The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance

Cognitive Systems Research

Volumn 9, Issue 1-2, 2008, Pages 64-75

  Gibbs Jr , Raymond W ^a   Cameron, Lynne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dynamic systems theory; Metaphor performance; Systematic metaphor

Indexed keywords

DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

DYNAMIC SYSTEMS THEORY; METAPHOR PERFORMANCE; SOCIAL-COGNITIVE DYNAMICS; SYSTEMATIC METAPHOR;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONVERSATION; CULTURAL FACTOR; EMOTION; GENDER; GESTURE; HUMAN; INTIMACY; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MORALITY; OCCUPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; VIOLENCE;

EID: 44249105431     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13890417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alibali M.W., Heath D.C., and Myers H.J. Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language 44 (2001) 169-188
2. Brennan S., and Clark H. Conceptual pacts and lexical choices in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 6 (1996) 1482-1493
3. Cameron L. Metaphor in Educational Discourse (2003), Continuum, London
4. Cameron Le. Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse and Society 18 2 (2007) 197-222
5. Cameron, L. (in press-a). Confrontation or complementarity: Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics.
6. Cameron, L. (in press-b). Metaphor shifting in the dynamics of talk. In M. S. Zanotto, L. Cameron, M. Cavalcanti (Eds.), Confronting metaphor in use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. Cameron L., and Deignan A. The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics 27 4 (2006) 671-690
8. Cienki, A., & Mueller, C. (Eds.), (in press). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
9. Deignan A. Metaphorical expression and culture: An indirect link. Metaphor and Symbol 18 (2003) 255-271
10. Deignan A. Metaphor and corpus linguistics (2005), John Benjamins, Amsterdam
11. Gibbs R. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding (1994), Cambridge University Press, New York
12. Gibbs R. Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. In: Gibbs R., and Steen G. (Eds). Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (1999), Benjamin, Amsterdam 145-166
13. Gibbs R. Embodiment and cognitive science (2006), Cambridge University Press, New York
14. Horton W. Metaphor and readers' attributions of intimacy. Memory & Cognition 35 (2007) 87-94
15. Katz A. Discourse and sociological factors in understanding nonliteral discourse. In: Colston H., and Katz A. (Eds). Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural factors (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 183-208
16. Kövecses Z. Metaphor in culture (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York
17. Kreuz R., and Link K. Do men and women differ in their use of nonliteral language when they talk about emotion?. In: Colston H., and Katz A. (Eds). Figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural factors (2005), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 153-182
18. Lakoff G., and Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought (1999), Basic Books, New York
19. Larsen-Freeman, D. & Cameron, L. (in press). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Oudeyer P.-Y. Self-organization and the evolution of speech (2006), Oxford University Press, New York
21. Roth W.-M., and Lawless D. Scientific investigation, metaphoric gestures, and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts. Learning and Instruction 12 (2002) 285-304
22. Slobin D. From "thought and language" to "thinking to speaking". In: Gumperz J., and Levinson S. (Eds). Rethinking linguistic relativity (1996), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 70-96
23. Spivey M. The continuity of mind (2007), Oxford University Press, New York
24. Stelma J., and Cameron L. Intonation units in spoken interaction: Developing transcriber competence. Text & Talk 27 3 (2007) 361-393
25. Wilson N., and Gibbs R. Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science 31 (2007) 721-731