Gender in Online Communication

Handbook of Research on New Literacies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 491-519

  Marshall, Jonathan Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867086744     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410618894-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (97)

1. Abbate, J. (2003). Women and gender in the history of computing. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 25(4), 4-8.
2. Albright, J., and Conran, T. (n.d.). Online love: Sex, gender, and relationships in cyberspace. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.eff.org/pub/Net_culture/Virtual_community/ online_love.article
3. Alsop, R., Fitzsimons, A., and Lennon, K. (2002). Theorizing gender. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
4. American Association of University Women. (2000). Tech-savvy: Educating girls in the new computer age. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.aauw.org/member_center/ publications/TechSavvy/TechSavvy.pdf
5. Arnold, J., and Miller, H. (1999). Gender and Web home pages. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://ess.ntu.ac.uk/miller/cyberpsych/cal99.htm
6. Arnold, J., and Miller, H. (2000). Same old gender plot? Women academics’ identities on the Web. Paper presented at Cultural Diversities in/and Cyberspace Conference, University of Maryland, Campus Park, Washington, DC. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http:// www.aber.ac.uk/~jmcwww/Identact/Papers/paper80.doc
7. Arnold, J., and Miller, H. (2001). Academic masters, mistresses and apprentices: gender and power in the real world of the Web. Mots pluriels, 19. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.arts.uwa.edu.au/MotsPluriels/MP1901jahm.html
8. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
9. Balka, E. (1993). Women’s access to on-line discussions about feminism. Electronic Journal of Communication, 3(1). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.cios.org/getfile/ Balka_v3n193
10. Benedikt, C. L. (1995). Tinysex is safe sex. Infobahn Magazine, 1(1), 13-14.
11. Bennett, C. M. (1998). Men online: Discussing lived experiences on the internet. Honors thesis, Department of Social Sciences, James Cook University, North Queensland, Australia. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.hotkey.net.au/%7Ecarolineb
12. Biber, J. K., Doverspike, D., Baznik, D., Cober, A., and Ritter, B. A. (2002). Sexual harassment in online communications: Effects of gender and discourse medium. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5(1), 33-42.
13. Borg, A. (1993). Why systers?. Computing Research News. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://cec.wustl.edu/~cs142/articles/GENDER_ISSUES/why_systers--borg
14. Bruckman, A. (1993). Gender swapping on the Internet. Proceedings of INET’93. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.cc.gatech.edu/elc/papers/bruckman/gender-swappingbruckman. pdf
15. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York:Routledge.
16. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’. New York: Routledge.
17. Campbell, K. K. (1994). Attack of the cyber-weenies.Wasatch Area Voices Express. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://kumo.swcp.com/synth/text/cyberweenies.html
18. Canada, K., and Brusca, F. (1992). The technological gender gap: Evidence and recommendations for educators and computer-based instruction designers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(2). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.arielpcs. com/resources/articles/etrd.shtml
19. Castranova, E. (2003). The price of ‘man’ and ‘woman’: A hedonic pricing model of avatar attributes in a synthetic world (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 957). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=415043
20. Clark, L. (1998). Dating on the Net: Teens and the rise of ‘pure’ relationships. In S. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 159-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Clerc, S. (1996). Estrogen brigades and ‘big tits’ threads: Media fandom online and off. In L. Cherney and E. R. Weise (Eds.), Wired women (pp. 73-97). Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
22. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
23. Colyer, A. (1997). Gender issues in cyberspace. A Trip Through Cyber-Cinema Fandom. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.outreach.psu.edu/users/afc1/thesis/eth. contents.html
24. Cooper, A., Scherer, C. R., Boies, S. C., and Gordon, B. L. (1999). Sexuality on the internet:From sexual exploration to pathological expression. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 30(2), 154-164.
