Chromatin and the genome integrity network

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 62-75

  Papamichos Chronakis, Manolis ^a,b   Peterson, Craig L ^c  

^a INSTITUT CURIE   (France)

^b INSERM ATIP Avenir Team   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; ATR PROTEIN; DNA DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; HISTONE DEACETYLASE 1; HISTONE DEACETYLASE 2; HISTONE DEACETYLASE 3; HISTONE DEACETYLASE 4; HISTONE H2AX; HISTONE H2AZ; HISTONE H2B; RAD54 PROTEIN; RING FINGER PROTEIN; SIRTUIN 1; SIRTUIN 6; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR EZH2; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARABIDOPSIS; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL DIVISION; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA TRANSCRIPTION; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EPIGENETICS; GENE MUTATION; GENOME; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HETEROCHROMATIN; HISTONE MODIFICATION; HISTONE UBIQUITINATION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; HUMAN; INHERITANCE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROCESSING; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; REVIEW; RNA INTERFERENCE; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SURVIVAL; VDJ RECOMBINATION;

CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENOME; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; MITOSIS;

EID: 84871344464     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: 14710064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg3345     Document Type: Review

References (133)

1. Ciccia, A. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: Making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 40, 179-204 (2010
2. Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 208-219 (2010
3. Gordon, D. J., Resio, B. & Pellman, D. Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 189-203 (2012
4. Symington, L. S. & Gautier, J. Double-Strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 247-271 (2011
5. Green, C. M. & Almouzni, G. When repair meets chromatin. EMBO Rep. 3, 28-33 (2002
6. Kent, N. A., Chambers, A. L. & Downs, J. A. Dual chromatin remodeling roles for RSC during DNA double strand break induction and repair at the yeast MAT locus. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 27693-27701 (2007
7. Shim, E. Y. et al. RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 1602-1613 (2007
8. Berkovich, E., Monnat, R. J. Jr & Kastan, M. B. Roles of ATM and NBS1 in chromatin structure modulation and DNA double-Strand break repair. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 683-690 (2007
9. Tsukuda, T. et al. INO80 dependent chromatin remodeling regulates early and late stages of mitotic homologous recombination. DNA Repair 8, 360-369 (2009
10. Shim, E. Y., Ma, J. L., Oum, J. H., Yanez, Y. & Lee, S. E. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-Strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3934-3944 (2005
11. Chai, B., Huang, J., Cairns, B. R. & Laurent, B. C. Distinct roles for the RSC and SWI/SNF ATP-Dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-Strand break repair. Genes Dev. 19, 1656-1661 (2005
12. Papamichos-Chronakis, M., Krebs, J. E. & Peterson, C. L. Interplay between INO80 and SWR1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 20, 2437-2449 (2006
13. Neumann, F. R. et al. Targeted INO80 enhances subnuclear chromatin movement and ectopic homologous recombination. Genes Dev. 26, 369-383 (2012
14. van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O., Hohn, B. & Gasser, S. M. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-Dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-Strand break repair. Cell 119, 777-788 (2004
15. Chen, X. et al. The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-Strand break ends. Nature 489, 576-580 (2012
16. Eapen, V. V., Sugawara, N., Tsabar, M., Wu, W. H. & Haber, J. E. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end-Resection and checkpoint deactivation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 4727-4740 (2012
17. Fritsch, O., Benvenuto, G., Bowler, C., Molinier, J. & Hohn, B. The INO80 protein controls homologous recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell 16, 479-485 (2004
18. van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O. & Gasser, S. M. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-Strand breaks. EMBO J. 26, 4113-4125 (2007
