The use of selected reaction monitoring in quantitative proteomics

Bioanalysis

Volumn 4, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 1763-1786

  Holman, Stephen W ^a   Sims, Paul F G ^a   Eyers, Claire E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; COLLISIONALLY ACTIVATED DISSOCIATION; DOWN REGULATION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MONITORING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SELECTED REACTION MONITORING;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; PEPTIDES; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 84864987862     PISSN: 17576180     EISSN: 17576199     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4155/bio.12.126     Document Type: Review

References (186)

1. Wasinger VC, Cordwell SJ, Cerpa-Poljak A et al. Progress with gene-product mapping of the Mollicutes: Mycoplasma genitalium. Electrophoresis 16, 1090-1094 (1995
2. Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 994-999 (1999
3. Shiio Y, Aebersold R. Quantitative proteome analysis using isotope-coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry. Nat. Protoc. 1, 139-145 (2006
4. Thompson A, Schäfer J, Kuhn K et al. Tandem mass tags: A novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 75, 1895-1904 (2003
5. Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 1154-1169 (2004
6. Raijmakers R, Berkers CR, de Jong A, Ovaa H, Heck AJR, Mohammed S. Automated online sequential isotope labeling for protein quantitation applied to proteasome tissue-specific diversity. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 1755-1762 (2008
7. Boersema PJ, Raijmakers R, Lemeer S, Mohammed S, Heck AJR. Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Protoc. 4, 484-494 (2009
8. Ong S-E, Blagoy B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376-386 (2002
9. Ong S-E, Mann M. A practical recipe for stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Nat. Protoc. 1, 2650-2660 (2007
10. Lanucara F, Eyers CE. Mass spectrometric-based quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Method. Enzymol. 500, 133-150 (2011
11. America AHP, Cordewener JHG. Comparative LC-MS. A landscape of peaks and valleys. Proteomics 8, 731-749 (2008
12. Lundgren DH, Hwang S-I, Wu L, Han DK. Role of spectral counting in quantitative proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 7, 39-53 (2010
13. Old WM, Meyer-Arendt K, Aveline-Wolf L et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1487-1502 (2005
14. Brönstrup M. Absolute quantification strategies in proteomics based on mass spectrometry. Expert Rev. Proteomics 1, 503-512 (2004
15. Brun V, Masselon C, Garin J, Dupuis A. Isotope dilution strategies for absolute quantitative proteomics. J. Proteomics 72, 740-749 (2009
16. Dowling P, Meleady P, Henry M, Clynes M. Recent advances in clinical proteomics using mass spectrometry. Bioanalysis 2, 1609-1615 (2010
17. Hester RL, Iliescu R, Summers R, Coleman TG. Systems biology and integrative physiology modelling. J. Physiol. 589, 1053-1060 (2011
18. Silva JC, GM V, Li G-Z, Vissers JPC, Geromanos SJ. Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 144-156 (2006
19. Neilson KA, Ali NA, Muralidharan S et al. Less label, more free: Approaches in label-free quantitative mass spectrometry. Proteomics 11, 535-553 (2011
20. Levin Y, Hradetzky E, Bahn S. Quantification of proteins using data-independent analysis (MSE) in simple and complex samples: A systematic evaluation. Proteomics 11, 3272-3287 (2011
21. Ludwig C, Claassen M, Schmidt A, Aebersold R. Estimation of absolute protein quantities of unlabeled samples by selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp. M1111.013987 (2012) (Epub ahead of print
22. Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, Rick J, Kuster B. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: A critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 389, 1017-1031 (2007
23. Ciccimaro E, Blair IA. Stable-isotope dilution LC-MS for quantitative biomarker analysis. Bioanalysis 2, 311-341 (2010
24. Leito I, Herodes K, Huopolainen M et al. Towards the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry ionization efficiency scale of organic compounds. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 22, 379-384 (2008
25. Oss M, Kruve A, Herodes K, Leito I. Electrospray ionization efficiency scale of organic compounds. Anal. Chem. 82, 2865-2872 (2010
