Tools used to study how protein complexes are assembled in signaling cascades

Bioengineered Bugs

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 247-259

  Dwane, Susan ^a   Kiely, Patrick A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIMERICK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Affinity tagging; Cell signaling; Co immunoprecipitation; Peptide array technology; Protein complexes; Protein protein interactions

Indexed keywords

BETA GALACTOSIDASE; FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN A; PROTEIN G; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GAL4;

AFFINITY TAGGING AND PULL DOWN ASSAY; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; DATABASE OF INTERACTING PROTEIN; DNA MICROARRAY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PEPTIDE ARRAY TECHNOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; YEAST TWO HYBRID ASSAY;

ANIMALS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 80054952470     PISSN: 19491018     EISSN: 19491026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/bbug.2.5.17844     Document Type: Article

References (150)

1. Berggård T, Linse S, James P. Methods for the detection and analysis of protein-protein interactions. Proteomics 2007. 7:2833-42.PMID:17640003. DOI:10.1002/pmic.200700131.
2. Gavin AC, Aloy P, Grandi P, Krause R, Boesche M, Marzioch M, et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 2006. 440:631-6.PMID:16429126. DOI:10.1038/nature04532.
3. Krogan NJ, Cagney G, Yu H, Zhong G, Guo X, Ignatchenko A, et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2006. 440:637-43.PMID:16554755. DOI:10.1038/nature04670.
4. Perkins JR, Diboun I, Dessailly BH, Lees JG, Orengo C. Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional and network properties. Structure 2010. 18:1233-43.PMID:20947012. DOI:10.1016/j.str.2010.08.007.
5. Li X, Keskin O, Ma B, Nussinov R, Liang J. Protein-protein interactions: hot spots and structurally conserved residues often locate in complemented pockets that pre-organized in the unbound states: implications for docking. J Mol Biol 2004. 344:781-95.PMID:15533445. DOI:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.09.051.
6. Matthews LR, Vaglio P, Reboul J, Ge H, Davis BP, Garrels J, et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or ''interologs''. Genome Res 2001. 11:2120-6.PMID:11731503. DOI:10.1101/gr.205301.
7. Hamadeh A, Roberts MA, August E, McSharry PE, Maini PK, Armitage JP, et al. Feedback control architecture and the bacterial chemotaxis network. PLOS Comput Biol 2011. 7:1001130.PMID:21573199. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001130.
8. Neumann S, Hansen CH, Wingreen NS, Sourjik V. Differences in signalling by directly and indirectly binding ligands in bacterial chemotaxis. EMBO J 2010. 29:3484-95.PMID:20834231. DOI:10.1038/emboj.2010.224.
9. Sourjik V, Armitage JP. Spatial organization in bacterial chemotaxis. EMBO J 2010. 29:2724-33.PMID:20717142. DOI:10.1038/emboj.2010.178.
10. Kentner D, Sourjik V. Spatial organization of the bacterial chemotaxis system. Curr Opin Microbiol 2006. 9:619-24.PMID:17064953. DOI:10.1016/j.mib.2006.10.012.
11. Galperin MY, Koonin EV. Who's your neighbor? New computational approaches for functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol 2000. 18:609-13.PMID:10835597. DOI:10.1038/76443.
12. Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR. Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part I. Experimental techniques and databases. PLOS Comput Biol 2007. 3:42.PMID:17397251. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030042.
13. Valencia A, Pazos F. Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002. 12:368-73.PMID:12127457. DOI:10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00333-0.
14. Rajasekaran S. Computational techniques for motif search. Front Biosci 2009. 14:5052-65.PMID:19482604. DOI:10.2741/3586.
15. Bader GD, Donaldson I, Wolting C, Ouellette BF, Pawson T, Hogue CW. BIND-The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2001. 29:242-5.PMID:11125103. DOI:10.1093/nar/29.1.242.
16. Bader GD, Hogue CW. BIND-a data specification for storing and describing biomolecular interactions, molecular complexes and pathways. Bioinformatics 2000. 16:465-77.PMID:10871269. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/16.5.465.
17. Salwinski L, Miller CS, Smith AJ, Pettit FK, Bowie JU, Eisenberg D. The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2004. 32:449-51.PMID:14681454. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkh086.