19. Kalocsay, M., Hiller, N. J. & Jentsch, S. Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading and SUMO H2A.Z dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-Strand break. Mol. Cell 33, 335-343 (2009
20. Xu, Y. et al. The p400 ATPase regulates nucleosome stability and chromatin ubiquitination during DNA repair. J. Cell Biol. 191, 31-43 (2010
21. Kruhlak, M. J. et al. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-Strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 172, 823-834 (2006
22. Nakamura, K. et al. Regulation of homologous recombination by RNF20 dependent H2B ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 41, 515-528 (2011
23. Fierz, B. et al. Histone H2B ubiquitylation disrupts local and higher-order chromatin compaction. Nature Chem. Biol. 7, 113-119 (2011
24. Ogiwara, H. et al. Histone acetylation by CBP and p300 at double-Strand break sites facilitates SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling and the recruitment of non-homologous end joining factors. Oncogene 30, 2135-2146 (2011
25. Sanchez-Molina, S. et al. Role for hACF1 in the G2/M damage checkpoint. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 8445-8456 (2011
26. Moyal, L. et al. Requirement of ATM-Dependent monoubiquitylation of histone H2B for timely repair of DNA double-Strand breaks. Mol. Cell 41, 529-542 (2011
27. Richardson, C., Moynahan, M. E. & Jasin, M. Double-Strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: Suppression of chromosomal translocations. Genes Dev. 12, 3831-3842 (1998
28. Inbar, O. & Kupiec, M. Homology search and choice of homologous partner during mitotic recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4134-4142 (1999
29. Sinha, M. & Peterson, C. L. Chromatin dynamics during repair of chromosomal DNA double-Strand breaks. Epigenomics 1, 371-385 (2009
30. Sinha, M., Watanabe, S., Johnson, A., Moazed, D. & Peterson, C. L. Recombinational repair within heterochromatin requires ATP-Dependent chromatin remodeling. Cell 138, 1109-1121 (2009
31. Mine-Hattab, J. & Rothstein, R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nature Cell Biol. 14, 510-517 (2012
32. Dion, V., Kalck, V., Horigome, C., Towbin, B. D. & Gasser, S. M. Increased mobility of double-Strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nature Cell Biol. 14, 502-509 (2012
33. Soutoglou, E. et al. Positional stability of single double-Strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 675-682 (2007
34. Hewitt, S. L. et al. RAG 1 and ATM coordinate monoallelic recombination and nuclear positioning of immunoglobulin loci. Nature Immunol. 10, 655-664 (2009
35. Chiolo, I. et al. Double-Strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair. Cell 144, 732-744 (2011
36. Torres-Rosell, J. et al. The Smc5-Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 923-931 (2007
37. Abraham, R. T. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM & ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15, 2177-2196 (2001
38. Durocher, D. in The DNA Damage Response: Implications on Cancer Formation and Treatment Ch. 1 (ed. Khanna, K. K., Yosef, S.) 1-24 (Springer, 2009
39. Zou, L. & Elledge, S. J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-SsDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542-1548 (2003
40. Bartek, J. & Lukas, J. DNA damage checkpoints: From initiation to recovery or adaptation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 238-245 (2007
41. West, M. H. & Bonner, W. M. Histone 2A, a heteromorphous family of eight protein species. Biochemistry 19, 3238-3245 (1980
42. Lee, H. S., Park, J. H., Kim, S. J., Kwon, S. J. & Kwon, J. A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, gamma H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double-Strand break repair. EMBO J. 29, 1434-1445 (2010
43. Shogren-Knaak, M. et al. Histone H4 K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311, 844-847 (2006
44. Li, X. et al. MOF and H4 K16 acetylation play important roles in DNA damage repair by modulating recruitment of DNA damage repair protein Mdc1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 5335-5347 (2010
45. Sharma, G. G. et al. MOF and histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16 are critical for DNA damage response and double-Strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 3582-3595 (2010
46. Miller, K. M. et al. Human HDAC1 and HDAC2 function in the DNA-Damage response to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1144-1151 (2010
