Learning to write: Issues in theory, research, and pedagogy

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 31, Issue , 2011, Pages 17-35

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85126884751     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/lllt.31.05hyl     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Aktas, R. & Cortes, V. 2008. Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1): 3-14.
2. Bakhtin, M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.
3. Benesch, S. 2001. Critical English for Academic Purposes. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Benesch, S. 2009. Theorizing and practicing critical English for academic purposes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8(2): 81-85.
5. Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. 1987. The Psychology of Written Composition. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Bernstein, B. 1990. Class, Codes and Control: Volume IV, The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Taylor & Francis.
7. Bhatia, V. K. 2008. Genre analysis, ESP and professional practice. English for Specific Purposes 27: 161-174.
8. Biber, D. 2006. Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 52: 97-116.
9. Bloch, J. 2007. Technologies in the Second Language Composition Classroom. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.
10. Bosher, S. 1998. The composing processes of three southeast Asian writers at the post-secondary level: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing 7(2): 205-233.
11. Breen, M. & Littlejohn, A. (eds). 2000. Classroom Decision-making: Negotiation and Process Syllabuses in Practice. Cambridge: CUP.
12. Bruce, I. 2008. Cognitive genre structures in Methods sections of research articles: A corpus study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1): 38-54.
13. Bruffee, K. 1986. Social construction: Language and the authority of knowledge. A bibliographical essay. College English 48: 773-779.
14. Cadman, K. 2002. English for Academic Possibilities: The research proposal as a contested site in postgraduate genre pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 1(2): 85-104.
15. Canagarajah, A. S. 2002. Globalization, methods, and practice in periphery classrooms. In Globalization and Language Teaching, D. Block & D. Cameron (eds), 134-150. London: Routledge.
16. Carter-Thomas, S. & Rowley-Jolivet, E. 2008. If-conditionals in medical discourse: From theory to disciplinary practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(3): 191-205.
17. Casanave, C. 2004. Controversies in Second Language Writing. Dilemmas and Decisions in Research and Instruction. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.
18. Chomsky, N. 1975. Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. New York NY: Plenum Press.
19. Christie, F. & Martin, J. (eds). 1997. Genre and Institutions: Social Processes in the Workplace and School. London: Cassell.
20. Clark, R. & Ivanic, R. 1997. The Politics of Writing. London: Routledge.
21. Dias, P. & Pare, P. (eds). 2000. Transitions: Writing in Academic and Workplace Settings. Cresskill NJ: Hampton Press.
22. Dudley-Evans, T. & St John, M.-J. 1998. Developments in English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: CUP.
23. Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. Harlow: Longman.
24. Feez, S. 2001. Heritage and innovation in second language education. In Genre in the Classroom, A. M. Johns (ed.), 47-68. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Ferris, D. 2006. Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Feedback in Second Language Writing, K. Hyland & F. Hyland (eds), 81-104. Cambridge: CUP.
26. Flower, L. & Hayes, J. 1981. A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication 32: 365-387.
27. Flower, L. 1994. The Construction of Negotiated Meaning A social Cognitive Theory of Writing. Carbondale IL: University of Southern Illinois Press.
28. Freedman, A. 1994. Anyone for tennis? In Genre and the New Rhetoric, A. Freedman & P. Med-way (eds), 43-66. London: Taylor & Francis.
29. Gimenez, J. 2009. Beyond the academic essay: Discipline-specific writing in nursing and midwifery. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(3): 151-164.
30. Goldstein, A. & Carr, P. 1996. Can students benefit from process writing? NCES Report, No. 3, Vol. 1: 96-845. Washington DC: National Centre for Educational Statistics.
31. Haffner, C. & Candlin, C. 2007 Corpus tools as an affordance to learning in professional legal education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 303-318.
32. Hall, K. & Harding, A. 2003. A Systematic Review of Effective Literacy Teaching in the 4-14 Age group. London: EPPI/Institute of Education.
33. Hammond, J. & Macken-Horarik, M. 1999. Critical literacy: Challenges and questions for ESL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 33(3): 528-544.
34. Hasan, R. 1996. Literacy, everyday talk and society. In Literacy in Society, R. Hasan & G. Williams (eds), 377-424. London: Longman.
35. Hayes, J. 1996. A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications, M. Levy & S. Ransdell (eds), 1-27. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Hyland, F. 1998. The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 7(3): 255-286.