18. Xenarios I, Rice DW, Salwinski L, Baron MK, Marcotte EM, Eisenberg D. DIP: the database of interacting proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2000. 28:289-91.PMID:10592249. DOI:10.1093/nar/28.1.289.
19. Nooren IM, Thornton JM. Diversity of protein-protein interactions. EMBO J 2003. 22:3486-92.PMID:12853464. DOI:10.1093/emboj/cdg359.
20. Nooren IM, Thornton JM. Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol 2003. 325:991-1018.PMID:12527304. DOI:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01281-0.
21. Shoemaker BA, Panchenko AR. Deciphering protein-protein interactions. Part II. Computational methods to predict protein and domain interaction partners. PLOS Comput Biol 2007. 3:43.PMID:17465672. DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030043.
22. Tuncbag N, Kar G, Keskin O, Gursoy A, Nussinov R. A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces. Brief Bioinform 2009. 10:217-32.PMID:19240123. DOI:10.1093/bib/bbp001.
23. Tuncbag N, Gursoy A, Keskin O. Prediction of protein-protein interactions: unifying evolution and structure at protein interfaces. Phys Biol 2011. 8:35006.PMID:21572173. DOI:10.1088/1478-3975/8/3/035006.
24. Tuncbag N, Keskin O, Gursoy A. HotPoint: hot spot prediction server for protein interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2010. 38:402-6.PMID:20444871. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkq323.
25. Tuncbag N, Gursoy A, Keskin O. Identification of computational hot spots in protein interfaces: combining solvent accessibility and inter-residue potentials improves the accuracy. Bioinformatics 2009. 25:1513-20.PMID:19357097. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp240.
26. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998. 95:14863-8.PMID:9843981. DOI:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863.
27. Bhardwaj N, Lu H. Correlation between gene expression profiles and protein-protein interactions within and across genomes. Bioinformatics 2005. 21:2730-8.PMID:15797912. DOI:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti398.
28. Ge H, Liu Z, Church GM, Vidal M. Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 2001. 29:482-6.PMID:11694880. DOI:10.1038/ng776.
29. Jansen R, Greenbaum D, Gerstein M. Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. Genome Res 2002. 12:37-46.PMID:11779829. DOI:10.1101/gr.205602.
30. Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, Kim SK. A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 2003. 302:249-55.PMID:12934013. DOI:10.1126/science.1087447.
31. Berrade L, Garcia AE, Camarero JA. Protein microarrays: novel developments and applications. Pharm Res 2011. 28:1480-99.PMID:21116694. DOI:10.1007/s11095-010-0325-1.
32. Abramovitz M, Leyland-Jones B. A systems approach to clinical oncology: focus on breast cancer. Proteome Sci 2006. 4:5.PMID:16595007. DOI:10.1186/1477-5956-4-5.
33. Arenkov P, Kukhtin A, Gemmell A, Voloshchuk S, Chupeeva V, Mirzabekov A. Protein microchips: use for immunoassay and enzymatic reactions. Anal Biochem 2000. 278:123-31.PMID:10660453. DOI:10.1006/abio.1999.4363.
34. Lee KB, Park SJ, Mirkin CA, Smith JC, Mrksich M. Protein nanoarrays generated by dip-pen nanolithography. Science 2002. 295:1702-5.PMID:11834780. DOI:10.1126/science.1067172.
35. MacBeath G, Schreiber SL. Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science 2000. 289:1760-3.PMID:10976071.
36. Luckert K, Gotschel F, Sorger PK, Hecht A, Joos TO, Potz O. Snapshots of protein dynamics and post-translational modifications in one experiment-beta-catenin and its functions. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011. 10:110-7377.
37. Jeong JS, Rho HS, Zhu H. A functional protein microarray approach to characterizing posttranslational modifications on lysine residues. Methods Mol Biol 2011. 723:213-23.PMID:21370068. DOI:10.1007/978-1-61779-043-0_14.
