The impact of instruction in the WWWDOT framework on students' disposition and ability to evaluate web sites as Sources of information

Elementary School Journal

Volumn 112, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 132-154

  Zhang, Shenglan ^a   Duke, Nell K ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052606339     PISSN: 00135984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/660687     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Agosto, D. E. (2002). A model of young people's decision-making in using the Web. Library & Information Science Research, 24, 311-341.
2. American Library Association. (2011). Criteria for evaluating Web sites. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/alsc/greatwebsites/greatwebsitesforkids/greatwebsites.cfm
3. Arafeh, S., Levin, D., Rainie, L., & Lenhart, A. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Retrieved from Pew Internet and American Life Project Web site: http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2002/PIP_Schools_Internet_Report.pdf.pdf
4. Baildon, R., & Baildon, M. (2008). Guiding independence: Developing a research tool to support student decision making in selecting online information sources. Reading Teacher, 61(8), 636-647.
5. Baskin, B. H. (1997). The role of computer graphics in literacy attainment. In J. Flood, S. B. Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 872-874). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
6. Bender, R., & Benner, A. (2000). Calculating ordinal regression models in SAS and S-Plus. Biometrical Journal, 42(6), 677-699.
7. Burbules, N. C. (1997). Rhetorics of the Web: Hyperreading and critical literacy. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 102-122). New York: Routledge.
8. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The risks and promises of information technologies for education. Boulder, CO: Westview.
9. Burke, J. (2000). Caught in the Web: Reading the Internet. Voices from the Middle, 7(3), 15-23.
10. Calisir, F., & Gurel, Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 135-145.
11. Card, S., Mackinlay, J. D., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Readings in information visualization: Using vision to think. San Diego: Academic Press.
12. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 214-257.
13. Davis, E. A., & Kirkpatrick, D. (2002). It's all the news: Critiquing evidence and claims. Science Scope, 25(5), 32-37.
14. Eagleton, M. B., & Dobler, E. (2007). Reading the Web: Strategies for Internet inquiry. New York: Guilford.
15. Eagleton, M. B., Guinee, K., & Langlais, K. (2003). Teaching Internet literacy strategies: The hero inquiry project. Voices from the Middle, 10(3), 28-35.
16. Graesser, A. C., Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., O'Reilly, T., Jeon, M., & McDaniel, B. (2007). SEEK Web tutor: Fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 89-105.
17. Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2005). Writing better: Effective strategies for teaching students with learning difficulties. Baltimore: Brookes.
18. Harris, R. (2007). Evaluating Internet research sources. Retrieved from http://www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm
19. Hawes, K. S. (1998). Reading the Internet: Conducting research for the virtual classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(7), 563-565.
20. Henry, L. A. (2007). Exploring new literacies pedagogy and online reading comprehension among middle school students and teachers: Issues of social equity or social exclusion? Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
21. Hirsh, S. G. (1999). Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(14), 1265-1283.
22. Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle school learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346.
23. Iding, M., Landsman, R., & Nguyen, T. (2002). Critical evaluation of scientific Web sites by high school students. In D. Watson & J. Anderson (Eds.), Networking the learner: Computers in education: Seventh IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education Conference Proceedings. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
24. Kafai, Y., & Bates, M. J. (1997). Internet Web-searching instruction in the elementary classroom: Building a foundation for information literacy. School Library Media Quarterly, 25(2), 103-111.
25. Kamil, M. L., & Lane, D. (1998). Researching the relationship between technology and literacy: An agenda for the 21st century. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 323-341). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Killi, C., Laurinen, L., & Marttunen, M. (2008). Students evaluating internet sources: From versatile evaluators to uncritical readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39, 75-95.
27. Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The Web as an information resource in K-12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Educational Research, 75, 285-328.
28. Lankshear, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
29. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
30. Larkin, J., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65-99.
31. Lenhart, A., Simon M., & Graziano, M. (2001). The Internet and education: Findings of the Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2001/PIP_Schools_Report.pdf.pdf
32. Leu, D. J., Jr. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the Internet and other digital technologies. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 310-337). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
33. Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1568-1611). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
34. Lorenzen, M. (2001). The land of confusion? High school students and their use of the World Wide Web for research. Research Strategies, 18, 151-163.
35. Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(5), 448-462.
36. McDonald, S., & Stevenson, R. J. (1998). Effects of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on navigation in hypertext. Human Factors, 40(1), 18-27.
37. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). Teachers' use of computers and the Internet in public schools. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/publications/2000090/index.asp?sectionid_2
38. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2005). Internet access in U.S. public schools and classrooms: 1994-2003. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid_2005015
39. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Computer and Internet use by students in 2003. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006065.pdf
40. New Literacies Research Team & Internet Reading Research Group. (2006). Results summary report from the Survey of Internet Usage and Online Reading for School District 10-C (Research Report No. 1), University of Connecticut, New Literacies Research Lab.
41. Nimwegen, C. V., Pouw, M., & Oostendorp, H. V. (1999). The influence of structure and readingmanipulation on usability of hypertexts. Interacting with Computers, 12, 7-21.
42. Quintana, C., Zhang, M., & Krajcik, J. (2005). A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 235-244.
43. Rouet, J. F., & Levonen, J. J. (1998). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J. F. Rouet., J. J. Levon, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 9-24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Schacter, J., Chung, G., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children's Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 840-849.
45. Schrock, K. (1999). Producing information consumers: Critical evaluation and critical thinking. Book Report, 17(4), 47-48.
46. Slone, D. J. (2002). The influence of mental models and goals on search patterns during web interaction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 53(13), 1152-1169.
47. Towne, L., & Hilton, M. (Eds.). (2004). Implementing randomized field trials in education: Report of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
48. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Information & Communications: Internet publishing and broadcasting and internet usage. Retrieved March 21, 2011 from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/cats/information_communications/internet_publishing_and_broadcasting_and_internet_usage.html
49. University of California, Berkeley. (2009, October 24). Evaluating Web pages: Techniques to apply and questions to ask. Retrieved from http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/TeachingLib/Guides/Internet/Evaluate.html
50. Wallace, R. M., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students on-line in a sixth-grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75-104.
51. Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers & Education, 52, 234-246.
52. Waniek, J., Brunstein, A., Naumann, A., & Krems, J. F. (2003). Interaction between text structure representation and situation model in hypertext reading. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 62(2), 103-111.
53. Zhang, S., & Duke, N. K. (2008). Strategies for Internet reading with different reading purposes: A descriptive study of twelve good Internet readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 128-162.
54. Zhang, S., & Duke, N. K. (2010, December). Fourth-and fifth-grade students tutoring younger students to evaluate Web sites. In D. Hartman & N. K. Duke (Chair), At the intersection of literacy & technology: Research and developments from the Literacy Achievement Research Center (LARC). Alternative format session to be conducted at the annual meeting of Literacy Research Association (NRC/LRA), Fort Worth, TX.