Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task

Language Teaching Research

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 459-479

  Hanaoka, Osamu ^a,b  

^a TOKYO INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36248995806     PISSN: 13621688     EISSN: 14770954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1362168807080963     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Adams, R. 2003: L2 output, reformulation and noticing: implications for IL development. Language Teaching Research 7: 347-76.
2. Bowles, M. and Leow, R. 2005: Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology: Expanding the scope of investigation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27: 415-40.
3. Brown, C. 1993: Factors affecting the acquisition of vocabulary: Frequency and saliency of words. In Huckin, T, Haynes, M. and Coady, J., editors, Second language reading and vocabulary learning, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 263-86.
4. Ellis, R. 1995: Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly 29: 87-105.
5. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H. and Loewen, S. 2001: Preemptive Focus on Form in the ESL Classroom. TESOL Quarterly 35: 407-32.
6. Hanaoka, O. 2006: Exploring the role of models in promoting noticing in L2 writing. JACET Bulletin 42: 1-13.
7. Izumi, S. 2000: Promoting noticing and SLA: an empirical study of the effects of output and input enhancement on ESL relativization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
8. Izumi, S. 2002: Output, input enhancement, and the Noticing Hypothesis: an experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24: 541-77.
9. Izumi, S. 2003: Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: in search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics 24: 168-96.
10. Izumi, S., Bigelow, M., Fujiwara, M. and Fearnow, S. 1999: Testing the output hypothesis: effects of output on noticing and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 21: 421-52.
11. Johnson, K. 1988: Mistake correction. ELT Journal 42: 89-96.
12. Jourdenais, R. 2001: Cognition, instruction and protocol analysis. In Robinson, P., editor, Cognition and second language instruction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 354-75.
13. Kowal, M. and Swain, M. 1994: Using collaborative language production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness 3: 73-93.
14. Kowal, M. and Swain, M. 1997: From semantic to syntactic processing: how can we promote it in the immersion classroom? In Johnson, R.K. and Swain, M, editors, Immersion education: international perspectives, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 284-309.
15. Lapkin, S., Swain, M. and Smith, M. 2002: Reformulation and the learning of French pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. Modern Language Journal 86: 485-507.
16. Leow, R. and Morgan-Short, K. 2004: To think aloud or not to think aloud: the issue of reactivity in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24, 35-58.
17. Long, M. 1991: Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R. and Kramsch, C., editors, Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39-52.
18. Long, M. and Robinson, P. 1998: Focus on form: theory, research and practice. In Doughty, C. and Williams, J., editors, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15-41.
19. Mackey, A., Gass, S. and McDonough, K. 2000: How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22: 471-97.
20. Morgan-Short, K. and Bowden, H.W. 2006: Processing instruction and meaningful output-based instruction: effects on second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28: 31-65.
21. Nation, I.S.P. 2001: Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Qi, D.S. and Lapkin, S. 2001: Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task. Journal of Second Language Writing 10: 277-303.
23. Robinson, P. 1995: Review article: Attention, memory, and the "noticing" hypothesis. Language Learning 45: 283-331.
24. Schmidt, R. 1990: The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11: 129-58.
25. Schmidt, R. 1995: Consciousness and foreign language learning: a tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Schmidt. R., editor, Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Technical Report No. 9), Honolulu: University of Hawai'i, 1-63.
26. Schmidt, R. 2001: Attention. In Robinson, P., editor, Cognition and second language instruction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-32.
27. Schmidt, R. and Frota, S. 1986: Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: a case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In Day, R., editor, Talking to learn: conversation in second language acquisition, Rowley, MA: Newbury House, 237-326.
28. Shehadeh, A. 2002: Comprehensible output, from occurrence to acquisition: an agenda for acquisitional research. Language Learning 52: 597-647.
29. Skehan, P. 1998: A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Swain, M. 1995: Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. and Seidlhofer, B., editors, Principle and practice in applied linguistics: studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 125-44.
31. Swain, M. 1998: Focus on form through conscious reflection. In Doughty, C. and Williams, J., editors, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 64-81.
32. Swain, M. 2005: The output hypothesis: theory and research. In Hinkel, E., editor, Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 471-83.
33. Swain, M. and Lapkin, S. 1995: Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: a step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics 16: 371-91.
34. Swain, M. 2002: Talking it through: two French immersion learners' response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research 37: 285-304.
35. Wajnryb, R. 1990: Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Williams, J. 2001: Learner-generated attention to form. In Ellis, R., editor, Form-focused instruction and second language learning, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 303-46.
37. Zeigarnik, B. 1999: On finished and unfinished tasks. In Ellis, W.D., editor, A source book of Gestalt psychology, London: Routledge, 300-14.