The promise and potential of visual organizational research

Management

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 169-189

  Kunter, Aylin ^a   Bell, Emma ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846813940     PISSN: 12864892     EISSN: 12864692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/mana.093.0177     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alvesson, M. 2003 Methodology for Close Up Studies: Struggling with Closeness and Closure, Higher Education, 46: 2, 167-193.
2. Alvesson, M., and K. Sköldberg 2000 Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research, London: Sage.
3. Banks, M. 1995 Visual Research Methods, Social Research Update, 11. Retrieved 19 December 2006 from: http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU11/ SRU11.html
4. Banks, M. 1998 Visual Anthropology: Image, Object and Interpretation, in J. Presser (Ed.),Image-based Image-based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers, London: Palmer Press, 9-23.
5. Becker, H. S. 1974 Photography and Sociology, Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1(1) 3-26.
6. Becker, H. S. 1998 Visual Sociology, Documentary Photography, and Photojournalism: It's (Almost) all a Matter of Context, in J. Prosser (Ed.), Image-based Research: A Sourcebook for Qualitative Researchers, London: Falmer Press, 84-96.
7. Bell, E. 1999 The Negotiation of a Working Role in Organizational Ethnography, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2: 1, 17-37.
8. Bell, E. 2005 Historical Time and Organizational Identity: The Life and Death of Jaguar Coventry, Paper presented at the 21st European Group for Organizational Studies Colloquium, Berlin, 30 June-2 July.
9. Bell, E., and A. Bryman forthcoming The Ethics of Management Research: An Exploratory Content Analysis, British Journal of Management.
10. Bolton, A., C. Pole, and P. Mizen 2001 Picture This: Researching Child Workers, Sociology, 35: 2, 501-518.
11. Buchanan, D. A. 2001 The Role of Photography in Organization Research: A Reengineering Case Illustration, Journal of Management Inquiry, 10: 2, 151-164.
12. Chaplin, E. 1994 Sociology and Visual Representation, London: Routledge.
13. Coffey, A. 1999 The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity, London: Sage.
14. Cohen, L., and M. Tyler 2004 The Office (27 November 2003-18 January 2004), the Photographers' Gallery, London: A Review, Work Employment and Society, 18: 3, 621-629.
15. Collier, J., Jr., and M. Collier 1986 Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method, Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
16. D'Alleva, A. 2005 Methods and Theories of Art History, London: Laurence King.
17. Dougherty, D., and G. Kunda 1990 Photograph Analysis: A Method to Capture Organizational Belief Systems, in P. Gagliardi (Ed.), Symbols and Artifacts: Views of the Corporate Landscape, Berlin: De Gruyter, 185-206.
18. Hardy, C., and N. Phillips 1999 No Joking Matter: Discursive Struggle in the Canadian Refugee System, Organization Studies, 20: 1, 1-24.
19. Harper, D. 1994 On the Authority of the Image: Visual Methods at the Crossroads, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 403-412.
20. Harper, D. 2000 Reimagining Visual Methods: Galileo to Neuromancer, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 717-732.
21. Harper, D. 2005 What's New Visually?, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd edition, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 747-762.
22. Halliday, M. A. K. 1978 Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, London: Edward Arnold.
23. Jewitt, C., and R. Oyama 2001 Visual Meaning: A Social Semiotic Approach, in T. van Leeuwen and C. Jewitt (Eds.), Handbook of Visual Analysis, Sage: London, 134-156.
24. Kress, G., and T. van Leeuwen 1996 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design, Routledge: London.
25. Meyer, A. D. 1991 Visual Data in Organizational Research, Organization Science, 2: 2, 218-236.
26. Mitchell, W. J. T. 1994 Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27. Phillips, N., and J. L. Brown 1993 Analyzing Communication in and around Organizations: A Critical Hermeneutic Approach, Academy of Management Journal, 36: 6, 1547-1576.
28. Pink, S. 2001a Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media, and Representation in Research, London: Sage.
29. Pink, S. 2001b More Visualising, More Methodologies: On Video, Reflexivity and Qualitative Research, Sociological Review, 49: 4, 586-599.
30. Pink, S. 2003 Interdisciplinary Agendas in Visual Research: Re-situating Visual Anthropology, Visual Studies, 18: 2, 179-192.
31. Pink, S. 2004 Applied Visual Anthropology: Social Intervention, Visual Methodologies and Anthropological Theory, Visual Anthropology Review, 20: 1, 3-16.
32. Ruby, J. 2006 Maintaining Diversity: An Ethnographic Study of Oak Park, Illinois, Progress Reports, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University. Retrieved 19 December 2006 from: http://astro.temple.edu/~ruby/opp/
33. Schneider, S. C., and R. L. M. Dunbar 1992 A Psychoanalytic Reading of Hostile Takeover Events, Academy of Management Review, 17: 3, 537-567.
34. Strangleman, T. 2004 Ways of (not) Seeing Work: The Visual as a Blind Spot in WES?, Work Employment and Society, 18: 1, 179-192.
35. Van Maanen, J. 1988 Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
36. Warren, S. 2002 'Show Me How it Feels to Work Here': Using Photography to Research Organizational Aesthetics, Ephemera, 2: 3, 224-245. Retrieved 19 December 2006 from: http://ephemeraweb.org/joumal/2-3/2-3index.htm
37. Young, C. 2002 Incorporated (Essays by A. Farquharson, J. Kelsey and J. Millar, collaborative text by C. Young and L. Gillick), London: Film and Video Umbrella.