Collapsing dimensions, physical limitation, and other student metaphors for limit concepts

Journal for Research in Mathematics Education

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 396-426

  Oehrtman, Michael ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Advanced mathematical thinking; Calculus analysis; Clinical interviews; College mathematics; Grounded theory; Language and mathematics; Qualitative methods

Indexed keywords

EID: 69249198270     PISSN: 00218251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Artigue, M. (1991). Analysis. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 167-198). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
2. Black, M. (1962a). Metaphor. In M. Black, Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy (pp. 25-47). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3. Black, M. (1962b). Models and archetypes. In M. Black, Models and metaphors: Studies in language and philosophy (pp. 219-243). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
4. Black, M. (1977). More about metaphor. Dialectica, 31, 433-457.
5. Black, M. (1979). How metaphors work: A reply to Donald Davidson. Critical Inquiry, 6, 131-143.
6. Cornu, B. (1991). Limits. InD. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 153-166). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
7. Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process schema. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167- 192.
8. Davis, R., & Vinner, S. (1986). The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5,281- 303.
9. Frid, S. ( 1994). Three approaches to undergraduate calculus instruction: Their nature and potential impact on students' language use and sources of conviction. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), CBMS issues in mathematics education: Vol. 4. Research in college mathematics education I (pp. 69-100). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
10. Kaput, J. ( 1994). Democratizing access to calculus: New routes to old roots. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Mathematics and cognitive science (pp. 77-156). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
11. Lakoff, G. ( 1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13. Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
14. Monk, G. S. (1994). Students' understanding of functions in calculus courses. Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal, 9, 21-27.
15. Monk, S. (1992). Students' understanding of a function given by a physical model. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), MAA notes: Vol. 25. The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp. 175-193). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
16. Núñez, R. (2004). Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In F. Iida, R. Pfeifer, L. Steels, & Y. Kuniyoshi (Eds.), Embodied artificial intelligence (pp. 54-73). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Oehrtman, M. (2008). Layers of abstraction: Theory and design for the instruction of limit concepts. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), MAA notes: Vol. 73. Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 65-80). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
18. Oehrtman, M., Carlson, M. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Foundational reasoning abilities that promote coherence in students' function understanding. In M. P. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), MAA notes: Vol. 73. Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 27-41). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
19. Orton, A. (1983). Students' understanding of differentiation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 235-250.
20. Scheffler, I. ( 1979). Beyond the letter: A philosophical inquiry into ambiguity, vagueness and metaphor in language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21. Sealey, V. (2008). Calculus students ' assimilation of the Riemann integral. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
22. Sealey, V., & Oehrtman, M. (2007). Calculus students' assimilation of the Riemann Integral into a previously established limit structure. In T. Lamberg & L. R. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 78-83). Stateline (Lake Tahoe): University of Nevada, Reno.
23. Sierpinska, A. ( 1987). Humanities students and epistemological obstacles related to limits. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18, 371-397.
24. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Szydlick, J. (2000). Mathematical beliefs and conceptual understanding of the limit of a functi on. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 258-276.
26. Tall, D. ( 1986). Graphic calculus I. London: Glentop Press.
27. Tall, D. (1990). Inconsistencies in the learning of calculus and analysis. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 12(3 & 4), 49-62.
28. Tall, D. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity, and proof. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 495-511). New York: Macmillan.
29. Tall, D., & Schwarzenberger, R. ( 1978). Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits. Mathematics Teaching, 82, 44-49.
30. Tall, D., & Vinner, S. ( 1981 ). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151- 169.
31. Thompson, P. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the fundamental theorem of calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 229-274.
32. Tirosh, D. (1991). The role of students' intuitions of infinity in teaching the Cantorian Theory. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 199-214). Dordrecht, The Netherlands.: Kluwer.
33. Vygotsky, L. ( 1987). The development of scientific concepts in childhood. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), Problems of generalpsychology: Vol. 1. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (pp. 167-241).New York: Plenum. (Original work published 1934)
34. Williams, S. (1991). Models of limit held by college calculus students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 219-236.
35. Williams, S. (2001). Predications of the limit concept: An application of repertory grids. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 341- 367.