The Visual Dimension in Organizing, Organization, and Organization Research: Core Ideas, Current Developments, and Promising Avenues

Academy of Management Annals

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 489-555

  Meyer, Renate E ^a   Höllerer, Markus A ^b   Jancsary, Dennis ^a   Van Leeuwen, Theo ^c  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876317477     PISSN: 19416520     EISSN: 19416067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2013.781867     Document Type: Article

References (336)

1. Aaron, M. 2007. Spectatorship: The power of looking on, London: Wallflower Press.
2. Abraham, L. and Appiah, O. 2006. Framing news stories: The role of visual imagery in priming racial stereotypes. Howard Journal of Communications, 17 (3): 183-203. (doi:10.1080/10646170600829584)
3. Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. 2000. Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: Challenges, responses, consequences. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36 (2): 136-158. (doi:10.1177/0021886300362002)
4. Anderson, C. J. and Imperia, G. 1992. The corporate annual report: A photo analysis of male and female portrayals. The Journal of Business Communication, 29 (2): 113-128. (doi:10.1177/002194369202900201)
5. Arnheim, R. 1974. Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
6. Arnheim, R. 1982. The power of the center, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7. Assael, H., Kofron, J. and Burgi, W. 1967. Advertising performance as a function of print ad characteristics. Journal of Advertising Research, 7 (2): 20-26.
8. Bagnoli, A. 2009. Beyond the standard interview: The use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9 (5): 547-570. (doi:10.1177/1468794109343625)
9. Bal, M. 2003. Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture. Journal of Visual Culture, 2 (1): 5-32.
10. Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in sociological research, Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Barnhurst, K. G., Vari, M. and Rodríguez, Í. 2004. Mapping visual studies in communication. Journal of Communication, 54 (4): 616-644. (doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02648.x)
12. Barthes, R. 1972. Mythologies, London: Cape.
13. Barthes, R. 1977. Image, music, text, London: Fontana Press.
14. Barthes, R. 1980. La chambre claire, Paris: Le Seuil.
15. Barthes, R. 1982. L'obvie et l'obtus, Paris: Le Seuil.
16. Bateman, J. A. 2008. Multimodality and genre, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Becker, H. S. 1974. Photography and sociology. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1 (1): 3-26. (doi:10.1525/var.1974.1.1.3)
18. Becker, H. S. 1998. " Visual sociology, documentary photography, and photojournalism: It's (almost) all a matter of context ". In Image-based research: A sourcebook for qualitative researchers, Edited by: Prosser, J. 84-96. London: Falmer Press.
19. Becker, W. S. and Burke, M. J. 2012. The staff ride: An approach to qualitative data generation and analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 15 (2): 316-335. (doi:10.1177/1094428111425615)
20. Bell, E. 2012. Ways of seeingorganisational death: A critical semiotic analysis of organisational memorialisation. Visual Studies, 27 (1): 4-17. (doi:10.1080/1472586X.2012.642954)
21. Bell, E. and Davison, J. forthcoming. Visual management studies: Empirical and theoretical approaches. International Journal of Management Reviews,
22. Bell, E., Schroeder, J. E. and Warren, S. 2013. The Routledge companion to visual organization, Edited by: Bell, E., Schroeder, J. E. and Warren, S. London: Routledge.
23. Belova, O. 2006. The event of seeing: A phenomenological perspective on visual sense-making. Culture and Organization, 12 (2): 93-107. (doi:10.1080/14759550600682866)
24. Benford, R. D. and Snow, D. A. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26 (1): 611-639. (doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611)
25. Benschop, Y. and Meihuizen, H. E. 2002. Keeping up gendered appearances: Representations of gender in financial annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27 (7): 611-636.
26. Berger, J. 1972. Ways of seeing, London: British Broadcasting Corporation and Penguin Books.
27. Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. 1967. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, New York: Anchor Books.
28. Boehm, G. 1994. " Die Wiederkehr der Bilder ". In Was ist ein Bild?, Edited by: Boehm, G. 11-38. Munich: Fink.
29. Bohnsack, R. 2007. " Die dokumentarische Methode in der Bild- und Fotointerpretation ". In Die dokumentarische Methode und ihre Forschungspraxis, Edited by: Bohnsack, R., Nentwig-Gesemann, I. and Nohl, A.-M. 69-91. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
30. Bohnsack, R. 2008. The interpretation of pictures and the documentary method [64 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9 (3) Art. 26. Retrieved fromhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803267
31. Boje, D. and Smith, R. 2010. Re-storying and visualizing the changing entrepreneurial identities of Bill Gates and Richard Branson. Culture and Organization, 16 (4): 307-331. (doi:10.1080/14759551003769250)
32. Boltanski, L. and Thévenot, L. 1991. On justification: Economies of worth, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33. Bolton, A., Pole, C. and Mizen, P. 2001. Picture this: Researching child workers. Sociology, 35 (2): 501-518.
34. Borah, P. (2009). Comparing visual framing in newspapers: Hurricane Katrina versus tsunami. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(1), 50-57.
35. Bourdieu, P. 1990. Photography: A middle-brow art, Cambridge: Polity Press.
36. Bourdieu, P. 2004. The peasant and photography. Ethnography, 5 (4): 601-616. (doi:10.1177/1466138104050701)
37. Boxenbaum, E. and Rouleau, L. 2011. New knowledge products as bricolage: Metaphors and scripts in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2): 272-296. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2011.59330898)
38. Bramming, P., Hansen, B. G., Bojesen, A. and Olesen, K. G. 2012. (Im)perfect pictures: Snaplogs in performativity research. Qualitative Researchin Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7 (1): 54-71. (doi:10.1108/17465641211223465)
39. Breitbarth, T., Harris, P. and Insch, A. 2010. Pictures at an exhibition revisited: Reflections on a typology of images used in the construction of corporate social responsibility and sustainability in non-financial corporate reporting. Journal of Public Affairs, 10 (4): 238-257. (doi:10.1002/pa.344)
40. Brown, J. 2010. Accounting and visual cultural studies: Potentialities, challenges and prospects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23 (4): 482-505. (doi:10.1108/09513571011041598)
41. Bryans, P. and Mavin, S. 2006. Visual images: A technique to surface conceptions of research and researchers. Qualitative Researchin Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 1 (2): 113-128. (doi:10.1108/17465640610686370)
42. Buchanan, D. A. 1998. Representing process: The contribution of a re-engineering frame. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 18 (12): 1163-1188. (doi:10.1108/01443579810236610)
43. Buchanan, D. A. 2001. The role of photography in organization research: A reengineering case illustration. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10 (2): 151-164. (doi:10.1177/1056492601102018)
44. Bulmer, S. and Buchanan-Oliver, M. 2006. Visual rhetoric and global advertising imagery. Journal of Marketing Communications, 12 (1): 49-61. (doi:10.1080/13527260500289142)
45. Burke, K. 1989. On symbols and society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46. Burrell, G. and Dale, K. 2003. " Building better worlds? Architecture and critical management studies ". In Studying management critically, Edited by: Alvesson, M. and Wilmott, H. 177-196. London: Sage.