38. Le Meur N, Gentleman R. Modeling synthetic lethality. Genome Biol 2008. 9:135.PMID:18789146. DOI:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r135
39. Pagano JM, Clingman CC, Ryder SP. Quantitative approaches to monitor protein-nucleic acid interactions using fluorescent probes. RNA 2011. 17:14-20.PMID:21098142. DOI:10.1261/rna.2428111
40. Park SH, Raines RT. Fluorescence gel retardation assay to detect protein-protein interactions. Methods Mol Biol 2004. 261:155-60.PMID:15064455
41. Ben-Shem A, Jenner L, Yusupova G, Yusupov M. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic ribosome. Science 2010. 330:1203-9.PMID:21109664. DOI:10.1126/science.1194294
42. Rabl J, Leibundgut M, Ataide SF, Haag A, Ban N. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic 40S ribosomal subunit in complex with initiation factor 1. Science 2011. 331:730-6.PMID:21205638. DOI:10.1126/science.1198308
43. Kobe B, Guncar G, Buchholz R, Huber T, Maco B, Cowieson N, et al. Crystallography and protein-protein interactions: biological interfaces and crystal contacts. Biochem Soc Trans 2008. 36:1438-41.PMID:19021571. DOI:10.1042/BST0361438
44. Fields S, Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature 1989. 340:245-6.PMID:2547163. DOI:10.1038/340245a0
45. Fields S, Sternglanz R. The two-hybrid system: an assay for protein-protein interactions. Trends Genet 1994. 10:286-92.PMID:7940758. DOI:10.1016/0168-9525(90)90012-U
46. Warbrick E. Two's company, three's a crowd: the yeast two hybrid system for mapping molecular interactions. Structure 1997. 5:13-7.PMID:9016722. DOI:10.1016/S0969-2126(97)00162-7
47. Sadowski I, Ma J, Triezenberg S, Ptashne M. GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator. Nature 1988. 335:563-4.PMID:3047590. DOI:10.1038/335563a0
48. Brückner A, Polge C, Lentze N, Auerbach D, Schlattner U. Yeast two-hybrid, a powerful tool for systems biology. Int J Mol Sci 2009. 10:2763-88.PMID:19582228. DOI:10.3390/ijms10062763
49. Ratushny V, Golemis E. Resolving the network of cell signaling pathways using the evolving yeast two-hybrid system. Biotechniques 2008. 44:655-62.PMID:18474041. DOI:10.2144/000112797
50. Koegl M, Uetz P. Improving yeast two-hybrid screening systems. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2007. 6:302-12.PMID:18218650. DOI:10.1093/bfgp/elm035
51. Drees BL. Progress and variations in two-hybrid and three-hybrid technologies. Curr Opin Chem Biol 1999. 3:64-70.PMID:10021404. DOI:10.1016/S1367-5931(99)80012-X
52. Bak G, Hwang SW, Ko Y, Lee J, Kim Y, Kim K, et al. On-off controllable RNA hybrid expression vector for yeast three-hybrid system. BMB Rep 2010. 43:110-4.PMID:20193129. DOI:10.5483/BMBRep.2010.43.2.110
53. Wurster SE, Maher LJ, 3rd. Selections that optimize RNA display in the yeast three-hybrid system. RNA 2010. 16:253-8.PMID:20008486. DOI:10.1261/rna.1880410
54. Wurster SE, Bida JP, Her YF, Maher LJ, 3rd. Characterization of anti-NFkappaB RNA aptamer-binding specificity in vitro and in the yeast three-hybrid system. Nucleic Acids Res 2009. 37:6214-24.PMID:19696077. DOI:10.1093/nar/gkp670
55. Jaeger S, Eriani G, Martin F. Results and prospects of the yeast three-hybrid system. FEBS Lett 2004. 556:7-12.PMID:14706817. DOI:10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01434-0
56. Alcaide-German ML, Vara-Vega A, Garcia-Fernandez LF, Landazuri MO, del Peso L. A yeast three-hybrid system that reconstitutes mammalian hypoxia inducible factor regulatory machinery. BMC Cell Biol 2008. 9:18.PMID:18402654. DOI:10.1186/1471-2121-9-18
57. Fiebitz A, Nyarsik L, Haendler B, Hu YH, Wagner F, Thamm S, et al. High-throughput mammalian two-hybrid screening for protein-protein interactions using transfected cell arrays. BMC Genomics 2008. 9:68.PMID:18254948. DOI:10.1186/1471-2164-9-68
58. Guo M, Xia Z, Ma H. Functional phosphosite screening for targeted protein-protein interactions by combining phosphoproteomics strategies and mammalian two-hybrid assays. Mol Biosyst 2011. 7:1838-41.PMID:21487622. DOI:10.1039/c1mb05053b
