The cartographers toolbox: Building bigger and better human protein interaction networks

Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-11

  Sanderson, Christopher M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AVEXIS; Human interactome; MAPPIT; Membrane proteins; MYTH; Network biology; PCA; Protein interaction network; Yeast two hybrid

Indexed keywords

COMPLEMENTARY DNA; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

COMPUTER INTERFACE; DNA SPLICING; FUNCTIONAL PROTEOMICS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MOLECULAR CLONING; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TARGETING; REVIEW;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENOME; HUMANS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 63849310190     PISSN: 14739550     EISSN: 14774062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elp003     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Formstecher E, Aresta S, Collura V, et al. Protein interaction mapping: A Drosophila case study. Genome Res 2005;15: 376-84.
2. Fromont-Racine M, Rain JC, Legrain P. Toward a functional analysis of the yeast genome through exhaustive two-hybrid screens. Nat Genet 1997;16:277-82.
3. Gavin AC, Bosche M, Krause R, et al. Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes. Nature 2002;415:141-7.
4. Giot L, Bader JS, Brouwer C, et al. A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 2003;302:1727-36.
5. Ho Y, Gruhler A, Heilbut A, et al. Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry. Nature 2002;415:180-3.
6. Ito T, Tashiro K, Muta S, et al. Toward a protein-protein interaction map of the budding yeast: A comprehensive system to examine two-hybrid interactions in all possible combinations between the yeast proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:1143-7.
7. Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N, et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 2004;303:540-3.
8. Stanyon CA, Liu G, Mangiola BA, et al. A Drosophila protein-interaction map centered on cell-cycle regulators. Genome Biol 2004;5:R96.
9. Uetz P, Giot L, Cagney G, et al. A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2000;403:623-7.
10. Walhout AJ, Sordella R, Lu X, et al. Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science 2000;287:116-22.
11. Rual J-F, Venkatesan K, Hao T, et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2005; 437:1173-8.
12. Stelzl U, Worm U, Lalowski M, et al. A human protein-protein interaction network: A resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 2005;122:957-68.
13. Colland F, Jacq X, Trouplin V, et al. Functional proteomics mapping of a human signaling pathway. Genome Res 2004; 14 1324-32.
14. Lehner B, Sanderson CM. A protein interaction framework for human mRNA degradation. Genome Res 2004;14: 1315-23.
15. Lehner B, Semple JI, Brown SE, et al. Analysis of a high-throughput yeast two-hybrid system and its use to predict the function of intracellular proteins encoded within the human MHC class III region. Genomics 2004; 83:153-67.
16. Lim J, Hao T, Shaw C, et al. A protein-protein interaction network for human inherited ataxias and disorders of Purkinje cell degeneration. Cell 2006;125:801-14.
17. Tsang HT, Connell JW, Brown SE, et al. A systematic analysis of human CHMP protein interactions: Additional MIT domain-containing proteins bind to multiple components of the human ESCRT III complex. Genomics 2006;88:333-46.
18. Fields S, Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 1989;340:245-6.
19. Ewing RM, Chu P, Elisma F, et al. Large-scale mapping of human protein-protein interactions by mass spectrometry. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:89.
20. Jeronimo C, Forget D, Bouchard A, et al. Systematic analysis of the protein interaction network for the human transcription machinery reveals the identity of the 7SK capping enzyme. Mol Cell 2007; 27:262-74.
21. Auerbach D, Galeuchet-Schenk B, Hottiger MO, et al. Genetic approaches to the identification of interactions between membrane proteins in yeast. J Recept Signal Transduct Res 2002;22 471-81.
22. Bushell KM, Sollner C, Schuster-Boeckler B, et al. Large-scale screening for novel low-affinity extracellular protein interactions. Genome Res 2008;18:622-30.
23. Casadio R, Fariselli P, Martelli PL. How many membrane proteins in the Human Genome? www.itb.cnr.it/bits2005/abstract/20.pdf (last accessed 20 February 2009).
24. Stagljar I, Fields S. Analysis of membrane protein interactions using yeast-based technologies. Trends Biochem Sci 2002;27:559-63.
25. Aronheim A. Improved efficiency sos recruitment system: Expression of the mammalian GAP reduces isolation of Ras GTPase false positives. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25: 3373-4.
26. Broder YC, Katz S, Aronheim A. The ras recruitment system, a novel approach to the study of protein-protein interactions. Curr Biol 1998;8:1121-4.
27. Ehrhard KN, Jacoby JJ, Fu XY, et al. Use of G-protein fusions to monitor integral membrane protein-protein interactions in yeast. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:1075-9.
28. Johnsson N, Varshavsky A. Split ubiquitin as a sensor of protein interactions in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91: 10340-4.
29. Stagljar I, Korostensky C, Johnsson N, et al. A genetic system based on split-ubiquitin for the analysis of interactions between membrane proteins in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95 5187-92.
