Identity specific adaptation with composite faces

Visual Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 109-120

  Laurence, Sarah ^a   Hole, Graham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Composite face effect; Face adaptation; Face recognition; Facial identity; Holistic processing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPOSITE FACE; DECISION MAKING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IDENTITY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

EID: 84857345738     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2012.655805     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Benton, C. P., Etchells, P. J., Porter, G., Clark, A. P., Penton-Voak, I. S., & Nikolov, S. G. (2007). Turning the other cheek: The viewpoint dependence of facial expression after-effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 2B(174), 2131-2137.
2. Benton, C. P., Jennings, S. J., & Chatting, D. J. (2006). Viewpoint dependence in adaptation to facial identity. Vision Research, 46, 3313-3325.
3. Brunas-Wagstaff, J., Young, A. W., & Ellis, W. (1992). Repetition priming follows spontaneous but not prompted recognition of familiar faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A(3), 423-454.
4. Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Johnston, R. A. (1990). Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 361-380.
5. Fox, C. J., Oruç, I., & Barton, J. J. S. (2008). It doesn't matter how you feel: The facial identity aftereffect is invariant to changes in facial expression. Journal of Vision, 8(3), 1-13.
6. Hills, P. J., Elward, R. L., & Lewis, M. B. (2008). Identity adaptation is mediated and moderated by visualisation ability. Perception, 37, 1241-1257.
7. Hills, P. J., Elward, R. L., & Lewis, M. B. (2010). Cross-modal effects in face identity after effects and their relation to priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 876-891.
8. Hole, G. J. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23, 65-74.
9. Hole, G. J. (2011). Identity-specific face adaptation effects: Evidence for abstractive face representations. Cognition, 119, 216-228.
10. Hole, G. J., George, P., & Dunsmore, V. (1999). Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives. Perception, 28, 341-359.
11. Jeffery, L., Rhodes, G., & Busey, T. (2006). View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science, 17(6), 501-505.
12. Jeffery, L., Rhodes, G., & Busey, T. (2007). Broadly tuned, view-specific coding of face shape: Opposing figural aftereffects can be induced in different views. Vision Research, 47, 3070-3077.
13. Jiang, F., Blanz, V., & O'Toole, A. J. (2007). The role of familiarity in three-dimensional viewtransferability of face identity adaptation. Vision Research, 47, 525-531.
14. Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., & van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1377-1388.
15. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), 89-94.
16. McKone, E. (2008). Configural processing and face viewpoint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 310-327.
17. Moradi, F., Koch, C., & Shimojo, S. (2005). Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron, 45, 169-175.
18. Pichler, P., Dosani, M., Oruç, I., & Barton, J. J. S. (2011). The nature of upright and inverted face representations: An adaptation-transfer study of configuration. Cortex. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.02.005.
19. Richler, J. J., Gauthier, I., Wenger, M. J., & Palmeri, T. J. (2008). Holistic processing of faces: Perceptual and decisional components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(2), 328-342.
20. Richler, J. J., Tanaka, J. W., Brown, D. D., & Gauthier, I. (2008). Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(6), 1356-1368.
21. Robbins, R., & McKone, E. (2007). No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition, 103, 34-79.
22. Ryu, J. J., Borrmann, K., & Chaudhuri, A. (2008). Imagine Jane and identify John: Face identity after-effects induced by imagined faces. PLoS One, 3, e2195.
23. Steede, L. L., & Hole, G. J. (2006). Repetition priming and recognition of dynamic and static chimeras. Perception, 35, 1367-1382.
24. Taubert, J., & Alais, D. (2009). The composite illusion requires composite face stimuli to be biologically plausible. Vision Research, 4, 1877-1885.
25. Wegner, M. J., & Ingvalson, E. M. (2002). A decisional component of holistic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(5), 872-892.
26. Yamashita, J. A., Hardy, J. L., De Valois, K. K., & Webster, M. A. (2005). Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 420-437.
27. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. (1987). Configural information in face perception. Perception, 10, 747-759.