25. Cooper, J., and Weaver, K. D. (2003). Gender and computers: Understanding the digital divide. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
26. Corneliussen, H. (2002). The multi-dimensional stories of the gendered users of ICT. In A. Morrison (Ed.), Researching ICTs in context, InterMedia report 3 (pp.). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.intermedia.uio.no/ konferanser/skikt-02/docs/Researching_ ICTs_in_context-Ch8-Corneliussen.pdf, pp. 161-184.
27. Curtis, P. (1997). MUDding: Social phenomena in text-based virtual realities. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 121-142). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Deuel, N. (1996). Our passionate response to virtual reality.In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 129-146). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
29. Dibbell, J. (2001). Samantha, among others. Mots pluriels, 19. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.arts.uwa.edu.au/MotsPluriels/MP1901jd.html
30. Ernst, S. (2003).Gender, power, and leadership: Perspectives from figurational sociology. Paper presented at the 5th European Feminist research conference, Gender and Power in the New Europe, Lund University, Sweden.
31. Eubanks, V. (2000). Paradigms and perversions: A women’s place in cyberspace. CPSR Newsletter, 18(1). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.cpsr.org/publications/newsletters/ issues/2000/Winter2000/eubanks.html
32. Fallows, D. (2005). How Men and Women use the Internet. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved, 5th August 2006 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_ Women_and_Men_online.pdf
33. Ferris, S. P. (1996). Women online: Cultural and relational aspects of women’s communication in online discussion groups. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 4, 29-40. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www. helsinki.fi/science/optek/1996/n3/ferris.txt
34. Fredrick, C. A. N. (1999). Feminist rhetoric in cyberspace: The ethos of feminist usenet newsgroups. Information Society, 15(3), 187-198.
35. Ghosh, R. A., Glott, R., Krieger, G., and Robles, B. (2002). Free/libre and open source software, survey, and study, part IV. Maastricht, The Netherlands: International Institute of Infonomics, University of Maastricht.
36. Gurak, L. (1997). Persuasion and privacy in cyberspace: The online protests over lotus market place and the clipper chip. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37. Hall, K. (1996). Cyberfeminism. In S. Herring (Ed.), Computer mediated communication:Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 147-170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
38. Hatt, D. F. (1998). Male/female language use in computer dyadic interactions. Unpublished master’s thesis, Lauretian University, Ontario, Canada. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.fortunecity.com/boozers/princessdi/302/Lang.html
39. Herring, S. (1993). Gender and democracy in computer mediated communication. EJC/REC, 3(2). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://dc.smu.edu/dc/classroom/Gender.txt
40. Herring, S. (1994, June 27). Gender differences in computer-mediated communication:Bringing familiar Baggageto the new frontier. Keynote address at the American Library Association annual convention, Miami, FL. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://cpsr. org/cpsr/gender/herring.txt
41. Herring, S. (2000). Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications. CPSR Newsletter, 18(1). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.cpsr.org/publications/newsletters/ issues/2000/Winter2000/herring.html
42. Herring, S., Job-Sluder, K., Scheckler, R., and Barab, S. (2002). Searching for safety online:Managing “trolling” in a feminist forum. The Information Society, 18, 371-384.
43. Jenkins, S. (1998). Gender differences in the use of the internet as a means of personal communication. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of London. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.agari.org/summer
44. Kendall, L. (1996). ‘MUDder? I hardly know er’! Adventures of a feminist MUDder. In L. Cherny and E. R. Weise (Eds.), Wired women (pp. 207-223). Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
45. Kendall, L. (1998). Meaning and identity in cyberspace: The performance of gender, class, and race online. Symbolic Interaction, 21(2), 129-153.
46. Kendall, L. (2000). ‘Oh no! I’m a nerd!' Hegemonic masculinity on an online forum. Gender and Society, 14(2), 256-274.