47. Campbell, D., McPhail, K. and Slack, R. 2009. Face work in annual reports: A study of the management of encounter through annual reports, informed by Levinas and Bauman. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (6): 907-932. (doi:10.1108/09513570910980463)
48. Campbell, N. 2012. Regarding Derrida: The tasks of visual deconstruction. Qualitative Researchin Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7 (1): 105-124. (doi:10.1108/17465641211223492)
49. Carley, K. 1993. Coding choices for textual analysis: A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23: 75-126. (doi:10.2307/271007)
50. Chaplin, E. 1994. Sociologyand visual representations, London: Routledge.
51. Cheema, A. and Bagchi, R. 2011. The effect of goal visualization on goal pursuit: Implications for consumers and managers. Journal of Marketing, 75: 109-123. (doi:10.1509/jmkg.75.2.109)
52. Cho, C. H., Phillips, J. R., Hageman, A. M. and Patten, D. M. 2009. Media richness, user trust, and perceptions of corporate social responsibility. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (6): 933-952. (doi:10.1108/09513570910980481)
53. Christmann, G. B. 2008. The power of photographs of buildings in the Dresden urban discourse: Towards a visual discourse analysis [29 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9 (3) Art. 11. Retrieved fromhttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0803115
54. Clarke, A. E. 1991. " Social worlds theory as organizational theory ". In Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss, Edited by: Maines, D. 119-158. New York: Aldine.
55. Collier, J. 1957. Photography in anthropology: A report on two experiments. American Anthropologist, 59 (5): 843-859. (doi:10.1525/aa.1957.59.5.02a00100)
56. Collier, J. and Collier, M. 1986. Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method, Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
57. Cornelissen, J. P. 2005. Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 30 (4): 751-764. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2005.18378876)
58. Cornelissen, J. P. and Durand, R. 2012. More than just novelty: Conceptual blending and causality. Academy of Management Review, 37 (1): 152-154.
59. Cornelissen, J. P., Holt, R. and Zundel, M. 2011. The role of analogy and metaphor in the framing and legitimization of strategic change. Organization Studies, 32 (12): 1701-1716. (doi:10.1177/0170840611425729)
60. Creed, W. E.D., Scully, M. A. and Austin, J. R. 2002. Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13 (5): 475-496. (doi:10.1287/orsc.13.5.475.7814)
61. Cummings, S. and Wilson, D. 2003. " Images of strategy". In Images of strategy, Edited by: Cummings, S. and Wilson, D. 1-40. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
62. Czarniawska, B. 2010. Translation impossible? Accounting for a city project. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23 (3): 420-437. (doi:10.1108/09513571011034361)
63. Davison, J. 2004. Sacred vestiges in financial reporting: Mythical readings guided by Mircea Eliade. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17 (3): 476-497. (doi:10.1108/09513570410545821)
64. Davison, J. 2007. Photographs and accountability: Cracking the code of an NGO. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20 (1): 133-158. (doi:10.1108/09513570710731236)
65. Davison, J. 2008. Rhetoric, repetition, reporting and the "dot.com" era: Words, pictures, intangibles. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21 (6): 791-826. (doi:10.1108/09513570810893254)
66. Davison, J. 2009. Icon, iconography, iconology: Visual branding, banking and the case of the bowler hat. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (6): 883-906. (doi:10.1108/09513570910980454)
67. Davison, J. 2010. [In]visible [in]tangibles: Visual portraits of the business élite. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35 (2): 165-183. (doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.03.003)
68. Davison, J. 2011. Barthesian perspectives on accounting communication and visual images of professional accountancy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24 (2): 250-283. (doi:10.1108/09513571111100708)
69. Davison, J., McLean, C. and Warren, S. 2012. Guest editorial: Exploring the visual in organizations and management. Qualitative Researchin Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7 (1): 5-15. (doi:10.1108/17465641211223528)
70. Davison, J. and Warren, S. 2009. Imag[in]ing accounting and accountability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (6): 845-857. (doi:10.1108/09513570910980436)
71. Deephouse, D. L. and Carter, S. M. 2005. An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (2): 329-360. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x)
72. Deephouse, D. L. and Suchman, M. C. 2008. " Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism ". In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, Edited by: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K. and Suddaby, R. 49-77. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73. Dell'Era, C. and Verganti, R. 2007. Strategies of innovation and imitation of product languages. Journal of Product Innovataion Management, 24 (6): 580-599. (doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00273.x)
74. Dellinger, K. 2002. Wearing gender and sexuality "on your sleeve": Dress norms and the importance of occupational and organizational culture at work. Gender Issues, 20 (1): 3-25. (doi:10.1007/s12147-002-0005-5)
75. Delmestri, G., Oberg, A. and Drori, G. forthcoming. The unbearable lightness of university branding: Cross-national patterns. International Studies of Management& Organization,
76. Derrida, J. 1987. The truth in painting, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
77. Derrida, J. 1993. Memoirs of the blind: The self-portrait and other ruins, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
78. DiMaggio, P. J. 1987. Classification in art. American Sociological Review, 52 (2): 440-455. (doi:10.2307/2095290)
79. DiMaggio, P. J. 1997. Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 263-287. (doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263)
80. Djonov, E. and Van Leeuwen, T. 2011. The semiotics of texture: From tactile to visual. Visual Communication, 10 (4): 541-564. (doi:10.1177/1470357211415786)
81. Dougherty, D. and Kunda, G. 1990. " Photograph analysis: A method to capture organizational belief systems ". In Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape, Edited by: Gagliardi, P. 185-206. Berlin: de Gruyter.