59. Fiebitz A, Vanhecke D. High-throughput mammalian two-hybrid screening for protein-protein interactions using transfected cell arrays (CAPPIA). Methods Mol Biol 2011. 723:165-83.PMID:21370065. DOI:10.1007/978-1-61779-043-0_11
60. Aloy P, Bottcher B, Ceulemans H, Leutwein C, Mellwig C, Fischer S, et al. Structure-based assembly of protein complexes in yeast. Science 2004. 303:2026-9.PMID:15044803. DOI:10.1126/science.1092645
61. Aloy P, Russell RB. Ten thousand interactions for the molecular biologist. Nat Biotechnol 2004. 22:1317-21.PMID:15470473. DOI:10.1038/nbt1018
62. Aloy P, Russell RB. Taking the mystery out of biological networks. EMBO Rep 2004. 5:349-50.PMID:15060570. DOI:10.1038/sj.embor.7400129
63. Lu L, Arakaki AK, Lu H, Skolnick J. Multimeric threading-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genomic scale: application to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome. Genome Res 2003. 13:1146-54.PMID:12799350. DOI:10.1101/gr.1145203
64. Russell RB, Alber F, Aloy P, Davis FP, Korkin D, Pichaud M, et al. A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004. 14:313-24.PMID:15193311. DOI:10.1016/j.sbi.2004.04.006
65. von Mering C, Krause R, Snel B, Cornell M, Oliver SG, Fields S, et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 2002. 417:399-403.PMID:12000970. DOI:10.1038/nature750
66. Bickle MB, Dusserre E, Moncorge O, Bottin H, Colas P. Selection and characterization of large collections of peptide aptamers through optimized yeast two-hybrid procedures. Nat Protoc 2006. 1:1066-91.PMID:17406388. DOI:10.1038/nprot.2006.32
67. Bolger GB, Baillie GS, Li X, Lynch MJ, Herzyk P, Mohamed A, et al. Scanning peptide array analyses identify overlapping binding sites for the signalling scaffold proteins, beta-arrestin and RACK1, in cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase PDE4D5. Biochem J 2006. 398:23-36.PMID:16689683. DOI:10.1042/BJ20060423
68. Kittanakom S, Chuk M, Wong V, Snyder J, Edmonds D, Lydakis A, et al. Analysis of membrane protein complexes using the split-ubiquitin membrane yeast two-hybrid (MYTH) system. Methods Mol Biol 2009. 548:247-71.PMID:19521829. DOI:10.1007/978-1-59745-540-4_14
69. Adams CC, Gross DS. The yeast heat shock response is induced by conversion of cells to spheroplasts and by potent transcriptional inhibitors. J Bacteriol 1991. 173:7429-35.PMID:1938939
70. Buckley DA, Cheng A, Kiely PA, Tremblay ML, O'Connor R. Regulation of insulin-like growth factor type I (IGF-I) receptor kinase activity by protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP-1B) and enhanced IGF-I-mediated suppression of apoptosis and motility in PTP-1B-deficient fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 2002. 22:1998-2010.PMID:11884589. DOI:10.1128/MCB.22.7.1998-2010.2002
71. Hansen LH, Knudsen S, Sorensen SJ. The effect of the lacY gene on the induction of IPTG inducible promoters, studied in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas fluorescens. Curr Microbiol 1998. 36:341-7.PMID:9608745. DOI:10.1007/s002849900320
72. Gossen M, Bujard H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992. 89:5547-51.PMID:1319065. DOI:10.1073/pnas.89.12.5547
73. Kumar R, Singh J. A truncated derivative of nmt 1 promoter exhibits temperature-dependent induction of gene expression in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 2006. 23:55-65.PMID:16408319. DOI:10.1002/yea.1343
74. Wu C. Heat shock transcription factors: structure and regulation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1995. 11:441-69.PMID:8689565. DOI:10.1146/annurev.cb.11.110195.002301
75. Einhauer A, Jungbauer A. The FLAG peptide, a versatile fusion tag for the purification of recombinant proteins. J Biochem Biophys Methods 2001. 49:455-65.PMID:11694294. DOI:10.1016/S0165-022X(01)00213-5
76. Einhauer A, Jungbauer A. Affinity of the monoclonal antibody M1 directed against the FLAG peptide. J Chromatogr A 2001. 921:25-30.PMID:11461009. DOI:10.1016/S0021-9673(01)00831-7
