Flash-lag chimeras: The role of perceived alignment in the composite face effect

Vision Research

Volumn 46, Issue 17, 2006, Pages 2757-2772

  Khurana, Beena ^a   Carter, R McKell ^b   Watanabe, Katsumi ^c   Nijhawan, Romi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Configural encoding; Face recognition; Facial form; Flash lag effect; Movement filter

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHIMERA; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; RETINA;

FACE; FAMOUS PERSONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 33646160985     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Baldo M.V.C., and Klein S.A. Extrapolation or attention shift?. Nature (London) 378 (1995) 565-566
2. Berry M.J., Brivanlou I.H., Jordan T.A., and Meister M. Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature (London) 398 (1999) 334-338
3. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 433-436
4. Bruce V., and Humphreys G.W. Recognizing objects and faces. Visual Cognition 1 (1994) 141-180
5. Bruce V., and Langton S. The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognizing the sex and identities of faces. Perception 23 (1994) 803-822
6. Burr D. Acuity for apparent vernier offset. Vision Research 19 (1979) 835-837
7. Burr D.C. Motion smear. Nature 284 (1980) 164-165
8. Cohen D. Elements or objects? Testing the movement filter hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 348-360
9. Diamond R., and Carey S. Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115 (1986) 107-117
10. Eagleman D.M., and Sejnowski T.J. Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness. Science 287 (2000) 2036-2038
11. Epstein W. Percept-percept couplings. Perception 11 (1982) 75-83
12. Farah M.J., Tanaka J.W., and Drain M. What causes the face inversion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 628-634
13. Galper R.E. Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science 19 (1970) 207-208
14. Gogel W.C., and Koslow M. The adjacency principle and induced movement. Perception & Psychophysics 11 (1972) 309-314
15. Hayes A., Morrone M.C., and Burr D. Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images. Perception 15 (1986) 595-602
16. Hochberg J. Higher-order stimuli and inter-response coupling in the perception of the visual world. In: McLeod R.B., and Pick Jr. H.L. (Eds). Perception essays in honor of James J Gibson (1974), Cornell, University Press, Ithaca, NY 17-39
17. Hogben J.H., and Di Lollo V. Perceptual integration and perceptual segregation of brief visual stimuli. Vision Research 14 (1974) 1059-1069
18. Hole G. Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception 23 (1994) 65-74
19. Hole G., George P.A., and Dunsmore V. Evidence for configurational processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives. Perception 28 (1999) 341-359
20. Johnston A., Hill H., and Carman N. Recognizing faces: Effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception 21 (1992) 365-375
21. Kemp R., McManus C., and Piggot T. Sensitivity to the displacement of facial features in negative and inverted images. Perception 19 (1990) 531-543
22. Khurana B., and Nijhawan R. Extrapolation or attention shift?. Nature (London) 378 (1995) 565-566
23. Khurana B., and Watanabe K. Priming of faces from one half to the other. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 42 (2001) 3927
24. Khurana B., Watanabe K., and Nijhawan R. The role of attention in motion extrapolation: Are moving objects 'corrected' or flashed objects attentionally delayed?. Perception 29 (2000) 675-692
25. Khurana B., Watanabe K., and Carter R.M. Configural face processes use high spatial frequencies. Perception 29 (2000) 16
26. Krekelberg B., and Lappe M. A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process. Vision Research 40 (2000) 201-215
27. Lehky S.R. Fine discrimination of faces can be performed rapidly. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (2000) 848-855
28. Liu J., Harris A., and Kanwisher N. Stages of processing in face perception: An MEG study. Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 910-916
29. Loffler G., Gordon G.E., Wilkinson F., Goren D., and Wilson H. Configural masking of faces: Evidence for high-level interactions in face perception. Vision Research 45 (2005) 2287-2297
30. Marr D. Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information (1982), W.H. Freeman, San Francisco
31. Maurer D., Le Grand R., and Mondloch C. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (2002) 255-260
32. McKone E., Martini P., and Nakayama K. Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 573-599
33. McLeod P., Driver J., and Crisp J. Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature 332 (1988) 154-155
34. McLeod P., Heywood C., Driver J., and Zihl J. Selective deficit of visual search in moving displays after extrastriate damage. Nature 339 (1989) 466-467
35. Moscovitch M., Winocur G., and Behrmann M. What is special about face recognition. Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9 (1997) 555-604
36. Nakayama K., Shimojo S., and Silverman G.H. Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception 18 (1989) 55-68
37. Nijhawan R. Misalignment of contours through the interaction of the apparent and real motion systems. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 33 (1992) 1415
38. Nijhawan R. Motion extrapolation in catching. Nature (London) 370 (1994) 256-257
39. Nijhawan R. Visual decomposition of color through motion extrapolation. Nature (London) 386 (1997) 66-69
40. Nijhawan R. Neural delays, visual motion and the flash-lag effect. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (2002) 387-393
41. O'Craven K., Downing P., and Kanwisher N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401 (1999) 584-587
42. Palmer S.E., Neff J., and Beck D. Later influences on perceptual grouping: Amodal completion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3 (1996) 75-80
43. Pelli D.G. The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 437-442
44. Phillips R.J. Why are faces hard to recognize in the photographic negative?. Perception & Psychophysics 12 (1972) 425-426
45. Purushothaman G., Patel S.S., Bedell H.E., and Ogmen H. Moving ahead through differential visual latency. Nature 396 (1988) 424
46. Rauschenberger R., and Yantis S. Masking unveils pre-amodal completion representation in visual search. Nature 410 (2001) 369-372
47. Rhodes G. Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception 17 (1988) 43-63
48. Rhodes G., Brake S., and Atkinson A.P. What's lost in inverted faces?. Cognition 47 (1993) 25-57
49. Rock I., and Brosgole L. Grouping based on phenomenal proximity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (1964) 531-538
50. Rock I., Nijhawan R., Palmer S.E., and Tudor L. Grouping based on phenomenal similarity of achromatic color. Perception 21 (1992) 779-789
51. Schulz M.F., and Sanocki T. Time course of perceptual grouping by color. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 26-30
52. Sergent J. An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology 75 (1984) 221-242
53. Sheth B., Nijhawan R., and Shimojo S. Changing objects lead briefly flashed ones. Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 489-495
54. Tanaka J.W., and Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (1993) 225-245
55. Tanaka J.W., and Sengco J.A. Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition 25 (1997) 583-592
56. Treisman A., and Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12 (1980) 97-136
57. Treue S. Climbing the cortical ladder from sensation to perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 469-471
58. Ungerleider L.G., and Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. In: Engel D.J., Goodale M.A., and Mansfield R.J. (Eds). Analysis of visual behavior (1982), MIT Press, Cambridge MA 549-585
59. Watanabe K. Visual grouping by motion precedes the relative localization between moving and flashed stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30 (2004) 504-512
60. Watanabe K., Nijhawan R., Khurana B., and Shimojo S. Global configuration of moving stimuli modulates the flash-lag effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 27 (2001) 879-894
61. Wertheimer M. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In: Ellis W.D. (Ed). A sourcebook of gestalt psychology (1950), Humanities Press, New York 71-81
62. Whitney D., Murakami I., and Cavanagh P. Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli. Vision Research 40 (2000) 137-149
63. Young A.W., Hellawell D., and Hay D.C. Configural information in face perception. Perception 16 (1987) 747-759