Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing, and even if it were...

System

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 600-613

  Bruton, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449520210     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2009.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Arapoff N. Writing: a thinking process. TESOL Quarterly 1 2 (1967) 33-39
2. Ashwell T. Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method?. Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2000) 227-257
3. Atkinson D. L2 writing is dying before our eyes. Journal of Second Language Writing 9 (2000) 2-4
4. Baskoff F.S. A new look at guided writing. Forum 19/3 (1981) 2-6
5. Bitchener J. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (2008) 102-118
6. Bitchener J., and Knoch U. The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research 12 (2008) 409-431
7. Bitchener J., Young S., and Cameron D. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 14 (2005) 191-205
8. Bruton A. A decision-making approach to the extended writing lesson. ELT Journal 35 (1981) 141-146
9. Bruton A. The hybrid writing exercise. Modern English Teacher 10/3 (1983) 21-22
10. Bruton A. What exactly are positive and negative evidence in SLA?. RELC Journal 31/2 (2000) 120-133
11. Bruton A. From tasking purposes to purposing tasks. ELT Journal 56 (2002) 280-288
12. Bruton, A., 2005. Process writing and communicative-task-based instruction: many common features, but more common limitations? TESL-EJ 9/3. Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org.
13. Bruton A. Vocabulary learning from dictionary referencing and language feedback in EFL translational writing. Language Teaching Research 11 (2007) 413-431
14. Bruton A. Vocabulary learning from dictionary reference in collaborative EFL translational writing. System 35 (2007) 354-367
15. Bruton A. Designing research into the effect of error correction in L2 writing: not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (2009) 136-140
16. Bruton A., and Broca A. Dictionary use and feedback in composition writing, and learning. In: Field J., Graham A., Griffiths E., and Head K. (Eds). Teachers Develop Teachers' Research II (1997), IATEFL, Whitstable, UK 194-207
17. Bygate M. Effects of task repetition: appraising the developing language of learners. In: Willis J., and Willis D. (Eds). Challenge and Change in Language Teaching (1996), Heinemann, London 136-146
18. Carver R.P. The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review 48 (1978) 378-399
19. Chandler J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12 (2003) 267-296
20. Chandler J. A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2004) 345-348
21. Chandler J. Response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (2009) 57-58
22. Chastain K. Characteristics of graded and ungraded compositions. The Modern Language Journal 74 (1990) 10-14
23. DeKeyser R. The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 77 (1993) 501-514
24. Ellis R. The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 27 (1993) 91-113
25. Ellis R. Interpretation-based grammar teaching. System 21 (1993) 69-78
26. Ellis R. Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly 29 (1995) 87-105
27. Ellis R., Sheen Y., Murakami M., and Takashima H. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 36 (2008) 353-371
28. Fatham A.K., and Whalley E. Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content. In: Kroll B. (Ed). Second Language Writing (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England 178-190
29. Fazio L. The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (2001) 235-249
30. Ferris D. The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: a response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (1999) 1-11
31. Ferris D.R. The "grammar correction" debate in L2 Writing: where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime...?). Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2004) 49-62
32. Ferris D., and Roberts B. Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing 10 (2001) 161-184
33. González-Bueno M., and Pérez L.C. Electronic mail in foreign language writing: a study of grammatical and lexical accuracy. Foreign Language Annals 33 (2000) 189-198
34. Greenslade T.A., and Félix-Brasdefer J.C. Error correction and learner perceptions in L2 Spanish writing. In: Klee C.A., and Face T.L. (Eds). Selected Proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (2006), Cascadilla Proceedings Project, Somerville, MA 185-194
35. Guénette D. Is feedback pedagogically correct? Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2007) 40-53
36. Hewins C.P. Writing in a foreign language: motivation and the process approach. Foreign Language Annals 19 (1986) 219-223