77. Brizzard BL, Chubet RG, Vizard DL. Immunoaffinity purification of FLAG epitope-tagged bacterial alkaline phosphatase using a novel monoclonal antibody and peptide elution. Biotechniques 1994. 16:730-5.PMID:8024796
78. Chiang CM, Roeder RG. Expression and purification of general transcription factors by FLAG epitope-tagging and peptide elution. Pept Res 1993. 6:62-4.PMID:7683509
79. Prendergast FG, Mann KG. Chemical and physical properties of aequorin and the green fluorescent protein isolated from Aequorea forskalea. Biochemistry 1978. 17:3448-53.PMID:28749. DOI:10.1021/bi00610a004
80. Ward TH, Lippincott-Schwartz J. The uses of green fluorescent protein in mammalian cells. Methods Biochem Anal 2006. 47:305-37.PMID:16335719
81. Haseloff J, Siemering KR. The uses of green fluorescent protein in plants. Methods Biochem Anal 2006. 47:259-84.PMID:16335717
82. Hazelrigg T, Mansfield JH. Green fluorescent protein applications in Drosophila. Methods Biochem Anal 2006. 47:227-57.PMID:16335716
83. Hitchcock AL, Kahana JA, Silver PA. The uses of green fluorescent protein in yeasts. Methods Biochem Anal 2006. 47:179-201.PMID:16335714
84. Valdivia RH, Cormack BP, Falkow S. The uses of green fluorescent protein in prokaryotes. Methods Biochem Anal 2006. 47:163-78.PMID:16335713
85. Choudhary C, Mann M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010. 11:427-39.PMID:20461098. DOI:10.1038/nrm2900
86. ten Have S, Boulon S, Ahmad Y, Lamond AI. Mass spectrometry-based immuno-precipitation proteomics-the user's guide. Proteomics 2011. 11:1153-9.PMID:21365760. DOI:10.1002/pmic.201000548
87. Li Y. Commonly used tag combinations for tandem affinity purification. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2010. 55:73-83.PMID:20156193. DOI:10.1042/BA20090273
88. Puig O, Caspary F, Rigaut G, Rutz B, Bouveret E, Bragado-Nilsson E, et al. The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. Methods 2001. 24:218-29.PMID:11403571. DOI:10.1006/meth.2001.1183
89. Völkel P, Le Faou P, Angrand PO. Interaction proteomics: characterization of protein complexes using tandem affinity purification-mass spectrometry. Biochem Soc Trans 2010. 38:883-7.PMID:20658971. DOI:10.1042/BST0380883
90. Xu X, Song Y, Li Y, Chang J, Zhang H, An L. The tandem affinity purification method: an efficient system for protein complex purification and protein interaction identification. Protein Expr Purif 2010. 72:149-56.PMID:20399864. DOI:10.1016/j.pep.2010.04.009
91. Bouwmeester T, Bauch A, Ruffner H, Angrand PO, Bergamini G, Croughton K, et al. A physical and functional map of the human TNFalpha/NFkappaB signal transduction pathway. Nat Cell Biol 2004. 6:97-105.PMID:14743216. DOI:10.1038/ncb1086
92. Matsumoto M, Oyamada K, Takahashi H, Sato T, Hatakeyama S, Nakayama KI. Large-scale proteomic analysis of tyrosine-phosphorylation induced by T-cell receptor or B-cell receptor activation reveals new signaling pathways. Proteomics 2009. 9:3549-63.PMID:19609962. DOI:10.1002/pmic.200900011
93. Nittis T, Guittat L, LeDuc RD, Dao B, Duxin JP, Rohrs H, et al. Revealing novel telomere proteins using in vivo cross-linking, tandem affinity purification and label-free quantitative LC-FTICR-MS. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010. 9:1144-56.PMID:20097687. DOI:10.1074/mcp.M900490-MCP200
94. Melcher K. New chemical crosslinking methods for the identification of transient protein-protein interactions with multiprotein complexes. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2004. 5:287-96.PMID:15320735. DOI:10.2174/1389203043379701
95. Robinette D, Neamati N, Tomer KB, Borchers CH. Photoaffinity labeling combined with mass spectrometric approaches as a tool for structural proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics 2006. 3:399-408.PMID:16901199. DOI:10.1586/14789450.3.4.399
96. Sinz A. Investigation of protein-protein interactions in living cells by chemical crosslinking and mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2010. 397:3433-40.PMID:20076950. DOI:10.1007/s00216-009-3405-5