30. Tarassov K, Messier V, Landry CR, et al. An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Science 2008;320: 1465-70.
31. Miyawaki A, Llopis J, Heim R, et al. Fluorescent indicators for Ca2+ based on green fluorescent proteins and calmodulin. Nature 1997;388:882-7.
32. Rossi F, Charlton CA, Blau HM. Monitoring protein-protein interactions in intact eukaryotic cells by beta-galactosidase complementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:8405-10.
33. Galarneau A, Primeau M, Trudeau LE, et al. Beta-lactamase protein fragment complementation assays as in vivo and in vitro sensors of protein protein interactions. Nat Biotechnol 2002;20:619-22.
34. Miller JP, Lo RS, Ben-Hur A, et al. Large-scale identification of yeast integral membrane protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:12123-8.
35. van der Merwe PA, Barclay AN. Transient intercellular adhesion: The importance of weak protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem Sci 1994;19:354-8.
36. van der Merwe PA, Barclay AN. Analysis of cell-adhesion molecule interactions using surface plasmon resonance. Curr Opin Immunol 1996;8:257-61.
37. Brown MH, Boles K, van der Merwe PA, et al. 2B4, the natural killer and T cell immunoglobulin superfamily surface protein, is a ligand for CD48. J Exp Med 1998;188: 2083-90.
38. Fanslow WC, Anderson DM, Grabstein KH, et al. Soluble forms of CD40 inhibit biologic responses of human B cells. J Immunol 1992;149:655-60.
39. Tomschy A, Fauser C, Landwehr R, et al. Homophilic adhesion of E-cadherin occurs by a co-operative two-step interaction of N-terminal domains. EMBO J 1996;15: 3507-14.
40. Voulgaraki D, Mitnacht-Kraus R, Letarte M, et al. Multivalent recombinant proteins for probing functions of leucocyte surface proteins such as the CD200 receptor. Immunology 2005;115:337-46.
41. Wojtowicz WM, Wu W, Andre I, et al. A vast repertoire of Dscam binding specificities arises from modular interactions of variable Ig domains. Cell 2007;130:1134-45.
42. Wright GJ, Puklavec MJ, Willis AC, et al. Lymphoid/neuronal cell surface OX2 glycoprotein recognizes a novel receptor on macrophages implicated in the control of their function. Immunity 2000;13 233-42.
43. de Wildt RM, Tomlinson IM, Ong JL, et al. Isolation of receptor-ligand pairs by capture of long-lived multivalent interaction complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99: 8530-35.
44. Sidhu SS, Fairbrother WJ, Deshayes K. Exploring protein-protein interactions with phage display. Chembiochem 2003; 4:14-25.
45. Venkatesan K, Rual JF, Vazquez A, et al. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 2009;6:83-90.
46. Hart GT, Ramani AK, Marcotte EM. How complete are current yeast and human protein-interaction networks?. Genome Biol 2006;7:120.
47. Mockli N, Deplazes A, Hassa PO, et al. Yeast split-ubiquitin-based cytosolic screening system to detect interactions between transcriptionally active proteins. Biotechniques 2007;42 725-30.
48. Eyckerman S, Verhee A, der Heyden JV, et al. Design and application of a cytokine-receptor-based interaction trap. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:1114-9.
49. Wehr MC, Laage R, Bolz U, et al. Monitoring regulated protein-protein interactions using split TEV. Nat Methods 2006; 3:985-93.
50. Suter B, Kittanakom S, Stagljar I. Two-hybrid technologies in proteomics research. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008;19: 316-23.
51. Ramachandran N, Hainsworth E, Bhullar B, et al. Self-assembling protein microarrays. Science 2004;305: 86-90.
52. Ramachandran N, Raphael JV, Hainsworth E, et al. Next-generation high-density self-assembling functional protein arrays. Nat Methods 2008;5:535-8.
53. Michnick SW, Ear PH, Manderson EN, et al. Universal strategies in research and drug discovery based on protein-fragment complementation assays. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2007;6:569-82.
54. Remy I, Ghaddar G, Michnick SW. Using the beta-lactamase protein-fragment complementation assay to probe dynamic protein-protein interactions. Nat Protoc 2007;2:2302-6.
55. Shyu YJ, Hu CD. Fluorescence complementation: An emerging tool for biological research. Trends Biotechnol 2008;26:622-30.
56. Barrios-Rodiles M, Brown KR, Ozdamar B, et al. High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science 2005;307:1621-5.
57. Bravman T, Bronner V, Lavie K, et al. Exploring "one-shot" kinetics and small molecule analysis using the ProteOn XPR36 array biosensor. Anal Biochem 2006;358: 281-8.
58. Futschik ME, Chaurasia G, Herzel H. Comparison of human protein-protein interaction maps. Bioinformatics 2007;23:605-11.
59. Ramani AK, Bunescu RC, Mooney RJ, et al. Consolidating the set of known human protein-protein interactions in preparation for large-scale mapping of the human interactome. Genome Biol 2005;6:R40.
60. Han JD, Dupuy D, Bertin N, et al. Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 2005;23:839-44.
61. Stumpf MP, Wiuf C, May RM. Subnets of scale-free networks are not scale-free: Sampling properties of networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005;102:4221-4.
62. Lehner B, Fraser AG. A first-draft human protein-interaction map. Genome Biol 2004;5:R63.
63. Matthews LR, Vaglio P, Reboul J, et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". Genome Res 2001;11:2120-6.
64. Remy I, Michnick SW. A highly sensitive protein-protein interaction assay based on Gaussia luciferase. Nat Methods 2006;3:977-9.