Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a U.S. survey

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 283-306

  McKenna, Michael C ^a   Conradi, Kristin ^b   Lawrence, Camille ^c   Jang, Bong Gee ^a   Meyer, J Patrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Columbus State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869168088     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/RRQ.021     Document Type: Article

References (159)

1. Aff lerbach, P.P., & Cho, B.Y. (2011). The classroom assessment of reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P.P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 487-514). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The inf luence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, B.T. Johnson, & M.P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173-221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Alexander, P.A., & Fox, E. (2011). Adolescents as readers. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P.P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 157-176). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
4. Alvermann, D.E. (2001). Reading adolescents' reading identities: Looking back to see ahead. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 676-690. (Pubitemid 33603211)
5. Alvermann, D.E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34(2), 189-208. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3402-4
6. Alvermann, D.E. (2008). Why bother theorizing adolescents' online literacies for classroom practice and research? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1), 8-19. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.1.2
7. Alvermann, D.E. (2009). Sociocultural constructions of adolescence and young people's literacies. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 14-28). New York, NY: Guilford.
8. Alvermann, D.E. (2011). Popular culture and literacy practices. In M.L. Kamil, P.D. Pearson, E.B. Moje, & P.P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 541-560). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
9. Alvermann, D.E., Young, J.P., Green, C., & Wisenbaker, J.M. (1999). Adolescents' perceptions and negotiations of literacy practices in after-school read and talk clubs. American Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 221-264.
10. Anderson, M.A., Tollefson, N.A., & Gilbert, E.C. (1985). Giftedness and reading: A cross-sectional view of differences in reading attitudes and behaviors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(4), 186-189. doi:10.1177/ 001698628502900411
11. Anderson, R.C., Wilson, P.T., & Fielding, L.G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 285-303. doi:10.1598/RRQ.23.3.2
12. Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 252-256. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.002
13. Askov, E.N., & Fischbach, T.J. (1973). An investigation of primary pupils' attitudes toward reading. Journal of Experimental Education, 41(3), 1-7.
14. Athey, I.J. (1985). Reading research in the affective domain. In H. Singer & R.B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (3rd ed., pp. 527-557). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
15. Baker, E.A., Pearson, P.D., & Rozendal, M.S. (2010). Theoretical perspectives and literacy studies: An exploration of roles and insights. In E.A. Baker (Ed.), The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice (pp. 1-22). New York, NY: Guilford.
16. Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their elations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452-477. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
17. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparat ive f it indexes in st ructural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
18. Brown, B., & Marin, P. (2009). Adolescents and electronic media: Growing up plugged in. Washington, DC: Child Trends and the National Adolescent Health Information Center. Retrieved May 16, 2011, from www.childtrends.org/ files/child-trends-2009-05-26-rb-adolelecmedia.pdf
19. Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
21. Byrne, B.M. (2008). Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20(4), 872-882.
22. Carico, K.M., Logan, D., & Labbo, L.D. (2004). A generation in cyberspace: Engaging readers through online discussions. Language Arts, 81(4), 293-302.
23. Case, R., & Khanna, F. (1981). The missing links: Stages in children's progression from sensorimotor to logical thought. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1981(12), 21-32. doi:10.1002/cd.23219811204
24. Chandler-Olcott, K., & Mahar, D. (2003). "Tech-savviness" meets multiliteracies: Exploring adolescent girls' technology-mediated literacy practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 356-385. doi:10.1598/RRQ.38.3.3 (Pubitemid 39659319)
25. Chi, M.T. (1978). Knowledge structures and memory development. In R.S. Siegler (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops? (pp. 73-96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Chi, M.T., & Klahr, D. (1975). Span and rate of apprehension in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 19(3), 434-439.
27. Conlon, E.G., Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., Creed, P.A., & Tucker, M. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(1), 11-32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00290.x (Pubitemid 43448443)
28. Cramer, E.H., & Castle, M. (Eds.). (1994). Fostering the love of reading: The affective domain in reading education. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
29. Crook, C., & Harrison, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning at key stages 3 and 4: Summary report. London, UK: Becta. Retrieved April 30, 2011, from dera.ioe.ac.uk/1480/1/becta-2008-web2-summary.pdf
30. Deck, D., & Barnette, J.J. (1976, April). Measuring attitudes toward reading in large-scale assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
31. Diamond, P.J., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2001). Factors associated with reading achievement and attitudes among elementary schoolaged students. Research in the Schools, 8(1), 1-11.
