The unmet potential of interdisciplinary research: Political psychological approaches to voting and public opinion

Political Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 485-510

  Druckman, James N ^a   Kuklinski, James H ^b   Sigelman, Lee ^c  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Interdisciplinary research; Political psychology; Public opinion; Voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956345906     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-009-9092-2     Document Type: Article

References (132)

1. Allen, B., O'Loughlin, P., Jasperson, A., & Sullivan, J. L. (1994). The media and the Gulf War: Framing, priming, and the spiral of silence. Polity, 27, 255-284. doi:10.2307/3235175.
2. Althaus, S. L., & Kim, Y. M. (2006). Priming effects in complex environments. The Journal of Politics, 68, 960-976. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00483.x.
3. Anderson, N. H., & Hubert, S. (1963). Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 379-391. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80039-0.
4. Bargh, J. A., Bond, R., Lombardi, W., & Tota, M. (1986). The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 869-878. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.869.
5. Bartels, L. M. (1996). Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 194-230. doi:10.2307/2111700.
6. Bartels, L. M. (2003). Democracy with attitudes. In M. B. MacKuen & G. Rabinowitz (Eds.), Electoral democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Birnbaum, P. H. (1981). Integration and specialization in academic research. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 487-503. doi:10.2307/255570.
9. Bizer, G. Y., Krosnick, J. A., Holbrook, A. L., Wheller, S. C., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2004). The impact of personality on cognitive, behavioral, and affective political processes: The effects of need to evaluate. Journal of Personality, 72, 995-1027. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00288.x.
10. Bizer, G. Y., Tormala, Z. L., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Memory-based versus on-line processing: Implications for attitude strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 646-653. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.002.
11. Bohman, J. (1998). Survey article: The coming age of deliberative democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 6, 400-425. doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00061.
12. Braman, E. (2006). Reasoning on the threshold: Testing separability of preferences in legal decision making. The Journal of Politics, 68, 308-321. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00408.x.
13. Braman, E., & Nelson, T. E. (2007). Mechanism of motivated reasoning?: Analogical perception in discrimination disputes. American Journal of Political Science, 51, 940-956. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00290.x.
14. Branscombe, N. R., & Doosje, B. (Eds.). (2004). Collective guilt. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Individual differences in attitude change. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes and attitude change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
17. Chong, D. (1993). How people think, reason, and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 867-899. doi:10.2307/2111577.
18. Chong, D. (2007). The value of information and endorsements. Unpublished paper, Northwestern University.
19. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054.
20. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2008). Dynamic public opinion: Framing effects over time. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, August 28-August 31.
21. Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington: National Academies Press.
22. Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. E. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent. New York: Free Press.
23. Converse, P. E. (2000). Assessing the capacity of mass electorates. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 331-353. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.331.
24. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: HarperCollins.
25. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. The American Political Science Review, 98, 671-686. doi:10.1017/S000305540 4041413.
26. Druckman, J. N., Jacobs, L. R., & Ostermeier, E. (2004). Candidate strategies to prime issues and image. The Journal of Politics, 66, 1180-1202. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3816.2004.00295.x.
27. Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2000). Preference formation. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 1-24. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.1.
28. Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2006). Mind, will, and choice: Lessons From experiments in contextual variation. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30, 297-321. doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9056-y.
30. Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 728-744. doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00051.
31. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace.
32. Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963). Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research. Psychological Review, 38, 193-242. doi:10.1037/h0044139.
33. Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Fazio, R. H. (2000). Accessible attitudes as tools for object appraisal: Their costs and benefits. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603-637. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.603.
36. Federico, C. M., & Schneider, M. C. (2007). Political expertise and the use of ideology: Moderating effects of evaluative motivation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 221-252. doi:10.1093/poq/nfm010.
37. Ferejohn, J. A., & Kuklinski, J. H. (Eds.). (1990). Information and democratic processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
38. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
39. Fiorina, M. (1981). Retrospective voting in American elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
40. Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2007). The logic of the survey experiment reexamined. Political Analysis, 15, 1-20. doi:10.1093/pan/mpl008.
41. Gerber, A., Gimpel, J. G., Green, D. P., & Shaw, D. R. (2007). The influence of television and radio advertising on candidate evaluations: Results from a large scale randomized experiment. Unpublished paper, Yale University.