97. Elion EA. Detection of protein-protein interactions by coprecipitation. Curr Protoc Neurosci 2006. 5:25.
98. Frank R, Heikens W, Heisterberg-Moutsis G, Blocker H. A new general approach for the simultaneous chemical synthesis of large numbers of oligonucleotides: segmental solid supports. Nucleic Acids Res 1983. 11:4365-77.PMID:6306587. DOI:10.1093/nar/11.13.4365
99. Frank R. The SPOT-synthesis technique. Synthetic peptide arrays on membrane supports-principles and applications. J Immunol Methods 2002. 267:13-26.PMID:12135797. DOI:10.1016/S0022-1759(02)00137-0
100. Katz C, Levy-Beladev L, Rotem-Bamberger S, Rito T, Rudiger SG, Friedler A. Studying protein-protein interactions using peptide arrays. Chem Soc Rev 2011. 40:2131-45.PMID:21243154. DOI:10.1039/c0cs00029a
101. Lichtman JW, Conchello JA. Fluorescence microscopy. Nat Methods 2005. 2:910-9.PMID:16299476. DOI:10.1038/nmeth817
102. Paddock SW. Principles and practices of laser scanning confocal microscopy. Mol Biotechnol 2000. 16:127-49.PMID:11131973. DOI:10.1385/MB:16:2:127
103. So PT, Dong CY, Masters BR, Berland KM. Two-photon excitation fluorescence microscopy. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000. 2:399-429.PMID:11701518. DOI:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.399
104. Mattheyses AL, Simon SM, Rappoport JZ. Imaging with total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy for the cell biologist. J Cell Sci 2010. 123:3621-8.PMID:20971701. DOI:10.1242/jcs.056218
105. Semwogerere D, Weeks ER. Confocal Microscopy. In: Gary E, Wnek GLB, Ed. Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering: Informa Healthcare 2008. 705-14.
106. Cody CW, Prasher DC, Westler WM, Prendergast FG, Ward WW. Chemical structure of the hexapeptide chromophore of the Aequorea green-fluorescent protein. Biochemistry 1993. 32:1212-8.PMID:8448132. DOI:10.1021/bi00056a003
107. Prasher DC, Eckenrode VK, Ward WW, Prendergast FG, Cormier MJ. Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein. Gene 1992. 111:229-33.PMID:1347277. DOI:10.1016/0378-1119(92)90691-H
108. Chiesa A, Rapizzi E, Tosello V, Pinton P, de Virgilio M, Fogarty KE, et al. Recombinant aequorin and green fluorescent protein as valuable tools in the study of cell signalling. Biochem J 2001. 355:1-12.PMID:11256942. DOI:10.1042/0264-6021:3550001
109. Giepmans BN, Adams SR, Ellisman MH, Tsien RY. The fluorescent toolbox for assessing protein location and function. Science 2006. 312:217-24.PMID:16614209. DOI:10.1126/science.1124618
110. Heim R, Tsien RY. Engineering green fluorescent protein for improved brightness, longer wavelengths and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Curr Biol 1996. 6:178-82.PMID:8673464. DOI:10.1016/S0960-9822(02)00450-5
111. Ormö M, Cubitt AB, Kallio K, Gross LA, Tsien RY, Remington SJ. Crystal structure of the Aequorea victoria green fluorescent protein. Science 1996. 273:1392-5.PMID:8703075. DOI:10.1126/science.273.5280.1392
112. Delagrave S, Hawtin RE, Silva CM, Yang MM, Youvan DC. Red-shifted excitation mutants of the green fluorescent protein. Biotechnology (NY) 1995. 13:151-4.PMID:9634755. DOI:10.1038/nbt0295-151
113. Matz MV, Fradkov AF, Labas YA, Savitsky AP, Zaraisky AG, Markelov ML, et al. Fluorescent proteins from nonbioluminescent Anthozoa species. Nat Biotechnol 1999. 17:969-73.PMID:10504696. DOI:10.1038/13657
