A stringent yeast two-hybrid matrix screening approach for protein-protein interaction discovery

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 812, Issue , 2012, Pages 63-87

  Worseck, Josephine M ^a   Grossmann, Arndt ^a   Weimann, Mareike ^a   Hegele, Anna ^a   Stelzl, Ulrich ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

FKBP6 FKBP36; Interactome mapping; Large scale screen; Network biology; PRKACA PKC alpha; Protein protein interactions; STUB1 Chip; Yeast two hybrid

Indexed keywords

BETA GALACTOSIDASE; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM TRANSFORMATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; YEAST;

BETA-GALACTOSIDASE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; PROTEINS; TRANSFORMATION, BACTERIAL; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES; YEASTS;

EID: 84856304670     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-455-1_4     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Fields S, Song O. (1989) A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 340, 245-6.
2. Fromont-Racine M, Rain JC, Legrain P. (1997) Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nat Genet 16, 277-82.
3. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, et al. (2000) A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 403, 623-7.
4. Walhout AJ, Sordella R, Lu X, et al. (2000) Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science 287, 116-22.
5. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, Sakaki Y. (2001) A comprehensive twohybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 4569-74.
6. Tong AH, Drees B, Nardelli G, et al. (2002) A combined experimental and computational strategy to define protein interaction networks for peptide recognition modules. Science 295, 321-4.
7. Goehler H, Lalowski M, Stelzl U, et al. (2004) A protein interaction network links GIT1, an enhancer of Huntingtin aggregation, to Huntington's disease. Mol Cell 15, 853-65.
8. Colland F, Jacq X, Trouplin V, et al. (2004) Functional proteomics mapping of a human signaling pathway. Genome Res 14, 1324-32.
9. Formstecher E, Aresta S, Collura V, et al. (2005) Protein interaction mapping: a Drosophila case study. Genome Res 15, 376-84.
10. Miller JP, Lo RS, Ben-Hur A, et al. (2005) Large-scale identification of yeast integral membrane protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 12123-8.
11. Lim J, Hao T, Shaw C, et al. (2006) A proteinprotein interaction network for human inherited ataxias and disorders of Purkinje cell degeneration. Cell 125, 801-14.
12. Kaltenbach LS, Romero E, Becklin RR, et al. (2007) Huntingtin interacting proteins are genetic modifi ers of neurodegeneration. PLoS Genet 3, e82.
13. Markson G, Kiel C, Hyde R, et al. (2009) Analysis of the human E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme protein interaction network. Genome Res 19, 1905-11.
14. van Wijk SJ, de Vries SJ, Kemmeren P, et al. (2009) A comprehensive framework of E2-RING E3 interactions of the human ubiquitin-proteasome system. Mol Syst Biol 5, 295.
15. Bell R, Hubbard A, Chettier R, et al. (2009) A human protein interaction network shows conservation of aging processes between human and invertebrate species. PLoS Genet 5, e1000414.
16. Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C, et al. (2003) A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 302, 1727-36.
17. Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N, et al. (2004) A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303, 540-3.
18. Stelzl U, Worm U, Lalowski M, et al. (2005) A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122, 957-68.
19. Rual JF, Venkatesan K, Hao T, et al. (2005) Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437, 1173-8.
20. LaCount DJ, Vignali M, Chettier R, et al. (2005) A protein interaction network of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 438, 103-7.
21. Parrish JR, Gulyas KD, Finley RL, Jr. (2006) Yeast two-hybrid contributions to interactome mapping. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17, 387-93.
22. Yu H, Braun P, Yildirim MA, et al. (2008) High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104-10.
23. Parrish JR, Yu J, Liu G, et al. (2007) A proteome-wide protein interaction map for Campylobacter jejuni. Genome Biol 8, R130.
24. Braun P, Tasan M, Dreze M, et al. (2009) An experimentally derived confi dence score for binary protein-protein interactions. Nat Methods 6, 91-7.
25. Figeys D. (2008) Mapping the human protein interactome. Cell Res 18, 716-24.
26. Schwartz AS, Yu J, Gardenour KR, Finley RL, Jr., Ideker T. (2009) Cost-effective strategies for completing the interactome. Nat Methods 6, 55-61.