26. King R, Bonfiglio R, Fernandez-Metzler C, Miller-Stein C, Olah T. Mechanistic investigation of ionization suppression in electrospray ionization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11, 942-950 (2000
27. Trufelli H, Palma P, Famiglini G, Cappiello A. An overview of matrix effects in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 30, 491-509 (2011
28. Desiderio DM, Kai M. Preparation of stable isotope-incorporated peptide internal standards for field desorption mass spectrometry quantification of peptides in biologic tissue. Biomed. Mass Spectrom. 10, 471-479 (1983
29. Barr JR, Maggio VL, Patterson Jr DG et al. Isotope dilution mass spectrometric quantification of specific proteins: model application with apolipoprotein A-I. Clin. Chem. 42, 1676-1682 (1996
30. Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, Kirschner MW, Gygi SP. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6940-6945 (2003
31. Kirkpatrick DS, Gerber SA, Gygi SP. The absolute quantification strategy: A general procedure for the quantification of proteins and post-translational modifications. Methods 35, 265-273 (2005
32. Kettenbach AN, Rush J, Gerber SA. Absolute quantification of protein and post-translational modification abundance with stable isotope-labeled synthetic peptides. Nat. Protoc. 6, 175-186 (2011
33. Papaioannou MD, Lagarrigues M, Vejnar CE et al. Loss of dicer in Sertoli cells has a major impact on the testicular proteome of mice. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp. M900587-MCP900200 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
34. Phu L, Izrael-Tomasevic A, Matsumoto ML et al. Improved quantitative mass spectrometry methods for characterizing complex ubiquitin signals. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp.M1110.003756 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
35. Brownridge P, Holman SW, Gaskell SJ et al. Global absolute quantification of a proteome: Challenges in the deployment of a QconCAT strategy. Proteomics 11, 2957-2970 (2011
36. Holzmann J, Pichler P, Madalinksi M, Kurzbauer R, Mechtler K. Stoichiometry determination of the MP1-p14 complex using a novel and cost-efficient method to produce an equimolar mixture of standard peptides. Anal. Chem. 81, 10254-10261 (2009
37. Beynon RJ, Doherty MK, Pratt JM, Gaskell SJ. Multiplexed absolute quantification in proteomics using artificial QCAT proteins of concatenated signature peptides. Nat. Methods 2, 587-589 (2005
38. Johnson H, Eyers CE, Eyers PA, Beynon RJ, Gaskell SJ. Rigorous determination of the stoichiometry of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20, 2211-2220 (2009
39. Ding C, Li Y, Kim B-J et al. Quantitative analysis of cohesin complex stoichiometry and SMC3 modification-dependent protein interactions. J. Proteome Res. 10, 3652-3659 (2011
40. Carroll KM, Simpson DM, Eyers CE et al. Absolute quantification of the glycolytic pathway in yeast: Deployment of a complete QconCAT approach. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp.M1111.007633-007631 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
41. Kito K, Ota K, Fujita T, Ito T. A synthetic protein approach toward accurate mass spectrometric quantification of component stoichiometry of multiprotein complexes. J. Proteome Res. 6, 792-800 (2007
42. Brun V, Dupuis A, Adrait A et al. Isotope-labeled protein standards: Toward absolute quantitative proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 2139-2149 (2007
43. Brownridge P, Beynon RJ. The importance of the digest: Proteolysis and absolute quantification in proteomics. Methods 54, 351-360 (2011
44. Coin I. The depsipeptide method for solid-phase synthesis of difficult peptides. J. Pept. Sci. 16, 223-230 (2010
45. Pezeshki A, Vergote V, Van Dorpe S et al. Adsorption of peptides at the sample drying step: Influence of solvent evaporation technique, vial material and solution additive. J. Pharmaceut. Biomed. 49, 607-612 (2009
46. Mirzaei H, McBee JK, Watts J, Aebersold R. Comparative evaluation of current peptide production platforms used in absolute quantification in proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 813-823 (2008
47. Siepen JA, Keevil EJ, Knight D, Hubbard SJ. Prediction of missed cleavage sites in tryptic peptides aids protein identification in proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 6, 399-408 (2007