42. Gilovich, T., & Griffin, D. (2002). Introduction-Heuristics and biases: Then and now. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Goren, P. (2002). Character weakness, partisan bias, and presidential evaluation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 627-641. doi:10.2307/3088404.
44. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or online. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.258.
45. Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford Press.
46. Higgins, E. T., & King, G. (1981). Social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 13, 141-154. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3.
48. Holbrook, T. M. (2006). Cognitive style and political learning in the 2000 US presidential campaign. Political Research Quarterly, 59, 343-352. doi:10.1177/106591290605900302.
49. Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
50. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Iyengar, S., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Krosnick, J. A. (1984). The evening news and presidential evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 778-787. doi:10.1037/0022-3514. 46.4.778.
52. Jackman, S., & Sniderman, P. M. (2002). The institutional organization of choice spaces: A political conception of political psychology. In K. Monroe (Ed.), Political psychology. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. Jarvis, W. B., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The need to evaluate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 172-194. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172.
54. Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 126-136. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916. 2008.00070.x.
55. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Kam, C. D. (2005). Who toes the party line?: Cues, values, and individual differences. Political Behavior, 27, 163-182. doi:10.1007/s11109-005-1764-y.
57. Kelley, S., Jr, & Mirer, T. W. (1974). The simple act of voting. The American Political Science Review, 68, 572-591. doi:10.2307/1959506.
58. Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
59. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
60. Krosnick, J. A. (2002). Is political psychology sufficiently psyhological: Distinghuishing political psychology from psychological political science. In J. H. Kuklinksi (Ed.), Thinking about political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
61. Kuklinski, J. H. (Ed.). (2001). Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
62. Kuklinski, J. H. (Ed.). (2002). Thinking about political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
63. Kuklinski, J. H., & Jerit, J. (2001). Commentary. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Understanding and expanding the limits of political rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
65. Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., & Rich, R. F. (2001). The political environment and citizen competence. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 410-424. doi:10.2307/2669349.
66. Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
67. Lasswell, H. D. (1946). Describing the contents of communication. In B. L. Smith, H. D. Lasswell, & R. D. Casey (Eds.), Propaganda, communication, and public opinion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
68. Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2006). How voters decide: Information processing in election campaigns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
69. Lenz, G. S. (2009). Learning and opinion change, not priming: Reconsidering the evidence for the priming hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 53 (forthcoming).
70. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: MacMillan.
71. Lodge, M. (1995). Toward a procedural model of candidate evaluation. In M. Lodge & K. M. McGraw (Eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
72. Lodge, M., McGraw, K. M., & Stroh, P. (1989). An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation. The American Political Science Review, 83, 399-420. doi:10.2307/1962397.
73. Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. The American Political Science Review, 89, 309-326. doi: 10.2307/2082427.
74. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2000). Three steps toward a theory of motivated political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2008). The rationalizing voter: Unconscious thought in political information processing. Unpublished paper, Stony Brook University.
76. Lodge, M., Taber, C. S., & Burdein, I. (2008). The impact of self-identification on political attitudes: An experimental test employing subliminal priming. Unpublished Manuscript, Stony Brook University.
77. Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. New York: Cambridge University Press.
78. Lupia, A., McCubbins, M. D., & Popkin, S. L. (2000). Beyond rationality: Reason and the study of politics. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Understanding and expanding the limits of political rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
79. Luskin, R. C. (2001). The heavenly public: What would be the ideal democratic citizenry be like. In G. Rabinowitz & M. B. MacKuen (Eds.), Electoral democracy. Ann Arbor, Mi: University of Michigan Press.
80. MacDonald, P. K. (2003). Useful fiction or miracle maker: The competing epistemological foundations of rational choice theory. The American Political Science Review, 97, 551-565. doi:10.1017/S0003055 40300087X.
81. Martin, L. L. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.493.
82. Martin, L. L., & Achee, J. W. (1992). Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
83. McGraw, K. M. (2003). Political impressions: Formation and management. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
84. McGraw, K. M. (2006). The infrastructure of political psychology. In L. Valenty (Ed.), Political psychology. Oplanden & Farmington Hills: Barbara Budich Publishers.
85. McGraw, K. M., & Dolan, T. (2007). Personifying the state: Consequences for attitude formation. Political Psychology, 28, 299-328. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00570.x.
