Rigid facial motion influences featural, but not holistic, face processing

Vision Research

Volumn 57, Issue , 2012, Pages 26-34

  Xiao, Naiqi G ^a   Quinn, Paul C ^b   Ge, Liezhong ^c   Lee, Kang ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c ZHEJIANG SCI TECH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic faces; Face composite effect; Face processing; Face recognition; Featural processing; Holistic processing; Rigid facial motion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE RECOGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL INFORMATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84863256922     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anaki D., Boyd J., Moscovitch M. Temporal integration in face perception: Evidence of configural processing of temporally separated face parts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1-19.
2. Bahrick L.E., Gogate L.J., Ruiz I. Attention and memory for faces and actions in infancy: The salience of actions over faces in dynamic events. Child Development 2002, 73:1629-1643.
3. Bruce V. Stability from variation: The case of face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 1994, 47A:5-28.
4. Bulf H., Turati C. The role of rigid motion in newborns' face recognition. Visual Cognition 2010, 18:504-512.
5. Calder A., Rhodes G., Johnson M., Haxby J. Oxford handbook of face perception 2011, Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
6. Christie F., Bruce V. The role of dynamic information in the recognition of unfamiliar faces. Memory & Cognition 1998, 26:780-790.
7. Correa A., Lupiáñez J., Madrid E., Tudela P. Temporal attention enhances early visual processing: A review and new evidence from event-related potentials. Brain Research 2006, 1076:116-128.
8. Correa A., Lupiáñez J., Tudela P. The attentional mechanism of temporal orienting: Determinants and attributes. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 169:58-68.
9. Donaldson W. Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:275-277.
10. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
11. Freire A., Lee K., Symons L.A. The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception 2000, 29:159-170.
12. Friedman A., Vuong Q.C., Spetch M.L. View combination in moving objects: The role of motion in discriminating between novel views of similar and distinctive objects by humans and pigeons. Vision Research 2009, 49:594-607.
13. Gauthier I., Klaiman C., Schultz R.T. Face composite effects reveal abnormal face processing in Autism spectrum disorders. Vision Research 2009, 49:470-478.
14. Harman K.L., Humphrey G.K. Encoding 'regular' and 'random' sequences of views of novel three-dimensional objects. Perception 1999, 28:601-615.
15. Hill H., Johnston A. Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Current Biology 2001, 11:880-885.
16. Klein R.M. Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:138-147.
17. Knappmeyer B., Thornton I.M., Bülthoff H.H. The use of facial motion and facial form during the processing of identity. Vision Research 2003, 43:1921-1936.
18. Knight B., Johnston A. The role of movement in face recognition. Visual Cognition 1997, 4:265-273.
19. Lander K., Bruce V. Recognizing famous faces: Exploring the benefits of facial motion. Ecological Psychology 2000, 12:259-272.
20. Lander K., Bruce V. The role of motion in learning new faces. Visual Cognition 2003, 10:897-912.
21. Lander K., Christie F., Bruce V. The role of movement in the recognition of famous faces. Memory & Cognition 1999, 27:974-985.
22. Lander K., Davies R. Exploring the role of characteristic motion when learning new faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:519-526.
23. Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J., Maurer D., Brent H.P. Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation. Psychological Science 2004, 15:762-768.
24. Lee K., Anzures G., Quinn P.C., Slater A., Pascalis O. Development of face processing expertise. Oxford handbook of face perception 2011, 753-778. Oxford University Press, New York, USA. A. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. Johnson, J. Haxby (Eds.).
25. Lupiáñez J., Milliken B., Solano C., Weaver B., Tipper S.P. On the strategic modulation of the time course of facilitation and inhibition of return. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology 2001, 54:753-773.
26. Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:255-260.
27. McAuliffe J., Pratt J. The role of temporal and spatial factors in the covert orienting of visual attention tasks. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung 2005, 69:285-291.
28. McKone E. Isolating the special component of face recognition: Peripheral identification and a Mooney face. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 2004, 30:181-197.
29. McKone E. Configural processing and face viewpoint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2008, 34:310-327.
30. Mondloch C.J., Maurer D. The effect of face orientation on holistic processing. Perception 2008, 37:1175-1186.
31. Mondloch C.J., Pathman T., Maurer D., Le Grand R., de Schonen S. The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:564-577.
32. O'Toole A.J., Phillips P.J., Weimer S., Roark D.A., Ayyad J., Barwick R., et al. Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: Dissecting identity with a fusion approach. Vision Research 2011, 51:74-83.
33. O'Toole A.J., Roark D.A., Abdi H. Recognizing moving faces: A psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:261-266.
34. Otsuka Y., Konishi Y., Kanazawa S., Yamaguchi M.K., Abdi H., O'Toole A.J. Recognition of moving and static faces by young infants. Child Development 2009, 80:1259-1271.
35. Pike G.E., Kemp R.I., Towell N.A., Phillips K.C. Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. Visual Cognition 1997, 4:409-437.
36. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma, D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Richler J.J., Cheung O.S., Gauthier I. Holistic processing predicts face recognition. Psychological Science 2011, 22:464-471.
38. Roark D.A., Barrett S.E., Spence M.J., Abdi H., O'Toole A.J. Psychological and neural perspectives on the role of motion in face recognition. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 2003, 2:15-46.
39. Rosenblum L.D., Yakel D.A., Baseer N., Panchal A., Nodarse B.C., Niehus R.P. Visual speech information for face recognition. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2002, 64:220-229.
40. Schiff W., Banka L., Galdi G.D.B. Recognizing people seen in events via dynamic " mug shots" The American Journal of Psychology 1986, 99:219-231.
41. Simons D.J., Levin D.T. Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1998, 5:644-649.
42. Stone J.V. Object recognition using spatiotemporal signatures. Vision Research 1998, 38:947-951.
43. Stone J.V. Object recognition: View-specificity and motion-specificity. Vision Research 1999, 39:4032-4044.
44. Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 1991, 50:184-193.
45. Vuong Q.C., Tarr M.J. Rotation direction affects object recognition. Vision Research 2004, 44:1717-1730.
46. Wallis G. The role of object motion in forging long-term representations of objects. Visual Cognition 2002, 9:233-247.
47. Wallis G., Bülthoff H.H. Effects of temporal association on recognition memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98:4800-4804.
48. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:141-145.
49. Young A.W., Hellawell D., Hay D.C. Configurational information in face perception. Perception 1987, 16:747-759.
50. Yovel G., Kanwisher N. Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron 2004, 44:889-898.