The potential role(s) of writing in second language development

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 321-331

  Williams, Jessica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Feedback; Hypothesis testing; Implicit and explicit knowledge; Noticing; Planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84871785861     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Adams R. L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for L2 development. Language Teaching Research 2003, 7:347-376.
2. Adams R. L2 tasks and orientation to form: A role for modality?. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2006, 152:7-34.
3. Adams R., Ross-Feldman L. Does writing influence learner attention to form?. The oral-literate connection 2008, 243-266. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. D. Belcher, A. Hirvela (Eds.).
4. Bitchener J., Knoch U. The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics 2010, 31:193-214.
5. Bitchener J., Knoch U. Raising the linguistic accuracy of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 2010, 19:207-217.
6. Brooks L., Swain M. Languaging in a collaborative setting. Multiple perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass 2009, 58-89. Taylor & Francis/Routledge, New York. A. Mackey, C. Polio (Eds.).
7. Bruton A. Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing, and even if it were.... System 2009, 37:600-613.
8. Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2009). The development of lexical proficiency in L2 speaking and writing tasks by Dutch-speaking learners of French in Brussels. Paper presented at Task-based language teaching conference, Lancaster, England.
9. Chandler J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2003, 12:267-296.
10. DeBot K. The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning 1996, 46:529-555.
11. DeKeyser R. Automaticity and automization. Cognition and second language instruction 2001, 125-151. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. Robinson (Ed.).
12. DeKeyser R. Skill acquisition theory. Theories in second language acquisition 2007, 97-112. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. B. VanPatten, J. Williams (Eds.).
13. DeKeyser R. Situating the concept of practice. Practice in a second language 2007, 1-18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R. DeKeyser (Ed.).
14. Doughty C. Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. Cognitive and second language instruction 2001, 206-257. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. Robinson (Ed.).
15. Doughty C., Williams J. Pedagogical choices in focus on form. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition 1998, 197-261. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.).
16. Ellis N. Implicit and explicit SLA and their interface. Implicit and explicit language learning 2011, 35-47. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC. C. Sanz, R. Leow (Eds.).
17. Ellis R. Interlanguage variability in narrative discourse: Style shifting in the use of the past tense. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 1987, 9:12-20.
18. Ellis R. Task-based language learning and teaching 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. Ellis R. The differential effects of three types of task planning on the fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics 2009, 30:474-509.
20. Ellis R., Sheen Y., Murakami M., Takashima H. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in English as a foreign language context. System 2008, 36:267-296.
21. Ellis R., Yuan F. The effects of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2004, 26:59-84.
22. Ellis R., Yuan F. The effects of careful within-task planning on oral and written task performance. Planning and task performance in a second language 2005, 167-192. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R. Ellis (Ed.).
23. Erlam R., Loewen S., Philp J. The roles of output-based and input-based instruction in the acquisition of L2 implicit and explicit knowledge. Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching 2009, 241-261. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, Avon, UK. R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, H. Reinders (Eds.).
24. Ferris D. Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2010, 32:181-201.
25. Fortune A. Learners' use of metalanguage in collaborative form-focused L2 output tasks. Language Awareness 2005, 14:21-38.
26. Granfeldt J. Speaking and writing in L2 French: Exploring effects on fluency, accuracy and complexity. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language use, learning and teaching 2008, 87-98. KVAB Universa Press, Wetteren. S. Van Daele, A. Housen, F. Kuiken, M. Pierrard, I. Vedder (Eds.).
27. Hanaoka.O. Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research 2007, 11:459-479.
28. Harklau L. The role of writing in classroom second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Writing 2002, 11:329-350.
29. Hartshorn J., Evans N., Merrill P., Sudweeks R., Strong-Krause D., Anderson N. Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly 2010, 44:84-109.
30. Housen A., Kuiken F. Complexity, accuracy and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 2009, 30:461-473.
31. Housen A., Pierrard M. Instructed second language acquisition: Introduction. Investigations in instructed second language acquisition 2005, 1-26. Mouton deGruyter, Berlin. A. Housen, M. Pierrard (Eds.).