32. Dressman, M., Wilder, P., & Connor, J.J. (2005). Theories of failure and the failure of theories: A cognitive/sociocultural/macrostructural study of eight struggling students. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(1), 8-61. (Pubitemid 41294934)
33. Duke, N.K., Schmar-Dobler, E., & Zhang, S. (2006). Comprehension and technology. In M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, R. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 317-326). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational belief, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych. 53.100901.135153
35. Erstad, O. (2006). A new direction? Digital literacy, student participation and curriculum reform in Norway. Education and Information Technologies, 11(3/4), 415-429. doi:10.1007/s10639-006-9008-2 (Pubitemid 44743761)
36. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37. Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D.P., Katz, L., Liberman, I.Y., Stuebing, K.K., et al. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 6-23.
38. Gee, J.P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
39. Gee, J.P. (2012). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in Discourses (4th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
40. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference: 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
41. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
42. Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Theories and principles of motivation. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 63-84). New York, NY: Macmillan.
43. Greaney, V., & Hagerty, P.E. (1987). Correlations of leisuretime reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 10(1), 3-20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817. 1987.tb00278.x
44. Guthrie, J.T. (Ed.). (2008). Engaging adolescents in reading. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
45. Guthrie, J.T., Taboada, A., & Wigfield, A. (2011). Alignment of cognitive processes in reading with motivations for reading. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 125-131). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (Eds.). (1997). Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
47. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Guzzetti, B., & Gamboa, M. (2004). Zines for social justice: Adolescent girls writing on their own. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 408-436. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.4.4 (Pubitemid 39603885)
49. Guzzetti, B., & Gamboa, M. (2005). Online journaling: The informal writings of two adolescent girls. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(2), 168-206. (Pubitemid 43013973)
50. Henk, W.A., McKenna, M.C., & Conradi, K. (2011). Developing affective instrumentation for use in literacy research. In N.K. Duke & M.H. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed., pp. 242-269). New York, NY: Guilford.
51. Hinchman, K.A., Payne-Bourcy, L., Thomas, H., & Chandler-Olcott, K. (2002). Representing adolescents' literacies: Case studies of three white males. Reading Research and Instruction, 41(3), 229-246. doi:10.1080/19388070209558368
52. Hitlin, P., & Rainee, L. (2005). Teens, technology, and school. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved August 31, 2011, from www.pewtrusts.org/uploadedFiles/wwwpew trustsorg/Reports/Society-and- the-Internet/PIP-Internet-and-schools-05.pdf
53. Hobbs, R. (2006). Multiple visions of mulitimedia literacy: Emerging areas of synthesis. In M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, R.D. Kieffer, & D. Reinking (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 15-28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Hobbs, R. (2007). Reading the media: Media literacy in high school English. New York: Teachers College Press.
55. Hobbs, R., & Frost, R. (2003). Measuring the acquisition of medialiteracy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(3), 330-355. doi:10.1598/RRQ.38.3.2
56. Hock, M.F., Brasseur, I.F., Deshler, D.D., Catts, H.W., Marquis, J.G., Mark, C.A., et al. (2009). What is the reading component skill profile of adolescent struggling readers in urban schools? Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(1), 21-38.
57. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (Eds.). (2002). School's out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
58. Hutchinson, A., & Henry, L.A. (2010). Internet use and online reading among middle grade students at risk of dropping out of school. Middle Grades Research Journal, 5(2), 61-75.
59. International Reading Association & National Council of Teachers of English. (2010). Standards for the assessment of reading and writing (Rev. ed.). Newark, DE & Urbana, IL: Authors.
60. Ishikawa, K. (1985). Developmental study of school children's attitudes toward reading. Science of Reading, 29, 89-98.
61. Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(2), 172-192. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.2.3
62. Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). Just plain reading: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 350-377. doi:10.1598/RRQ.36.4.2 (Pubitemid 33610360)
63. Jewitt, C., & Kress, G.R. (2003). Multimodal literacy. New York: Peter Lang.
64. Kamil, M.L., & Chou, H.K. (2009). Comprehension and computer technology: Past results, current knowledge, and future promises. In S.E. Israel & G.G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 289-304). New York, NY: Routledge.
65. Katzir, T., Lesaux, N.K., & Kim, Y. (2009). The role of reading selfconcept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 261-276. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9112-8
66. Kear, D.J., Coffman, G.A., McKenna, M.C., & Ambrosio, A.L. (2000). Measuring attitude toward writing: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 54(1), 10-23.
