The Thatcher illusion as a test of configural disruption

Perception

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 225-227

  Lewis, Michael B ^a   Johnston, Robert A ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMANS; LIGHTING; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PHYSIOGNOMY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0030624001     PISSN: 03010066     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/p260225     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bartlett J C, Searcy J, 1993 "Inversion and configuration of faces" Cognitive Psychology 25 281-316
2. Bruce V, Langton S, 1994 "The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces" Perception 23 803-822
3. Johnston A, Hill H, Carman N, 1992 "Recognising faces: effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal" Perception 21 365-375
4. Kemp R, Pike G, White P, Musselman A, 1996 "Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: the role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues" Perception 25 37-52
5. Rhodes G, 1988 "Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance" Perception 17 43-63
6. Tanaka J W, Farah M J, 1993 "Parts and wholes in face recognition" The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 46 225-245
7. Thompson P, 1980 "Margaret Thatcher - a new illusion" Perception 9 483-484