The Case for Metaphor in Political Reasoning and Cognition

Political Psychology

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 145-163

  Bougher, Lori D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Analogy; Discourse; Implicit cognition; Metaphor; Metaphorical reasoning; Voter cognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857419208     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: 14679221     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00865.x     Document Type: Article

References (155)

1. Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(1), 53-63.
2. Ahrens, K. (2011). Examining conceptual worldviews though lexical frequency patterns: A case study of U.S. presidential speeches. In S. Handl H. Schmid (Eds.), Windows to the mind: Metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending (pp. 167-184). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
3. Althaus, S. L. (2006). False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research. Critical Review, 18(1-3), 75-104.
4. Antle, A. N., Corness, G., Droumeva, M. (2009). What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments. Interacting with Computers, 21(1-2), 66-75.
5. Arceneaux, K. (2009). Cognitive biases and the strength of political arguments. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University. Retrieved from
6. Arcuri, L., Castelli, L., Galdi, S., Zogmaister, C., Amadori, A. (2008). Predicting the vote: Implicit attitudes as predictors of the future behavior of decided and undecided voters. Political Psychology, 29(3), 369-387.
7. Barr, D. J., Keysar, B. (2005). Making sense of how we make sense: The paradox of egocentrism in language use. In H. L. Colston A. N. Katz (Eds.), Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 21-42). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Barry, C. L., Brescoll, V. L., Brownell, K. D., Schlesinger, M. (2009). Obesity metaphors: How beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. The Milbank Quarterly, 87(1), 7-47.
9. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
10. Bartels, L. M. (2005). Homer gets a tax cut: Inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspectives on Politics, 3(1), 15-31.
11. Bartels, L. M. (2007). Homer gets a warm hug: A note on ignorance and extenuation. Perspectives on Politics, 5(4), 785-790.
12. Baumer, E. P. S., Sinclair, J., Tomlinson, B. (2010). "America is like Metamucil": Fostering critical and creative thinking about metaphor in political blogs. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2010) (pp. 1437-1446). Atlanta: ACM Press.
13. Beer, F. A., De Landtsheer, C. (2004). Metaphorical world politics. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
14. Blanchette, I., Dunbar, K. (2000). How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory and Cognition, 29(1), 730-735.
15. Bliznashki, S., Kokinov, B. (2009). Analogical transfer of emotions. In B. Kokinov, K. Holyoak, D. Gentner (Eds.), New frontiers in analogy research: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy (pp. 45-53). Sofia: NBU Press.
16. Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade's literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246-263.
17. Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition, 118(1), 123-129.
18. Bowdle, B. F., Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193-216.
19. Bryan, C. J., Dweck, C. S., Ross, L., Kay, A. C., Mislavsky, N. O. (2009). Political mindset: Effects of schema priming on liberal-conservative political positions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 890-895.
20. Bulmer, S., Dolowitz, D., Humphreys, P., Padgett, S. (2007). Policy transfer in European Union governance. New York: Routledge.
21. Cameron, L. (2010a). What is metaphor and why does it matter? In L. Cameron R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 3-25). London: Equinox.
22. Cameron, L. (2010b). The discourse dynamics framework for metaphor. In L. Cameron R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 77-94). London: Equinox.
23. Cameron, L., Maslen, R. (2010). Using metaphor analysis to compare expert and public perceptions of the risk of terrorism. In L. Cameron R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences, and the humanities (pp. 248-256). London: Equinox.
24. Carver, T., Pikalo, J. (Eds.) (2008). Political language and metaphor: Interpreting and changing the world. New York: Routledge.
25. Casasanto, D. (2008). Conceptual affiliates of metaphorical gestures. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language, Communication, Cognition. Brighton, UK.
26. Casasanto, D. (2009). When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor? In V. Evans S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 127-145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
27. Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
29. Chong, D. (1993). How people think, reason, and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 867-899.
30. Chong, D., Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.
31. Chong, D., Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99-118.
32. Chong, D., Druckman, J. N. (2007c). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637-655.
33. Chong, D., Druckman, J. N. (2011). Public-elite interactions: Puzzles in search of researchers. In R. Y. Shapiro L. R. Jacobs (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of American public opinion and media (pp. 170-188). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Cienki, A. (2005). Metaphor in the "Strict Father" and "Nurturant Parent" cognitive models: Theoretical issues raised in an empirical study. Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2), 279-312.
