Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade's Literature

Journal of Communication

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 246-263

  Borah, Porismita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; COMMUNICATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATABASE; LITERATURE REVIEW; UNIVERSITY SECTOR;

EID: 79953285529     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
2. Benson, R., & Saguy, A. (2005). Constructing social problems in an age of globalization: A French-American comparison. American Sociological Review, 70(2), 233-259.
3. Bleich, S. (2007). Is it all in a word? The effect of issue framing on public support for U.S. spending on HIV/AIDS in developing countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 12(2), 120-132.
4. Brewer, P. R. (2003). Values, political knowledge, and public opinion about gay rights: A framing-based account. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 173-201.
5. Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2005). Values, framing, and citizens' thoughts about policy issues: Effects on content and quantity. Political Psychology, 26(6), 929-948.
6. Cappella, J., & Jamieson, K. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Carragee, K., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214-233.
8. Chang, C.-T. (2007a). Interactive effects of message framing, product perceived risk, and mood: The case of travel healthcare product advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 51-65.
9. Chang, C.-T. (2007b).Health-care product advertising: The influences of message framing and perceived product characteristics. Psychology & Marketing, 24(2), 143-169.
10. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007a). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99-118.
11. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007b). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103-126.
12. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007c). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(4), 637-655.
13. D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870-888.
14. Devitt, J. (2002). Framing gender on the campaign trail: Female gubernatorial candidate and the press. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(2), 445-463.
15. de Vreese, C. H. (2004). The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(1), 36-52.
16. Domke, D., Shah, D., & Wackman, D. (1998). "Moral referendums": Values, news media, and the process of candidate choice. Political Communication, 15(3), 301-321.
17. Donovan, R. J., & Geoffrey, J. (1999). Positively versus negatively framed product attributes: The influence of involvement. Psychology of Marketing, 16(7), 613-630.
18. Druckman, J. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225-256.
19. Druckman, J. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir) relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 671-686.
20. Druckman, J., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 728-744.
21. Entman, R. (1991). Framing United-States coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the Kal and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27.
22. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
23. Entman, R. M. (2004). Projects of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Gamson, W., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Eds.), Research in political sociology (pp. 137-177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25. Gamson, W., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
26. Gans, H. (2004). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, and Time. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
27. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Grabe, M., & Kamhawi, R. (2006). Hard wired for negative news? Gender differences in processing broadcast news. Communication Research, 33, 346-369.
30. Gross, K., & D'Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25(1), 1-29.
31. Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Hertog, J., & McLeod, D. (2001). A multiperspectival approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 139-161). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Iyengar, S. (1987). Television news and citizens' explanations of national affairs. The American Political Science Review, 81(3), 815-832.
34. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58(9), 697-720.
36. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-292.
37. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341-350.
38. Keum, H., Hillback, E., Rojas, H., Zuniga, H., Shah, D., & McLeod, D. (2005). Personifying the radical: How framing polarizes security concerns and tolerance judgments. Human Communication Research, 31(3), 337-364.
39. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition, 8, 73-103.
40. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
41. Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23-55.
42. Lau, R., & Schlesinger, M. (2005). Policy frames, metaphorical reasoning, and support for public policies. Political Psychology, 26(1), 77-114.
43. Maher, M. (2001). Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting? In S. Reese, O. Gandy, Jr., & A. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp 83-94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 172-187.
45. McLeod, D. M., & Detenber, B. H. (1999). Framing effects of television news coverage of social protest. Journal of Communication, 49(3), 3-23.
46. Miller, P. M., & Fagley, N. S. (1991). The effects of framing, problem variations, and providing rationale on choice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 517-522.
47. Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construct level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33, 489-514.
48. Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567-583.
49. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221-246.
50. Nelson, T. E., & Willey, E. A. (2001). Issue frames that strike a value balance: A political psychology perspective. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 245-266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Communication Yearbook, 30(1), 1-43.
52. O'Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623-644.
53. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. (2005). Framing and the understanding of citizenship. In S. Dunwoody, L. Backer, D. McLeod, & G. Kosicki (Eds.), The evolution of key mass communication concepts. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
55. Potter, W. J., & Riddle, K. (2007). A content analysis of the media effects literature. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(1), 90-104.
56. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
57. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: a bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148-154.
58. Rhee, J. W. (1997). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 26-48.
59. Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism: Media strategies for grassroots organizing. Boston: South End Press.
60. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.
61. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2 & 3), 297-316.
62. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20.
63. Schuck, R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2006). Between risk and opportunity: News framing and its effects on public support for EU enlargement. European Journal of Communication, 21, 5-31.
64. Schudson, M. (1983). Why news is the way it is. Raritan, 2, 109-125.
65. Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (1996). "To thine own self be true": Values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23(5), 509-560.
66. Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 102-120.
67. Shen, F. (2004a). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 123-137.
68. Shen, F. (2004b). Effects of news frames and schemas on individuals' issue interpretations and attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 400-416.
69. Shen, F., & Edwards, H. (2005). Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 795-809.
70. Shoemaker, P., & Reese, S. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content. New York: Longman.
71. Silcock, B. W. (2002). Global news, national stories: Producers as mythmakers at Germany's Deutsche Welle television. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(2), 339-352.
72. Simon, A. F. (2001). A unified method for analyzing media framing. In R. P. Hart & D. R. Shaw (Eds.), Communication in U.S. elections: New agendas (pp. 75-89). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
73. Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 133-165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
74. Terkildsen, N., & Schnell, F. (1997). How media frames move public opinion: An analysis of the women's movement. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 879-900.
75. Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M., Raymond, A., & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804-829.
76. Valentino, N., Beckmann, M., & Buhr, T. (2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18, 347-367.
77. Valkenburg, P. M., Semetko, H. A., & de Vreese, C. H. (1999). The effects of news frames on readers' thoughts and recall. Communication Research, 26(5), 550-569.
78. Zhang, Y. Z., & Buda, R. (1999). Moderating effects of need for cognition on responses to positively versus negatively framed advertising messages. Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 1-15.