Feedback Control Architecture and the Bacterial Chemotaxis Network

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  Hamadeh, Abdullah ^a   Roberts, Mark A J ^a,b   August, Elias ^a   McSharry, Patrick E ^a   Maini, Philip K ^a   Armitage, Judith P ^a,b   Papachristodoulou, Antonis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; COMPLEX NETWORKS; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; PROTEINS; ROBUST CONTROL; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS; CASCADE CONTROL; CHEMOTAXI; CONTROL ARCHITECTURE; E. COLI; FEEDBACK ARCHITECTURE; FEEDBACK CONFIGURATION; IMPORTANT FEATURES; PERFORMANCE; SIGNALLING PATHWAYS;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; CHEMOTACTIC FACTOR;

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL CHEMOTAXIS; BACTERIAL TRANSLOCATION; BIOENGINEERING; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; CHEMOTAXIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROTEIN FUNCTION; RHODOBACTER SPHAEROIDES; SPECIES COMPARISON; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS; BACTERIAL PHENOMENA AND FUNCTIONS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI; RHODOBACTER SPHAEROIDES;

BACTERIAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CHEMOTACTIC FACTORS; CHEMOTAXIS; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHODOBACTER SPHAEROIDES; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 79958167054     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001130     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Tyson JJ, Chen KC, Novak B, (2003) Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15: 221-231.
2. Hartwell LH, Hopfield JJ, Leibler S, Murray AW, (1999) From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature pp. C47-53.
3. Wadhams GH, Armitage JP, (2004) Making sense of it all: Bacterial chemotaxis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 1024-1037.
4. Emonet T, Cluzel P, (2008) Relationship between cellular response and behavioral variability in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 3304-3309.
5. Shimizu TS, Tu Y, Berg HC, (2010) A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli. Mol Syst Biol 6: 382.
6. Clausznitzer D, Oleksiuk O, Løvdok L, Sourjik V, Endres RG, (2010) Chemotactic Response and Adaptation Dynamics in Escherichia coli. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000784.
7. Baker M, Wolanin P, Stock JB, (2006) Signal transduction in bacterial chemotaxis. BioEssays 28: 9-22.
8. Yi T-M, Huang Y, Simon MI, Doyle J, (2000) Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 4649-4653.
9. Brogan WL, (1991) Modern control theory Englewood Cliffs; London Prentice-Hall pp. xviii, 653.
10. Wuichet K, Zhulin IB, (2010) Origins and Diversification of a Complex Signal Transduction System in Prokaryotes. Sci Signal 3: ra50.
11. Hamer R, Chen P-Y, Armitage J, Reinert G, Deane C, (2010) Deciphering chemotaxis pathways using cross species comparisons. BMC Syst Biol 4: 3.
12. Szurmant H, Ordal GW, (2004) Diversity in Chemotaxis Mechanisms among the Bacteria and Archaea. Microbiol Mol Biol R 68: 301-319.
13. Porter SL, Wadhams GH, Armitage JP, (2008) Rhodobacter sphaeroides: complexity in chemotactic signalling. Trends Microbiol 16: 251-260.
14. Wadhams GH, Warren AV, Martin AC, Armitage JP, (2003) Targeting of two signal transduction pathways to different regions of the bacterial cell. Mol Microbiol 50: 763-770.
15. Porter SL, Armitage JP, (2002) Phosphotransfer in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chemotaxis. J Mol Biol 324: 35-45.
16. Porter SL, Armitage JP, (2004) Chemotaxis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides requires an atypical histidine protein kinase. J Biol Chem 279: 54573-54580.
17. Martin AC, Wadhams GH, Shah DS, Porter SL, Mantotta JC, et al. (2001) CheR- and CheB-dependent chemosensory adaptation system of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Bacteriol 183: 7135-7144.
18. Rao CV, Kirby JR, Arkin AP, (2004) Design and diversity in bacterial chemotaxis: a comparative study in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. PLoS Biol 2: E49.
19. Seborg DEET, Mellichamp DA, (2004) Process Dynamics and Control John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
20. Roberts M, August E, Hamadeh A, Maini P, McSharry P, et al. (2009) A model invalidation-based approach for elucidating biological signalling pathways, applied to the chemotaxis pathway in R. sphaeroides. BMC Syst Biol 3: 105.
21. Andrews BW, Yi T-M, Iglesias PA, (2006) Optimal Noise Filtering in the Chemotactic Response of Escherichia coli. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e154.
22. Jiang L, Ouyang Q, Tu Y, (2010) Quantitative Modeling of Escherichia coli Chemotactic Motion in Environments Varying in Space and Time. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000735.
23. Barkai N, Leibler S, (1997) Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387: 913-917.
24. Melykuti B, August E, Papachristodoulou A, El-Samad H, (2010) Discriminating between rival biochemical network models: three approaches to optimal experiment design. BMC Syst Biol 4: 38.
25. Zhou K, Doyle JC, Glover K, (1996) Robust and optimal control: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
26. Sockett RE, Foster JCA, Armitage JP, (1990) Molecular biology of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides flagellum. FEMS Symposium 53: 473-479.