The value of high quality protein-protein interaction networks for systems biology

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 551-558

  Stelzl, Ulrich ^a   Wanker, Erich E ^a  

^a MAX DELBRÜCK CENTER FOR MOLECULAR MEDICINE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL FUNCTION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN QUALITY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SCREENING; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TWO HYBRID SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS; YEAST;

HUMANS; PROTEIN BINDING; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 33751395622     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.10.005     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Steinmetz L.M., and Davis R.W. Maximizing the potential of functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet 5 (2004) 190-201
2. Mewes H.W., Frishman D., Mayer K.F., Munsterkotter M., Noubibou O., Pagel P., Rattei T., Oesterheld M., Ruepp A., and Stumpflen V. MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005. Nucleic Acids Res 34 (2006) D169-D172
3. Huh W.K., Falvo J.V., Gerke L.C., Carroll A.S., Howson R.W., Weissman J.S., and O'Shea E.K. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425 (2003) 686-691
4. Kumar A., Agarwal S., Heyman J.A., Matson S., Heidtman M., Piccirillo S., Umansky L., Drawid A., Jansen R., Liu Y., et al. Subcellular localization of the yeast proteome. Genes Dev 16 (2002) 707-719
5. Ghaemmaghami S., Huh W.K., Bower K., Howson R.W., Belle A., Dephoure N., O'Shea E.K., and Weissman J.S. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425 (2003) 737-741
6. Newman J.R., Ghaemmaghami S., Ihmels J., Breslow D.K., Noble M., DeRisi J.L., and Weissman J.S. Single-cell proteomic analysis of S. cerevisiae reveals the architecture of biological noise. Nature 441 (2006) 840-846
7. Jansen R., and Gerstein M. Analyzing protein function on a genomic scale: the importance of gold-standard positives and negatives for network prediction. Curr Opin Microbiol 7 (2004) 535-545
8. de Lichtenberg U., Jensen L.J., Brunak S., and Bork P. Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science 307 (2005) 724-727. This study presents a network-based dynamic description of the yeast cell cycle. Protein interaction and gene expression data were integrated resulting in time-dependent interaction networks corresponding to distinct complexes with both periodically and constitutively expressed subunits.
9. Aloy P., and Russell R.B. Structural systems biology: modelling protein interactions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7 (2006) 188-197
10. Gerhard D.S., Wagner L., Feingold E.A., Shenmen C.M., Grouse L.H., Schuler G., Klein S.L., Old S., Rasooly R., Good P., et al. The status, quality, and expansion of the NIH full-length cDNA project: the Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC). Genome Res 14 (2004) 2121-2127
11. Collins M.O., Husi H., Yu L., Brandon J.M., Anderson C.N., Blackstock W.P., Choudhary J.S., and Grant S.G. Molecular characterization and comparison of the components and multiprotein complexes in the postsynaptic proteome. J Neurochem 97 Supp1 (2006) 16-23. This mass spectrometry-based study determined the in vivo protein composition of membrane-associated signaling complexes of the post-synaptic density region of synapses. This study provides very useful information to disentangle tissue-specific networks (e.g. for neurons) form large interaction maps.
12. Uhlen M., Bjorling E., Agaton C., Szigyarto C.A., Amini B., Andersen E., Andersson A.C., Angelidou P., Asplund A., Asplund C., et al. A human protein atlas for normal and cancer tissues based on antibody proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 4 (2005) 1920-1932. This study presents a human protein atlas based on tissue staining with over 700 different antibodies. It gives a nice account on different methods to validate antibodies. Projects devoted to the systematic generation of antibodies might become equally important tools for the mass spectrometry-based complex purification approaches as the ORFeome projects are for systematic Y2H analysis.
13. Stelzl U., Worm U., Lalowski M., Haenig C., Brembeck F.H., Goehler H., Stroedicke M., Zenkner M., Schoenherr A., Koeppen S., et al. A human protein-protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 122 (2005) 957-968. The studies by Stelzl et al. and Rual et al. report the first systematic studies to identify human protein interactions. Both studies generated large networks of similar size (∼3000 PPIs) applying Y2H matrix screening approaches including one pairwise repetition of every interaction found. Both groups tested a subset of interactions in independent binding assay with high success rates and performed thorough bioinformatic assessment of their networks.
14. ••].
