Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects

Journal of Politics

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 630-645

  Slothuus, Rune ^a   De Vreese, Claes H ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957270553     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S002238161000006X     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Andersen, Jr.gen G. 2006. The Parliamentary Election in Denmark, February 2005. Electoral Studies 25 (3): 393-398 (Pubitemid 44430790)
2. Bartels, Larry M. 2002. Beyond the Running Tally. Political Behavior 24 (2): 117-150
3. Bartels, Larry M. 2003. Democracy with Attitudes. In Electoral Democracy, ed. Michael B. MacCuen and George Rabinowitz. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 48-82.
4. Binderkrantz, Anne. 2008. Competition for Attention. In Non- Party Actors in Elections, ed. David Farrell and Rüdiger Schmidt-Beck. Baden-Baden: Nomos-Verlag, 127-149
5. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
6. Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1980. The Two Faces of Issue Voting. American Political Science Review 74 (1): 78-91.
7. Carmines, Edward G., and Michael W. Wagner. 2006. Political Issues and Party Alignments. Annual Review of Political Science 9: 67-81.
8. Carsey, Thomas M., and Geoffrey C. Layman. 2006. Changing Sides or Changing Minds? American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 464-477
9. Chaiken, Shelly, Akiva Liberman, and Alice H. Eagly. 1989. Heuristic and Systematic Information Processing within and beyond the Persuasion Context. In Unintended Thought, eds. James S. Uleman and John A. Bargh. New York: Guilford Press, 212-252
10. Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007a. Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. American Political Science Review 101 (4): 637-655
11. Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2007b. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 103-126
12. Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2008. Dynamic Public Opinion. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
13. Cohen, Jeoffrey L. 2003. Party over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (5): 808-822
14. Druckman, James N. 2001a. On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame? Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1041-1066 (Pubitemid 33361550)
15. Druckman, James N. 2001b. Using Credible Advice to Overcome Framing Effects. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17 (1): 62-82. (Pubitemid 33280258)
16. Druckman, James N., James H. Kuklinski, and Lee Sigelman. 2009. The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research. Political Behavior 31 (4): 485-510.
17. Druckman, N., and Kjersten R. Nelson. 2003. Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens Conversations Limit Elite Influence. American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 729-745
18. Gaines, Brian J., James H. Kuklinski, Paul J. Quirk, Buddy Peyton, and Jay Verkuilen. 2007. Same Facts, Different Interpretations. Journal of Politics 69 (4): 957-974
19. Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1987. The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action. Research in Political Sociology 3: 137-177
20. Gilens, Martin, and Naomi Murakawa. 2002. Elite Cues and Political Decision-Making. In Research in Micropolitics, Vol.6, eds. Michael X. Delli-Carpini, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Y. Shapiro. Amsterdam: JAI, 15-49.
21. Goren, Paul. 2005. Party Identification and Core Political Values. American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 881-896
22. Green, Donald, Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2002. New Public Management Reforms of the Danish and Swedish Welfare States. Governance 15 (2): 271-294
24. Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Lisbeth H. Thomsen. 2005. Bloc Politics vs. Broad Cooperation. Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (2): 153-169
25. Hartman, Todd K., and Christopher R. Weber. 2009. Who Said What? The Effects of Source Cues in Issue Frames. Political Behavior 31 (4): 537-558
26. Higgins, E. Tory. 1996. Knowledge Activation: Accessibility, Applicability, and Salience. In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, eds. E. Tory Higgins and Arie W. Kruglanski. New York: Guilford Press, 133-168
27. Huddy, Leonie. 2001. From Social to Political Identity. Political Psychology 22 (1): 127-156
28. Jerit, Jennifer 2008. Issue Framing and Engagement. Political Behavior 30 (1): 1-24.
29. Jerit, Jennifer 2009. How Predictive Appeals Affect Policy Opinions. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2): 411-426
30. Joslyn, Mark R., and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2006. Should we really kill the messenger? Political Communication 23 (1): 85-103.
31. Kam, Cindy. 2005. Who Toes the Party Line? Political Behavior 27 (2): 163-182
32. Kinder, Donald R. 2003. Communication and Politics in the Age of Information. In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy and Robert Jervis. New York: Oxford University Press, 357-393
33. Kinder, Donald R. 2007. Curmudgeonly Advice. Journal of Communication 57 (1): 155-162
34. Kunda, Ziva. 1990. The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108 (3): 480-498
35. Lebo, Matthew J., and Daniel Cassino. 2007. The Aggregated Consequences of Motivated Reasoning and the Dynamics of Partisan Presidential Approval. Political Psychology 28 (6): 719-746
36. Lecheler, Sophie K., and Claes H. de Vreese. 2009. What a Difference a Day Can Make. Presented at the Conference Living in a Mediated World, KNAW: Amsterdam, NL.
37. Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. Mondak, Jeffery J. 1993. Source Cues and Policy Approval. American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 186-212.
39. Mutz, Diana C. 2007. Political Psychology and Choice. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, eds. Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. New York: Oxford University Press, 80-99.
40. Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee A. Clawson, and Zoe M. Oxley. 1997. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review 91 (3): 567-583
41. Petersen, Michael Bang, Rune Slothuus, and Lise Togeby. N.d. Political Parties and Value Consistency in Public Opinion Formation. Public Opinion Quarterly.
42. Price, Vincent. 1989. Social Identification and Public Opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 53 (2): 197-224.
43. Price, Vincent, Lilach Nie, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2005. Framing Public Discussion of Gay Civil Unions. Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (2): 179-212.
44. Price, Vincent, and David Tewksbury. 1997. News Values and Public Opinion: A Theoretical Account of Media Priming and Framing. In Progress in Communication Sciences, Vol.13, eds. George A. Barnett and Franklin J. Boster. Greenwich: Ablex Publishing, 173-212.
45. Schoenbach, Klaus, Jan De Ridder, and Edmund Lauf. 2001. Politicians on the news. European Journal of Political Research 39 (4): 519-531
46. Shen, Fuyuan, and Heidi H. Edwards. 2005. Economic Individualism, Humanitarianism, and Welfare Reform. Journal of Communication 55 (4): 795-809.
47. Slothuus, Rune. N.d. When Can Political Parties Lead Public Opinion? Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Political Communication.
48. Sniderman, Paul M. 2000. Taking Sides. In Elements of Reason, eds. Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. New York: Cambridge University Press, 67-84.
49. Sniderman, Paul M., and John Bullock. 2004. A Consistency Theory of Public Opinion and Political Choice. In Studies in Public Opinion, eds. Willem E. Saris and Paul M. Sniderman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 337-357
50. Sniderman, Paul M., and Sean M. Theriault. 2004. The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.In Studies in Public Opinion, eds. Willem E. Saris and Paul M. Sniderman. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 133-165
51. Taber, Charles S., Damon Cann, and Simona Kucsova. 2009. The Motivated Processing of Political Arguments. Political Behavior 31 (2): 137-155
52. Taber, Charles S., and Milton Lodge. 2006. Motivated Scepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755-769 (Pubitemid 43823240)
53. Taber, Charles S., Milton Lodge, and Jill Glathar. 2001. The Motivated Construction of Political Judgments.In Citizens and Politics, ed. James H. Kuklinski. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 198-226.
54. Togeby, Lise. 2004. Man har et standpunkt. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
55. Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.