Comments on Greenhow, Robelia, and Hughes: Expanding the new literacies conversation

Educational Researcher

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 264-269

  Leu, Donald J ^a   lan O'Byrne, W ^a   Zawilinski, Lisa ^a   McVerry, J Greg ^a   Everett Cacopardo, Heidi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Literacy; New literacies; Online reading comprehension; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249140120     PISSN: 0013189X     EISSN: 1935102X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09336676     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2002). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.) Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 285-310). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Alvermann, D. E. (Ed.). (2004). Adolescents and literacies in a digital world. New York: Peter Lang.
3. Anderson, P. (2007). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. Retrieved Feb 26, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
4. Barbry, E. (2007). Web 2.0: Nothing changes... but everything is different. Communications and Strategies, 65, 91. Available from General OneFile via Gale: http://www.gale.cengage.com/
5. Bennet, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The digital natives debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 775-786.
6. Bilal, D. (2000). Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 646-665.
7. Bleha, T. (2005, May/June). Down to the wire. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.foreignaffairs.org/20050501faessay84311/thomas-bleha/down-to- thewire.html
8. Borzekowski, D., Fobil, J., & Asante, K. (2006). Online access by adolescents in Accra: Ghanaian teens' use of the Internet for health information. Developmental Psychology, 42, 450-458.
9. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230.
10. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Castek, J. (2008). How do 4th and 5th Grade Students Acquire the New Literacies of Online Reading Comprehension? Exploring the Contexts that Facilitate Learning. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.
12. Coiro, J. (2003). Rethinking comprehension strategies to better prepare students for critically evaluating content on the Internet. New England Reading Association Journal, 39, 29-34.
13. Coiro, J. (2007). Exploring changes to reading comprehension on the Internet: Paradoxes and possibilities for diverse adolescent readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
14. Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 214-257.
15. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu. (Eds.), The handbook of research in new literacies (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Cooper, M. (2004). Expanding the digital divide and falling behind on broadband: Why telecommunications policy of neglect is not benign. Washington, DC: Consumer Federation of America. Retrieved April 17, 2007, from http://www.consumerfed.org/pdfs/digitaldivide.pdf
17. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (1999). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. New York: Routledge.
18. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Dede, C. (2007). Reinventing the role of information and communication technologies in education. In L. Smolin, K. Lawless, & N. C. Burbules (Eds.), Information and communication technologies: Considerations of current practices for teachers and teacher educators. 106th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part 2, pp. 11-38). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
20. Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palalgeorgiou, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas, L., et al. (2003). "Cultures in negotiation": Teachers' acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of technology into schools. Computers and Education, 41(1), 19-37.
21. Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2006). From Wikipedia to the classroom: Exploring online publication and learning. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Learning Sciences, 182-188.
22. Friedman, T. L. (2006). The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
23. Gee, J. P. (2007). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Routledge.
24. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259.
25. Gu, W., Liu, C., & Lin, H. (2004, August). Bring Internet to education: An empirical study of different policy initiatives. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, San Francisco. Retrieved February 6, 2009, from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p108792_index.html
26. Hagood, M. C. (2008). Intersections of popular culture, identities, and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.). The handbook of research in new literacies (pp. 531-552). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Henry, L. (2006). SEARCHing for an answer: The critical role of new literacies while reading on the Internet. Reading Teacher, 59, 614-627.
28. Henry, L. A. (2007). Exploring new literacies pedagogy and online reading comprehension among middle school students and teachers: Issues of social equity or social exclusion? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
29. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
30. Hirsh, S. G. (1999). Children's relevance criteria and information seeking on electronic resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50, 1265-1283.
31. Hodas, S. (1993). Technology refusal and the organizational culture of schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 1(10). Retrieved February 26, 2009, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v1n10.html
32. Huffaker, D. (2004). Spinning yarns around a digital fire: Storytelling and dialogue among youth on the Internet. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 1, 63-75.
33. Huffaker, D. (2005). The educated blogger: Using weblogs to promote literacy in the classroom. AACE Journal, 13, 91-98.
34. Hull, G., & Schultz, K. (2002). School's out: Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