48. Pritchard C, Quaglia M, Ashcroft AE, O'Connor G. Considering the advantages and pitfalls of the use of isotopically labeled protein standards for accurate protein quantification. Bioanalysis 3, 2797-2802 (2011
49. Huillet C, Adrait A, Lebert D et al. Accurate quantification of cardiovascular biomarkers in serum using protein standard absolute quantification (PSAQTM) and selected reaction monitoring. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp.M1111.008235 (2012) (Epub ahead of print
50. Gilmore JM, Washburn MP. Advances in shotgun proteomics and the analysis of membrane proteins. J. Proteomics 73, 2078-2091 (2010
51. Skipp PJ, O'Connor D. Shotgun proteomics: Future perspective in bioanalysis. Bioanalysis 3, 2159-2160 (2011
52. Griffiths WJ, Wang Y. Mass spectrometry: From proteomics to metabolomics and lipidomics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1882-1896 (2009
53. Kebarle P, Verkerk UH. Electrospray: From ions in solution to ions in the gas phase, what we know now. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 28, 898-917 (2009
54. Paizs B, Suhai S. Fragmentation pathways of protonated peptides. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 24, 508-548 (2005
55. Mikesh LM, Ueberhide B, Chi A et al. The utility of ETD mass spectrometry in proteomic analysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1764, 1811-1822 (2006
56. Wiesner J, Premsler T, Sickmann A. Application of electron transfer dissociation (ETD) for the analysis of posttranslational modifications. Proteomics 8, 4466-4483 (2008
57. Wu S-L, Huehmer AFR, Hao Z, Karger BL. Online LC-MS approach combining collision-induced dissociation (CID), electron-transfer dissociation (ETD) and CID of an isolated charge-reduced species for the trace-level characterization of proteins with post-translational modifications. J. Proteome Res. 6, 4230-4244 (2007
58. Jones AW, Cooper HJ. Dissociation techniques in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Analyst 136, 3419-3429 (2011
59. Thakur SS, Geiger T, Chatterjee B et al. Deep and highly sensitive proteome coverage by LC-MS/MS without pre-fractionation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp. M1110.003699 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
60. Simpson RJ, Connolly LM, Eddes JS, Pereira JJ, Moritz RL, Reid GE. Proteomic analysis of the human colon carcinoma cell line (LIM 1215): Development of a membrane protein database. Electrophoresis 21, 1707-1732 (2000
61. Keller BO, Sui J, Young AB, Whittal RM. Interferences and contaminants encountered in modern mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 627, 71-81 (2008
62. Picotti P, Aebersold R, Domon B. The implications of proteolytic background for shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1589-1598 (2007
63. de Godoy LM, Olsen JV, de Souza GA, Li G, Mortensen P, Mann M. Status of complete proteome analysis by mass spectrometry: SILAC labeled yeast as a model system. Genome Biol. 7, R50 (2006
64. Ghaemmaghami S, Huh W-K, Bower K et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741 (2003
65. Picotti P, Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Domon B, Aebersold R. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell 138, 795-806 (2009
66. Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 845-867 (2002
67. Silva JC, Denny R, Dorschel CA et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis by accurate mass retention time pairs. Anal. Chem. 77, 2187-2200 (2005
68. Tsou C-C, Tsai C-F, Tsui Y-H et al. IDEAL-Q, an automated tool for label-free quantitation analysis using an efficient peptide alignment approach and spectral data validation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 131-144 (2010
69. Wada K, Ogiwara A, Nagasaka K, Tanaka N, Komatsu Y. i-RUBY: A novel software for quantitative analysis of highly accurate shotgun-proteomics liquid chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry data obtained without stable-isotope labeling of proteins. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 25, 960-968 (2011
70. Bateman RH, Carruthers R, Hoyes JB et al. A novel precursor ion discovery method on a hybrid quadrupole orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer for studying protein phosphorylation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 13, 792-803 (2002
71. Chernushevich IV, Loboda AV, Thomson BA. An introduction to quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 36, 849-865 (2001
