On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame?

Journal of Politics

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 1041-1066

  Druckman, James N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035540315     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0022-3816.00100     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Alwin, Duane F., and Jon A. Krosnick. 1985. "The Measurement of Values in Surveys: A Comparison of Ratings and Rankings." Public Opinion Quarterly 49(4): 535-52.
2. Barker, David C., Christopher Jan Carman, and Kathleen Knight. 1998. "Rush To Judgment: Framing Issues, Priming Values, and Changing Minds - A Model of Political Persuasion through Talk Radio." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
3. Berinsky, Adam J., and Donald R. Kinder. 2000. "Making Sense of Issues through Frames: Understanding the Kosovo Crisis." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
4. Blalock, Jr., Hubert M. 1979. Social Statistics. 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Chong, Dennis. 1993. "How People Think, Reason, and Feel about Rights and Liberties." American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 867-99.
6. Chong, Dennis. 1996. "Creating Common Frames of Reference on Political Issues." In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, eds. Diana C. Mutz, Paul M. Sniderman, and Richard A. Brody. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
7. Chong, Dennis. 2000. Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8. Cobb, Michael D., and James H. Kuklinski. 1997. "Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion." American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 88-121.
9. Druckman, James N. N.d. "The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence." Political Behavior. Forthcoming.
10. Entman, Robert M. 1993. "Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm." Journal of Communication 43(4): 51-58.
11. Farr, James. 1993. "Framing Democratic Discussion." In Reconsidering the Democratic Public, eds. George E. Marcus and Russell L. Hanson. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
12. Fazio, Russell H. 1995. "Attitudes as Object-Evaluation Associations: Determinants, Consequences, and Correlates of Attitude Accessibility." In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, ed. Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Feldman, Stanley, and John Zaller. 1992. "The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State." American Journal of Political Science 36(1): 268-307.
14. Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. 1987. "The Changing Culture of Affirmative Action." In Research in Political Sociology, Vol. 3, ed. Richard D. Braungart. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
15. Gross, Kimberly Ann, and Lisa D'Ambrosio. 1999. "Media Framing, Causal Attribution and Emotions: An Experimental Investigation of the Framing of Emotion Response." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.
16. Hovland, Carl I., and Walter Weiss. 1951-52. "The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness." Public Opinion Quarterly 15(4): 635-50.
17. Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible?: How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Jaccard, James, Carmen Radecki, Tracey Wilson, and Patricia Dittus. 1995. "Methods for Identifying Consequential Beliefs: Implications for Understanding Attitude Strength." In Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, eds. Richard E. Petty and Jon A. Krosnick. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Jones, Bryan D. 1994. Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics: Attention, Choice, and Public Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Kifner, John. 1999. "Unmasked Klan Is Besieged at Manhattan Rally." The New York Times (October 24) 1, 37.
21. Kinder, Donald R. 1998. "Communication and Opinion." Annual Review of Political Science 1: 167-97.
22. Kinder, Donald R., and Don Herzog. 1993. "Democratic Discussion." In Reconsidering the Democratic Public, ed. George E. Marcus and Russell L. Hanson. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
23. Kinder, Donald R., and Lynn M. Sanders. 1990. "Mimicking Political Debate With Survey Questions: The Case of White Opinion on Affirmative Action for Blacks." Social Cognition 8(1): 73-103.
24. Krosnick, Jon A., and Matthew K. Berent. 1993. "Comparisons of Party Identification and Policy Preferences: The Impact of Survey Question Format." American Journal of Political Science 37(3): 941-64.
25. Kühberger, Anton. 1998. "The Influence of Framing on Risky Decisions: A Meta-analysis." Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75(1): 23-55.
26. Kuklinski, James H., and Norman L. Hurley. 1994. "On Hearing and Interpreting Political Messages: A Cautionary Tale of Citizen Cue-Taking." Journal of Politics 56(3): 729-51.