82. Drori, G. S., Höllerer, M. A. and Walgenbach, P. forthcoming. " The glocalization of organization and management: Issues, dimensions, and themes ". In Global themes and local variations in organization and management: Perspectives on glocalization, Edited by: Drori, G. S., Höllerer, M. A. and Walgenbach, P. New York: Routledge.
83. Duff, A. 2011. Big four accounting firms' annual reviews: A photo analysis of gender and race portrayals. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22 (1): 20-38. (doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2010.05.001)
84. Durand, J. 1970. Rhétorique et image publicitaire. Communications, 15: 70-93. (doi:10.3406/comm.1970.1215)
85. Durand, R. and Vaara, E. 2009. Causation, counterfactuals and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (12): 1245-1264. (doi:10.1002/smj.793)
86. Dutton, J. E. and Ashford, S. J. 1993. Selling issues to top management. Academy of Management Review, 18 (3): 397-428.
87. Edell, J. A. and Staelin, R. 1983. The information processing of pictures in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (1): 45-61. (doi:10.1086/208944)
88. Elkins, J. 2000. How to use your eyes, New York: Routledge.
89. Elsbach, K. D., Barr, P. S. and Hargadon, A. B. 2005. Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organization Science, 16 (4): 422-433. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0138)
90. Elsbach, K. D. and Pratt, M. G. 2007. The physical environment in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1: 181-224. (doi:10.1080/078559809)
91. Eppler, M. J. and Platts, K. W. 2009. Visual strategizing. The systematic use of visualization in the strategic-planning process. Long Range Planning, 42 (1): 42-74. (doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2008.11.005)
92. Espeland, W. N. and Stevens, M. L. 1998. Commensuration as a social process. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 313-343. (doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.313)
93. Ewenstein, B. and Whyte, J. 2007. Beyond words: Aesthetic knowledge and knowing in organizations. Organization Studies, 28 (5): 689-708. (doi:10.1177/0170840607078080)
94. Ewenstein, B. and Whyte, J. 2009. Knowledge practices in design: The role of visual representations as "epistemic objects". Organization Studies, 30 (1): 7-30. (doi:10.1177/0170840608083014)
95. Ewing, M. T., Pitt, L. F. and Murgolo-Poore, M. E. 2001. Bean couture: Using photographs and publicity to re-position the accounting profession. Public Relations Quarterly, 46 (4): 23-30.
96. Fahmy, S. 2010. Contrasting visual frames of our times: A framing analysis of English- and Arabic-language press coverage of war and terrorism. International Communication Gazette, 72 (8): 695-717. (doi:10.1177/1748048510380801)
97. Fahmy, S., Kelly, D. and Kim, Y. S. 2007. What Katrina revealed: A visual analysis of the hurricane coverage by news wires and U.S. newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84 (3): 546-561. (doi:10.1177/107769900708400309)
98. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
99. Fellmann, F. 1995. " Innere Bilder im Licht des imagic turn ". In Bilder im Geiste: Zur kognitiven und erkenntnistheoretischen Funktion piktorialer Repräsentationen, Edited by: Sachs-Hombach, K. 21-38. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
100. Fiol, M. and Huff, A. 1992. Maps for managers: Where are we? Where do we go from here?. Journal of Management Studies, 29 (3): 267-285. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00665.x)
101. Fiss, P. C. and Zajac, E. J. 2004. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49 (4): 501-534.
102. Fiss, P. C. and Zajac, E. J. 2006. The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (6): 1173-1193. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.23478255)
103. Fligstein, N. 2001. Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19 (2): 105-125. (doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00132)
104. Forceville, C. 1996. Pictorial metaphor in advertising, London: Routledge.
105. Foster, W. M., Suddaby, R., Minkus, A. and Wiebe, E. 2011. History as social memory assets: The example of Tim Hortons. Management& Organizational History, 6 (1): 101-120. (doi:10.1177/1744935910387027)
106. Foucault, M. 1979. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, New York: Vintage Books.
107. Freedberg, D. 1991. The power of images: Studies in the history and theory of response, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
108. Friedel, T. L. 2008. (Not so) crude text and images: Staging native in "big oil" advertising. Visual Studies, 23 (3): 238-254. (doi:10.1080/14725860802489908)
109. Friedland, R. and Alford, R. R. 1991. " Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions ". In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Edited by: Powell, W. W. and DiMaggio, P. J. 232-263. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
110. Gagliardi, P. 1990. Symbols and artifacts: Views of the corporate landscape, Edited by: Gagliardi, P. Berlin: de Gruyter.
111. Gagliardi, P. 2006. " Exploring the aesthetic side of organizational life ". In Handbook of organization studies, 2, Edited by: Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C. and Nord, W. R. 701-724. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
112. Gamson, W. A. and Lasch, K. E. 1983. " The political culture of social welfare policy ". In Evaluating the welfare state: Social and political perspectives, Edited by: Spiro, S. E. and Yuchtman-Yaar, E. 397-415. New York: Academic Press.
113. Gioia, D. A. and Chittipeddi, K. 1991. Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6): 433-448. (doi:10.1002/smj.4250120604)
114. Gombrich, E. H. 1960. Art and illusion. A study in the psychology of pictorial representation, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
115. Grady, J. 1996. The scope of visual sociology. Visual Sociology, 11 (2): 10-24. (doi:10.1080/14725869608583762)
116. Grady, J. 2001. Becoming a visual sociologist. Sociological Imagination, 38 (1-2): 83-119.
117. Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. and Putnam, L. 2004. The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse, Edited by: Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C. and Putnam, L. London: Sage.
118. Graves, O. F., Flesher, D. L. and Jordan, R. E. 1996. Pictures and the bottom line: The television epistemology of U.S. annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21 (1): 57-88. (doi:10.1016/0361-3682(94)00026-R)
119. Green, S. E. Jr. 2004. A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Academy of Management Review, 29 (4): 653-669.
120. Greenwood, R., Díaz, A. M., Li, S. X. and Lorente, J. C. 2010. The multiplicity of institutional logics and the heterogeneity of organizational responses. Organization Science, 21 (2): 521-539. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0453)
121. Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R. and Lounsbury, M. 2011. Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5: 317-371. (doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590299)
122. Gross, A. G. 1990. The rhetoric of science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
123. Guthey, E. and Jackson, B. 2005. CEO Portraits and the autheticity paradox. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (5): 1057-1082. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00532.x)
124. Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action, Vol. 1, Cambridge: Polity Press.