27. Venkatesan K, Rual JF, Vazquez A, et al. (2009) An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 6, 83-90.
28. Walhout AJ, Vidal M. (1999) A genetic strategy to eliminate self-activator baits prior to high-throughput yeast two-hybrid screens. Genome Res 9, 1128-34.
29. Vidalain PO, Boxem M, Ge H, Li S, Vidal M. (2004) Increasing specifi city in high-throughput yeast two-hybrid experiments. Methods 32, 363-70.
30. Rajagopala SV, Hughes KT, Uetz P. (2009) Benchmarking yeast two-hybrid systems using the interactions of bacterial motility proteins. Proteomics 9, 5296-302.
31. Golemis EA, Serebriiskii I, Finley RL, Jr., Kolonin MG, Gyuris J, Brent R. (2009) Interaction trap/two-hybrid system to identify interacting proteins. Curr Protoc Protein Sci Chapter 19, Unit19 2.
32. Estojak J, Brent R, Golemis EA. (1995) Correlation of two-hybrid affinity data with in vitro measurements. Mol Cell Biol 15, 5820-9.
33. Simonis N, Rual JF, Carvunis AR, et al. (2009) Empirically controlled mapping of the Caenorhabditis elegans protein-protein interactome network. Nat Methods 6, 47-54.
34. Eyckerman S, Lemmens I, Lievens S, et al. (2002) Design and use of a mammalian protein-protein interaction trap (MAPPIT). Sci STKE 2002, pl18.
35. Stelzl U, Wanker EE. (2006) The value of high quality protein-protein interaction networks for systems biology. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10, 551-8.
36. Suter B, Kittanakom S, Stagljar I. (2008) Twohybrid technologies in proteomics research. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19, 316-23.
37. Sanderson CM. (2009) The Cartographers toolbox: building bigger and better human protein interaction networks. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 8, 1-11.
38. Lamesch P, Li N, Milstein S, et al. (2007) hORFeome v3.1: a resource of human open reading frames representing over 10,000 human genes. Genomics 89, 307-15.
39. Goshima N, Kawamura Y, Fukumoto A, et al. (2008) Human protein factory for converting the transcriptome into an in vitro-expressed proteome. Nat Methods 5, 1011-7.
40. Temple G, Gerhard DS, Rasooly R, et al. (2009) The completion of the Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC). Genome Res 19, 2324-33.
41. Chung CT, Niemela SL, Miller RH. (1989) One-step preparation of competent Escherichia coli: transformation and storage of bacterial cells in the same solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86, 2172-5.
42. Jin F, Hazbun T, Michaud GA, et al. (2006) A pooling-deconvolution strategy for biological network elucidation. Nat Methods 3, 183-9.
43. Xin X, Rual JF, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, et al. (2009) Shifted Transversal Design smart-pooling for high coverage interactome mapping. Genome Res 19, 1262-9.
44. Jansen R, Gerstein M. (2004) Analyzing protein function on a genomic scale: the importance of gold-standard positives and negatives for network prediction. Curr Opin Microbiol 7, 535-45.
45. Chuang HY, Lee E, Liu YT, Lee D, Ideker T. (2007) Network-based classifi cation of breast cancer metastasis. Mol Syst Biol 3, 140.
46. Lage K, Karlberg EO, Storling ZM, et al. (2007) A human phenome-interactome network of protein complexes implicated in genetic disorders. Nat Biotechnol 25, 309-16.
47. Kohler S, Bauer S, Horn D, Robinson PN. (2008) Walking the interactome for prioritization of candidate disease genes. Am J Hum Genet 82, 949-58.
48. Taylor IW, Linding R, Warde-Farley D, et al. (2009) Dynamic modularity in protein interaction networks predicts breast cancer outcome. Nat Biotechnol 27, 199-204.
49. Pujana MA, Han JD, Starita LM, et al. (2007) Network modeling links breast cancer susceptibility and centrosome dysfunction. Nat Genet 39, 1338-49.
50. Deribe YL, Wild P, Chandrashaker A, et al. (2009) Regulation of epidermal growth factor receptor traffi cking by lysine deacetylase HDAC6. Sci Signal 2, ra84.
51. Grelle G, Kostka S, Otto A, et al. (2006) Identifi cation of VCP/p97, carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP), and amphiphysin II interaction partners using membrane-based human proteome arrays. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 234-44.
52. Dickey CA, Patterson C, Dickson D, Petrucelli L. (2007) Brain CHIP: removing the culprits in neurodegenerative disease. Trends Mol Med 13, 32-8.
53. Jarczowski F, Fischer G, Edlich F. (2008) FKBP36 forms complexes with clathrin and Hsp72 in spermatocytes. Biochemistry 47, 6946-52.
54. Mackay HJ, Twelves CJ. (2007) Targeting the protein kinase C family: are we there yet? Nat Rev Cancer 7, 554-62.
55. Roffey J, Rosse C, Linch M, Hibbert A, McDonald NQ, Parker PJ. (2009) Protein kinase C intervention: the state of play. Curr Opin Cell Biol 21, 268-79.