Public-Elite Interactions: Puzzles in Search of Researchers

The Oxford Handbook of American Public Opinion and the Media

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Chong, Dennis ^a   Druckman, James N ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication effects; Democratic theory; Elite influence; Elite rhetoric; Elite strategies; Empirical issues; Political communications research; Theoretical issues

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924263791     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199545636.003.0011     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. AARØE, L. 2008. Investigating Frame Strength. Unpublished paper. Aarhus University.
2. AJZEN, I., and FISHBEIN, M. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3. ALTHAUS, S. L., and KIM, Y. M. 2006. Priming Effects in Complex Environments. Journal of Politics, 68: 960-76.
4. ARCENEAUX, K. 2009. Cognitive Biases and the Strength of Political Arguments. Unpublished paper. Temple University.
5. ARCENEAUX, K. and JOHNSON, M. 2008. Choice, Attention, and Reception in Political Communication Research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Paris, July 9-12.
6. BAI, M. 2005. The Framing Wars. New York Times Magazine, July 17.
7. BARABAS, J., and JERIT, J. Forthcoming. The External Validity of Treatments. American Political Science Review.
8. BARTELS, L. M. 1993. Messages Received. American Political Science Review, 87/2: 267-85.
9. BARTELS, L. M. 2003. Democracy with Attitudes. In Electoral Democracy, ed. M. B. MacKuen and G. Rabinowitz. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. BAUM, M. A., and KERNELL, S. 1999. Has Cable Ended the Golden Age of Presidential Television? American Political Science Review, 93/1: 99-114.
11. BAUMGARTNER, F. R., BERRY, J. M., HOJNAACKI, M., KIMBALL, D. C., and LEECH, B. L. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. BAUMGARTNER, F. R., DE BOEF, S. L., and BOYDSTUN, A. E. 2008. The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. BENNETT, W. L., and IYENGAR, S. 2008. A New Era of Minimal Effects? Journal of Communication, 58: 707-31.
14. BLESS, H., FIEDLER, K., and STRACK, F. 2004. Social Cognition. New York: Psychology Press.
15. BREWER, P. R. 2001. Value Words and Lizard Brains. Political Psychology, 22: 45-64.
16. BULLOCK, J., and HA, S. Forthcoming. Mediation Analysis Is Harder than it Looks. In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, ed. J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H. Kuklinski, and A. Lupia. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. CHONG, D. 2000. Rational Lives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. CHONG, D. and DRUCKMAN, J. N. 2007a. A Theory of Framing and Opinion Formation in Competitive Elite Environments. Journal of Communication, 57: 99-118.
19. CHONG, D. and DRUCKMAN, J. N. 2007b. Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies. American Political Science Review, 101/4: 637-55.
20. CHONG, D. and DRUCKMAN, J. N. 2007c. Framing Theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10/1: 103-26.
21. CHONG, D. and DRUCKMAN, J. N. 2010. Dynamics in Mass Communication Effects Research. In The Sage Handbook of Political Communication, ed. H. Semetko and M. Scammell. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. CHONG, D. and DRUCKMAN, J. N. Forthcoming a. Identifying Frames in Political News. In Sourcebook for Political Communication Research, ed. E. P. Bucy and R. L. Holbert. New York: Routledge.
23. CHONG, D. and DRUCKMAN, J. N. Forthcoming b. Dynamic Public Opinion: Communication Effects over Time. American Political Science Review.
24. COX, G. W., and MCCUBBINS, M. D. 2005. Setting the Agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25. DAHL, R. A. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
26. DE VREESE, C. H. 2004. Primed by the Euro. Scandinavian Political Studies, 27/1: 45-65.
27. DISCH, L. 2009. Beyond Responsiveness. Unpublished paper. University of Michigan.
28. DRUCKMAN, D. 2003. Puzzles in Search of Researchers: Processes, Identities, and Situations. International Journal of Conflict Management, 14/1: 3-22.
29. DRUCKMAN, J. N. 2001. The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence. Political Behavior, 23/3: 225-56.
30. DRUCKMAN, J. N. 2004. Political Preference Formation. American Political Science Review, 98 (Nov.), 671-86.
31. DRUCKMAN, J. N. 2010. Competing Frames in a Political Campaign. In Winning with Words, ed. B. F. Schaffner and P. J. Sellers. New York: Routledge.
32. DRUCKMAN, J. N. Forthcoming. What's It All About? In Perspectives on Framing, ed. G. Keren.
33. DRUCKMAN, J. N. and BOLSEN, T. 2009. Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions about Emergent Technologies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, Sept. 3-6.
34. DRUCKMAN, J. N. and HOLMES, J. W. 2004. Does Presidential Rhetoric Matter? Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34: 755-78.
35. DRUCKMAN, J. N. and JACOBS, L. R. 2006. Lumpers and Splitters: The Public Opinion Information that Politicians Collect and Use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70: 453-76.
36. DRUCKMAN, J. N. and JACOBS, L. R. 2009. Presidential Responsiveness to Public Opinion. In The Oxford Handbook of the American Presidency, ed. G. C. Edwards III and W. G. Howell. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. DRUCKMAN, J. N. and NELSON, K. R. 2003. Framing and Deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 47/4: 728-44.
38. DRUCKMAN, J. N. HENNESSY, C. L., ST., CHARLES, K., and WEBER, J. 2010. Competing Rhetoric over Time: Frames versus Cues. Journal of Politics, 72: 136-48.
39. DRUCKMAN, J. N. JACOBS, L. R., and OSTERMEIER, E. 2004. Candidate Strategies to Prime Issues and Image. Journal of Politics, 66: 1205-27.
40. DRUCKMAN, J. N. KIFER, M. J., and PARKIN, M. 2009. Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review, 103/3: 343-66.