15. Goehler H., Lalowski M., Stelzl U., Waelter S., Stroedicke M., Worm U., Droege A., Lindenberg K.S., Knoblich M., Haenig C., et al. A protein interaction network links GIT1, an enhancer of huntingtin aggregation, to Huntington's disease. Mol Cell 15 (2004) 853-865. This paper is the first description of a disease-focused human Y2H PPI network. It demonstrates the power of the network approach for the identification and characterization of proteins involved in disease processes. The protein GIT1 was further characterized as a potential modifier of Huntington's disease.
16. Lim J., Hao T., Shaw C., Patel A.J., Szabo G., Rual J.F., Fisk C.J., Li N., Smolyar A., Hill D.E., et al. A protein-protein interaction network for human inherited ataxias and disorders of Purkinje cell degeneration. Cell 125 (2006) 801-814
17. Colland F., Jacq X., Trouplin V., Mougin C., Groizeleau C., Hamburger A., Meil A., Wojcik J., Legrain P., and Gauthier J.M. Functional proteomics mapping of a human signaling pathway. Genome Res 14 (2004) 1324-1332
18. Suzuki H., Saito R., Kanamori M., Kai C., Schonbach C., Nagashima T., Hosaka J., and Hayashizaki Y. The mammalian protein-protein interaction database and its viewing system that is linked to the main FANTOM2 viewer. Genome Res 13 (2003) 1534-1541
19. Albers M., Kranz H., Kober I., Kaiser C., Klink M., Suckow J., Kern R., and Koegl M. Automated yeast two-hybrid screening for nuclear receptor-interacting proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 4 (2005) 205-213
20. Lehner B., and Sanderson C.M. A protein interaction framework for human mRNA degradation. Genome Res 14 (2004) 1315-1323. The study reports an mRNA decay interaction network determined by a combination of matrix and library Y2H screening. The authors stress the importance of repeating Y2H interactions in independent experiments.
21. Suzuki H., Fukunishi Y., Kagawa I., Saito R., Oda H., Endo T., Kondo S., Bono H., Okazaki Y., and Hayashizaki Y. Protein-protein interaction panel using mouse full-length cDNAs. Genome Res 11 (2001) 1758-1765
22. Lehner B., Semple J.I., Brown S.E., Counsell D., Campbell R.D., and Sanderson C.M. Analysis of a high-throughput yeast two-hybrid system and its use to predict the function of intracellular proteins encoded within the human MHC class III region. Genomics 83 (2004) 153-167
23. Nakayama M., Kikuno R., and Ohara O. Protein-protein interactions between large proteins: two-hybrid screening using a functionally classified library composed of long cDNAs. Genome Res 12 (2002) 1773-1784
24. Thierry-Mieg N. A new pooling strategy for high-throughput screening: the Shifted Transversal Design. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (2006) 28
25. Zhong J., Zhang H., Stanyon C.A., Tromp G., and Finley Jr. R.L. A strategy for constructing large protein interaction maps using the yeast two-hybrid system: regulated expression arrays and two-phase mating. Genome Res 13 (2003) 2691-2699
26. Jin F., Hazbun T., Michaud G.A., Salcius M., Predki P.F., Fields S., and Huang J. A pooling-deconvolution strategy for biological network elucidation. Nat Methods 3 (2006) 183-189
27. Bader G.D., Cary M.P., and Sander C. Pathguide: a pathway resource list. Nucleic Acids Res 34 (2006) D504-D506
28. Han J.D., Dupuy D., Bertin N., Cusick M.E., and Vidal M. Effect of sampling on topology predictions of protein-protein interaction networks. Nat Biotechnol 23 (2005) 839-844
29. Stagljar I., and Fields S. Analysis of membrane protein interactions using yeast-based technologies. Trends Biochem Sci 27 (2002) 559-563
30. Miller J.P., Lo R.S., Ben-Hur A., Desmarais C., Stagljar I., Noble W.S., and Fields S. Large-scale identification of yeast integral membrane protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102 (2005) 12123-12128. This study uses the split ubiquitin Y2H system to assay yeast membrane proteins for potential interactions on a genome wide scale. It demonstrates that the system is applicable to high throughput screening, opening a perspective for the systematic screening of human membrane receptor protein interactions.
31. Barrios-Rodiles M., Brown K.R., Ozdamar B., Bose R., Liu Z., Donovan R.S., Shinjo F., Liu Y., Dembowy J., Taylor I.W., et al. High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science 307 (2005) 1621-1625. This study describes a novel, sensitive, HTP approach to detect binary interactions in mammalian cell culture. From approx. 12 000 pairwise interaction tests between pre-selected human cDNAs, 947 interactions were found, resulting in a PPI network that connects the TGFβ pathway to the p21-activated kinase (PAK) network, the polarity complex, and to tight junction components.