125. Hall, S. 1999. " Introduction: Looking and subjectivity ". In Visual culture: The reader, Edited by: Evans, J. and Hall, S. 309-314. London: Sage.
126. Halliday, M. A.K. 1978. Language as social semiotic, London: Edward Arnold.
127. Halliday, M. A.K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar, 2, London: Edward Arnold.
128. Hancock, P. 2005. Uncovering the semiotic in organizational aesthetics. Organization, 12 (1): 29-50. (doi:10.1177/1350508405048575)
129. Hancock, P. 2006. The spatial and temporal mediation of social change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19 (5): 619-639. (doi:10.1108/09534810610686706)
130. Hancock, P. and Tyler, M. 2007. Un/doing gender and the aesthetics of organizational performance. Gender, Work and Organization, 14 (6): 512-533. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00369.x)
131. Hardy, C. and Phillips, N. 1999. No joking matter: Discursive struggle in the Canadian refugee system. Organization Studies, 20 (1): 1-24. (doi:10.1177/0170840699201001)
132. Hargadon, A. B. and Douglas, Y. 2001. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (3): 476-501. (doi:10.2307/3094872)
133. Harper, D. 2002. Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 17 (1): 13-26. (doi:10.1080/14725860220137345)
134. Heckler, S. E. and Childers, T. L. 1992. The role of expectancy and relevancy in memory for verbal and visual information: What is incongruency?. Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (4): 475-492. (doi:10.1086/209275)
135. Heisley, D. D. and Levy, S. J. 1991. Autodriving: A photoelicitation technique. Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (3): 257-272. (doi:10.1086/209258)
136. Henderson, K. 1991. Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 16 (4): 419-447. (doi:10.1177/016224399101600402)
137. Henderson, K. 1995. The political career of a prototype: Visual representation in design engineering. Social Problems, 42 (2): 274-299. (doi:10.2307/3096905)
138. Heracleous, L. and Jacobs, C. D. 2008. Crafting strategy: The role of embodied metaphors. Long Range Planning, 41 (3): 309-325. (doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2008.02.011)
139. Hill, C. A. 2004. " The psychology of rhetorical images ". In Defining visual rhetorics, Edited by: Hill, C. A. and Helmers, M. 25-40. New York: Routledge.
140. Hill, C. A. and Helmers, M. 2004. Defining visual rhetorics, Edited by: Hill, C. A. and Helmers, M. New York: Routledge.
141. Hinings, C. R. 1988. Defending organization theory: A British view from North America. Organization Studies, 9 (1): 2-7. (doi:10.1177/017084068800900103)
142. Hjorth, D. and Steyaert, C. 2006. " American psycho/European schizo: Stories of managerial elites in a hundred images ". In Management, education and humanities, Edited by: Gagliardi, P. and Czarniawska, B. 67-97. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
143. Hjorth, D. and Steyaert, C. 2009. The politics and aesthetics of entrepreneurship, Edited by: Hjorth, D. and Steyaert, C. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
144. Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D., Meyer, R. E. and Vettori, O. forthcoming. Imageries of corporate social responsibility: Visual re-contextualization and field-level meaning. Research in the Sociologyof Organizations,
145. Holsanova, J., Rahm, H. and Holmqvist, K. 2006. Entry points and reading paths on newspaper spreads: Comparing a semiotic analysis with eye-tracking measurements. Visual Communication, 5 (1): 65-93. (doi:10.1177/1470357206061005)
146. Houston, M. J., Childers, T. L. and Heckler, S. E. 1987. Picture-word consistency and the elaborative processing of advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (4): 359-369. (doi:10.2307/3151383)
147. Humphreys, M. and Brown, A. D. 2002. Dress and identity: A Turkish case study. Journal of Management Studies, 39 (7): 927-952. (doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00318)
148. Iedema, R. 2001. Resemiotization. Semiotica, 137 (1/4): 23-46.
149. Iedema, R. 2003. Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2 (1): 29-57. (doi:10.1177/1470357203002001751)
150. Imdahl, M. 1995. " Ikonik. Bilder und ihre Anschauung ". In Was ist ein Bild?, Edited by: Boehm, G. 300-324. Munich: Fink.
151. Jeong, S.-H. 2008. Visual metaphor in advertising: Is the persuasive effect attributable to visual argumentation or metaphorical rhetoric?. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14 (1): 59-73. (doi:10.1080/14697010701717488)
152. Johnson, V. 2007. What is organizational imprinting? Cultural entrepreneurship in the founding of the Paris Opera. American Journal of Sociology, 113 (1): 97-127. (doi:10.1086/517899)
153. Justesen, L. and Mouritsen, J. 2009. The triple visual. Translations between photographs, 3-D visualizations and calculations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (6): 973-990. (doi:10.1108/09513570910980490)
154. Kamla, R. and Roberts, C. 2010. The global and the local: Arabian Gulf States and imagery in annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23 (4): 449-481. (doi:10.1108/09513571011041589)
155. Kaplan, S. 2011. Strategy and power point: An inquiry into the epistemic culture and machinery of strategy making. Organization Science, 22 (2): 320-346. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0531)
156. Kates, S. M. 1999. Making the ad perfectly queer: Marketing "normality" to the gay men's community. Journal of Advertising, 28 (1): 25-37.
157. Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
158. Knox, J. S. 2007. Visual-verbal communication on online newspaper home pages. Visual Communication, 6 (1): 19-53. (doi:10.1177/1470357207071464)
159. Kornberger, M. 2010. The brand society: How brands transform management and lifestyle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
160. Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication, New York: Routledge.
161. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design, London: Routledge.
162. Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. 2001. Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication, London: Hodder Education.
163. Kuasirikun, N. 2011. The portrayal of gender in annual reports in Thailand. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22 (1): 53-78. (doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2009.11.008)
164. Kunter, A. and Bell, E. 2006. The promise and potential of visual organizational research. Management, 9 (3): 177-197.
165. Lacan, J. 1998. The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis: The seminars of Jacques Lacan, Book XI, New York: W.W. Norton.
166. Lamot, M. and Molnár, V. 2002. The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 167-195. (doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141107)
167. Latour, B. 1986. " Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands ". In Knowledge and society: Studies in the sociology of culture. Past and present, Edited by: Kuklick, H. and Long, E. 1-40. London: Jai Press.
168. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
169. Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
170. Lawrence, T. B. and Suddaby, R. 2006. " Institutions and institutional work ". In The SAGE handbook of organization studies, Edited by: Clegg, S. R., Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B. and Nord, W. R. 215-254. London: Sage.