114. Smith CL. Basic confocal microscopy. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2008. 14:1.
115. Scriven DR, Lynch RM, Moore ED. Image acquisition for colocalization using optical microscopy. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008. 294:1119-22.PMID:18353895. DOI:10.1152/ajpcell.00133.2008
116. Xiao GQ, Corle TR, Kino GS. Real-time confocal scanning optical microscope. Appl Phys Lett 1988. 53:716-8. DOI:10.1063/1.99814.
117. Henthorn DC, Jaxa-Chamiec AA, Meldrum EA. GAL4-based yeast three-hybrid system for the identification of small molecule-target protein interactions. Biochem Pharmacol 2002. 63:1619-28.PMID:12007565. DOI:10.1016/S0006-2952(02)00884-5
118. North AJ. Seeing is believing? A beginners' guide to practical pitfalls in image acquisition. J Cell Biol 2006. 172:9-18.PMID:16390995. DOI:10.1083/jcb.200507103
119. Holmes TJ, Cheng PC. Basic Principles of Imaging. In: Yu HCPCLPCKFJ, Ed. Multi-Modality Microscopy. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co., Pte., Ltd. 2006. 1-74.
120. Barlow AL, Macleod A, Noppen S, Sanderson J, Guerin CJ. Colocalization analysis in fluorescence micrographs: verification of a more accurate calculation of pearson's correlation coefficient. Microsc Microanal 2010. 16:710-24.PMID:20946701. DOI:10.1017/S143192761009389X
121. Zinchuk V, Zinchuk O, Okada T. Quantitative colocalization analysis of multicolor confocal immunofluorescence microscopy images: pushing pixels to explore biological phenomena. Acta Histochem Cytochem 2007. 40:101-11.PMID:17898874. DOI:10.1267/ahc.07002
122. Adler J, Parmryd I. Quantifying colocalization by correlation: the Pearson correlation coefficient is superior to the Mander's overlap coefficient. Cytometry A 2010. 77:733-42.PMID:20653013. DOI:10.1002/cyto.a.20896
123. Dimitrova M, Imbert I, Kieny MP, Schuster C. Protein-protein interactions between hepatitis C virus nonstructural proteins. J Virol 2003. 77:5401-14.PMID:12692242. DOI:10.1128/JVI.77.9.5401-14.2003
124. Helmchen F, Denk W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat Methods 2005. 2:932-40.PMID:16299478. DOI:10.1038/nmeth818
125. Konjufca V, Miller MJ. Two-photon microscopy of host-pathogen interactions: acquiring a dynamic picture of infection in vivo. Cell Microbiol 2009. 11:551-9.PMID:19170686. DOI:10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01289.x
126. Neu TR, Woelfl S, Lawrence JR. Three-dimensional differentiation of photo-autotrophic biofilm constituents by multi-channel laser scanning microscopy (single-photon and two-photon excitation). J Microbiol Methods 2004. 56:161-72.PMID:14744445. DOI:10.1016/j.mimet.2003.10.012
127. Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 1990. 248:73-6.PMID:2321027. DOI:10.1126/science.2321027
128. Xu C, Zipfel W, Shear JB, Williams RM, Webb WW. Multiphoton fluorescence excitation: new spectral windows for biological nonlinear microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996. 93:10763-8.PMID:8855254. DOI:10.1073/pnas.93.20.10763
129. Zipfel WR, Williams RM, Webb WW. Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nat Biotechnol 2003. 21:1369-77.PMID:14595365. DOI:10.1038/nbt899
130. Diaspro A, Sheppard C. Two-photon microscopy: basic principles and architectures. In: Diaspro A, Ed. Confocal and Two-Photon Microscopy Foundations, Applications and Advances. New York: Wiley-Liss Inc. 2002. 39-73.