47. Hammet, A., Magill, C., Heierhorst, J. & Jackson, S. P. Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO Rep. 8, 851-857 (2007
48. Javaheri, A. et al. Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13771-13776 (2006
49. Xie, A. et al. Control of sister chromatid recombination by histone H2AX. Mol. Cell 16, 1017-1025 (2004
50. Helmink, B. A. et al. H2AX prevents CtIP-Mediated DNA end resection and aberrant repair in G1 phase lymphocytes. Nature 469, 245-249 (2011
51. Celeste, A. et al. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 296, 922-927 (2002
52. Huen, M. S. et al. RNF8 transduces the DNA-Damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly. Cell 131, 901-914 (2007
53. Kolas, N. K. et al. Orchestration of the DNA-Damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. Science 318, 1637-1640 (2007
54. Mailand, N. et al. RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-Strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 131, 887-900 (2007
55. Doil, C. et al. RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins. Cell 136, 435-446 (2009
56. Stewart, G. S. et al. The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-Dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage. Cell 136, 420-434 (2009
57. Luijsterburg, M. S. et al. A new non-Catalytic role for ubiquitin ligase RNF8 in unfolding higher-order chromatin structure. EMBO J. 31, 2511-2527 (2012
58. Chou, D. M. et al. A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-Regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18475-18480 (2010
59. Botuyan, M. V. et al. Structural basis for the methylation state-Specific recognition of histone H4 K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair. Cell 127, 1361-1373 (2006
60. Huyen, Y. et al. Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-Strand breaks. Nature 432, 406-411 (2004
61. Sanders, S. L. et al. Methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 controls recruitment of Crb2 to sites of DNA damage. Cell 119, 603-614 (2004
62. Pei, H. et al. MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites. Nature 470, 124-128 (2011
63. Roos, W. P. & Kaina, B. DNA damage-induced cell death by apoptosis. Trends Mol. Med. 12, 440-450 (2006
64. Cook, P. J. et al. Tyrosine dephosphorylation of H2AX modulates apoptosis and survival decisions. Nature 458, 591-596 (2009
65. Xiao, A. et al. WSTF regulates the H2A.X DNA damage response via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Nature 457, 57-62 (2008
66. Singh, N. et al. Dual recognition of phosphoserine and phosphotyrosine in histone variant H2A.X by DNA damage response protein MCPH1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14381-14386 (2012
67. Shanbhag, N. M., Rafalska-Metcalf, I. U., Balane-Bolivar, C., Janicki, S. M. & Greenberg, R. A. ATM-Dependent chromatin changes silence transcription in cis to DNA double-Strand breaks. Cell 141, 970-981 (2010
68. Wang, H. et al. Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing. Nature 431, 873-878 (2004
69. Iacovoni, J. S. et al. High-Resolution profiling of γH2AX around DNA double strand breaks in the mammalian genome. EMBO J. 29, 1446-1457 (2010
70. Papamichos-Chronakis, M., Watanabe, S., Rando, O. J. & Peterson, C. L. Global regulation of H2A.Z localization by the INO80 chromatin-Remodeling enzyme is essential for genome integrity. Cell 144, 200-213 (2011
71. Chowdhury, D. et al. Gamma H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-Strand break repair. Mol. Cell 20, 801-809 (2005
72. Nakada, S., Chen, G. I., Gingras, A. C. & Durocher, D. PP4 is a gamma H2AX phosphatase required for recovery from the DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO Rep. 9, 1019-1026 (2008
73. Keogh, M. C. et al. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates γH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439, 497-501 (2006
74. Chen, C. C. et al. Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 134, 231-243 (2008
75. Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair 8, 1038-1046 (2009
76. De Piccoli, G. et al. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol. Cell 45, 696-704 (2012
77. Cobb, J. A. et al. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 19, 3055-3069 (2005
78. Baker, S. P. et al. Histone H3 Thr 45 phosphorylation is a replication-Associated post-Translational modification in S. cerevisiae. Nature Cell Biol. 12, 294-298 (2010
79. Levesque, N., Leung, G. P., Fok, A. K., Schmidt, T. I. & Kobor, M. S. Loss of H3 K79 trimethylation leads to suppression of Rtt107 dependent DNA damage sensitivity through the translesion synthesis pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 35113-35122 (2010