171. Lefsrud, L., Graves, H., & Phillips, N. (2013). Dirty oil, ethical oil: Categorical illegitimacy and the struggle over the Alberta oil sands. Working Paper. University of Alberta.
172. Lefsrud, L. and Meyer, R. E. 2012. Science or science fiction? Professionals' discursive construction of climate change. Organization Studies, 33 (11): 1477-1506. (doi:10.1177/0170840612463317)
173. Leifer, E. M. 1988. Interaction preludes to role setting: Exploratory local action. American Sociological Review, 53 (6): 865-878. (doi:10.2307/2095896)
174. Linstead, S. and Höpfl, H. 2000. The aesthetics of organization, London: Sage.
175. Livingstone, M. 2002. Vision and art: The biology of seeing, New York: Harry A. Abrams.
176. Locke, J. and Lowe, A. 2012. " Process flowcharts: Malleable visual mediators of ERP implementation ". In Imagining organizations: Performative imagery in business and beyond, Edited by: Puyou, F.-R., Quattrone, P., McLean, C. and Thrift, N. 99-125. New York: Routledge.
177. Loewenstein, J., Ocasio, W. and Jones, C. 2012. Vocabularies and vocabulary structure: A new approach linking categories, practices, and institutions. The Academy of Management Annals, 6: 41-86. (doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.660763)
178. Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (6-7): 545-564. (doi:10.1002/smj.188)
179. Lueger, M., Sandner, K., Meyer, R. and Hammerschmid, G. 2005. Contextualizing influence activities: An objective hermeneutical approach. Organization Studies, 26 (8): 1145-1168. (doi:10.1177/0170840605055265)
180. Lurie, N. H. and Mason, C. H. 2007. Visual representation: Implications for decision making. Journal of Marketing, 71 (1): 160-177. (doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.1.160)
181. Maar, C. and Burda, H. 2004. Iconic Turn: Die neue Macht der Bilder, Edited by: Maar, C. and Burda, H. Köln: DuMont.
182. Machin, D. 2004. Building the world's visual language: The increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media. Visual Communication, 3 (3): 316-336. (doi:10.1177/1470357204045785)
183. Machin, D. and Van Leeuwen, T. 2003. Global schemas and local discourses in Cosmopolitan. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7 (4): 493-2. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2003.00239.x)
184. Machin, D. and Van Leeuwen, T. 2007. Global media discourse: A critical introduction, London: Routledge.
185. Mandel, N. and Johnson, E. J. 2002. When web pages influence choice: Effects of visual primes on experts and novices. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (2): 235-245. (doi:10.1086/341573)
186. Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. 2011. The SAGE handbook of visual research methods, Edited by: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
187. Martens, M. L., Jennings, J. E. and Jennings, P. D. 2007. Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (5): 1107-1132. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2007.27169488)
188. Massironi, M. 2002. The psychology of graphic images: Seeing, drawing, communicating, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
189. Matilal, S. and Höpfl, H. 2009. Accounting for the Bhopal disaster: Footnotes and photographs. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (6): 953-972. (doi:10.1108/09513570910980472)
190. McKinstry, S. 1996. Designing the annual reports of Burton PLC from 1930 to 1994. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 21 (1): 89-111. (doi:10.1016/0361-3682(95)00016-3)
191. McQuarrie, E. F. and Mick, D. G. 1992. On resonance: A critical pluralistic inquiry into advertising rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (2): 180-197. (doi:10.1086/209295)
192. McQuarrie, E. F. and Mick, D. G. 1996. Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22 (4): 424-438. (doi:10.1086/209459)
193. McQuarrie, E. F. and Mick, D. G. 1999. Visual rhetoric in advertising: Text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (1): 37-54. (doi:10.1086/209549)
194. McQuarrie, E. F. and Mick, D. G. 2003. Visual and verbal rhetorical figures under directed processing versus incidental exposure to advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (4): 579-587. (doi:10.1086/346252)
195. McQuarrie, E. F. and Phillips, B. J. 2005. Indirect persuasion in advertising: How consumers process metaphors presented in pictures. Journal of Advertising, 34 (2): 7-20. (doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639188)
196. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1964. The primacy of perception, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
197. Merleau-Ponty, M. 1968. The visible and the invisible, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
198. Messaris, P. 1997. Visual persuasion: The role of images in advertising, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
199. Messaris, P. and Abraham, L. 2001. " The role of images in framing news stories ". In Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world, Edited by: Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H. Jr. and Grant, A. E. 215-226. New York: Routledge.
200. Meyer, A. D. 1991. Visual data in organizational research. Organization Science, 2 (2): 218-236. (doi:10.1287/orsc.2.2.218)
201. Meyer, R. E. 2004. Globale Managementkonzepte und lokaler Kontext: Organisationale Wertorientierung im österreichischen öffentlichen Diskurs, Wien: WUV.
202. Meyer, R. E. 2008. " New sociology of knowledge: Historical legacy and contributions to current debates in institutional research ". In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, Edited by: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin-Andersson, K. and Suddaby, R. 519-538. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
203. Meyer, R. E. and Boxenbaum, E. 2010. Exploring European-ness in organization research. Organization Studies, 31 (6): 737-755. (doi:10.1177/0170840610372579)
204. Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M. A. and Hammerschmid, G. forthcoming. Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration,
205. Meyer, R. E. and Höllerer, M. A. 2010. Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (6): 1241-1262. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.57317829)
206. Mills, C. W. 1940. Situated actions and vocabularies of motive. American Sociological Review, 5 (6): 904-913. (doi:10.2307/2084524)
207. Mitchell, A. A. and Olson, J. C. 1981. Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (3): 318-322. (doi:10.2307/3150973)
208. Mitchell, W. J.T. 1980. The language of images, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
209. Mitchell, W. J.T. 1994. Picture theory. Essays on verbal and visual representation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
210. Mitchell, W. J.T. 2008. Bildtheorie, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
211. Mouritsen, J., Larsen, H. T. and Buck, P. N.D. 2001. Intellectual capital and the "capable firm": Narrating, visualising and numbering for managing knowledge. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26 (7-8): 735-762. (doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00022-8)
212. Müller, M. G. 2011. " Iconography and iconology as a visual method and approach ". In The SAGE handbook of visual research methods, Edited by: Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. 283-297. London: Sage.