131. Piston DW, Kremers GJ. Fluorescent protein FRET: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Biochem Sci 2007. 32:407-14.PMID:17764955. DOI:10.1016/j.tibs.2007.08.003
132. Sahoo H, Schwille P. FRET and FCS-friends or foes? ChemPhysChem 2011. 12:532-41.PMID:21308943. DOI:10.1002/cphc.201000776
133. Mizuno H, Sawano A, Eli P, Hama H, Miyawaki A. Red fluorescent protein from Discosoma as a fusion tag and a partner for fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Biochemistry 2001. 40:2502-10.PMID:11327872. DOI:10.1021/bi002263b
134. Hayward RD, Goguen JD, Leong JM. No better time to FRET: shedding light on host pathogen interactions. J Biol 2010. 9:12.PMID:20236488. DOI:10.1186/jbiol225
135. Galperin E, Verkhusha VV, Sorkin A. Three-chromophore FRET microscopy to analyze multiprotein interactions in living cells. Nat Methods 2004. 1:209-17.PMID:15782196. DOI:10.1038/nmeth720
136. Boute N, Jockers R, Issad T. The use of resonance energy transfer in high-throughput screening: BRET versus FRET. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2002. 23:351-4.PMID:12377570. DOI:10.1016/S0165-6147(02)02062-X
137. Bevan N, Rees S. Pharmaceutical applications of GFP and RCFP. In: Martin Chalfie SK, Ed. Green fluorescent protein: properties, applications and protocols: John Wiley and Sons 2006. 361-90.
138. Pfleger KD, Eidne KA. Illuminating insights into protein-protein interactions using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). Nat Methods 2006. 3:165-74.PMID:16489332. DOI:10.1038/nmeth841
139. Pfleger KD, Seeber RM, Eidne KA. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) for the real-time detection of protein-protein interactions. Nat Protoc 2006. 1:337-45.PMID:17406254. DOI:10.1038/nprot.2006.52
140. Xu Y, Piston DW, Johnson CH. A bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) system: application to interacting circadian clock proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999. 96:151-6.PMID:9874787. DOI:10.1073/pnas.96.1.151.
141. Erni R, Rossell MD, Kisielowski C, Dahmen U. Atomic-resolution imaging with a sub-50-pm electron probe. Phys Rev Lett 2009. 102:096101.PMID:19392535. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.096101
142. Hell SW. Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science 2007. 316:1153-8.PMID:17525330. DOI:10.1126/science.1137395
143. Patterson G, Davidson M, Manley S, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Superresolution imaging using single-molecule localization. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2010. 61:345-67.PMID:20055680. DOI:10.1146/annurev.physchem.012809.103444
144. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Manley S. Putting super-resolution fluorescence microscopy to work. Nat Methods 2009. 6:21-3.PMID:19116610. DOI:10.1038/nmeth.f.233
145. Schermelleh L, Heintzmann R, Leonhardt H. A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Biol 2010. 190:165-75.PMID:20643879. DOI:10.1083/jcb.201002018
146. Fujii T, Iwane AH, Yanagida T, Namba K. Direct visualization of secondary structures of F-actin by electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 2010. 467:724-8.PMID:20844487. DOI:10.1038/nature09372
147. Luger P. Fast electron density methods in the life sciences-a routine application in the future? Org Biomol Chem 2007. 5:2529-40.PMID:18019525. DOI:10.1039/b706235d.
148. Pilhofer M, Ladinsky MS, McDowall AW, Jensen GJ. Bacterial TEM: new insights from cryo-microscopy. Methods Cell Biol 2010. 96:21-45.PMID:20869517. DOI:10.1016/S0091-679X(10)96002-0.
149. Pelletier DA, Hurst GB, Foote LJ, Lankford PK, McKeown CK, Lu TY, et al. A general system for studying protein-protein interactions in Gram-negative bacteria. J Proteome Res 2008. 7:3319-28.PMID:18590317. DOI:10.1021/pr8001832.
150. Kerppola TK. Design and implementation of bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays for the visualization of protein interactions in living cells. Nat Protoc 2006. 1:1278-86.PMID:17406412. DOI:10.1038/nprot.2006.201.