When is a linguistic metaphor a conceptual metaphor?

Human Cognitive Processing

Volumn 24, Issue , 2009, Pages 127-145

  Casasanto, Daniel ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85190155838     PISSN: 13876724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1075/hcp.24.11cas     Document Type: Chapter

References (38)

1. Alverson, H. 1994. Semantics and Experience: Universal Metaphors of Time in English, Mandarin, Hindi, and Sesotho. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Anderson, J. 1991. The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review 98 (3): 409-429.
3. Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75 (1): 1-28.
4. Boroditsky, L. 2001. Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43 (1): 1-22.
5. Bowerman, M. 1994. From universal to language-specific in early grammatical development. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 346 (1315): 37-45.
6. Calbris, G. 1990. The Semiotics of French Gestures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
7. Casasanto, D. 2008a. Conceptual affiliates of metaphorical gestures. Paper presented at International Conference on Language, Communication, & Cognition. Brighton, UK.
8. Casasanto, D. 2008b. Who's afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning 58 (177): 63-79.
9. Casasanto, D. 2008c. Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind? Memory & Cognition 36 (6): 1047-1056.
10. Casasanto, D. & Boroditsky, L. 2008. Time in the mind: Using space to think about time. Cognition 106: 579-593.
11. Cienki, A. 1998. Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In Discourse and Cognition, J.-P. Koenig (ed.), 189-204. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
12. Clark, E. 2003. Languages and representations. In Language in Mind, D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (eds), 17-23. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Clark, H. H. 1973. Space, time, semantics and the child. In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, T. E. Moore (ed.), 27-63. New York: Academic Press.
14. Evans, V. 2004. The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Gibbs, R. W., Jr. 1994. The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Glenberg, A. M. & Kaschak, M. P. 2002. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9: 558-565.
17. Grady, J. 1997. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
18. Goldstone, R. 1994. An efficient method for obtaining similarity data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 26 (4): 381-386.
19. Goodman, N. 1972. Seven strictures on similarity. In Problems and Projects, N. Goodman (ed.), 437-447. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
20. Johnson, C. 1999. Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: The case of see. In Cultural, Typological, and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics, M. Hiraga, C. Sinha & S. Wilcox (eds), 155-169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Lafargue, P. 1898/1906. The Origin of Abstract Ideas: Inquiries into the Origin of the Idea of Justice and the Idea of Goodness. Chicago: Charles Kerr and Co.
22. Lakoff, G. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought, A. Ortony (ed.), 202-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science 4: 195-208.
24. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Medin, D., Goldstone, R. & Gentner, D. 1993. Respects for similarity. Psychological Review 100 (2): 254-278.
26. Mori, I., Kitagawa, O. & Tadang, N. 1974. The effect of language on a child's forming of spatio-temporal concept: On comparing Japanese and Thai children. Science Education 58 (4): 523-529.
27. Narayanan, S. 1997. Embodiment in Language Understanding: Sensory-Motor Representations for Metaphoric Reasoning about Event Descriptions. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
28. Núñez, R. & Sweetser, E. 2006. Looking ahead to the past: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30 (3): 401-450.
29. Piaget, J. 1927/1969. The Child's Conception of Time. New York: Ballantine Books.
30. Richardson, D. & Spivey, M. 2000. Representation, space, and Hollywood Squares: Looking at things that aren't there anymore. Cognition 76: 269-295.
31. Shepard, R. 1987. Toward a universal law of generalization in psychological science. Science 237 (4820): 1317-1323.
32. Slobin, D. 1987. Thinking for speaking. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, CA.
33. Sweetser, E. 1991. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Sweetser, E. 1998. Regular metaphoricity in gesture: Bodily-based models of speech interaction. Paper presented at the 16e Congrès International des Linguistes.
35. Tenenbaum, J. & Griffiths, T. 2001. Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 629-640.
36. Torralbo, A., Santiago, J. & Lupiáñez, J. 2006. Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science 30 (4): 745-757.
37. Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S. & Winter, A. 1991. Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology 23: 515-557.
38. Wertheimer, M. 1923/1938. Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In A Source Book of Gestalt psychology, W. Ellis (ed.), 71-88. London: Routledge.