Dynamic modularity in protein interaction networks predicts breast cancer outcome

Nature Biotechnology

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 199-204

  Taylor, Ian W ^a,b   Linding, Rune ^a,c   Warde Farley, David ^b,d   Liu, Yongmei ^a   Pesquita, Catia ^e   Faria, Daniel ^e   Bull, Shelley ^a,d   Pawson, Tony ^a,b   Morris, Quaid ^b,d   Wrana, Jeffrey L ^a,b  

^a MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCERS; DYNAMIC STRUCTURES; HUB PROTEINS; HUMAN PROTEINS; ONCOGENESIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS;

ACTIVE NETWORKS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS;

PROTEINS;

ARTICLE; BIOCHEMISTRY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CARCINOGENESIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION;

ALGORITHMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; NEOPLASM PROTEINS; PROGNOSIS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES;

EID: 59849125136     PISSN: 10870156     EISSN: 15461696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1522     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Chuang, H.Y., Lee, E., Liu, Y.T., Lee, D. & Ideker, T. Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 140 (2007).
2. Brown, K.R. & Jurisica, I. Online predicted human interaction database. Bioinformatics 21, 2076-2082 (2005).
3. Su, A.I. et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6062-6067 (2004).
4. Chatr-aryamontri, A. et al. MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D572-D574 (2007).
5. von Mering, C. et al. STRING 7-recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D358-D362 (2007).
6. Fraser, H.B. Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins. Nat. Genet. 37, 351-352 (2005).
7. Han, J.D. et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 430, 88-93 (2004).
8. Barabasi, A.L. & Oltvai, Z.N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 101-113 (2004).
9. de Lichtenberg, U., Jensen, L.J., Brunak, S. & Bork, P. Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science 307, 724-727 (2005).
10. Tengowski, M.W., Feng, D., Sutovsky, M. & Sutovsky, P. Differential expression of genes encoding constitutive and inducible 20S proteasomal core subunits in the testis and epididymis of theophylline- or 1,3-dinitrobenzene- exposed rats. Biol. Reprod. 76, 149-163 (2007).
11. Thomas, M.K., Yao, K.M., Tenser, M.S., Wong, G.G. & Habener, J.F. Bridge-1, a novel PDZ-domain coactivator of E2A-mediated regulation of insulin gene transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8492-8504 (1999).
12. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).
13. Yip, K.Y., Yu, H., Kim, P.M., Schultz, M. & Gerstein, M. The tYNA platform for comparative interactomics: a web tool for managing, comparing and mining multiple networks. Bioiformatics 22, 2968-2970 (2006).
14. Yu, H., Greenbaum, D., Xin Lu, H., Zhu, X. & Gerstein, M. Genomic analysis of essentiality within protein networks. Trends Genet. 20, 227-231 (2004).
15. Puntervoll, P. et al. ELM server: A new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3625-3630 (2003).
16. Letunic, I. et al. SMART 5: domains in the context of genomes and networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D257-D260 (2006).
17. Karnoub, A.E. & Weinberg, R.A. Ras oncogenes: split personalities. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 517-531 (2008).
18. McKusick, V.A. Mendelian inheritance in man and its online version, OMIM. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80, 588-604 (2007).
19. Futreal, P.A. et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 177-183 (2004).
20. van de Vijver, M.J. et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 1999-2009 (2002).
21. Roukos, D.H. Prognosis of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1555-1556, author reply 1556.
22. Soderlund, K. et al. Intact Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex predicts good response to radiotherapy in early breast cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 68, 50-58 (2007).
23. Tusher, V.G., Tibshirani, R. & Chu, G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5116-5121 (2001).
24. Chang, H.Y. et al. Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds. PLoS Biol. 2, E7 (2004).
25. Liu, R. et al. The prognostic role of a gene signature from tumorigenic breast-cancer cells. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 217-226 (2007).
26. Sorlie, T. et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8418-8423 (2003).
27. Easton, D.F. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature 447, 1087-1093 (2007).
28. Frey, B.J. & Dueck, D. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315, 972-976 (2007).
29. Paik, S. et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 2817-2826 (2004).
30. Buyse, M. et al. Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 98, 1183-1192 (2006).
31. Haibe-Kains, B. et al. Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer. BMC Genomics 9, 394 (2008).
32. Bertin, N. et al. Confirmation of organized modularity in the yeast interactome. PLoS Biol. e153 (2007).
33. von Mering, C. et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417, 399-403 (2002).
34. Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498-2504 (2003).
35. Linding, R. et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 129, 1415-1426 (2007).