47. Kibby, M. (1997). Babes on the Web: Sex, identity, and the home page. Media International Australia, 84, 39-45. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.newcastle.edu.au/ department/so/babes.htm
48. Kibby, M. (1999). Sex entertainment for women on the Web. Sexuality and Culture, 3, 89-103.
49. Kibby, M. (2001). Women and sex entertainment on the Internet: Discourses of gender and power. Mots pluriels, 19. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.arts.uwa.edu.au/ MotsPluriels/MP1901mk.html
50. Kibby, M., and Costello, B. (1999). Displaying the phallus: Masculinity and the performance of sexuality on the Internet. Men and Masculinities, 1(4), 352-364.
51. Kibby, M., and Costello, B. (2001). Between the image and the act: Interactive sex entertainment on the Internet. Sexualities: Studies in Culture and Society, 4(3), 353-369.
52. King, L. J. (2000). Gender issues in online communities. Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility Newsletter, 18(1). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.cpsr.org/ publications/newsletters/issues/2000/Winter2000/king.html
53. Kramarae, C. (1988). Technology and women’s voices: Keeping in touch. New York:Routledge.
54. LaPin, G. (1999). Shapeshifters: Why women must adapt in the computer world to succeed. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.fusion-studio.com/soc/shapeshifters.html
55. LaPin, G., and Bharadwaj, L. (1998). Pick a gender and get back to us. How cyberspace affects who we are. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.fusion-studio.com/soc/ pick_a_gender.html
56. Margolis, J., and Fischer, A. (2003). Unlocking the clubhouse: Women and computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Marshall, B. L. (2000). Configuring gender: Explorations in theory and politics. Ontario, Canada: Broadview Press.
58. Marshall, J. (2000).Living online: Categories, communication and control. A study of the internet mailing list Cybermind. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Sydney, Australia. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http:// www.geocities.com/jpmarshall.geo/T2/contents.html
59. Marshall, J. (2001). Cyber-space or cyber-topos: The creation of online space. Social Analysis, 45(1), 81-102.
60. Marshall, J. (2002). The sexual life of cyber-savants. The Australian Journal of Anthropology, 14(2), 229-248.
61. Marshall, J. (2003). Resistances of gender. Media Culture Australia, 6(4).Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://journal.media-culture.org.au/0308/06-resistances.php
62. Marshall, J. (2004a). Governance, structure and existence: Authenticity, rhetoric, race and gender on an Internet mailing list. Proceedings of the Australian Electronic Governance Conference, Centre for Public Policy, University of Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.public-policy.unimelb.edu.au/egovernance/ papers/21_Marshall.pdf
63. Marshall, J. (2004b). The online body breaks out: Asence, ghosts, cyborgs and politics. Fibreculture Journal, 3. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://journal.fibreculture.org/ issue3/issue3_marshall.html
64. Mascia-Lees, F., and Black, N. J. (2000) Gender and anthropology. Prospect Heights, IL:Waveland Press.
65. McRae, S. (1996). Coming apart at the seams: Sex, text, and the virtual body. In L. Cherney and E. R.Wiese (Eds.), Wired women (pp. 242-264). Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
66. Millar, M. S. (2000). Cracking the gender code: Who rules the wired world? Annandale, New South Wales, Australia: Pluto Press.
67. Morahan-Martin, J. (1998, March 25-27). Women and girls last: Females and the Internet. Paper presented at the IRISS Conference, Bristol, U.K. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.sosig.ac.uk/iriss/papers/paper55.htm
68. Mowbray, M. (2001). Does online gender masking work? [Electronic version]. International Journal of Communication, 11, 105-120.
69. Munster, A. (1999). Is there postlife after postfeminism? Tropes of technics and life in cyberfeminism. Australian Feminist Studies, 14(29), 119-130.
70. Nishimura, Y. (2003). Linguistic innovations and interactional features of casual online communication in Japanese. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 9(1). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol9/issue1/nishimura.html
71. O’Brien, J. (1999a, April). Changing the subject. Echo Magazine. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.ucm.es/info/rqtr/biblioteca/ciberespacio%20gltb/CHANGING%20 THE%20SUBJECT.pdf
72. O’Brien, J. (1999b). Writing in the body: Gender (re)production in online interaction. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 76-104). London:Routledge.