32. Hulstijn J., Laufer B. Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 2001, 51:539-558.
33. Hyland K. Learning to write: Issues in theory, research and pedagogy. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language 2011, 17-35. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R.M. Manchón (Ed.).
34. Izumi S., Bigelow M. Does output promote noticing and second language acquisition?. TESOL Quarterly 2000, 34:239-278.
35. Keating G. Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language. Language Teaching Research 2008, 16:365-386.
36. Kim Y. The role of task-induced involvement and learner proficiency in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning 2008, 58:285-325.
37. Kormos, J. (2012). Differences across modality of performance: An investigation of linguistic and discourse complexity in narrative tasks. In H. Byrnes & R. Manchón (Eds.), Task-based L2 language learning: Insights from and for L2 writing. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins, in press.
38. Kuiken F., Vedder I. Noticing and the role of interaction in promoting language learning. Investigations in instructed second language acquisition 2005, 357-381. Mouton deGruyter, Berlin. A. Housen, M. Pierrard (Eds.).
39. Kuiken F., Vedder I. Task complexity and measures of linguistic performance in L2 writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics 2007, 45:261-284.
40. Kuiken F., Vedder I. Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:48-60.
41. Kuiken F., Vedder I. Task performance and linguistic performance in L2 writing and speaking: The effect of mode. Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance 2011, 91-104. John Benjamins, Philadelphia/Amsterdam. P. Robinson (Ed.).
42. Lam W. L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly 2000, 34:457-482.
43. Lapkin S., Swain M., Smith M. Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian immersion context. Modern Language Journal 2002, 86:485-507.
44. Laufer B., Hulstijn J. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics 2001, 22:1-26.
45. Long M., Robinson P. Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition 1998, 15-41. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.).
46. Lu X. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers' language development. TESOL Quarterly 2011, 45(1):36-62.
47. Mackey, A., Adams, R., Stafford, C., & Winke, P. (2002). Exploring the relationship between modified output and working memory capacity. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Salt Lake City, Utah.
48. Mackey A., Philp J., Egi T., Fujii A., Tatsumi T. Individual differences in working memory, noticing interactional feedback and L2 development. Individual differences and instructed language learning 2002, 181-209. Benjamins, Philadelphia. P. Robinson (Ed.).
49. Manchón R.M. Broadening the perspective of L2 writing scholarship: The contribution of research on foreign language writing. Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching, and research 2009, 1-19. Multilingual Matters, Bristol. R.M. Manchón (Ed.).
50. Manchón R.M. Writing to learn the language: Issues in theory and research. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language 2011, 61-82. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R.M. Manchón (Ed.).
51. Manchón R.M. The language learning potential of writing in foreign language contexts: Lessons from research. Foreign language writing. Research insights 2011, 44-64. Parlour Press, West Lafayette. M. Reichelt, T. Chimasko (Eds.).
52. Manchón R.M., Roca de Larios J. Writing to learn in FL contexts: Exploring learners' perceptions of the learning potential of L2 writing. Learning-to-write and writing-to-learn in an additional language 2011, 181-207. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R.M. Manchón (Ed.).
53. Mondria J.-A. The effects of inferring, verifying, and memorizing on the retention of L2 word meanings. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2003, 25:473-499.
54. Nassaji H., Tian J. Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research 2010, 14:397-419.
55. Niu R. Effect of task-inherent production modes on EFL learners' focus on form. Language Awareness 2009, 18:384-402.
56. Norris J., Ortega L. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 2009, 30(4):555-578.
57. Ortega L. What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. Planning and task performance in a second language 2005, 77-109. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. R. Ellis (Ed.).
58. Ortega, L. (2010). Exploring interfaces between second language writing and second language acquisition. Paper presented and Symposium on second language writing, Murcia, Spain.
59. Pichette F., de Serres L., LaFontaine M. Sentence reading and writing for second language vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics 2012, 33:66-82.
60. Polio C., Fleck C., Leder N. If only I had more time: ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing 1998, 7:43-68.
61. Qi D., Lapkin S. Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing 2001, 10:277-303.
62. Robinson P. Task complexity, task difficulty and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics 2001, 22:27-57.