213. Müller-Doohm, S. 1993. " Visuelles Verstehen. Konzepte kultursoziologischer Bildhermeneutik ". In "Wirklichkeit" im Deutungsprozeß: Verstehen und Methoden in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften, Edited by: Jung, T. and Müller-Doohm, S. 438-457. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
214. Müller-Doohm, S. 1997. " Bildinterpretation als struktural-hermeneutische Symbolanalyse ". In Sozialwissenschaftliche Hermeneutik, Edited by: Hitzler, R. and Honer, A. 81-108. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
215. Navis, C. and Glynn, M. A. 2010. How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55 (3): 439-471. (doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439)
216. Nicolini, D. 2007. Studying visual practices in construction. Building Research & Information, 35 (5): 576-580. (doi:10.1080/09613210701355732)
217. Nigam, A. and Ocasio, W. 2010. Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: An inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton's health care reform initiative. Organization Science, 21 (4): 823-841. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0490)
218. Ocasio, W. 2011. Attention to attention. Organization Science, 22 (5): 1286-1296. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0602)
219. Oevermann, U., Allert, T., Konau, E. and Krambeck, J. 1979. " Die Methodologie einer "objektiven Hermeneutik" und ihre allgemeine forschungslogische Bedeutung in den Sozialwisenschaften ". In Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften, Edited by: Soeffner, H.-G. 352-434. Stuttgart: Metzler.
220. Okhuysen, G. and Bonardi, J. P. 2011. The challenges of theory building through the combination of lenses. Academy of Management Review, 26 (1): 6-12.
221. Oliver, C. 1991. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1): 145-179.
222. Oswick, C., Fleming, P. and Hanlon, G. 2011. From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the process of organizational theory building. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2): 318-337. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2011.59330932)
223. Pache, A.-C. and Santos, F. 2010. When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35 (3): 455-476. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2010.51142368)
224. Padgett, J. F. and Ansell, C. K. 1993. Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98 (6): 1259-1319. (doi:10.1086/230190)
225. Page, M. L. and Gagiotti, H. 2012. A visual inquiry into ethics and change. Qualitative Researchin Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7 (1): 72-85. (doi:10.1108/17465641211223474)
226. Panofsky, E. 1939. Studies in iconology: Humanistic themes in the art of the renaissance, New York: Oxford University Press.
227. Panofsky, E. 1957. Gothic architecture and scholasticism: An inquiry into the analogy of the arts, philosophy, and religion in the middle ages, New York: World Publishing.
228. Parker, L. D. 2009. Photo-elicitation: An ethno-historical accounting and management research prospect. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (7): 1111-1129.
229. Parry, K. 2010. A visual framing analysis of British press photography during the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict. Media, War & Conflict, 3 (1): 67-85. (doi:10.1177/1750635210353679)
230. Pauwels, L. 2005. " Introduction: The role of visual representation in the production of scientific reality ". In Visual cultures of science: Rethinking representational practices in knowledge building & science communication, Edited by: Pauwels, L. vii-xix. Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College Press.
231. Pauwels, L. 2010. Visual sociology reframed: An analytical synthesis and discussion of visual methods in social and cultural research. Sociological Methods & Research, 38 (4): 545-581. (doi:10.1177/0049124110366233)
232. Pedersen, J. and Dobbin, F. 2006. In search of identity and legitimation: Bridging organizational culture and neoinstitutionalism. American Behavioral Scientist, 49 (7): 897-907. (doi:10.1177/0002764205284798)
233. Pfeffer, J. 1982. Organizations and organization theory, Boston, MA: Pitman.
234. Phillips, B. J. 2000. The impact of verbal anchoring on consumer response to image ads. Journal of Advertising, 29 (1): 15-24.
235. Phillips, B. J. and McQuarrie, E. F. 2004. Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4 (1/2): 113-136. (doi:10.1177/1470593104044089)
236. Phillips, N. and Brown, J. L. 1993. Analyzing communication in and around organizations: A critical hermeneutic approach. Academy of Management Journal, 36 (6): 1547-1576. (doi:10.2307/256821)
237. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B. and Hardy, C. 2004. Discourse and institutions. The Academy of Management Review, 29 (4): 635-652.
238. Phillips, N. and Oswick, C. 2012. Organizational discourse: Domains, debates, and directions. The Academy of Management Annals, 6: 435-481. (doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.681558)
239. Pink, S. 2001. Doing visual ethnography, London: Sage.
240. Podolny, J. M. 2005. Status signals: A sociological study of market competition, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
241. Pollock, G. 2006. Psychoanalysis and the image: Transdisciplinary perspectives, Malden, MA: Blackwell.
242. Powell, W. W. and Sandholtz, K. W. 2012. Amphibious entrepreneurs and the emergence of organizational forms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6 (2): 94-115. (doi:10.1002/sej.1129)
243. Pratt, M. G. and Foreman, P. O. 2000. Classifying managerial responses to multiple organizational identities. The Academy of Management Review, 25 (1): 18-42.
244. Pratt, M. G. and Rafaeli, A. 1997. Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (4): 862-898. (doi:10.2307/256951)
245. Preston, A. M., Wright, C. and Young, J. J. 1996. Imag[in]ing annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21 (1): 113-137. (doi:10.1016/0361-3682(95)00032-5)
246. Preston, A. M. and Young, J. J. 2000. Constructing the global corporation and corporate constructions of the global: A picture essay. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25 (4-5): 427-449. (doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00066-X)
247. Purdy, J. M. and Gray, B. 2009. Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (2): 355-380. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2009.37308255)
248. Puyou, F.-R., Quattrone, P., McLean, C. and Thrift, N. 2012. Imagining organizations: Performative imagery in business and beyond, Edited by: Puyou, F.-R., Quattrone, P., McLean, C. and Thrift, N. New York: Routledge.
249. Quattrone, P. 2009. Books to be practiced: Memory, the power of the visual, and the success of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34 (1): 85-118. (doi:10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.001)
250. Raab, J. 2008. Visuelle Wissenssoziologie: Theoretische Konzeption und materiale Analysen, Konstanz: UVK.
251. Rafaeli, A. and Pratt, M. G. 1993. Tailored meanings: On the meaning and impact of organizational dress. Academy of Management Rewiew, 18 (1): 32-55.