72. Stafford GC, Kelley PE, Syka JEP, Reynolds WE, Todd JFJ. Recent improvements in and analytical applications of advanced ion trap technology. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 60, 85-98 (1984
73. Jonscher KR, Yates III JR. The quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer - a small solution to a big challenge. Anal. Biochem. 244, 1-15 (1997
74. Hager JW. A new linear ion trap mass spectrometer. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 16, 512-526 (2002
75. Schwartz JC, Senko MW, Syka JEP. A two-dimensional quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 13, 659-669 (2002
76. Douglas DJ, Frank AJ, Mao D. Linear ion traps in mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 24, 1-29 (2005
77. Loboda AV, Chernushevich IV. A novel ion trap that enables high duty cycle and wide m/z range on an orthogonal injection TOF mass spectrometer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 20, 1342-1348 (2009
78. Michalski A, Cox J, Mann M. More than 100,000 detectable peptide species elute in single shotgun proteomics runs but the majority is inaccessible to data-dependent LC-MS/MS. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1785-1793 (2011
79. Murray KK, Boyd RK, Eberlin MN, Langley GJ, Li L, Naito Y. IUPAC standard definitions of terms relating to mass spectrometry: Final recommendations. Proceedings of: The 56th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics. 1-5 June, Denver, CO, USA (2008
80. Murray KK. Glossary of terms for separations coupled to mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1217, 3922-3928 (2010
81. Kondrat RW, McClusky GA, Cooks RG. Multiple reaction monitoring in mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry for direct analysis of complex mixtures. Anal. Chem. 50, 2017-2021 (1978
82. Zakett D, Flynn GA, Cooks RG. Chlorine isotope effects in mass spectrometry by multiple reaction monitoring. J. Phys. Chem. 82, 2359-2362 (1978
83. Yost RA, Enke CG. Triple quadrupole mass spectrometry for direct mixture analysis and structural elucidation. Anal. Chem. 51, 1251A-1264A (1979
84. Douglas DJ. Linear quadrupoles in mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 28, 937-960 (2009
85. March RE. Quadrupole ion traps. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 28, 961-989 (2009
86. Lin S, Shaler TA, Becker CH. Quantification of intermediate-abundance proteins in serum by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry in a single-quadrupole ion trap. Anal. Chem. 78, 5762-5767 (2006
87. Shipkova P, Drexler DM, Langish R, Smalley J, Salyan ME, Sanders M. Application of ion trap technology to liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry quantitation of large peptides. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 22, 1359-1366 (2008
88. Tanaka N, Nagasaka K, Komatsu Y. Selected reaction monitoring by linear ion-trap mass spectrometry can effectively be applicable to simultaneous quantification of multiple peptides. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 34, 135-141 (2011
89. Cohen AM, Mansour AAH, Banoub JH. Absolute quantification of Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout vitellogenin by the 'signature peptide' approach using electrospray ionization QqToF tandem mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 41, 646-658 (2006
90. Anderson L, Hunter CL. Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 573-588 (2006
91. Boyd RK, Basic C, Bethem RA. Trace Quantitative Analysis by Mass Spectrometry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK (2008
92. Addona TA, Abbatiello SE, Schilling B et al. Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 633-641 (2009
93. Kuster B, Schirle M, Mallick P, Aebersold R. Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 6, 577-583 (2005
94. Picotti P, Lam H, Campbell D et al. A database of mass spectrometric assays for the yeast proteome. Nat. Methods 5, 913-914 (2008
95. Brot N, Weissbach H. Biochemistry and physiological role of methionine sulfoxide residues in proteins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 223, 271-281 (1983
96. Froelich JM, Reid GE. The origin and control of ex vivo oxidative peptide modifications prior to mass spectrometry analysis. Proteomics 8, 1334-1345 (2008