67. Kennedy, L.D., & Halinsky, R.S. (1975). Measuring attitudes: An extra dimension. Journal of Reading, 18(7), 518-522.
68. Kim, H.S., & Kamil, M.L. (2004). Adolescents, computer technology, and literacy. In T.L. Jetton & J.A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 351-368). New York, NY: Guilford.
69. Kress, G.R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203164754
70. Kush, J.C., & Watkins, M.W. (1996). Long-term stability of children's attitudes toward reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(5), 315-319. doi:10.1080/00220671.1996.9941333 (Pubitemid 126350239)
71. Kush, J.C., Watkins, M.W., & Brookhart, S.M. (2005). The temporal-interactive influence of reading achievement and reading attitude, educational research and evaluation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(1), 29-44. doi:10.1080/13803610500110141
72. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2008). Introduction: Digital literacies-Concepts, policies and practices. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
73. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Open University Press.
74. Lemke, J.L. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 283-301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
75. Lemke, J.L. (2006). Toward critical multimedia literacy: Technology, research and politics. In M. McKenna, D. Reinking, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), International handbook of literacy and technology (Vol. 2, pp. 3-14). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., MacGill, A.R., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved November 12, 2011, from www.pewinternet. org/Reports/2007/Teens-and- Social-Media.aspx
77. Lenhar t, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved November 12, 2011, from pewresearch.org/pubs/1484/ social-media-mobile-internet-use-teens-millennials-fewer-blog
78. Leu, D.J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J.L, & Cammack, D.W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
79. Leu, D.J., O'Byrne, W.I., Zawilinski, L., McVerry, J.G., & Everett-Cacopardo, H. (2009). Comments on Greenhow, Robelia, and Hughes: Expanding the new literacies conversation. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 264-269. doi:10.3102/0013189X09336676
80. Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved November 5, 2011, from www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/67/report-display.asp
81. Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 470-501. doi:10.1598/RRQ.40.4.5 (Pubitemid 41560608)
82. Ley, T.C., Schaer, B.B., & Dismukes, B.W. (1994). Longitudinal study of the reading attitudes and behaviors of middle school students. Reading Psychology, 15(1), 11-38. doi:10.1080/0270271940150102
83. Liska, A.E. (1984). A critical examination of the causal structure of the Fishbein/Ajzen attitude-behavior model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47(1), 61-74. doi:10.2307/3033889
84. Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Sex differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 199-214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x
85. Lomax, R.G. (2007). An introduction to statistical concepts (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
86. Love, K., & Hamston, J. (2004). Committed and reluctant male teenage readers: Beyond bedtime stories. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(3), 335-400. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3603-4
87. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., & Wen, S. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103-2 (Pubitemid 38874703)
88. Marshall, J.P. (2008). Gender in online communication. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 491-519). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
89. Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit-A European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2(2), 130-136. Retrieved July 24, 2011, from www.jelit.org/65/01/JeLit-Paper-31.pdf
90. Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the "digital society." In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 151-176). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
91. Martin, A., & Madigan, D. (Eds.). (2006). Digital literacies for learning. London: Facet.
92. Martínez, R.S., Aricak, O.T., & Jewell, J. (2008). Influence of reading attitude on reading achievement: A test of the temporalinteraction model. Psychology in the Schools, 45(10), 1010-1023. doi:10.1002/pits.20348
93. McKenna, M.C. (1994). Toward a model of reading attitude acquisition. In E.H. Cramer & M. Castle (Eds.), Fostering the love of reading: The affective domain in reading education (pp. 18-40). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
94. McKenna, M.C. (2001). Development of reading attitudes. In L. Verhoeven & C. Snow (Eds.), Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups (pp. 135-158). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
95. McKenna, M.C., & Kear, D.J. (1990). Measuring attitude toward reading: A new tool for teachers. The Reading Teacher, 43(8), 626-639. doi:10.1598/RT.43.8.3
96. McKenna, M.C., Kear, D.J., & Ellsworth, R.A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934-956. doi:10.2307/748205
97. Melnick, S.A., Henk, W.A., & Marinak, B.A. (2009). Validation of a Reader Self-Perception Scale (RSPS2) for use in grades 7 and above. In NERA Conference Proceedings 2009 (Paper 11). East Hampton, CT: Northeastern Educational Research Association. Retrieved April 19, 2011, from digitalcommons.uconn.edu/nera-2009/11
98. Meyer, J.P. (2010). Understanding measurement: Reliability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
99. Moje, E.B. (2000). "To be part of the story": The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102(3), 651-690. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00071
100. Moje, E.B. (2006). Motivating texts, motivating contexts, motivating adolescents: An examination of the role of motivation in adolescent literacy practices and development. Perspectives, 32(3), 10-14.