32. Kersten B., Wanker E.E., Hoheisel J.D., and Angenendt P. Multiplex approaches in protein microarray technology. Expert Rev Proteomics 2 (2005) 499-510
33. Ramachandran N., Hainsworth E., Bhullar B., Eisenstein S., Rosen B., Lau A.Y., Walter J.C., and LaBaer J. Self-assembling protein microarrays. Science 305 (2004) 86-90
34. Grelle G., Kostka S., Otto A., Kersten B., Genser K.F., Muller E.C., Walter S., Boddrich A., Stelzl U., Hanig C., et al. Identification of VCP/p97, carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP), and amphiphysin II interaction partners using membrane-based human proteome arrays. Mol Cell Proteomics 5 (2006) 234-244
35. Jones R.B., Gordus A., Krall J.A., and MacBeath G. A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays. Nature 439 (2006) 168-174. In this study protein arrays are used to identify and determine relative affinities for more than 350 protein-phosphopeptide interactions.
36. Cokol M., Iossifov I., Weinreb C., and Rzhetsky A. Emergent behavior of growing knowledge about molecular interactions. Nat Biotechnol 23 (2005) 1243-1247
37. Peri S., Navarro J.D., Amanchy R., Kristiansen T.Z., Jonnalagadda C.K., Surendranath V., Niranjan V., Muthusamy B., Gandhi T.K., Gronborg M., et al. Development of human protein reference database as an initial platform for approaching systems biology in humans. Genome Res 13 (2003) 2363-2371
38. Gandhi T.K., Zhong J., Mathivanan S., Karthick L., Chandrika K.N., Mohan S.S., Sharma S., Pinkert S., Nagaraju S., Periaswamy B., et al. Analysis of the human protein interactome and comparison with yeast, worm and fly interaction datasets. Nat Genet 38 (2006) 285-293. The paper is an updated report on the human protein reference database (HPRD), including a network analysis of the more than 25 000 interactions that have been collected from the literature. The HPRD dataset, not only because of its size but also because of its 'puristic' approach to collect literature data, is a very useful benchmark for the analysis of other systematically generated data.
39. Ramani A.K., Bunescu R.C., Mooney R.J., and Marcotte E.M. Consolidating the set of known human protein-protein interactions in preparation for large-scale mapping of the human interactome. Genome Biol 6 (2005) R40
40. Lehner B., and Fraser A.G. A first-draft human protein-interaction map. Genome Biol 5 (2004) R63
41. Rhodes D.R., Tomlins S.A., Varambally S., Mahavisno V., Barrette T., Kalyana-Sundaram S., Ghosh D., Pandey A., and Chinnaiyan A.M. Probabilistic model of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nat Biotechnol 23 (2005) 951-959
42. Brown K.R., and Jurisica I. Online predicted human interaction database. Bioinformatics 21 (2005) 2076-2082
43. Calvano S.E., Xiao W., Richards D.R., Felciano R.M., Baker H.V., Cho R.J., Chen R.O., Brownstein B.H., Cobb J.P., Tschoeke S.K., et al. A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans. Nature 437 (2005) 1032-1037. As a result of a collaborative research program, the authors show that integration of a protein-interaction network (generated by a text mining approach) with expression profiling data can indeed lead to network states reflecting dynamic cellular processes. Addressing endotoxin-stimulated inflammation in blood leukocytes, it is one of the first reports generating disease relevant network states for human.
44. Zhao R., Davey M., Hsu Y.C., Kaplanek P., Tong A., Parsons A.B., Krogan N., Cagney G., Mai D., Greenblatt J., et al. Navigating the chaperone network: an integrative map of physical and genetic interactions mediated by the hsp90 chaperone. Cell 120 (2005) 715-727. This study describes a large set of yeast Hsp90 interacting proteins, combining four different screening approaches. It shows that each approach provides biologically meaningful information, even if the results of individual approaches show little overlap.
45. Barabasi A.L., and Oltvai Z.N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5 (2004) 101-113
46. Bader G.D., and Hogue C.W. An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 4 (2003) 2
47. Dunn R., Dudbridge F., and Sanderson C.M. The use of edge-betweenness clustering to investigate biological function in protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 6 (2005) 39
48. Przulj N., Wigle D.A., and Jurisica I. Functional topology in a network of protein interactions. Bioinformatics 20 (2004) 340-348
49. Fraser A.G., and Marcotte E.M. A probabilistic view of gene function. Nat Genet 36 (2004) 559-564