35. Cienki, A., Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 483-501). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Clement, C. A., Gentner, D. (1991). Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15(1), 89-132.
37. Colhoun, J., Gentner, D. (2009). Inference processes in causal analogies. In B. Kokinov, K. Holyoak, D. Gentner (Eds.), New frontiers in analogy research: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy (pp. 82-96). Sofia: NBU Press.
38. Converse, P. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: The Free Press.
39. Cook, I. R. (2008). Mobilising urban policies: The policy transfer of US Business Improvement Districts to England and Wales. Urban Studies, 45(4), 773-795.
40. Dehghani, M., Gentner, D., Forbus, K., Ekhtiari, H., Sachdeva, S. (2009). Analogy and moral decision making. New frontiers in analogy research: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Analogy. Sofia: NBU Press.
41. De Landtsheer, C. (2009). Collecting political meaning from the count of metaphor. In A. Musolff J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and discourse (pp. 59-78). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
42. Dijksterhuis, A. (2004). Think different: The merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 586-598.
43. Dodge, K. A. (2008). Framing public policy and prevention of chronic violence in American youths. American Psychologist, 63(7), 573-590.
44. Dolowitz, D. P., Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 13(1), 5-24.
45. Dolowitz, D. P., Medearis, D. (2009). Considerations of the obstacles and opportunities to formalizing cross-national policy transfer to the United States: A case study of the transfer of urban environmental and planning policies from Germany. Environment and Planning C: Government and Politics, 27(4), 684-697.
46. Druckman, J. N. (2001a). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225-256.
47. Druckman, J. N. (2001b). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041-1066.
48. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671-686.
49. Druckman, J. N., Hennessy, C. L., St. Charles, K., Webber, J. (2010). Competing rhetoric over time: Frames versus cues. Journal of Politics, 72(1), 136-148.
50. Druckman, J. N., Kuklinski, J. H., Sigelman, L. (2009). The unmet potential of interdisciplinary research: Political psychological approaches to voting and public opinion. Political Behavior, 31(4), 485-510.
51. Druckman, J. N., McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30(3), 297-321.
52. Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In D. Gentner, K. Holyoak, B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 313-334). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Dyson, S. B., Preston, T. (2006). Individual characteristics of political leaders and the use of analogy in foreign policy decision making. Political Psychology, 27(2), 265-288.
54. Esterling, K. M., Neblo, M. A., Lazer, D. M. J. (2011). Means, motive, and opportunity in becoming informed about politics: A deliberative field experiment with members of Congress and their constituents. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3), 483-503.
55. Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56. Geary, J. (2011). I is an other: The secret life of metaphor and how it shapes the way we see the world. New York: HarperCollins.
57. Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.
58. Gentner, D. (2003). Why we're so smart. In D. Gentner S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195-235). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F., Wolff, P., Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. Holyoak, B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199-253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Gentner, D., Colhoun, J. (2010). Analogical processes in human thinking and learning. In A. von Müller E. Pöppel (Series Eds.) B. Glatzeder, V. Goel, A. von Müller (Vol. Eds.), On thinking: Vol. 2. Towards a theory of thinking: Building blocks for a conceptual framework (pp. 35-48). Heidelberg: Springer.
61. Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Gibbs, R. W., Cameron, L. (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1-2), 64-75.
63. Gibbs, R. W., Costa Lima, P. L., Francozo, E. (2004). Metaphor is grounded in embodied experience. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1189-1210.
64. Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Adaptive thinking: Rationality in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65. Gigerenzer, G., Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: Why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 107-143.
66. Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding nonliteral speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 85-98.
67. Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episode and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169-192.
68. Gross, K., D'Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25(1), 1-29.
69. Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834.
70. Hofstadter, D. R. (2001). Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. Holyoak, B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 499-538). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Holyoak, K. J., Thagard, P. (1995). Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
72. Houghton, D. P. (1998). Historical analogies and the cognitive dimension of domestic policymaking. Political Psychology, 19(2), 279-303.
73. Huckfeldt, R., Mondak, J. J., Craw, M., Mendez, J. M. (2005). Making sense of candidates: Partisanship, ideology, and issues as guides to judgments. Cognitive Brain Research, 23(1), 11-23.