97. Khandke KM, Fairwell T, Chait BT, Manjula BN. Influence of ions on cyclization of the amino terminal glutamine residues of tryptic peptides of streptococcal PepM49 protein: Resolution of cyclized peptides by HPLC and characterization by mass spectrometry. Int. J. Peptide Protein Res. 34, 118-123 (1989
98. Han B, Higgs RE. Proteomics: From hypothesis to quantitative assay on a single platform. Guidelines for developing MRM assays using ion trap mass spectrometers. Brief. Funct. Genomic Proteomic 7, 340-354 (2008
99. Schechter I, Berger A. On the size of the active site in proteases. I. Papain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 27, 157-162 (1967
100. Craig R, Cortens JP, Beavis RC. Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. J. Proteome Res. 3, 1234-1242 (2004
101. Deutsch EW, Lam H, Aebersold R. PeptideAtlas: A resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows. EMBO Rep. 9, 429-434 (2008
102. Siepen JA, Belhajjame K, Selley JN et al. ISPIDER Central: An integrated database web-server for proteomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W485-W490 (2008
103. Vizcaíno JA, Côté R, Reisinger F et al. A guide to the Proteomics Identifications Database proteomics data repository. Proteomics 9, 4276-4383 (2009
104. Mallick P, Schirle M, Chen SS et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 125-131 (2007
105. Fusaro VA, Mani DR, Mesirov JP, Carr SA. Prediction of high-responding peptides for targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 190-198 (2009
106. Eyers CE, Lawless C, Wedge DC, Lau KW, Gaskell SJ, Hubbard SJ. CONSeQuence: Prediction of reference peptides for absolute quantitative proteomics using consensus machine learning approaches. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi: 10.1074/mcp.M1110.003384 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
107. Helsens K, Brusniak M-Y, Deutsch E, Moritz RL, Martens L. jTraML: An open source java API for TraML, the PSI standard for sharing SRM transitions. J. Proteome Res. 10, 5260-5263 (2011
108. Deutsch EW, Chambers M, Neumann S et al. TraML - a standard format for exchange of selected reaction monitoring transition lists. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp.R1111.015040 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
109. Cham JA, Bianco L, Bessant C. Free computational resources for designing selected reaction monitoring transitions. Proteomics 10, 1106-1126 (2010
110. Bertsch A, Jung S, Zerck A et al. Optimal de novo design of MRM experiments for rapid assay developing in targeted proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 9, 2696-2704 (2010
111. Li S, Arnold RJ, Tang H, Radivojac P. On the accuracy and limits of peptide fragmentation spectrum prediction. Anal. Chem. 83, 790-796 (2011
112. Willard BB, Kinter M. Effects of the position of internal histidine residues on the collision-induced fragmentation of triply protonated tryptic peptides. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21, 1262-1271 (2001
113. Schwartz BL, Bursey MM. Some proline substituent effects in the tandem mass spectrum of protonated pentaalanine. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 21, 92-96 (1992
114. Breci LA, Tabb DL, Yates III JR, Wysocki VH. Cleavage N terminal to proline: Analysis of a database of peptide tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 75, 1963-1971 (2003
115. Huang Y, Triscari JM, Tseng GC et al. Statistical characterization of charge state and residue dependence of low-energy CID peptide dissociation patterns. Anal. Chem. 77, 5800-5813 (2005
116. Picotti P, Rinner O, Stallmach R et al. High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat. Methods 7, 43-46 (2010
117. Stergachis AB, MacLean B, Lee K, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, MacCoss MJ. Rapid empirical discovery of optimal peptides for targeted proteomics. Nat. Methods 1041-1043 (2011
118. Frewen BE, Merrihew GE, Wu CC, Noble WS, MacCoss MJ. Analysis of peptide MS/ MS spectra from large-scale proteomics experiments using spectrum libraries. Anal. Chem. 78, 5678-5684 (2006
119. Prakash A, Tomazela DM, Frewen B et al. Expediting the development of targeted SRM assays: using data from shotgun proteomics to automate method development. J. Proteome Res. 8, 2733-2739 (2009
120. Lam H, Aebersold R. Building and searching tandem mass (MS/MS) spectral libraries for peptide identification in proteomics. Methods 54, 424-431 (2011
