Prediction of high-responding peptides for targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 190-198

  Fusaro, Vincent A ^a,b   Mani, D R ^a   Mesirov, Jill P ^a   Carr, Steven A ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIO-FLUIDS; BIO-MARKER DISCOVERIES; CURRENT RESPONSE; DETECTION SENSITIVITIES; EXPERIMENTAL DATUM; FOREST CLASSIFIERS; PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; PROTEIN ASSAYS; PROTEIN CONCENTRATIONS; PROTEIN LEVELS; PROTEOME; RESOURCE CONSTRAINTS;

AMINES; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETERS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDES; SPECTROMETERS; SPECTROMETRY; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS;

PROTEINS;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; PEPTIDE; PROTEOME;

ARTICLE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HUMAN; ION CURRENT; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN TARGETING; RANDOM FOREST;

ALGORITHMS; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; PEPTIDES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PHENOMENA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION;

EID: 59849093889     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1524     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Rifai, N., Gillette, M.A. & Carr, S.A. Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 971-983 (2006).
2. Uhlen, M. & Hober, S. Generation and validation of affinity reagents on a proteome-wide level. J. Mol. Recognit. (2008).
3. Anderson, L. & Hunter, C.L. Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 573-588 (2006).
4. Gerber, S.A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M.W. & Gygi, S.P. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6940-6945 (2003).
5. Keshishian, H., Addona, T., Burgess, M., Kuhn, E. & Carr, S.A. Quantitative, multiplexed assays for low abundance proteins in plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 2212-2229 (2007).
6. Stahl-Zeng, J. et al. High sensitivity detection of plasma proteins by multiple reaction monitoring of N-glycosites. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1809-1817 (2007).
7. Kuster, B., Schirle, M., Mallick, P. & Aebersold, R. Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 577-583 (2005).
8. Craig, R., Cortens, J.P. & Beavis, R.C. Open source system for analyzing, validating, and storing protein identification data. J. Proteome Res. 3, 1234-1242 (2004).
9. Deutsch, E.W., Lam, H. & Aebersold, R. PeptideAtlas: a resource for target selection for emerging targeted proteomics workflows. EBMO reports 9, 429-434 (2008).
10. Mallick, P. et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 125-131 (2007).
11. Sanders, W.S., Bridges, S.M., McCarthy, F.M., Nanduri, B. & Burgess, S.C. Prediction of peptides observable by mass spectrometry applied at the experimental set level. BMC Bioinformatics 8 Suppl 7, S23 (2007).
12. Tang, H. et al. A computational approach toward label-free protein quantification using predicted peptide detectability. Bioinformatics 22, e481-e488 (2006).
13. Webb-Robertson, B.J. et al. A support vector machine model for the prediction of proteotypic peptides for accurate mass and time proteomics. Bioinformatics 24, 1503-1509 (2008).
14. Jaffe, J.D. et al. Accurate inclusion mass screening: a bridge from unbiased discovery to targeted assay development for biomarker verification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 1952-1962 (2008).
15. Malmstrom, J., Lee, H. & Aebersold, R. Advances in proteomic workflows for systems biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18, 378-384 (2007).
16. Kawashima, S. & Kanehisa, M. AAindex: amino acid index database. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 374 (2000).
17. Zhang, Z. Prediction of low-energy collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides. Anal. Chem. 76, 3908-3922 (2004).
18. Breiman, L. Random forest. Mach. Learn. 45, 5-32 (2001).
19. Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. ClassificatIon and Regression by randomForest. R News 2, 18-22 (2002).
20. Diaz-Uriarte, R. & Alvarez de Andres, S. Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 3 (2006).
21. Enot, D.P., Beckmann, M., Overy, D. & Draper, J. Predicting interpretability of metabolome models based on behavior, putative identity, and biological relevance of explanatory signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 14865-14870 (2006).
22. Vapnik, V.. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory (Springer, New York, 1995).
23. Bishop, C. Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).
24. Fawcett, T. ROC Graphs: Notes and Practical Considerations for Researchers (Technical report, HP Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2004).
25. Lange, V., Picotti, P., Domon, B. & Aebersold, R. Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 222 (2008).
26. Svetnik, V. et al. Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 43, 1947-1958 (2003).
27. Cech, N.B. & Enke, C.G. Relating electrospray ionization response to nonpolar character of small peptides. Anal. Chem. 72, 2717-2723 (2000).
28. Cech, N.B. & Enke, C.G. Practical implications of some recent studies in electrospray ionization fundamentals. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 20, 362-387 (2001).
29. Cowan, R. & Whittaker, R.G. Hydrophobicity indices for amino acid residues as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pept. Res. 3, 75-80 (1990).
30. Parker, J.M., Guo, D. & Hodges, R.S. New hydrophilicity scale derived from high-performance liquid chromatography peptide retention data: correlation of predicted surface residues with antigenicity and X-ray-derived accessible sites. Biochemistry 25, 5425-5432 (1986).
31. Whiteaker, J.R. et al. Integrated pipeline for mass spectrometry-based discovery and confirmation of biomarkers demonstrated in a mouse model of breast cancer. J. Proteome Res. 6, 3962-3975 (2007).
32. Zolg, J.W. & Langen, H. How industry is approaching the search for new diagnostic markers and biomarkers. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 345-354 (2004).
33. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. Biometry the Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, edn. 3 (W.H. Freeman and Company, 1995).
34. Thomson, R., Hodgman, T.C., Yang, Z.R. & Doyle, A.K. Characterizing proteolytic cleavage site activity using bio-basis function neural networks. Bioinformatics 19, 1741-1747 (2003).
35. Yen, C.Y. et al. Improving sensitivity in shotgun proteomics using a peptide-centric database with reduced complexity: protease cleavage and SCX elution rules from data mining of MS/MS spectra. Anal. Chem. 78, 1071-1084 (2006).
36. Chen, C., Liaw, A & Breiman, L. Using Random Forest to Learn Imbalanced Data (Technical Report 666. Statistics Department of University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, 2004).
37. Sing, T., Sander, O., Beerenwinkel, N. & Lengauer, T. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics 21, 3940-3941 (2005).
38. Klimek, J. et al. The standard protein mix database: a diverse data set to assist in the production of improved peptide and protein identification software tools. J. Proteome Res. 7, 96-103 (2008).
39. Wang, H. et al. Development and evaluation of a micro- and nanoscale proteomic sample preparation method. J. Proteome Res. 4, 2397-2403 (2005).