37. Higgs T.V., and Clifford R. The push toward communication. In: Higgs T.V. (Ed). Curriculum, Competence, and the Foreign Language Teacher (1982), National Textbook Company, Skokie, IL 57-79
38. Homstad T., and Thorson H. Quantity versus quality? Using extensive and intensive writing in the FL classroom. In: Braüer G. (Ed). Writing across Languages (2000), Ablex, Stamford, CT 141-152
39. Hulstijn J.H. Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: a reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. In: Robinson P. (Ed). Cognition and Second Language Instruction (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 258-286
40. Hyland F. Focusing on form: student engagement with teacher feedback. System 31 (2003) 217-230
41. Kenworthy, R., 2006. Times versus at-home assessment tests: does time affect the quality of second language learners' written compositions? TESL-EJ 10/1. Retrieved from http://tesl-ej.org.
42. Kepner C.G. An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal 75 (1991) 305-313
43. Krashen S.D. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications (1985), Longman, London
44. Krashen S.D. Comprehensible output?. System 26 (1998) 175-182
45. Krashen S. Language education: past, present and future. RELC Journal 39/2 (2008) 178-187
46. Laufer B. Reading, word-focused activities and incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language. Prospect 16/3 (2001) 44-54
47. Laufer B. Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review 59 (2003) 567-587
48. Lee I. ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing: some implications for teaching. System 25 (1997) 465-477
49. Lee I. Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (2008) 144-164
50. Lee I. Ten mismatches between teachers' beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal 63 (2009) 13-22
51. Leki I. Coaching from the margins: issues in written responses. In: Kroll B. (Ed). Second Language Writing (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 57-68
52. Leki I. The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24 (1991) 203-218
53. Li, H., Lin, Q., 2007. The role of revision and teacher feedback in a Chinese college context. Asian EFL Journal 9/4, article 15. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com.
54. Makino T.-Y. Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions. ELT Journal 47 (1993) 337-341
55. Mantello M. Error correction in the L2 classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review 54 (1997) 127-131
56. McLaughlin B.M. Restructuring. Applied Linguistics 11 (1990) 113-128
57. Pica T. An interactional approach to the teaching of writing. English Teaching Forum 24/3 (1986) 6-10
58. Robb T., Ross S., and Shortreed I. Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20 (1986) 83-95
59. Sachs R., and Polio C. Learners' uses of two types of written feedback on a L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29 (2007) 67-100
60. Schulz R.A. Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: students' and teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals 29 (1996) 343-364
61. Semke H.D. Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals 17 (1984) 195-202
62. Sengupta S. An investigation into the effects of revision strategy instruction on L2 secondary school learners. System 28 (2000) 97-113
63. Sheen Y. The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41 (2007) 255-283
64. Sheppard K. Two feedback types: do they make a difference?. RELC Journal 23 (1992) 103-110
65. Shin S.-K. 'Fire your proofreader!' Grammar correction in the writing classroom. ELT Journal 62 (2008) 358-365
66. Skehan P. A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics 17 (1996) 38-62
67. Swain M. Communicative competence. Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In: Gass S.M., and Madden C.G. (Eds). Input in Second Language Acquisition (1985), Newbury House, Rowley, MA 235-253
68. Taylor B.P. Content and written form: a two-way street. TESOL Quarterly 15 (1981) 5-13
69. Tribble C. Writing (1996), Oxford University Press, Oxford
70. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing. Language Learning 46 (1996) 327-369
71. Truscott J. The case for "the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes: a response to Ferris". Journal of Second Language Writing 8 (1999) 111-122
72. Truscott J. Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: a response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 13 (2004) 337-343
73. Truscott J. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 16 (2007) 255-272
74. Truscott J. Arguments and appearances: a response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (2009) 59-60
75. Truscott J., and Hsu A.Y. Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 17 (2008) 292-305
76. White R., and Arndt V. Process Writing (1991), Longman, Harlow, Essex
77. Zamel V. The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case studies. TESOL Quarterly 17 (1983) 165-187