27. Kuklinski, James H., and Norman L. Hurley. 1996. "It's a Matter of Interpretation." In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, eds. Diana C. Mutz, Paul M. Sniderman, and Richard A. Brody. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
28. Kuklinski, James H., and Paul J. Quirk. 2000. "Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion." In Elements of Reason: Understanding and Expanding the Limits of Political Rationality, eds. Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kuklinski, James H., Ellen Riggle, Victor Ottati, Norbert Schwarz, and Robert S. Wyer Jr. 1991. "The Cognitive and Affective Bases of Political Tolerance Judgments." American Journal of Political Science 35(1): 1-27.
30. Lupia, Arthur. 2000. "Who Can Persuade Whom?: Implications from the Nexus of Psychology and Rational Choice Theory." In Political Psychology, ed. James H. Kuklinski. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Miller, Joanne M., and Jon A. Krosnick. 1996. "News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: A Program of Research on the Priming Hypothesis." In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, eds. Diana C. Mutz, Paul M. Sniderman, and Richard A. Brody. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
33. Miller, Joanne M., and Jon A. Krosnick. 1998. "News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Learn from a Trusted Source of Information." Ohio State University. Typescript.
34. Miller, Joanne M., and Jon A. Krosnick. 2000. "News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source." American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 295-309.
35. Mixon, Don. 1972. "Instead of Deception." Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 2(2): 145-77.
36. Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee A. Clawson, and Zoe M. Oxley. 1997. "Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance." American Political Science Review 91(3): 567-83.
37. Nelson, Thomas E., and Donald R. Kinder. 1991. "Framing Effects Need Not Depend on Changes in Construct Accessibility." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
38. Nelson, Thomas E., and Donald R. Kinder. 1996. "Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion." Journal of Politics 58(4): 1055-78.
39. Nelson, Thomas E., and Zoe M. Oxley. 1999. "Issue Framing Effects and Belief Importance and Opinion." Journal of Politics 61(4): 1040-67.
40. Nelson, Thomas E., Zoe M. Oxley, and Rosalee A. Clawson. 1997. "Toward A Psychology of Framing Effects." Political Behavior 19(3): 221-46.
41. Nelson, Thomas E., Elaine Willey, and Zoe M. Oxley. 1998. "Belief Content, Importance, and Accessibility in Issue Opinion." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
42. Petty, Richard E., and John T. Cacioppo. 1986. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
43. Petty, Richard E., and Duane T. Wegener. 1998. "Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables." In Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edition, Volume 2, eds. Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44. Pew Research Center. 1998. "Event-Driven News Audiences: Internet News Takes Off." Pew Research Center Biennial News Consumption Survey, http://www.people-press.org/med98rpt.htni.
45. Rabin, Matthew. 1998. "Psychology and Economics." Journal of Economic Literature 36(1): 11-46.
46. Riker, William H. 1986. The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
47. Riker, William H. 1990. "Heresthetic and Rhetoric in the Spatial Model." In Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting, eds. James M. Enelow and Melvin J. Hinich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Sears, David O. 1986. "College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(3): 515-30.
49. Sherman, Steven J., Diane M. Mackie, and Denise M. Driscoll. 1990. "Priming and the Differential Use of Dimensions in Evaluation." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16(3): 405-18.
50. Sniderman, Paul M. 2000. "Taking Sides: A Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning." In Elements of Reason: Understanding and Expanding the Limits of Political Rationality, eds. Arthur Lupia, Mathew D. McCubbins, and Samuel L. Popkin. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Sniderman, Paul M., and Sean M. Theriault. 1999. "The Dynamics of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
52. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. "The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice." Science 211(4481): 453-58.
53. Weiser, Benjamin. 1999a. "Court Says New York Must Allow the Ku Klux Klan to Demonstrate." The New York Times (October 22) A1, A27.
54. Weiser, Benjamin. 1999b. "Appeals Court Bars Klan Masks; Group Still Plans to Stage Rally." The New York Times (October 23) A1, B5.
55. Wyer Jr., Robert S., and Thomas K. Srull. 1989. Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
56. Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.