101. Moje, E.B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107-154.
102. Moore, D.W., Alvermann, D.E., & Hinchman, K.A. (2007). Literacies in and out of school: A survey of U.S. youth. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 170-190.
103. Moran, J., Ferdig, R.E., Pearson, P.D., & Wardrop, J. (2008). Technology and reading performance in the middle-school grades: A meta-analysis with recommendations for policy and practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(1), 6-58. doi:10.1080/10862960802070483
104. Morgan, P.L., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation? Exceptional Children, 73(2), 165-183.
105. Morrell, E. (2004). Linking literacy and popular culture: Finding connections for lifelong learning. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
106. Mortensen, T.E. (2008). Of a divided mind: Weblog literacy. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 449-466). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
107. National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The nation's report card: Reading 2009: National Assessment of Educational Progress at grades 4 and 8 (NCES 2010-458). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved December 4, 2011, from nces.ed.gov/ nationsreportcard/pdf/main2009/2010458.pdf
108. National Endowment for the Arts. (2007). To read or not to read: A question of national consequence (Research Report No. 47). Retrieved September 14, 2011, from www.arts.gov/research/ToRead.pdf
109. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
110. Nitko, A.J., & Brookhart, S.M. (2010). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
111. Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
112. O'Brien, D.G. (2012). "Struggling" adolescents' engagement in multimediating: Countering the institutional construction of incompetence. In D.E. Alvermann & K.A. Hinchman (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents' lives (3rd ed., pp. 71-91). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
113. O'Brien, D.G., Beach, R., & Scharber, C. (2007). " Struggling" middle schoolers: Engagement and literate competence in a reading writing intervention class. Reading Psychology, 28(1), 51-73. doi:10.1080/02702710601115463
114. O'Brien, D.G., & Dubbels, B. (2009). Technology and literacy: Current and emerging practices with Student 2.0 and beyond. In K.D. Wood & W.E. Blanton (Eds.), Literacy instruction for adolescents: Research-based practice (pp. 472-493). New York, NY: Guilford.
115. O'Brien, D.G., Stewart, R., & Beach, R. (2009). Proficient reading in school: Traditional paradigms and new textual landscapes. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 80-97). New York, NY: Guilford.
116. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning trends: Changes in student performance since 2000 (Vol. 5). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264091580-en
117. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on line: Digital technologies and performance (Vol. 6). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112995-en
118. Park, J.H., & Rojewski, J.W. (2006). Learning organization model across vocational and academic teacher groups. Career and Technical Education Research, 31(1), 23-48. doi:10.5328/CTER31.1.23
119. Parker, A., & Paradis, E. (1986). Attitude development toward reading in grades one through six. The Journal of Educational Research, 79(5), 313-315.
120. Perry, T.B. (2006). Multiple literacies and middle school students. Theory Into Practice, 45(4), 328-336. doi:10.1207/sl5430421tip4504-6
121. Petscher, Y. (2010). A meta-analysis of the relationship between student at titudes towards reading and achievement in reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(4), 335-355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01418.x.
122. Pintrich, P.R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667 (Pubitemid 37514207)
123. Pitcher, S.M., Albright, L.K., DeLaney, C.J., Walker, N.T., Seunarinesingh, K., Mogge, S., et al. (2007). Assessing adolescents' motivation to read. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(5), 378-396. doi:10.1598/JAAL.50.5.5
124. Rajecki, D.W. (1990). Attitudes (2nd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
125. Rea, D., Romine, B.C., McKenna, M.C., & Griffin, B. (1997, March). A cross-cultural analysis of reading attitude development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
126. Reed, J.H., Schallert, D.L., Beth, A.D., & Woodruff, A.L. (2004). Motivated reader, engaged writer: The role of motivation in the literate acts of adolescents. In T.L. Jetton & J.A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp. 251-282). New York, NY: Guilford.