41. DRUCKMAN, J. N. KUKLINSKI, J. H., and SIGELMAN, L. 2009. The Unmet Potential of Interdisciplinary Research: Political Psychological Approaches to Voting and Public Opinion. Political Behavior, 31/4: 485-510.
42. EDY, J. A. 2006. Troubled Pasts. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
43. ENELOW, J. M., and HINICH, M. J. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
44. ENTMAN, R. M. 2004. Projects of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
45. ERIKSON, R. S., MACKUEN, M. B., and STIMSON, J. A. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. IYENGAR, S. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. IYENGAR, S. and KINDER, D. R. 1987. News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. JACOBS, L. R., and SHAPIRO, R. Y. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. JACOBSON, G. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 6th edn. New York: Pearson Longman.
50. JAMIESON, K. H. 2000. Everything You Think You Know about Politics...And Why You're Wrong. New York: Basic Books.
51. KINDER, D. R. 1998. Communication and Opinion. Annual Review of Political Science, 1: 167-97.
52. LAKOFF, G. 2004. Don't Think of an Elephant? White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
53. LAU, R. R., and REDLAWSK, D. P. 2006. How Voters Decide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. LECHELER, S., DE VREESE, C. H., and SLOTHUUS, R. 2009. Issue Importance as a Moderator of Framing Effects. Communication Research, 36/3: 400-25.
55. LENZ, G. 2009. Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming. American Journal of Political Science, 53/4: 821-37.
56. LODGE, M., and TABER, C. 2000. Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning. In Elements of Reason, ed. A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, and S. L. Popkin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. LUPIA, A. 2006. How Elitism Undermines the Study of Voter Competence. Critical Review, 18: 217-32.
58. MCCOMBS, M. 2004. Setting the Agenda. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
59. MATTHES, J. 2008. Media Frames and Public Opinion. Studies in Communication Studies, 8: 101-28.
60. MILLER, J. M., and KROSNICK, J. A. 2000. News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations. American Journal of Political Science, 44/2: 301-15.
61. MUTZ, D. C., and REEVES, B. 2005. The New Videomalaise. American Political Science Review, 99/1: 1-15.
62. NELSON, T. E., and OXLEY, Z. M. 1999. Issue Framing Effects and Belief Importance and Opinion. Journal of Politics, 61: 1040-67.
63. NELSON, T. E., CLAWSON, R. A., and OXLEY, Z. M. 1997. Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and its Effect on Tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91/3: 567-83.
64. NELSON, T. E., OXLEY, Z. M., and CLAWSON, R. A. 1997. Toward a Psychology of Framing Effects. Political Behavior, 19/3: 221-46.
65. O'KEEFE, D. J. 2002. Persuasion. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. PAGE, B. I., and SHAPIRO, R. Y. 1992. The Rational Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67. PETERSEN, M. B. Forthcoming. Distinct Emotions, Distinct Domains: Anger, Anxiety and Perceptions of Intentionality. Journal of Politics, 72/2.
68. PETTY, R. E., and CACIOPPO, J. T. 1986. Communication and Persuasion. New York: Springer.
69. POLLETTA, F., and HO, M. K. 2006. Frames and their Consequences. In The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Studies, ed. R. E. Goodin and C. Tilly. New York: Oxford University Press.
70. POPKIN, S. L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
71. POPKIN, S. L. 1994. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
72. PRICE, V., and TEWKSBURY, D. 1997. News Values and Public Opinion. In Progress in Communication Sciences, xiii, ed. G. A. Barnett and F. J. Boster. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
73. RIKER, W. H. 1996. The Strategy of Rhetoric. New Haven: Yale University Press.
74. SCHATTSCHNEIDER, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
75. SCHEUFELE, D. A. 1999. Framing as a Theory of Media Effects. Journal of Communication, 49: 103-22.
76. SCHEUFELE, D. A. 2000. Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited. Mass Communication and Society, 3: 297-316.
77. SIMON, H. A. 1955. A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69: 99-118.
78. SLOTHUUS, R. 2008. More than Weighting Cognitive Importance. Political Psychology, 29/1: 1-28.
79. SLOTHUUS, R. 2009. The Political Logic of Party Cues in Opinion Formation. Unpublished paper. University of Aarhus.
80. SNIDERMAN, P. M., and LEVENDUSKY, M. S. 2007. An Institutional Theory of Political Choice. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior, ed. R. J. Dalton and H.-D. Klingeman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
81. SNIDERMAN, P. M., and THERIAULT, S. M. 2004. The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing. In Studies in Public Opinion, ed. W. E. Saris and P. M. Sniderman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
82. SOROKA, S. N., and WLEZIEN, C. 2009. Degrees of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
83. STONECASH, J. 2003. Political Polling. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
84. TOGEBY, L. 2007. The Context of Priming. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30/3: 345-76.
85. VAVRECK, L. 2009. The Message Matters. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
86. WINTER, N. J. G. 2008. Dangerous Frames. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
87. WOOD, B. D., and VEDLITZ, A. 2007. Issue Definition, Information Processing, and the Politics of Global Warming. American Journal of Political Science, 51/3: 552-68.
88. WOOD, W. 2000. Attitude Change: Persuasion and Social Influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 50: 539-70.
89. ZALLER, J. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.