74. Indurkhya, B. (2007). Rationality and reasoning with metaphors. New Ideas in Psychology, 25(1), 16-36.
75. Ijzerman, H., Koole, S. L. (2011). From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches-bodily, social, and cultural constraints on sociocognitive metaphors: Comment on Landau, Meier, and Keefer (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 355-361.
76. Jakobson, B., Wickman, P. (2007). Transformation through language use: Children's spontaneous metaphors in elementary school science. Science Education, 16(3-5), 267-289.
77. Johnson, M. (2010). Metaphor and cognition. In S. Gallagher D. Schmicking (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 401-414). London: Springer.
78. Jones, T., Newburn, T. (2007). Policy transfer and criminal justice: Exploring US influence over British crime control policy. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
79. Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1171-1174.
80. Keysar, B. (1989). On the functional equivalence of literal and metaphorical interpretations in discourse. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(4), 375-385.
81. Kilhamn, C. (2009). Making sense of negative numbers through metaphorical reasoning. In C. Bergsten, B. Grevholm, T. Lingefjärd (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematical knowledge. Proceedings of MADIF6 (pp. 30-35). Linköping, Sweden: SMDF.
82. Koleva, S., Graham, J., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Ditto, P. H. (2009). The ties that bind: How five moral concerns organize and explain political attitudes. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from
83. Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85. Lakoff, G. (1991). Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify the war in the gulf. Peace Research, 23(2-3), 25-32.
86. Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
87. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
88. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
89. Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
90. Lakoff, G., Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
91. Landau, M. J., Meier, B. P., Keefer, L. A. (2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1045-1067.
92. Landau, M. J., Sullivan, D., Greenberg, J. (2009). Evidence that self-relevant motives and metaphoric framing interact to influence political and social attitudes. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1421-1427.
93. Lau, R. R., Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951-971.
94. Lau, R. R., Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Lau, R. R., Schlesinger, M. (2005). Policy frames, metaphorical reasoning, and support for public policies. Political Psychology, 26(1), 77-114.
96. Lieberman, M. D., Schreiber, D., Ochsner, K. N. (2003). Is political cognition like riding a bicycle? How cognitive neuroscience can inform research on political thinking. Political Psychology, 24(4), 681-704.
97. Lupia, A. (2006). How elitism undermines the study of voter competence. Critical Review, 18(1-3), 217-232.
98. Lupia, A., Levine, A. S., Menning, J. O., Sin, G. (2007). Were Bush tax cut supporters "simply ignorant"? A second look at conservatives and liberals in "Homer gets a tax cut. Perspectives on Politics, 5(4), 773-784.
99. Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., Popkin, S. L. (2000). Beyond rationality: Reason and the study of politics. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 1-20). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
100. Marcus, A. A., Sheaffer, Z. (2009). Analogical reasoning and complexity. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 6, Article 82.
101. Markman, A. B., Moreau, C. P. (2001). Analogy and analogical comparison in choice. In D. Gentner, K. Holyoak, B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 362-399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
102. Marsden, G., Stead, D. (2011). Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence. Transport Policy, 18(3), 492-500.
103. McAdams, D. P., Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J., Logan, R. L., Olson, B. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: How conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 978-990.
104. McGlone, M. S. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language and Communication, 27(2), 109-126.
105. Mintz, A., DeRouen, Jr., K. (2010). Understanding foreign policy decision-making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
106. Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
107. Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23-38.
108. Musolff, A. (2010). Political metaphor and bodies politic. In U. Okulska P. Cap (Eds.), Perspectives in politics and discourse (pp. 23-41). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
109. Neustadt, R., May, E. (1986). Thinking in time: The use of history for decision makers New York: Free Press.
110. Newell, B. R., Bröder, A. (2008). Cognitive processes, models and metaphors in decision research. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(3), 195-204.
111. Nickerson, R. S. (2001). The projective way of knowing: A useful heuristic that sometimes misleads. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(5), 168-172.
112. Nosek, B. A. (2007). Implicit-explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(2), 65-69.
113. Nosek, B. A., Graham, J., Hawkins, C. B. (2010). Implicit political cognition. In B. Gawronski B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 548-564). New York: Guilford Press.