127. Reinking, D. (2008). Thoughts on the Lewis and Fabos article on instant messaging. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D.J. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 1175-1187). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
128. Retelsdorf, J., Köller, O., & Möller, J. (2011). On the effects of motivation on reading performance growth in secondary school. Learning and Instruction, 21(4), 550-559. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.11.001
129. Reynolds, W.M., & Miller, G.E. (2003). Current perspectives in educational psychology. In W.M. Reynolds, G.E. Miller, & I.B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 7. Educational psychology (pp. 3-22). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
130. Roettger, D., Szymczuk, M., & Millard, J. (1979). Validation of a reading attitude scale for elementary students and an investigation of the relationship between attitude and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 72(3), 138-142.
131. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
132. Sainsbury, M., & Clarkson, R. (2008). Attitudes to reading at ages nine and eleven: Full report. Slough, UK: National Foundation for Educational Research. Retrieved April 19, 2012, from www.nfer.ac.uk/nfer/publications/RAQ01/ RAQ01-home.cfm?publicationID= 77&title= Attitudes%20to%20reading%20at%20ages%20nine%20and%20eleven:%20full%20report
133. Sainsbury, S., & Schagen, I. (2004). Attitudes to reading at ages nine and eleven. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(4), 373-386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00240.x (Pubitemid 40190495)
134. Shankweiler, D., Crane, S., Katz, L., Fowler, A.E., Liberman, A.M., Brady, S.A., et al. (1995). Cognitive profiles of readingdisabled children: Comparison of language skills in phonology, morphology, and syntax. Psychological Science, 6(3), 149-156. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00324.x
135. Smith, M.C. (1990). A longitudinal investigation of reading attitude development from childhood to adulthood. The Journal of Educational Research, 83(4), 215-219.
136. Smith, M.W., & Wilhelm, J.D. (2004). "I just like being good at it": The importance of competence in the literate lives of young men. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47(6), 454-461. (Pubitemid 40176321)
137. Spires, H.A., Lee, J.K., Turner, K.A., & Johnson, J. (2008). Having our say: Middle grade student perspectives on school, technologies, and academic engagement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 497-515.
138. Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-407. doi:10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
139. Street, B. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10(1), 1-24. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(99)80103-X (Pubitemid 128435907)
140. Street, B. (2003). What's "new" in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 77-91.
141. Strommen, L.T., & Mates, B.F. (2004). Learning to love reading: Interviews with older children and teens. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 48(3), 188-200. doi:10.1598/JAAL.48.3.1 (Pubitemid 39666191)
142. Swalander, L., & Taube, K. (2007). Inf luences of family-based prerequisites, reading attitude, and self-regulation on reading ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(2), 206-230. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych. 2006.01.002
143. Swanson, B.B. (1982). The relationship between attitudes toward reading and reading achievement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42(4), 1303-1304. doi:10.1177/001316448204200442
144. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
145. Taboada, A., Tonks, S., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 22(1), 85-106. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y
146. Thomas, A. (2007). Youth online: Identity and literacy in the digital age. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
147. Tucker, L.R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10. doi:10.1007/BF02291170
148. Ünlüsoy, A., De Haan, M., Leseman, P., & Van Kruistum, C. (2010). Sex differences in adolescents' out-of-school literacy practices: A multifaceted approach. Computers & Education, 55(2), 742-751. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.007
149. Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(2), 81-101. doi:10.3200/JOER.100.2.81-101 (Pubitemid 44843773)
150. Wallbrown, F.H., Levine, M.A., & Engin, A.W. (1981). Sex differences in reading attitudes. Reading Improvement, 18(3), 226-234.
151. Wang, J.H.Y., & Guthrie, J.T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162-186. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2 (Pubitemid 38739855)
152. Weiner, B. (1990). History of motivational research in education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 616-622. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.616
153. Wigfield, A. (2004). Motivation for reading during the early adolescent and adolescent years. In D.S. Strickland & D.E. Alvermann (Eds.), Bridging the literacy achievement gap, grades 4-12 (pp. 56-69). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
154. Wigf ield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
155. Willis, G.B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
156. Worrell, F.C., Roth, D.A., & Gabelko, N.H. (2006). Elementary Reading Attitude Survey scores in academically talented students. Roeper Review, 29(2), 119-124. doi:10.1080/02783190709554395
157. Worthy, J., Moorman, M., & Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(1), 12-27. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.1.2
158. Yoon, J., & Kim, Y. (2008). The developmental trends in middle schoolers' attitude toward reading. Research on Korean Language Education, 43, 159-184.
159. Zhang, S., & Duke, N.K. (2011). The impact of instruction in the WWWDOT framework on students' disposition and ability to evaluate websites as sources of information. The Elementary School Journal, 112(1), 132-154. doi:10.1086/660687