80. Conde, F. & San-Segundo, P. A. Role of Dot1 in the response to alkylating DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Regulation of DNA damage tolerance by the error-prone polymerases Polzeta/Rev1. Genetics 179, 1197-1210 (2008
81. Wysocki, R. et al. Role of Dot1 dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 8430-8443 (2005
82. Murakami-Sekimata, A., Huang, D., Piening, B. D., Bangur, C. & Paulovich, A. G. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17 and RAD24 genes are required for suppression of mutagenic post-Replicative repair during chronic DNA damage. DNA Repair 9, 824-834 (2010
83. Li, Q. et al. Acetylation of histone H3 lysine 56 regulates replication-Coupled nucleosome assembly. Cell 134, 244-255 (2008
84. Groth, A. et al. Regulation of replication fork progression through histone supply and demand. Science 318, 1928-1931 (2007
85. Smith, D. J. & Whitehouse, I. Intrinsic coupling of lagging-Strand synthesis to chromatin assembly. Nature 483, 434-438 (2012
86. Burgess, R. J., Zhou, H., Han, J. & Zhang, Z. A role for Gcn5 in replication-Coupled nucleosome assembly. Mol. Cell 37, 469-480 (2010
87. Corpet, A. & Almouzni, G. Making copies of chromatin: The challenge of nucleosomal organization and epigenetic information. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 29-41 (2009
88. Au, T. J., Rodriguez, J., Vincent, J. A. & Tsukiyama, T. ATP-Dependent chromatin remodeling factors tune S phase checkpoint activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 4454-4463 (2011
89. Papamichos-Chronakis, M. & Peterson, C. L. The INO80 chromatin-Remodeling enzyme regulates replisome function and stability. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 338-345 (2008
90. Shimada, K. et al. INO80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks. Curr. Biol. 18, 566-575 (2008
91. Hur, S. K. et al. Roles of human INO80 chromatin remodeling enzyme in DNA replication and chromosome segregation suppress genome instability. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 2283-2296 (2010
92. Falbo, K. B. et al. Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1167-1172 (2009
93. Boerkoel, C. F. et al. Mutant chromatin remodeling protein SMARCAL1 causes Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia. Nature Genet. 30, 215-220 (2002
94. Ciccia, A. et al. The SIOD disorder protein SMARCAL1 is an RPA-interacting protein involved in replication fork restart. Genes Dev. 23, 2415-2425 (2009
95. Bansbach, C. E., Betous, R., Lovejoy, C. A., Glick, G. G. & Cortez, D. The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 23, 2405-2414 (2009
96. Yuan, J., Ghosal, G. & Chen, J. The annealing helicase HARP protects stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 23, 2394-2399 (2009
97. Yusufzai, T., Kong, X., Yokomori, K. & Kadonaga, J. T. The annealing helicase HARP is recruited to DNA repair sites via an interaction with RPA. Genes Dev. 23, 2400-2404 (2009
98. Yusufzai, T. & Kadonaga, J. T. HARP is an ATP-Driven annealing helicase. Science 322, 748-750 (2008
99. Driscoll, R. & Cimprich, K. A. HARPing on about the DNA damage response during replication. Genes Dev. 23, 2359-2365 (2009
100. Betous, R. et al. SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 26, 151-162 (2012
101. Vincent, J. A., Kwong, T. J. & Tsukiyama, T. ATP-Dependent chromatin remodeling shapes the DNA replication landscape. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 477-484 (2008
102. Collins, N. et al. An ACF1 ISWI chromatin-Remodeling complex is required for DNA replication through heterochromatin. Nature Genet. 32, 627-632 (2002
103. Poot, R. A. et al. The Williams syndrome transcription factor interacts with PCNA to target chromatin remodelling by ISWI to replication foci. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 1236-1244 (2004
104. Whitehouse, I., Rando, O. J., Delrow, J. & Tsukiyama, T. Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature 450, 1031-1035 (2007
105. Fyodorov, D. V., Blower, M. D., Karpen, G. H. & Kadonaga, J. T. Acf1 confers unique activities to ACF/CHRAC and promotes the formation rather than disruption of chromatin in vivo. Genes Dev. 18, 170-183 (2004
106. Rowbotham, S. P. et al. Maintenance of silent chromatin through replication requires SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1. Mol. Cell 42, 285-296 (2011
