An experimentally derived confidence score for binary protein-protein interactions

Nature Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 91-97

  Braun, Pascal ^a,b   Tasan, Murat ^b   Dreze, Matija ^a,b,c   Barrios Rodiles, Miriam ^d   Lemmens, Irma ^e   Yu, Haiyuan ^a,b   Sahalie, Julie M ^a,b   Murray, Ryan R ^a,b   Roncari, Luba ^d   de Smet, Anne Sophie ^e   Venkatesan, Kavitha ^a,b,f   Rual, Jean François ^a,b   Vandenhaute, Jean ^c   Cusick, Michael E ^a,b   Pawson, Tony ^d   Hill, David E ^a,b   Tavernier, Jan ^e   Wrana, Jeffrey L ^d   Roth, Frederick P ^a,b   Vidal, Marc ^a,b  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

^d MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^e GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^f NOVARTIS INSTITUTES FOR BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SCORING SYSTEM; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 58149242456     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.1281     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barrios-Rodiles, M. et al. High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science 307, 1621-1625 (2005).
2. von Mering, C. et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417, 399-403 (2002).
3. Yu, H. et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104-110 (2008).
4. Ge, H., Liu, Z., Church, G.M. & Vidal, M. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Genet. 29, 482-486 (2001).
5. Ramani, A.K., Bunescu, R.C., Mooney, R.J. & Marcotte, E.M. Consolidating the set of known human protein-protein interactions in preparation for large-scale mapping of the human interactome. Genome Biol. 6 R40 (2005).
6. Ramani, A.K. et al. A map of human protein interactions derived from co-expression of human mRNAs and their orthologs. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 180 (2008).
7. Chiang, T. et al. Coverage and error models of protein-protein interaction data by directed graph analysis. Genome Biol. 8, R186 (2007).
8. Ito, T. et al. A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4569-4574 (2001).
9. Sato, S. et al. A large-scale protein protein interaction analysis in Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. DNA Res. 14, 207-216 (2007).
10. Gavin, A.C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
11. Krogan, N.J. et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637-643 (2006).
12. Han, J.D. et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 430, 88-93 (2004).
13. Li, S. et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science 303, 540-543 (2004).
14. Rual, J.F. et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437, 1173-1178 (2005).
15. Vidalain, P.O. et al. Increasing specificity in high-throughput yeast two-hybrid experiments. Methods 32, 363-370 (2004).
16. Walhout, A.J. & Vidal, M. High-throughput yeast two-hybrid assays for large-scale protein interaction mapping. Methods 24, 297-306 (2001).
17. Eyckerman, S. et al. Design and application of a cytokine-receptor-based interaction trap. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 1114-1119 (2001).
18. Nyfeler, B., Michnick, S.W. & Hauri, H.P. Capturing protein interactions in the secretory pathway of living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6350-6355 (2005).
19. Ramachandran, N. et al. Next-generation high-density self-assembling functional protein arrays. Nat. Methods 5, 535-538 (2008).
20. Venkatesan, K. et al. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat. Methods advance online publication, doi:10.1038/nmeth.1280 (7 December 2008).
21. Bader, G.D., Betel, D. & Hogue, C.W. BIND: The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 248-250 (2003).
22. Chatr-aryamontri, A. et al. MINT: The Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D572-D574 (2007).
23. Mishra, G.R. et al. Human protein reference database-2006 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D411-D414 (2006).
24. Pagel, P. et al. The MIPS mammalian protein-protein interaction database. Bioinformatics 21, 832-834 (2005).
25. Salwinski, L. et al. The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D449-D451 (2004).
26. Cusick, M.E. et al. Literature-curated protein interaction datasets. Nat. Methods (in the press).
27. Rual, J.F. et al. Human ORFeome version 1.1: A platform for reverse proteomics. Genome Res. 14, 2128-2135 (2004).
28. Ben-Hur, A. & Noble, W.S. Choosing negative examples for the prediction of protein-protein interactions. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (suppl. 1), S2 (2006).
29. Qi, Y., Bar-Joseph, Z. & Klein-Seetharaman, J. Evaluation of different biological data and computational classification methods for use in protein interaction prediction. Proteins 63, 490-500 (2006).
30. Vidal, M. et al. Reverse two-hybrid and one-hybrid systems to detect dissociation of protein-protein and DNA-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10315-10320 (1996).
31. Lemmens, I. et al. Heteromeric MAPPIT: A novel strategy to study modification-dependent protein-protein interactions inmammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, e75 (2003).
32. Lemmens, I., Lievens, S., Eyckerman, S. & Tavernier, J. Reverse MAPPIT detects disruptors of protein-protein interactions in human cells. Nat. Protoc. 1, 92-97 (2006).