2000;492-496.
29. Rhodes G. Looking at faces: first-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception. 17:(1):1988;43-63.
30. Rhodes G., Brake S., Atkinson A.P. What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition. 47:(1):1993;25-57.
31. Sergent J. An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology. 75:(Pt 2):1984;221-242.
32. Stevenage S.V. Which twin are you? A demonstration of induced categorical perception of identical twin faces. British Journal of Psychology. 89:1998;39-57.
33. Takane Y., Sergent J. Multidimensional scaling models for reaction times and same-different judgements. Psychometrika. 48:(3):1983;393-423.
34. Tanaka J.W., Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A. 46:(2):1993;225-245.
35. Tanaka J.W., Gauthier I. Expertise in object and face recognition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 36:1997;83-125.
36. Tanaka J.W., Kay J.B., Grinnell E., Stansfield B., Szechter L. Face recognition in young children: when the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. Visual Cognition. 5:(4):1998;479-496.
37. Tanaka J.W., Sengco J.A. Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory and Cognition. 25:(5):1997;583-592.
38. Tarr M.J. Rotating objects to recognize them: a case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2:(1):1995;55-82.
39. Tarr M.J., Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology. 21:(2):1989;233-282.
40. Thompson P. Margaret Thatcher: a new illusion. Perception. 9:(4):1980;483-484.
41. Tong F., Nakayama K. Robust representations for faces: evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 25:(4):1999;1016-1035.
42. Valentine T. Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology. 79:(Pt 4):1988;471-491.
43. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 81:(1):1969;141-145.
44. Young A.W., Hellawell D., Hay D.C. Configurational information in face perception. Perception. 16:(6):1987;747-759.