Online journaling: The informal writings of two adolescent girls

Research in the Teaching of English

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 168-206

  Guzzetti, Barbara ^a   Gamboa, Margaret ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29544441961     PISSN: 0034527X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Alverez, D. (1998). Four adolescents, their compensatory strategies and writing development and the texts they authored out of school. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1990). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59, 2478.
2. Alvermann, D. E., & Hagood, M. (2000). Critical media literacy: Research, theory and practice in new times. Educational Researcher, 93, 193-205.
3. Alvermann, D. E., & Heron, A. (2001). Literacy identity work: Playing to learn with popular media. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45, 118-122.
4. Azzerad, M. (2001). Our band could be your life: Scenes from the American indie underground 1981-1991. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
5. Ba, H., Tally, B., & Tsikalas, K. (2002). Children's emerging digital literacies: Investigating home computing in low- and middle-income families. NY: Education Development Center, Center for Children and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED477716).
6. Bean, T., Bean, S., & Bean, R. (1999). Intergenerational conversations and two adolescents' multiple literacies: Implications for redefining content areas. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 38-45.
7. Beavis, C. (2002). Reading, writing, and role-playing computer games. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 47-61). London: Routledge.
8. Blair, H., & Sanford, K. (2003, November). Game boys. Where is the literacy? Paper presented at the meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, San Francisco, CA.
9. Blake, B. E. (1997). She say, he say! Urban girls write their lives. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
10. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11. Brandt, D. (2003). Changing literacy. Teachers College Record, 105, 245-260.
12. Bruce, B. C. (2001). Diversity and critical social engagement: How changing technologies enable new modes of literacy in changing circumstances. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 1-18). NY: Peter Lang.
13. Buckingham, D., & Sefton-Green, J. (1994). Cultural studies goes to school: Reading and teaching popular media. London: Taylor & Francis.
14. Carvin, A. (2000). Mind the gap: The digital divide as the civil rights issue of the new millennium. Multimedia Schools, 7(1), 56-58.
15. Cervetti, G., Pardales, M. J., & Damico, J. S. (2001, April). A tale of differences: Comparing the traditions, perspectives and educational goals of critical reading and critical literacy. Reading Online, 4(9). Retrieved January 15, 2005 from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/ art_index.asp?HREF=/articles/cervetti/index.html
16. Christie, A. (1995). No chips on their shoulders: Girls, boys and telecommunications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
17. Collot, M., & Belmore, N. (1996). Electronic language: A new variety of English. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 13-28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (Vol. 3, pp. 119-161). NY: MacMillan.
19. Facer, K., Furlong, J., & Sutherland, R. (2003). Screen play: Children and computing in the home. London: Routledge Falmer.
20. Frith, S. (1996). Music and identity. In S. Hall & P. duGay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 108-127). London: Sage.
21. Gee, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in the discourses (2nd ed.). Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis. (Original work published 1990.)
22. Gee, J. P. (2001). Reading as situated language: A sociocognitive perspective. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 714-725.
23. Gee, J. P. (2002). Millennials and Bobos, Blue's clues and Sesame Street: A story for our times. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 51-67). New York: Peter Lang.
24. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. NY: Palgrave/MacMillan.
25. Glaser, B. J., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
26. Guzzetti, B. J., & Gamboa, M. (2004a). Zines for social justice: Adolescent girls writing on their own. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 408-437.
27. Guzzetti, B. J., & Gamboa, M. (2004b). Zining: The unsanctioned literacy practice of adolescents. In C. Fairbanks, J. Worthy, B. Maloch, J. Hoffman, & D. L. Schallert (Eds.), 53rd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 206-217). Oak Creek, WI: The National Reading Conference.
28. Hall, K. (1998). Cyberfeminism. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 147-170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Hall, S., & duGay, P. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. duGay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1-17). London: Sage.
30. Hartman, D. (1997). Doing things with texts: Mapping the textual practices of two African American male high school students (Interim/ Final Report). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
31. Heilman, E. E. (1998). The struggle for self: Power and identity in adolescent girls. Youth & Society, 30, 182-208.
32. Herring, S. C. (1996). Introduction. In S.C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 1-10). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
33. Hicks, D. (1995-96). Discourse, learning & teaching. In M. W. Apple (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 21, 49-95.
34. Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2003). Cyberkids. Children in the information age. London: Routledge Falmer.
35. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2001). Literacy and learning out of school: A review of theory and research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 575-611.
36. Hunt, S. (1995). Choice in the writing class: How do students decide what to write and how to write it? The Quarterly of the National Writing Project and the Center for the Study of Writing, 17, 7-11.