107. Stralfors, A., Walfridsson, J., Bhuiyan, H. & Ekwall, K. The FUN30 chromatin remodeler, Fft3, protects centromeric and subtelomeric domains from euchromatin formation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001334 (2011
108. Storchova, Z. & Pellman, D. From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 45-54 (2004
109. Talbert, P. B. & Henikoff, S. Histone variants - Ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 264-275 (2010
110. Verdaasdonk, J. S. & Bloom, K. Centromeres: Unique chromatin structures that drive chromosome segregation. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 320-332 (2011
111. Kim, H. S. et al. An acetylated form of histone H2A.Z regulates chromosome architecture in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1286-1293 (2009
112. Krogan, N. J. et al. Regulation of chromosome stability by the histone H2A variant Htz1, the Swr1 chromatin remodeling complex, and the histone acetyltransferase NuA4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13513-13518 (2004
113. Perez-Cadahia, B., Drobic, B. & Davie, J. R. H3 phosphorylation: Dual role in mitosis and interphase. Biochem. Cell Biol. 87, 695-709 (2009
114. Kawashima, S. A., Yamagishi, Y., Honda, T., Ishiguro, K. & Watanabe, Y. Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science 327, 172-177 (2010
115. Kelly, A. E. et al. Survivin reads phosphorylated histone H3 threonine 3 to activate the mitotic kinase Aurora B. Science 330, 235-239 (2010
116. Yamagishi, Y., Honda, T., Tanno, Y. & Watanabe, Y. Two histone marks establish the inner centromere and chromosome bi orientation. Science 330, 239-243 (2010
117. Tada, K., Susumu, H., Sakuno, T. & Watanabe, Y. Condensin association with histone H2A shapes mitotic chromosomes. Nature 474, 477-483 (2011
118. Hsu, J. M., Huang, J., Meluh, P. B. & Laurent, B. C. The yeast RSC chromatin-Remodeling complex is required for kinetochore function in chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 3202-3215 (2003
119. Ogiwara, H., Enomoto, T. & Seki, M. The INO80 chromatin remodeling complex functions in sister chromatid cohesion. Cell Cycle 6, 1090-1095 (2007
120. Xue, Y. et al. The human SWI/SNF B chromatin-Remodeling complex is related to yeast RSC and localizes at kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13015-13020 (2000
121. Gkikopoulos, T. et al. The SWI/SNF complex acts to constrain distribution of the centromeric histone variant Cse4. EMBO J. 30, 1919-1927 (2011
122. Wu, S. et al. A YY1 INO80 complex regulates genomic stability through homologous recombination-Based repair. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1165-1172 (2007
123. Campsteijn, C., Wijnands-Collin, A. M. & Logie, C. Reverse genetic analysis of the yeast RSC chromatin remodeler reveals a role for RSC3 and SNF5 homolog 1 in ploidy maintenance. PLoS Genet. 3, e92 (2007
124. Steigemann, P. et al. Aurora B mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization. Cell 136, 473-484 (2009
125. Norden, C. et al. The NoCut pathway links completion of cytokinesis to spindle midzone function to prevent chromosome breakage. Cell 125, 85-98 (2006
126. Baumann, C., Korner, R., Hofmann, K. & Nigg, E. A. PICH, a centromere-Associated SNF2 family ATPase, is regulated by Plk1 and required for the spindle checkpoint. Cell 128, 101-114 (2007
127. Chan, K. L., North, P. S. & Hickson, I. D. BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges. EMBO J. 26, 3397-3409 (2007
128. Chan, K. L., Palmai-Pallag, T., Ying, S. & Hickson, I. D. Replication stress induces sister-Chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 753-760 (2009
129. Sillibourne, J. E., Delaval, B., Redick, S., Sinha, M. & Doxsey, S. J. Chromatin remodeling proteins interact with pericentrin to regulate centrosome integrity. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3667-3680 (2007
130. Vaze, M. B. et al. Recovery from checkpoint-Mediated arrest after repair of a double-Strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol. Cell 10, 373-385 (2002
131. Shroff, R. et al. Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-Strand break. Curr. Biol. 14, 1703-1711 (2004
132. Korber, P., Luckenbach, T., Blaschke, D. & Horz, W. Evidence for histone eviction in trans upon induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 10965-10974 (2004
133. Klopf, E. et al. Cooperation between the INO80 complex and histone chaperones determines adaptation of stress gene transcription in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 4994-5007 (2009