121. Sleno L, Volmer DA. Ion activation methods for tandem mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 39, 1091-1112 (2004
122. Roepstorff P, Fohlman J. Proposal for a common nomenclature for sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 11, 601-601 (1984
123. Johnson RS, Martin SA, Biemann K. Collision-induced fragmentation of (M + H)+ ions of peptides. Side chain specific sequence ions. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 86, 137-154 (1988
124. Lau KW, Hart SR, Lynch JA, Wong SCC, Hubbard SJ, Gaskell SJ. Observations on the detection of b- and y-type ions in the collisionally activated decomposition spectra of protonated peptides. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 23, 1508-1514 (2009
125. Sherwood CA, Eastham A, Lee LW, Risler J, Vitek O, Martin DB. Correlation between y-type ions observed in ion trap and triple quadrupole mass spectrometers. J. Proteome Res. 8, 4243-4251 (2009
126. Sherman J, McKay MJ, Ashman K, Molloy MP. How specific is my SRM? The issue of precursor and product ion redundancy. Proteomics 9, 1120-1123 (2009
127. Abbatiello SE, Mani DR, Keshishian H, Carr SA. Automated detection of inaccurate and imprecise transitions in peptide quantification by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 56, 291-305 (2010
128. Reiter L, Rinner O, Picotti P et al. mProphet: Automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments. Nat. Methods 8, 430-435 (2011
129. Hu Q, Noll RJ, Li H, Makarov A, Hardman M, Cooks RG. The Orbitrap: A new mass spectrometer. J. Mass Spectrom. 40, 430-443 (2005
130. Olsen JV, Macek B, Lange O, Makarov A, Horning S, Mann M. Higher-energy C-trap dissociation for peptide modification analysis. Nat. Methods 4, 709-712 (2007
131. de Graaf EL, Altelaar AFM, van Breukelen B, Mohammed S, Heck AJR. Improving SRM assay development: A global comparison between triple quadrupole, ion trap and higher energy CID peptide fragmentation spectra. J. Proteome Res. 10, 4334-4341 (2011
132. Olsen JV, Schwartz JC, Griep-Raming J et al. A dual pressure linear ion trap Orbitrap instrument with very high sequencing speed. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 2759-2769 (2009
133. Michalski A, Damoc E, Hauschild J-P et al. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics using Q exactive, a high-performance benchtop quadrupole Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp. M1111.011015 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
134. Michalski A, Damoc E, Lange O et al. Ultra high resolution linear ion trap Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Orbitrap Elite) facilitates top down LC MS/MS and versatile peptide fragmentation modes. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp.O1111.013698 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
135. Haller I, Mirza UA, Chait BT. Collision induced decomposition of peptides. Choice of collision parameters. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 7, 677-681 (1996
136. Jones JL, Dongré AR, Somogyi A, Wysocki VH. Sequence dependence of peptide fragmentation efficiency curves determined by electrospray ionization/surface-induced dissociation mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116, 8368-8369 (1994
137. Dongré AR, Jones JL, Somogyi A, Wysocki VH. Influence of peptide composition, gas-phase basicity, and chemical modification on fragmentation efficiency: Evidence for the mobile proton model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 8365-8374 (1996
138. Mohammed S, Chalmers MJ, Gielbert J et al. A novel tandem quadrupole mass spectrometer allowing gaseous collisional activation and surface induced dissociation. J. Mass Spectrom. 36, 1260-1268 (2001
139. MacLean B, Tomazela DM, Abbatiello SE et al. Effect of collision energy optimization on the measurement of peptides by selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 82, 10116-10124 (2010
140. Sherwood CA, Eastham A, Lee LW et al. Rapid optimization of MRM-MS instrument parameters by subtle alteration of precursor and product m/z targets. J. Proteome Res. 8, 3746-3751 (2009
141. Holstein CA, Gafken PR, Martin DB. Collision energy optimization of b- and y-ions for multiple reaction monitoring. J. Proteome Res. 10, 231-240 (2011
142. Qin J, Chait BT. Preferential fragmentation of protonated gas-phase peptide ions adjacent to acidic amino acid residues. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 5411-5412 (1995