86. McGraw, K. M., Hasecke, E., & Conger, K. (2003). Ambivalence, uncertainty, and processes of candidate evaluation. Political Psychology, 24, 421-448. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00335.
87. McGraw, K. M., Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1990). On-line processing in candidate evaluation: The effects of issue order, issue salience, and sophistication. Political Behavior, 12, 41-58. doi:10.1007/ BF00992331.
88. Mendelsohn, M. (1996). The media and interpersonal communication: The priming of issues, leaders, and party identification. The Journal of Politics, 58, 112-125. doi:10.2307/2960351.
89. Miller, J. M., & Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 295-309.
90. Monroe, K. (Ed.). (2002). Political psychology. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
91. Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
92. Mutz, D. C., & Reeves, B. (2005). The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. The American Political Science Review, 99, 1-15. doi:10.1017/S0003055405051452.
93. Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. The American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583. doi:10.2307/2952075.
94. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. D. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
95. O'Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
96. Oppenheim, P., & Putnam, H. (1958). Unity of science as a working hypothesis. In H. Fiegel, M. Scriven, & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. II). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
97. Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans' policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
98. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
99. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
100. Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
101. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association. (1904). The organization of the American Political Science Association. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, 1, 5-15.
102. Rahn, W. M., Aldrich, J. H., & Borgida, E. (1994). Individual and contextual variations in political candidate appraisal. The American Political Science Review, 88, 193-199. doi:10.2307/2944891.
103. Redlawsk, D. (2001). Hot cognition or cool consideration: Testing the effects of motivated reasoning on political decision making. The Journal of Politics, 64, 1021-1044.
104. Riker, W. H. (1995). The political psychology of rational choice theory. Political Psychology, 16, 23-44. doi:10.2307/3791448.
105. Riker, W. H. (1996). The strategy of rhetoric: Campaigning for the American constitution. New Haven: Yale University Press.
106. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values? The Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-46.
107. Sears, D. O., Huddy, L., & Jervis, R. (Eds.). (2003). Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
108. Sears, D. O., & Whitney, R. W. (1973). Political persuasion. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
109. Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (Eds.). (1969). Interdisciplinary relationships in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine.
110. Sherman, S. J., Mackie, D. M., & Driscoll, D. M. (1990). Priming and the differential use of dimensions in evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 405-418. doi:10.1177/01461672 90163001.
111. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man. New York: Wiley.
112. Simon, H. A. (1963). Problems of methodology. American Economic Review Proceedings, 53, 229-231. Discussion.
113. Sniderman, P. M. (2000). Taking sides: A fixed choice theory of political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
114. Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and choice: Explorations in political psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
115. Somin, I. (2006). Knowledge about ignorance: New directions in the study of political information. Critical Review, 18, 255-278.
116. Stapel, D., Koomen, W., & Zeelenberg, M. (1998). The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation, comparison, and correction processes: Accuracy 9 knowledge accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 878-893. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.878.
117. Taber, C. S. (2003). Information processing in public opinion. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & R. Jervis (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
118. Taber, C. S., Cann, A., & Kucsova, S. (2009). The motivated processing of political arguments. Unpublished paper, Stony Brook University.
119. Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluations of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 755-769. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x.
120. Taber, C. S., Lodge, M., & Glather, J. (2001). The motivated construction of political judgment. In J. H. Kuklinski (Ed.), Citizens and politics: Perspectives from political psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
121. Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1978). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top-of-the-head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Academic Press.
122. Tetlock, P. E. (1983). Accountability and complexity of thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 74-83. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.74.
123. Thompson, E. P., Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 474-489. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.474.
124. Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2001). On-line versus memory-based processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1599-1612. doi:10.1177/01461672012712004.
125. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.
126. Visser, P. S., Bizer, G. Y., & Krosnick, J. A. (2006). Exploring the latent structure of strength-related attitude attributes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 1-67. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601 (06)38001-X.
127. Wilson, E. O. (1998). Conscilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.
128. Wittman, D. (1995). The myth of democratic failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
129. Wyer, R. S., Jr, & Srull, T. K. (1980). The processing of social stimulus information: A conceptual integration. In R. Hastie, T. Ostrom, E. Ebbesen, R. Wyer, D. Hamilton, & D. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
130. Wyer, R. S., Jr, & Srull, T. K. (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
131. Wyer, R. S., Jr, & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
132. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.