252. Rafaeli, A. and Vilnai-Yavetz, I. 2004. Emotion as a connection of physical artifacts and organizations. Organization Science, 15 (6): 671-686. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0083)
253. Rao, H., Monin, P. and Durand, R. 2003. Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. The American Journal of Sociology, 108 (4): 795-843. (doi:10.1086/367917)
254. Ravasi, D. and Stigliani, I. 2012. Product design: A review and research agenda for management studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14 (4): 464-488. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00330.x)
255. Ray, J. L. and Smith, A. D. 2012. Using photographs to research organizations: Evidence, considerations, and application in a field study. Organizational Research Methods, 15 (2): 288-315. (doi:10.1177/1094428111431110)
256. Rindova, V. and Petkova, A. P. 2007. When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design, and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organization Science, 18 (2): 217-232. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1060.0233)
257. Rindova, V. and Schultz, M. 1998. " Identity within and identity without: Lessons from corporate and organizational identity ". In Identity in organizations: Building theory through conversation, Edited by: Whetten, D. A. and Godfrey, P. C. 46-55. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
258. Rodríguez, L. and Dimitrova, D. 2011. The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30 (1): 48-65.
259. Rorty, R. 1967. The linguistic turn: Recent essays in philosophical method, Edited by: Rorty, R. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
260. Rose, G. 2007. Visual methodologies: An introduction to the interpretation of visual materials, 2, Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
261. Sartre, J.-P. 1940. L'imaginaire: Psychologie phénoménologique de l'imagination, Paris: Gallimard.
262. Schneiberg, M. and Lounsbury, M. 2008. " Social movements and institutional analysis ". In The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism, Edited by: Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. and Suddaby, R. 650-672. London: Sage.
263. Schneider, S. C. and Dunbar, R. L.M. 1992. A psychoanalytic reading of hostile takeover events. Academy of Management Review, 17 (3): 537-567.
264. Schroeder, J. E. 2012. " Style and strategy: Snapshot aesthetics in brand culture ". In Imagining organizations: Performative imagery in business and beyond, Edited by: Puyou, F.-R., Quattrone, P., McLean, C. and Thrift, N. 129-151. New York: Routledge.
265. Schroeder, J. E. and Zwick, D. 2004. Mirrors of masculinity: Representation and identity in advertising images. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 7 (1): 21-52. (doi:10.1080/1025386042000212383)
266. Schwalbe, C. B., Silcock, W. and Keith, S. 2008. Visual framing of the early weeks of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq: Applying the master war narrative to electronic and print images. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52 (3): 448-456. (doi:10.1080/08838150802205702)
267. Schütz, A. and Luckmann, T. 1973. The structures of the life-world, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
268. Scott, L. M. 1992. Playing with pictures: Postmodernism, poststructuralism, and advertising visuals. Advances in Consumer Research, 19 (2): 596-612.
269. Scott, L. M. 1994. Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (2): 252-273. (doi:10.1086/209396)
270. Scott, L. M. and Rajeev, B. 2003. Persuasive imagery: A consumer response perspective, Edited by: Scott, L. M. and Rajeev, B. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
271. Scott, L. M. and Vargas, P. 2007. Writing with pictures: Toward a unifying theory of consumer response to images. Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (3): 341-356. (doi:10.1086/519145)
272. Scott, S. V. and Orlikowski, W. J. 2012. " Imagining technology in organizational knowledge: Entities, webs, and mangles ". In Imagining organizations: Performative imagery in business and beyond, Edited by: Puyou, F.-R., Quattrone, P., McLean, C. and Thrift, N. 83-98. New York: Routledge.
273. Shortt, H. and Warren, S. 2012. Fringe benefits: Valuing the visual in narratives of hairdressers' identities at work. Visual Studies, 27 (1): 18-34. (doi:10.1080/1472586X.2012.642955)
274. Sillince, J. A.A. 1999. The organizational setting, use and institutionalization of argumentation repertoires. Journal of Management Studies, 36 (6): 795-830. (doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00159)
275. Sillince, J. A.A. and Barker, J. R. 2012. A tropological theory of institutionalization. Organization Studies, 33 (1): 7-38. (doi:10.1177/0170840611425735)
276. Simon, H. A. 1947. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations, Chicago, IL: Macmillan.
277. Slutskaya, N., Simpson, A. and Hughes, J. 2012. Lessons from photoelicitation: Encouraging working men to speak. Qualitative Researchin Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7 (1): 16-33. (doi:10.1108/17465641211223447)
278. Smircich, L. and Morgan, G. 1982. Leadership: The management of meaning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18 (3): 257-273. (doi:10.1177/002188638201800303)
279. Smith, M. and Taffler, R. 1996. Improving the communication of accounting through cartoon graphics. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9 (2): 68-85. (doi:10.1108/09513579610116367)
280. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B. Jr., Worden, S. K. and Benford, R. D. 1986. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51 (4): 464-481. (doi:10.2307/2095581)
281. Spencer, S. 2011. Visual research methods in the social sciences: Awakening visions, New York: Routledge.
282. Stanczak, G. C. 2007. Visual research methods. Image, society, and representation, Edited by: Stanczak, G. C. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
283. Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. 1989. Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19 (3): 387-420. (doi:10.1177/030631289019003001)
284. Steyaert, C., Marti, L. and Michels, C. 2012. Multiplicity and reflexivity in organizational research: Towards a performative approach to the visual. Qualitative Researchin Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7 (1): 34-53. (doi:10.1108/17465641211223456)
285. Stiles, D. R. 2011. Disorganization, disidentification and ideological fragmentation: Verbal and pictorial evidence from a British business school. Culture and Organization, 17 (1): 5-30. (doi:10.1080/14759551.2011.530742)
286. Strang, D. and Meyer, J. W. 1993. Institutional conditions for diffusion. Theory and Society, 22 (4): 487-511. (doi:10.1007/BF00993595)
287. Strang, D. and Soule, S. A. 1998. Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24 (1): 265-290. (doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.265)
288. Strati, A. 1992. Aesthetic understanding of organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 17 (3): 568-581.
289. Strati, A. 1999. Organizations and aesthetics, London: Sage.
290. Styhre, A. 2010a. Knowledge work and practices of seeing: Epistemologies of the eye, gaze, and professional vision. Culture and Organization, 16 (4): 361-376. (doi:10.1080/14759551.2010.519931)
291. Styhre, A. 2010b. Visual culture in organizations: Theory and cases, London: Routledge.
292. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (3): 571-610.