143. Qin J, Chait BT. Collision-induced dissociation of singly charge peptide ions in a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization ion trap mass spectrometer. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 190/191, 313-320 (1999
144. Kapp EA, Schütz F, Reid GE et al. Mining a tandem mass spectrometry database to determine the trends and global factors influencing peptide fragmentation. Anal. Chem. 75, 6251-6264 (2003
145. Stahl-Zeng J, Lange V, Ossola R et al. High sensitivity detection of plasma proteins by multiple reaction monitoring of N-glycosites. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1809-1817 (2007
146. Fillâtre Y, Rondeau D, Jadas-Hécart A, Communal PY. Advantages of the scheduled selected reaction monitoring algorithm in liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry multi-residue analysis of 242 pesticides: A comparative approach with classical selected reaction monitoring mode. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 2453-2461 (2010
147. Keshishian H, Addona T, Burgess M, Kuhn E, Carr SA. Quantitative, multiplexed assays for low abundance proteins in plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 2212-2229 (2007
148. Keshishian H, Addona T, Burgess M et al. Quantification of cardiovascular biomarkers in patient plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 2339-2349 (2009
149. Krokhin OV, Craig R, Spicer V et al. An improved model for prediction of retention times of tryptic peptides in ion pair reversed-phase HPLC. Its application to protein peptide mapping by off-line HPLC-MALDI MS. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 908-919 (2004
150. Petritis K, Kangas LJ, Yan B et al. Improved peptide elution time prediction for reversed-phase liquid chromatography-MS by incorporating peptide sequence information. Anal. Chem. 78, 5026-5039 (2006
151. Gorshkov AV, Tarasova IA, Evreinov VV et al. Liquid chromatography at critical conditions: Comprehensive approach to sequence-dependent retention time prediction. Anal. Chem. 78, 7770-7777 (2006
152. Klammer AA, Yi X, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS. Improving tandem mass spectrum identification using peptide retention time prediction across diverse chromatography conditions. Anal. Chem. 79, 6111-6118 (2007
153. Baczek T, Kaliszan R. Predictions of peptides' retention times in reversed-phase liquid chromatography as a new supportive tool to improve protein identification in proteomics. Proteomics 9, 835-847 (2009
154. Babushok VI, Zenkevich IG. Retention characteristics of peptides in RP-LC: Peptide retention prediction. Chromatographia 72, 781-797 (2010
155. Moruz L, Tomazela D, Käll L. Training, selection and robust calibration of retention time models for targeted proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 9, 5209-5216 (2010
156. Eyers CE, Simpson DM, Wong SCC, Beynon RJ, Gaskell SJ. QCAL - a novel standard for assessing instrument conditions for proteome analysis. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 19, 1275-1280 (2008
157. Taradfer A, Aumann L, Morbidelli M. The role of ion-pairing in peak deformations in overloaded reversed-phase chromatography of peptides. J. Chromatogr. A 1217, 7065-7073 (2010
158. Tanaka N, Thornton ER. Isotopic effects in hydrophobic binding measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, 1617-1619 (1976
159. Zhang R, Sioma CS, Wang S, Regnier FE. Fractionation of isotopically labeled peptides in quantitative proteomics. Anal. Chem. 73, 5142-5149 (2001
160. Zhang R, Sioma CS, Thompson RA, Xiong L, Regnier FE. Controlling deuterium isotope effects in comparative proteomics. Anal. Chem. 74, 3662-3669 (2002
161. Kiyonami R, Schoen A, Prakash A et al. Increased selectivity, analytical precision, and throughput in targeted proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp.M1110.002931 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
162. Martin DB, Holzman T, May D et al. MRMer, an interactive open source and cross-platform system for data extraction and visualization of multiple reaction monitoring experiments. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 2270-2278 (2008
163. MacLean B, Tomazela DM, Shulman N et al. Skyline: An open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26, 966-968 (2010
164. Bradshaw RA, Burlingame AL, Carr S, Aebersold R. Reporting protein identification data: The next generation of guidelines. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 787-788 (2006