37. Hyland, K. 2003. Second Language Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
38. Hyland, K. 2004a. Genre and Second Language Writers. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
39. Hyland, K. 2004b. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
40. Hyland, K. 2006. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.
41. Hyland, K. 2007. Genre pedagogy: language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 16(3): 148-164.
42. Hyland, K. 2008. Genre and academic writing in the disciplines Language Teaching 41(4): 543-562.
43. Hyland, K. 2009. Academic Discourse. London: Continuum.
44. Hyland, K. 2010. Teaching and Researching Writing, 2nd edn. London: Pearson.
45. Johns, A. M. 1997. Text, Role and Context: Developing Academic Literacies. Cambridge: CUP.
46. Kennedy, G. 1987. Expressing temporal frequency in academic English. TESOL Quarterly 21: 69-86.
47. Kent, T. (ed.). 1999. Post-process Theory: Beyond the Writing Process Paradigm. Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
48. Knapp, P. & Watkins, M. 1994. Context - Text - Grammar: Teaching the Genres and Grammar of School Writing in Infants and Primary Classrooms. Sydney: Text Productions.
49. Kroll, B. (ed.) 2003. Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing. Cambridge: CUP.
50. Lung, J. 2008. Discursive hierarchical patterning in Law and Management cases. English for Specific Purposes 27(4): 424-441.
51. Macken-Horarik, M. 2002. 'Something to shoot for': A systemic functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science. In Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives, A. Johns (ed.), 17-42. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
52. Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J. & Murphy, L. 2009. The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes. Implications for theory. In Writing in Foreign Language Contexts. Learning, Teaching and Research, R. M. Manchón (ed.), 102-129. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
53. Nelson, G. & Carson, J. 1998. ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing 7(2): 113-131.
54. Nystrand, M., Greene, S. & Wiemelt, J. 1993. Where did composition studies come from? An intellectual history. Written Communication 10: 207-333.
55. Patthey-Chavez, G., Matsumura, L. & Valdes, R. 2004. Investigating the process approach to writing instruction in urban middle schools. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy 47(6): 642-676.
56. Pritchard, R. & Honeycutt, R. 2006. The process approach to writing instruction: Examining its effectiveness. In Handbook of Writing Research, C. A. Macarthur, S. Graham & J. Fitzgerald (eds), 275-290. New York NY: The Guilford Press.
57. Sasaki, M. 2007. Effects of study abroad experiences on EFL writers: A multiple-data analysis. The Modern Language Journal 91: 602-620.
58. Sasaki, M. 2009. Changes in English as a foreign language students' writing over 3.5 years: A sociocognitive account. In Writing in Foreign Language Contexts. Learning, Teaching and Research, R. M. Manchón (ed.), 49-76. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
59. Saussure, F. 2006. Writings in General Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
60. Schoonen, R., Snellings, P., Stevenson, M. & van Gelderen, A. 2009. Towards a blueprint of the foreign language writer: The linguistic and cognitive demands of foreign language writing. In Writing in Foreign Language Contexts. Learning, Teaching and Research, R. M. Manchón (ed.), 77-101. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
61. Shaw, P. & Liu, E. 1998. What develops in the development of second language writing? Applied Linguistics 19: 224-254.
62. Shi, L. & Kubota, R. 2007. Patterns of rhetorical organization in Canadian and American language arts textbooks: An exploratory study. English for Specific Purposes 26(2): 180-202.
63. Silva, T. & Brice, C. 2004. Research in teaching writing, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24: 70-106.
64. Smagorinsky, P. (ed.). 2006. Research on Composition: Multiple Perspectives on Two Decades of Change. New York NY: Teachers College Press.
65. Storch, N. 2005. Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students' reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing 14(3): 153-173.
66. Street, B. 1995. Social Literacies. Harlow: Longman.
67. Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.
68. Swales, J. 2004. Research Genres. Cambridge: CUP.
69. Swales, J. & Feak, C. 2004. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills, 2nd edn. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.
70. Tottie, G. 1991. Negation in English Speech and Writing. London: Academic Press.
71. Truscott, J. & Hsu, A. 2008. Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 17(4): 292-305.
72. van den Bergh, H. & Rijlaarsdam, G. 2001. Changes in cognitive activities during the writing process and relationships with text quality. Educational Psychology 21(4): 373-385.
73. Wells, G. 1992. The centrality of talk in education. In Thinking Voices: The Work of the National Oracy Project, K. Norman (ed.), 283-310. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
74. White, A. 2007. A tool for monitoring the development of written English: T-unit analysis using the SAWL. American Annals of the Deaf 152(1): 29-41.
75. Zamel, V. 1983. The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case-studies. TESOL Quarterly 17: 165-187.