73. Ogilvie, E. (2000). The internet and cyberstalking. Paper presented at the Australian Institute of Criminology conference, Sydney, Australia.
74. Pilcher, J., and Whelehan, I. (2004). 50 key concepts in gender studies. London: Sage.
75. Reeves, B., and Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
76. Reid, E. (1994). Cultural formations in text-based virtual realities. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of English, University of Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.aluluei.com/cult-form.htm
77. Roberts, L. D., and Parks, M. (2001). The social geography of gender-switching in virtual environments on the Internet. In E. Green and A. Adam (Eds.), Virtual gender: Technology, consumption and identity (pp. 265-285). London: Routledge.
78. Savicki, V. and Kelley, M. (2000). Computer mediated communication: Gender and group composition. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour 3 (5), pp. 817-826.
79. Savicki, V., Kelley, M., and Oesterreich, E. (1999). Judgments of gender in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 185-194.
80. Savicki, V., Lingenfalter, D., and Kelley, M (1996), Gender Language Style and Group Composition in Internet Discussion Groups. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. Retrieved April 15 2006 from, http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue3/savicki.html
81. Schaap, F. (1999). Males say ‘blue, ' females say ‘aqua, ' ‘sapphire, ' and ‘dark navy.' The importance of gender in computer-mediated communication. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.fragment.nl/texts/males_say_blue.txt
82. Shade, L. R. (1993). Gender issues in computer networking. Paper presented at Community Networking: The International Free-Net Conference, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.cpsr.org/cpsr/gender/leslie_regan_ shade.txt
83. Slater, D. (1998). Trading sexpics on IRC: Embodiment and authenticity on the Internet. Body and Society, 4(4), 91-117.
84. Sofia, Z. (2000). Container technologies. Hypatia, 15(2), 181-201.
85. Sollfrank, C. (1999, March 8-13). Women hackers. Paper presented at Cyberfeminist International, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www. obn.org/nCI/report2.htm
86. Suler, J. (1999). Do boys (and girls) just wanna have fun? Gender-switching in cyberspace. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/genderswap.html
87. Sussman, N. M., and Tyson, D. H. (2000). Sex and power: Gender differences in computermediated interactions. Computers in Human Behaviour, 16, 381-394.
88. ten Have, P. (2000). ‘hi, a/s/l please?': Identification/categorization in computer-mediated communication. Paper presented at the ‘Sociaal-Wetenschappelijke Studiedagen 2000', Session ICT and Huiselijk Leven. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.fragment. nl/mirror/Have2000/ASL-home.htm
89. Thomas, A (2000) Textual constructions of children’s online identities. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 3(4), 665-672.
90. Thomas, A. (2004). Digital literacies of the cybergirl. E-Learning, 1(3), 358-382.
91. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
92. Vaughn, Trias, J. (1997). Democracy or difference?: Gender differences in the amount of discourse on an Internet relay chat channel. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://nimbus. temple.edu/~jvaughn/papers/pca99.html
93. Veryard, R. (2001). Are computers sexy: Notes on technology and gender. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~rxv/tcm/gender.htm
94. We, G. (1994). Cross-gender communication in cyberspace. Arachnet Journal of Virtual Culture, 2(3). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.infomotions.com/serials/aejvc/ aejvc-v2n03-we-crossgender.txt
95. Weisbard, P. H. (2000, April 12). Cyberjanes and cyberjitters: Myths and realities of gender differences and the Net. Paper presented at the WAAL Spring Conference Talk, Fond du Lac, Wisconsin. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.library.wisc.edu/libraries/ WomensStudies/Talks/waaltalk.htm
96. Witmer, D. F. (1996). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents? Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/witmer1.html
97. Wright, K. (2000). Gender bending in games. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://www.womengamers.com/articles/gender.html