165. Wolf-Yadlin A, Hautaniemi S, Lauffenburger DA, White FM. Multiple reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular signaling networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5860-5865 (2007
166. Ding S-J, Qian W-J, Smith RD. Quantitative proteomic approaches for studying phosphotyrosine signaling. Expert Rev. Proteomics 4, 13-23 (2007
167. Dunn JD, Reid GE, Bruening ML. Techniques for phosphopeptide enrichment prior to analysis by mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 29, 29-54 (2010
168. Brauer MJ, Saldanha AJ, Dolinski K, Botstein D. Homeostatic adjustment and metabolic remodeling in glucose-limited yeast cultures. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 2503-2517 (2005
169. Costenoble R, Picotti P, Reiter L et al. Comprehensive quantitative analysis of central carbon and amino-acid metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under multiple conditions by targeted proteomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. doi:10.1038/msb.2010.1122 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
170. Ewles M, Goodwin L. Bioanalytical approaches to analyzing peptides and proteins by LC-MS/MS. Bioanalysis 3, 1379-1397 (2011
171. Kuzyk MA, Smith D, Yang J et al. Multiple reaction monitoring-based multiplexed, absolute quantitation of 45 proteins in human plasma. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 1860-1877 (2009
172. Rifai N, Gillette MA, Carr SA. Protein biomarker discovery and validation: The long and uncertain path to clinical utility. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 971-983 (2006
173. Anderson NL, Anderson NG, Haines LR, Hardie DB, Olafson RW, Pearson TW. Mass spectrometric quantitation of peptides and proteins using stable isotope standards and capture by anti-peptide antibodies (SISCAPA). J. Proteome Res. 3, 235-244 (2004
174. Whiteaker JR, Zhang H, Eng JK et al. Head-to-head comparison of serum fractionation techniques. J. Proteome Res. 6, 828-836 (2007
175. Bandow JE. Comparison of protein enrichment strategies for proteome analysis of plasma. Proteomics 10, 1416-1425 (2010
176. Righetti PG, Fasoli E, Egisto B. Combinatorial peptide ligand libraries: The conquest of the 'hidden proteome' advances at great strides. Electrophoresis 32, 960-966 (2011
177. Kuhn E, Whiteaker JR, Mani D et al. Inter-laboratory evaluation of automated, multiplexed peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for quantifying proteins in plasma. Mol. Cell. Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp.M1111.013854 (2011) (Epub ahead of print
178. Becker JO, Hoofnagle AN. Replacing immunoassays with tryptic digestion-peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and LC-MS/ MS. Bioanalysis 4, 281-290 (2012
179. Polanksi M, Anderson NL. A list of candidate cancer biomarkers for targeted proteomics. Biomark. Insights 1, 1-48 (2006
180. Paulovich AG, Whiteaker JR, Hoofnagle AN, Wang P. The interface between biomarker discovery and clinical validation: The tar pit of the protein
181. Zhang H, Li X-j, Martin DB, Aebersold R. Identification and quantification of N-linked glycoproteins using hydrazide chemistry, stable isotope labeling and mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 660-666 (2003
182. Makawita S, Diamandis EP. The bottleneck in the cancer biomarker pipeline and protein quantification through mass spectrometry-based approaches: Current strategies for candidate verification. Clin. Chem. 56, 212-222 (2010
183. Whiteaker JR, Lin C, Kennedy J et al. A targeted proteomics-based pipeline for verification of biomarkers in plasma. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 625-634 (2011
184. Addona TA, Shi X, Keshishian H et al. A pipeline that integrates the discovery and verification of plasma protein biomarkers reveals candidate markers for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 635-643 (2011
185. Jaffe JD, Keshishian H, Chang B, Addona TA, Gillette MA, Carr SA. Accurate inclusion mass screening: A bridge from unbiased discovery to targeted assay development for biomarker verification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 1952-1962 (2008
186. Bluemlein K, Ralser M. Monitoring protein expression in whole-cell extracts by targeted label- and standard-free LC-MS/MS. Nat. Protoc. 6, 859-869 (2011