When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 513-536

  Leder, Helmut ^a   Bruce, Vicki ^b  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ADULT; FACE; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0034180106     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755889     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bartlett, J.C., & Searcy, J.H. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94(2), 115-147.
3. Bruce, V., Burton, A.M., Carson, D., Hanna, E., & Mason, O. (1994). Repetition priming of face recognition. In C. Umiltà and M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 179-201). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
5. Enns, J.T., & Shore, D.I. (1997). Separate influences of orientation and lighting in the inverted-face effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(1), 23-31.
6. Farah, M.J., Tanaka, J.W., & Drain, H.M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 628-634.
7. Goldstein, A.G., & Chance, J.E. (1980). Memory for faces and schema theory. Journal of Psychology, 105, 47-59.
8. Haig, N. (1986). Exploring recognition with interchanged facial features. Perception, 15, 235-247.
9. Kemp, R., Pike, G., White, P., & Musselman, A. (1996). Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces - the role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues. Perception, 25, 37-52.
10. Leder, H. (1996). Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing. Perception, 25, 355-366.
11. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 449-473.
12. Lee, J.K., & Perrett, D. (1997). Presentation-time measures of the effects of manipulations in color space on discrimination of famous faces. Perception, 26, 733-752.
13. Lee, V.H., Kim, J.S., & Park, K.H. (1996). Automatic human face location in a complex background using motion and color information. Pattern Recognition, 29(11), 1877-1889.
14. Macho, S., & Leder, H. (1998). Your eyes only? A test of interactive influence in the processing of facial features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1486-1500.
15. Rakover, S.S., & Teucher, B. (1997). The facial inversion effects: Parts and whole relationship Perception & Psychophysics, 59(5), 752-761.
16. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., & Atkinson, A.P. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47, 25-57.
17. Searcy, J.H., & Bartlett, J.C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 904-915.
18. Tanaka, J., & Farah, M. (1991). Second-order relational properties and the inversion-effect: Testing a theory of face perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 367-372.
19. Tanaka, J., & Farah, M. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 225-245.
20. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.
21. Yin, R.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.