37. Johnson, C. M. (2001). A survey of current research on online communities of practice. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 45-60.
38. Knobel, M. (1999). Everyday literacies: Students, discourse and social practice. NY: Peter Lang.
39. Knobel, M. (2001). "I'm not a pencil man": How one student challenges our notions of literacy failure in school. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 404-414.
40. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2002). Cut, paste, publish: The production and consumption of zines. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 164-185). NY: Peter Lang.
41. Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., Honan, E., & Crawford, J. (1998). The wired world of second language education. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 20-50). London: Routledge.
42. Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp.109-128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Roudedge Falmer.
44. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self. A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457-483.
45. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003, April), Do-it-yourself broadcasting. Writing Weblogs in a knowledge society. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
46. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. NY: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
47. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (1999, December). Chatting online. Uses of instant message communication among adolescent girls. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Orlando, FL.
49. Lewis, C., & Finders, M. (2002). Implied adolescents and implied teachers: A generation gap for new times. In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 101-113). NY: Peter Lang.
50. Lincoln, Y. (1997). What constitutes quality in interpretative research? In C. Kinzer, K. Hinchman, & D. Leu (Eds.), Inquiries in literacy theory and practice., 46th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 540-568). Chicago, IL: The National Reading Conference.
51. Luce-Kapler, R. (1999). As if women writing. Journal of Literacy Research, 31, 267-291.
52. Luke, C. (1997). Media literacy and cultural studies. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, and P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 19-40). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
53. Mahar, D. (2001). Positioning in a middle-school culture: Gender, race, social class, and power. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 43, 200-209.
54. Mandell, N. (1988). The least adult role in studying children. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 18, 433-465.
55. McCarthey, S. J. (2002). Students' identities and literacy learning. Newark, DE: International Reading Association/National Reading Conference.
56. McDowell, L. (1997). Women/gender/feminists: Doing feminist geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21, 381-400.
57. Merchant, G. (2001). Teenagers in cyberspace: An investigation of language use and language change in Internet chatrooms. Journal of Research in Reading, 24, 293-306.
58. Merchant, G. (in press). Digikids: Cool dudes and the new writing. In J. Marsh (Ed.), Popular culture, new media and digital literacy in early childhood. London: Routledge Falmer.
59. mIRC (n.d.). IRC FAQ: Introduction to IRC for people using windows. Retrieved July 23, 2005 from http://www.mirc.com/ircintro.html.
60. Moje E. B. (2000). "All the stories that we have": Adolescents' insights about literacy and learning in schools. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
61. Moll, L., & Gonzales, N. (1994). Lessons from research with language minority children. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 439-456.
62. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies (pp. 9-38). London: Routledge.
63. Pak, J. (2003, September). Opening up on the Web: Diaries come out of locked closets. The Arizona Republic, p. A20.
64. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65. Rogoff, B. (1984). Thinking and learning in social context. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 1-8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. NY: Oxford University Press.
67. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation and apprenticeship. In J. V. Werstsch, P. Del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139-163). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
68. Schultz, K. (2002). Looking across space and time: Re-conceptualizing literacy learning in and out of school. Research in the Teaching of English, 36, 356-390.
69. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Snyder, I. (Ed.). (1998). Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era. London: Routledge.
71. Snyder, I. (2002). Silicon literacies. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic age (pp. 3-12). London: Routledge.
72. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. NY: Holt.
73. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denizen & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed., pp. 86-109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74. Street, B. V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75. Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman.
76. Street B. V. (1998). New literacies in theory and practice: What are the implications for language in education? Linguistics and Education, 10, 1-24.
77. Stoicheva, M. (2000). The digital divide and its implications for language arts (ERIC Digest D153). Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse in Reading, English and Communication. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED442138).
78. Tatum, B. (1997). "Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?" New York: Basic Books.
79. Taormino, T. (2003, October 31). Pucker Up: Peek-a-Blog. The Village Voice. Retrieved January 15, 2005 from http://villagevoice.com/issues/ 0345/taormino.php
80. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
81. Werry, C. C. (1996). Linguistic and interactional features of internet relay chat. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47-63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.