Isolating the Special Component of Face Recognition: Peripheral Identification and a Mooney Face

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 181-197

  McKone, Elinor ^a  

^a The Australian National University   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECOGNITION; VISION;

CUES; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0942278852     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.181     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ashbridge, E., Perrett, D. I., Jellema, T., & Oram, M. W. (2000). Effect of image orientation and size on object recognition: Responses of single units in the macaque monkey temporal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 13-34.
2. Bartlett, J., & Searcy, J. (1993). Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 281-316.
3. Behrmann, M., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (1994), Intact visual imagery and impaired visual perception in a patient with visual agnosia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 1068-1087.
4. Benton, A., & Van Allen, M. (1968). Impairment in facial recognition in patients with cerebral disease. Transactions of the American Neurological Association, 93, 38-42.
5. Boutet, I., & Chaudhuri, A. (2001). Multistability of overlapped face stimuli is dependent upon orientation. Perception, 30, 743-753.
6. Bradshaw, J. L., & Sherlock, D. (1982). Bugs and faces in the two visual fields: The analytic/holistic processing dichotomy and task sequencing. Cortex, 18, 211-226.
7. Bruce, V., Doyle, T., Dench, N., & Burton, M. (1991), Remembering facial configurations. Cognition, 38, 109-144.
8. Collishaw, S. M., & Hole, G. J. (2002). Is there a linear or nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces? Perception, 31, 287-296.
9. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
10. Corballis, M. C, Zbrodoff, N. J, Shetzer, L. I., & Butler, P. B. (1978). Decisions about identity and orientation of rotated letters and digits. Memory & Cognition, 6, 98-107.
11. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
12. Fallshore, M., & Schooler, J. W. (1995). Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1608-1623.
13. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K. D., Drain, H. M., & Tanaka, J. R. (1995). The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms. Vision Research, 35, 2089-2093.
14. Gauthier, I., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 191-197.
15. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Gregory, R. L. (1973). The confounded eye. In R. L. Gregory & E. H. Gombrich (Eds.), Illusion in nature and art (pp 49-95). London: Gerald Duckworth.
17. Hancock, P. J. B., Burton, A. M., & Bruce, V. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory & Cognition, 24, 26-40.
18. Hillger, L. A., & Koenig, O. (1991). Separable mechanisms in face processing: Evidence from hemispheric specialization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 42-58.
19. Johnston, A., Hill, H., & Carman, N. (1992). Recognising faces: Effects of lighting and direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception, 21, 365-375.
20. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disorientated natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289-303.
21. Jolicoeur, P., & Milliken, B. (1989). Identification of disoriented objects: Effects of context of prior presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 200-210.
22. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialised for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
23. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (1998). Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 57(A), 49-473.
24. Leehey, S., Carey, S., Diamond, R. & Cahn, A. (1978). Upright and inverted faces: The right hemisphere knows the difference. Cortex, 14, 411-419.
25. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. P. (2001a). Early visual experience and face processing. Nature, 410, 890.
26. Le Grand, R., Mondloch, C. J., Maurer, D., & Brent, H. P. (2001b). Correction: "Early visual experience and face processing." Nature, 412, 786.
27. Levin, D. T., & Beale, J. M. (2000). Categorical perception occurs in newly learned faces, cross-race faces, and inverted faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 386-401.
28. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260.
29. McKone, E., & Grenfell, T. (1999). Object invariance in naming rotated objects: Individual differences and repetition priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1590-1603.
30. McKone, E., & MacPherson, S. (2003). Testing facelike holistic processing for objects in within-class discrimination tasks. Manuscript in preparation.
31. McKone, E., Martini, P., & Nakayama, K. (2001). Categorical perception of face identity in noise isolates configural processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 573-599.
32. Mooney, C. M. (1957). Age in the development of closure ability in children. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 11, 219-226.
33. Morton, J., & Johnson, M. H. (1991). CONSPEC and CONLEARN: A two-process theory of infant face recognition. Psychological Review, 98, 164-181.
34. Moscovitch, M., & Moscovitch, D. A. (2000). Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 201-219.
35. Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555-604.
36. Murray, J. E., Yong, E., & Rhodes, G. (2000). Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces. Psychological Science, 11, 498-502.
37. O'Toole, A. J., Deffenbacher, K. A., Valetin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other race effect. Memory & Cognition, 22, 208-224.
38. Ramachandran, V. S. (1988). Perceiving shape from shading. Scientific American, 259, 58-65.
39. Rhodes, G. (1985). Lateralized processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 249-271.
40. Rhodes, G. (1988). Looking at faces: First-order and second-order features as determinants of facial appearance. Perception, 17, 43-63.
41. Rhodes, G. (1993). Configural coding, expertise, and the right hemisphere advantage for face recognition. Brain and Cognition, 22, 19-41.
42. Rhodes, G., Brake, S., & Atkinson, A. P. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47, 25-57.
43. Robbins, R. & McKone, E. (2003). Can holistic processing be learned for inverted faces? Cognition, 88, 79-107.
44. Rossion, B., Dricot, B., Devolder, A., Bodart, J-M., Crommelinck, M., de Gelder, B., & Zoontijes, R. (2000). Hemispheric asymmetries for whole-based and part-based face processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 793-802.
45. Sergent, J. (1985). Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 846-861.
46. Sinha, P., & Poggio, T. (1996). I think I know that face .... Nature, 384, 404.
47. Sturzel, F., & Spillman, L. (2000). Thatcher illusion: Dependence on angle of rotation. Perception, 29, 937-942.
48. Tanaka, J. W. (2001). The entry point of face recognition: Evidence for face expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 534-543.
49. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 46(A), 225-245.
50. Tanaka, J. W., & Gauthier, I. (1997). Expertise in object and face recognition. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 36, 83-125.
51. Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 583-592.
52. Tarr, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 55-82.
53. Tarr, M. J., & Bulthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
54. Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
55. Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483-484.
56. Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1999). Robust representations for faces: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1016-1035.
57. Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
58. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 43(A), 161-204.
59. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525-535.
60. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1988). Mental rotation of faces. Memory & Cognition, 16, 556-566.
61. Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology; Human Experimental Psychology, 44(A), 671-703.
62. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145.
63. Young, A. W., Ellis, A. W., Flude, B. M., McWeeny, K. H., & Hay, D. C. (1986). Face-name interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 466-475.
64. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.