35. International ICT Literacy Panel. (2002, May). Digital transformation: A framework for ICT literacy. Retrieved May 1, 2007, from Educational Testing Service website: http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/Information_and_Communication_Technology_ Literacy/ictreport.pdf
36. International Reading Association. (2002). Integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum: A position statement. Newark, DE: Author.
37. International Reading Association. (2009). IRA position statement on literacy and technology: Unpublished draft. Newark, DE: Author.
38. Internet world stats: Usage and population statistics. (2008). Retrieved January 28, 2008, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
39. Kling, R. (1999). What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine, 5(1). Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://www.dlib.org:80/dlib/january99/kling/01kling.html
40. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
41. Kuiper, E., & Volman, M. (2008). The Web as a source of information for students in K-12 education. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 241-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Lam, W. (2006). Culture and learning in the context of globalization: Research directions. Review of Research in Education, 30, 213-237.
43. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
44. Lazarus, W., Wainer, A., & Lipper, L. (2005). Measuring digital opportunity for America's children: Where we stand and where we go from here. Santa Monica, CA: Children's Partnership. Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://www.contentbank.org/DOMS
45. Leander, K. M. (2008). Toward a connective ethnography of online/offline literacy networks. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 33-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Lemke, J. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1, 299-325.
47. Lessig, L. (2005, May). Creative commons. Paper presented at the 2005 Annual ITU Conference, Creative Dialogues, Oslo, Norway.
48. Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and technology: Deictic consequences for literacy education in an information age. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 743-770). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49. Leu, D. J., Ataya, R., & Coiro, J. (2002, December). Assessing assessment strategies among the 50 states: Evaluating the literacies of our past or our future? Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami, FL.
50. Leu, D., Castek, J., Hartman, D., Coiro, J., Henry, L., Kulikowich, et al. (2005). Evaluating the development of scientific knowledge and new forms of reading comprehension during online learning. Final report presented to the North Central Regional Educational Laboratory/Learning Point Associates. Retrieved May 15, 2007, from http://www.newliteracies.uconn.edu/ncrel.html
51. Leu, D. J., Jr., & Kinzer, C. K. (2000). The convergence of literacy instruction and networked technologies for information and communication. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 108-127.
52. Leu, D. J., Jr., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1568-1611). Newark, DE: International reading Association. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from http://www.readingonline.org/newliteracies/lit_index.asp?HREF=/newlitera cies/leu
53. Leu, D. J., McVerry, J. G., O'Byrne, W. I., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., & Hartman, D. K. (in press). The new literacies of online reading comprehension and the irony of No Child Left Behind: Students who require our assistance the most, actually receive it the least. In L. M. Morrow, R. Rueda, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of research on literacy instruction: Issues of diversity, policy, and equity. New York: Guilford.
54. Leu, D. J., Reinking, D., Carter, A., Castek, J., Coiro, J., Henry, L. A., et al. (2007, April). Defining online reading comprehension: Using think aloud verbal protocols to refine a preliminary model of Internet reading comprehension processes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dcbjhrtq_10djqrhz
55. Leu, D. J., Zawilinski, L., Castek, J., Banerjee, M., Housand, B., Liu, Y., et al. (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension? In L. Rush, J. Eakle, & A. Berger (Eds.), Secondary school literacy: What research reveals for classroom practices (pp. 37-68). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
56. Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 470-501.
57. Matteucci, N., O'Mahony, M., Robinson, C., & Zwick, T. (2005). Productivity, workplace performance and ICT: Industry and firm-level evidence for Europe and the US. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52, 359-386.
58. Mayer, R. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. McVerry, J. G. (2007). Forums and functions of threaded discussions. New England Reading Association Journal, 43(1), 79-85.
60. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
61. O'Byrne, W. I. (2008). The audience is watching: Effectively using video in your classroom and in online spaces. Sigtel Bulletin [Online serial]. Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Membership/SIGs/SIGTel_Telele arning_/SIGTelBulletin/Archive/20082009/The_Audience_Is_Watching.htm
62. Starke-Meyerring, D. (2005). Meeting the challenges of globalization: A framework for global literacies in professional communication programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 19, 468-499.
63. Street, B. (1995). Social literacies. London: Longman.
64. Street, B. (2003). What's new in new literacy studies? Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 1-14.
65. Thorne, S. L. (2008). Computer-mediated communication. In N. Hornberger & N. Van Duesen-Scholl (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 4, 2nd and foreign language education, pp. 325-336). Springer/Kluwer: New York.
66. Weare, C., & Lin, W.-Y. (2000). Content analysis of the World Wide Web: Opportunities and challenges. Social Science Computer Review, 18, 272-292.
67. Webber, S., & Johnson, B. (2000). Conceptions of information literacy: New perspectives and implications. Journal of Informational Science, 26, 381-397.
68. Zawilinski, L. (2009). HOT blogging: A framework for blogging to promote higher order thinking. Reading Teacher, 62, 650-661.