114. Núñez, R. E., Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the cross-linguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401-450.
115. Oehrtman, M. (2009). Collapsing dimensions, physical limitation, and other student metaphors for limit concepts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(4), 396-426.
116. Okulska, U., Cap, P. (Eds.) (2010). Perspectives in politics and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
117. Ottati, V. C., Renstrom, R. A. (2010). Metaphor and persuasive communication: A multifunctional approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(9), 783-794.
118. Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
119. Popkin, S. L., Dimock, M. A. (2000). Knowledge, trust, and international reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 214-238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. Pramling, N. (2009). The role of metaphor in Darwin and the implications for teaching evolution. Science Education, 93(3), 535-547.
121. Rigney, D. (2001). The metaphorical society: An invitation to social theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.
122. Risen, J. L., Critcher, C. R. (2011). Visceral fit: While in a visceral state, associated states of the world seem more likely. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 777-793.
123. Roccato, M., Zogmaister, C. (2010). Predicting the vote through implicit and explicit attitudes: A field research. Political Psychology, 31(2), 249-274.
124. Ross, M. H. (2007). Cultural contestation in ethnic conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
125. Ross, M. H. (2009). Culture and belonging in divided societies: Contestation and symbolic landscapes. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
126. Rundgren, C., Hirsch, R., Tibell, L. A. E. (2009). Death of metaphors in life science? A study of upper and tertiary students' use of metaphors in their meaning-making of scientific content. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), Article 3.
127. Schinck, A. G., Neale, H. W., Pugalee, D. K., Cifarelli, V. V. (2008). Using metaphors to unpack student beliefs about mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 108(7), 326-333.
128. Schlesinger, M., Lau, R. R. (2000). The meaning and measure of policy metaphors. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 611-626.
129. Schön, D. A. (1993). Generative metaphor: A perspective of problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 137-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
130. Shimko, K. L. (1994). Metaphors and foreign policy decision making. Political Psychology, 15(4), 655-671.
131. Skinner, D., Squillacote, R. (2010). New bodies: Beyond illness, dirt, vermin and other metaphors of terror. In U. Okulska P. Cap (Eds.), Perspectives in politics and discourse (pp. 43-60). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
132. Slothuus, R., de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. Journal of Politics, 72(3), 630-645.
133. Sniderman, P. M. (2000). Taking sides: A fixed choice theory of political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 67-84). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
134. Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
135. Sniderman, P. M., Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 133-165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
136. Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213-241.
137. Steen, G. J. (2011). The language of knowledge management: A linguistic approach to metaphor analysis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 28(2), 181-188.
138. Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T. (2010). Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 765-796.
139. Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
140. Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Social functionalistic frameworks for judgment and choice: Intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors. Psychological Review, 109(3), 451-471.
141. Thagard, P. (2000). Coherence in thought and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
142. Thagard, P. (2006). Hot thought: Mechanisms and applications of emotional cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
143. Thagard, P. (2011). The brain is wider than the sky: Analogy, emotion, and allegory. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(2), 131-142.
144. Thibodeau, P. H., Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.
145. Turner, M. (2000). Backstage cognition in reason and choice. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 264-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Welshman, J. (2010). From Head Start to Sure Start: Reflections on policy transfer. Children Society, 24(2), 89-99.
147. Wharton, C. M., Holyoak, K. J., Downing, P. E., Lange, T. E., Wickens, T. D., Melz, E. R. (1994). Below the surface: Analogical similarity and retrieval competition in reminding. Cognitive Psychology, 26(1), 64-101.
148. Williams, L. E., Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606-607.
149. Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257-1267.
150. Winter, N. J. G. (2005). Framing gender: Political rhetoric, gender schemas, and public opinion on U.S. health care reform. Politics Gender, 1(3), 453-480.
151. Winter, N. J. G. (2006). Beyond welfare: Framing and the racialization of white opinion on Social Security. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 400-420.
152. Winter, N. J. G. (2008). Dangerous frames: How ideas about race and gender shape public opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
153. Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
154. Zinken, J. (2007). Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3), 445-466.
155. Zuckerman, A. S., Dasović, J., Fitzgerald, J. (2007). Partisan families: The social logic of bounded partisanship in Germany and Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.