293. Suddaby, R., Elsbach, K., Greenwood, R., Meyer, J. W. and Zilber, T. B. 2010. Organizations and their institutional environments-bringing meaning, values, and culture back in: Introduction to the special resarch forum. Academy of Management Journal, 53 (6): 1234-1240. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.57317486)
294. Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50 (1): 35-67.
295. Suddaby, R., Hardy, C. and Huy, Q. N. 2011. Where are the new theories of organization?. Academy of Management Review, 36 (2): 236-246. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2011.59330875)
296. Sweetman, P. 2009. Revealing habitus, illuminating practice: Bourdieu, photography and visual methods. The Sociological Review, 57 (3): 491-511. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01851.x)
297. Swidler, A. 1986. Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51 (2): 273-286. (doi:10.2307/2095521)
298. Sørensen, B. M. 2010. St. Paul's conversion: The aesthetic organization of labour. Organization Studies, 31 (3): 307-326. (doi:10.1177/0170840609357383)
299. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W. and Lounsbury, M. 2012. The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
300. Toulmin, S. E. 2008. The uses of argument, updated, New York: Cambridge University Press.
301. Tracey, P. 2012. Religion and organization: A critical review of current trends and future directions. The Academy of Management Annals, 6: 87-134. (doi:10.1080/19416520.2012.660761)
302. Tufte, E. R. 1997. Visual explanations: Images and quantities, evidence and narrative, Cheshire: Graphics Press.
303. Unnava, H. R. and Burnkrant, R. E. 1991. An imagery-processing view of the role of pictures in print advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (2): 226-231. (doi:10.2307/3172811)
304. Vaara, E. and Tienari, J. 2008. A discursive perspective on legitimation strategies in multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 985-993. (doi:10.5465/AMR.2008.34422019)
305. Vaara, E., Tienari, J. and Irrmann, O. 2007. " Crafting an international identity: The Nordea case ". In Organizational identity in practice, Edited by: Lerpold, L., Ravasi, D., van Rekom, J. and Soenen, G. 215-231. London: Routledge.
306. Vaara, E., Tienari, J. and Laurila, J. 2006. Pulp and paper fiction: On the discursive legitimation of global industrial restructuring. Organization Studies, 27 (6): 789-813. (doi:10.1177/0170840606061071)
307. Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Semiotics and iconography. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of visual analysis (pp. 92-118). London: Sage.
308. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005a). Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.
309. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005b). Multimodality, genre and design. In S. Norris & R.H. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 73-94). London: Routledge.
310. Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Towards a semiotics of typography. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 14(2), 139-155.
311. Van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
312. Van Leeuwen, T. (2011a). The language of colour: An introduction. London: Routledge.
313. Van Leeuwen, T. (2011b). The semiotics of decoration. In K.L. O'Halloran & B.A. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains (pp. 115-131). London: Routledge.
314. Van Leeuwen, T., & Wodak, R. (1999). Legitimizing immigration control: A discoursehistorical analysis. Discourse Studies, 1(1), 83-118.
315. Vásquez, C. and Cooren, F. 2012. " Imagining passion in action: An analysis of translation and treason ". In Imagining organizations: Performative imagery in business and beyond, Edited by: Puyou, F.-R., Quattrone, P., McLean, C. and Thrift, N. 191-212. New York: Routledge.
316. Venkatraman, M. and Nelson, T. 2008. From servicescape to consumptionscape: A photo-elicitation study of Starbucks in the new China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (6): 1010-1026. (doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400353)
317. Vince, R. and Broussine, M. 1996. Paradox, defense and attachment: Accessing and working with emotions and relations underlying organizational change. Organization Studies, 17 (1): 1-21. (doi:10.1177/017084069601700101)
318. Vince, R. and Warren, S. 2012. " Participatory visual methods ". In Qualitative organizational resarch: Core methods and current challenges, Edited by: Cassell, C. and Symon, G. 275-295. London: Sage.
319. Voronov, M. and Vince, R. 2012. Integrating emotions into the analysis of institutional work. Academy of Management Review, 37 (1): 58-81.
320. Wagner, J. 2002. Contrasting images, complementary trajectories: Sociology, visual sociology and visual research. Visual Studies, 17 (2): 160-171. (doi:10.1080/1472586022000032233)
321. Warren, S. 2002. "Show me how it feels to work here": Using photography to research organizational aesthetics. ephemera, 2 (3): 224-245.
322. Warren, S. 2005. Photography and voice in critical qualitative management research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18 (6): 861-882. (doi:10.1108/09513570510627748)
323. Warren, S. 2008. Empirical challenges in organizational aesthetics research: Towards a sensual methodology. Organization Studies, 29 (4): 559-580. (doi:10.1177/0170840607083104)
324. Warren, S. 2012. Psychoanalysis, collective viewing and the "social photo matrix" in organizational research. Qualitative Researchin Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7 (1): 86-104. (doi:10.1108/17465641211223483)
325. Wasserman, V. and Frenkel, M. 2011. Organizational aesthetics: Caught between identity regulation and culture jamming. Organization Science, 22 (2): 503-521. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0583)
326. Weber, K. and Dacin, T. 2011. The cultural construction of organizational life. Organization Science, 22 (2): 286-298. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0632)
327. Weick, K. E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
328. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. and Obstfeld, D. 2005. Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16 (4): 409-421. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133)
329. Whetten, D. A., Felin, D. and King, B. G. 2009. The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Management, 35 (3): 537-563. (doi:10.1177/0149206308330556)
330. Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. 2009. Methods of critical discourse analysis, Edited by: Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. London: Sage.
331. Wry, T., Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M. A. 2011. Legitimating nascent identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22 (2): 449-463. (doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0613)
332. Yakura, E. K. 2002. Charting time: Timelines as temporal boundary objects. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (5): 956-970. (doi:10.2307/3069324)
333. Yanow, D. 2006. " Studying physical artifacts: An interpretive approach ". In Artifacts and organizations: Beyond mere symbolism, Edited by: Rafaeli, A. and Pratt, M. G. 41-60. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
334. Yantis, S. 2001. Visual perception: Essential reading, Edited by: Yantis, S. London: Taylor & Francis.
335. Zerubavel, E. 1996. Lumping and splitting: Notes on social classification. Sociological Forum, 11 (3): 421-433. (doi:10.1007/BF02408386)
336. Zilber, T. B. 2006. The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli high tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49 (2): 281-303. (doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786073)