63. Robinson P. Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogical tasks. Investigating tasks in formal language learning 2007, 7-26. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, Avon, UK. M. García de Mayo (Ed.).
64. Sachs R., Polio C. Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2007, 29:67-100.
65. Sagarra N. Working memory and L2 processing of redundant forms. Understanding second language process 2008, 133-147. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, Avon, UK. Z. Han (Ed.).
66. Schoonen R., Snellings P., Stevenson M., van Gelderen A. Toward a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. Writing in foreign language contexts 2009, 77-101. Multilingual Matters, Bristol. R. Manchón (Ed.).
67. Sheen Y. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 2007, 41:255-283.
68. Sheen Y. Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 2010, 32:203-234.
69. Skehan P. A cognitive approach to language learning 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
70. Storch N. Are two heads better than one? Pairwork and grammatical accuracy. System 1999, 27:363-374.
71. Storch N. How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research 2001, 5:29-53.
72. Storch N., Wigglesworth G. Writing tasks: The effects of collaboration. Investigating tasks in formal language learning 2007, 157-177. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, Avon, UK. M. García de Mayo (Ed.).
73. Swain M. Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input in second language acquisition 1985, 235-253. Newbury House, Rowley, MA. S. Gass, C. Madden (Eds.).
74. Swain M. Focus on form through conscious reflection. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition 1998, 64-81. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.).
75. Swain M. The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. Sociocultural theory and second language learning 2000, 97-114. Oxford University Press, Oxford. J. Lantolf (Ed.).
76. Swain M. Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language learning. Advanced language learning: The contributions of Halliday and Vygotsky 2006, 95-108. Continuum, London, UK. H. Byrnes (Ed.).
77. Swain M., Lapkin S. Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step toward second language learning. Applied Linguistics 1995, 16:371-391.
78. Swain M., Lapkin S. Talking it through: Two French immersion students' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research 2002, 3/4:285-304.
79. Swain M., Lapkin S., Knouzi I., Suzuki W., Brooks L. Languaging: University students learn the grammatical concept of voice in French. Modern Language Journal 2009, 93:5-29.
80. Tocalli-Beller A., Swain M. Reformulation: The cognitive conflict and L2 learning that it generates. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2005, 15:5-28.
81. Toth P. Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition. Language Learning 2006, 56:319-385.
82. Trofimovich P., Ammar A., Gatbonton E. How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory and analytical ability. Conversational interaction in second language acquisition 2007, 171-195. Oxford University Press, Oxford. A. Mackey (Ed.).
83. Truscott J. Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 2004, 13:337-343.
84. Truscott J. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16:255-272.
85. Truscott J., Hsu A.Y. Error correction, revision and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:292-305.
86. Van Beuningen C.G. Corrective feedback in L2 writing: Theoretical perspectives, empirical insights and future directions. International Journal of English Studies 2010, 10:1-27.
87. Van Beuningen C.G., De Jong N.H., Kuiken F. The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners' written accuracy. ITL Journal of Applied Linguistics 2008, 156:279-296.
88. Van Beuningen C.G., De Jong N.H., Kuiken F. Evidence of the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing. Language Learning 2012, 62:1-41.
89. VanPatten B. Input processing in adult second language acquisition. Theories in second language acquisition 2007, 115-135. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. B. VanPatten, J. Williams (Eds.).
90. Webb S. Receptive and productive vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Learning 2005, 27:33-52.
91. Weissberg R. Developing relationships in the acquisition of English syntax: Writing versus speech. Learning and Instruction 2000, 10:37-53.
92. Weissberg R. Connecting speaking and writing in second language instruction 2006, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
93. Wigglesworth G., Storch N. Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing 2009, 26:445-466.
94. Wolff D. Some reflections on the importance of writing in a foreign language. Language use, language acquisition and language history 2000, 213-226. Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, Trier. I. Plag, K. Schneider (Eds.).
95. Xu C. Overgeneralization from a narrow focus. A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing 2009, 18:270-275.
96. Yang L., Zhang L. Exploring the role of reformulations and a model text in EFL students' writing performance. Language Teaching Research 2010, 14:464-484.
97. Zhang S. Cognitive complexity and written production in English as a second language. Language Learning 1987, 37:469-481.