Cements and adhesives for all-ceramic restorations

Dental Clinics of North America

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 311-332

  Manso, Adriana P ^a,b   Silva, Nelson R F A ^c   Bonfante, Estevam A ^d   Pegoraro, Thiago A ^e   Dias, Renata A ^c   Carvalho, Ricardo M ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^b Instituto HNary   (Brazil)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^d Unigranrio University   (Brazil)

^e Direito Público pela UFAL Especialista em Direito Penal e Processual Penal pela UCDB Direito Penal no Centro Universitário CESMAC Maceió AL   (Brazil)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Ceramics; Dental cements; Esthetic dentistry; Incompatibility; Resin based cements; Silanation; Simplified adhesives systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953302407     PISSN: 00118532     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2011.01.011     Document Type: Review

References (105)

1. Meyer J.M., Cattani-Lorente M.A., Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials 1998, 19(6):529-539.
2. Rosenstiel S.F., Land M.F., Crispin B.J. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998, 80(3):280-301.
3. O'Brien W. Dental materials and their selection 2002, Chicago (IL): Quintessence, p. 133-55. 3rd edition.
4. Wettstein F., Sailer I., Roos M., et al. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008, 116(3):272-279.
5. Yiu C.K., Tay F.R., King N.M., et al. Interaction of glass-ionomer cements with moist dentin. J Dent Res 2004, 83(4):283-289.
6. Glasspoole E.A., Erickson R.L., Davidson C.L. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of glass ionomers to enamel. Dent Mater 2002, 8:454-462.
7. Naasan M.A., Watson T.F. Conventional glass ionomers as posterior restorations. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1998, 11(1):36-45.
8. Kerby R.E., Knobloch L. Strength characteristics of glass-ionomer cements. Oper Dent 1992, 17(5):170-174.
9. Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., et al. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000, 28(3):163-177.
10. Christensen G.J. The rise of resin for cementing restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1993, 124(10):104-105.
11. Breeding L.C., Dixon D.L., Caughman W.F. The curing potential of light-activated composite resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1991, 65(4):512-518.
12. Caughman W.F., Chan D.C., Rueggeberg F.A. Curing potential of dual-polymerizable resin cements in simulated clinical situations. J Prosthet Dent 2001, 86(1):101-106.
13. Myers M.L., Caughman W.F., Rueggeberg F.A. Effect of restoration composition, shade, and thickness on the cure of a photoactivated resin cement. J Prosthodont 1994, 3(3):149-157.
14. Anusavice K.J. Phillips' science of dental materials 2003, Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia. 11th edition.
15. Mitra S.B. Dental cements: formulations and handling techniques. Dental biomaterials. Imaging, testing, and modeling 2008, 27. Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton (FL). V.R. Curtis, T. Watson (Eds.).
16. el-Badrawy W.A., el-Mowafy O.M. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995, 73(6):515-524.
17. Hasegawa E.A., Boyer D.B., Chan D.C. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1991, 66(2):187-192.
18. Pereira S.G., Fulgencio R., Nunes T.G., et al. Effect of curing protocol on the polymerization of dual-cured resin cements. Dent Mater 2010, 26(7):710-718.
19. Pegoraro T.A. Efeito do protocolo de ativação da polimerização e envelhecimento acelerado em algumas propriedades de cimentos resinosos 2010, Reabilitação Oral, Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru (Brazil), [in Portuguese].
20. Pegoraro T.A., da Silva N.R., Carvalho R.M. Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2007, 51(2):453-471.
21. Peutzfeldt A., Asmussen E. Investigations on polymer structure of dental resinous materials. Trans Acad Dent Mater 2004, 18:81-104.
22. Carvalho R.M., Garcia F.C., e Silva S.M., et al. Adhesive-composite incompatibility, part II. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005, 17(3):191-195.
23. Tay F.R., Pashley D.H., Yiu C.K., et al. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003, 5(1):27-40.
24. Tay F.R., Suh B.I., Pashley D.H., et al. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2003, 5(2):91-105.
25. Cheong C., King N.M., Pashley D.H., et al. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent 2003, 28(6):747-755.
26. Sanares A.M., Itthagarun A., King N.M., et al. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 2001, 17(6):542-556.
27. Suh B.I., Feng L., Pashley D.H., et al. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically cured or dual-cured composites. Part III. Effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 2003, 5(4):267-282.
28. Carvalho R.M., Pegoraro T.A., Tay F.R., et al. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 2004, 32(1):55-65.
29. Tay F.R., Pashley D.H., Suh B.I., et al. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002, 30:371-382.
30. King N.M., Tay F.R., Pashley D.H., et al. Conversion of one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. Am J Dent 2005, 18(2):126-134.
31. Cury A.H., Goracci C., de Lima Navarro M.F., et al. Effect of hygroscopic expansion on the push-out resistance of glass ionomer-based cements used for the luting of glass fiber posts. J Endod 2006, 32(6):537-540.
32. Goracci C., Fabianelli A., Sadek F.T., et al. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod 2005, 31(8):608-612.
33. Paul S.J., Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997, 17(6):536-545.
34. Duarte S., de Freitas C.R., Saad J.R., et al. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2009, 102(1):1-9.
35. Hu J., Zhu Q. Effect of immediate dentin sealing on preventive treatment for postcementation hypersensitivity. Int J Prosthodont 2010, 23(1):49-52.
36. Duke E.S. New technology directions in resin cements. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003, 24(8). 606-8, 610.
37. Burke F.J., Crisp R.J., Richter B. A practice-based evaluation of the handling of a new self-adhesive universal resin luting material. Int Dent J 2006, 56(3):142-146.
38. Radovic I., Monticelli F., Goracci C., et al. Self-adhesive resin cements: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2008, 10(4):251-258.
39. De Munck J., Van Landuyt K., Peumans M., et al. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005, 84(2):118-132.
40. Gerth H.U., Dammaschke T., Zuchner H., et al. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites-a comparative study. Dent Mater 2006, 22(10):934-941.
41. Abo-Hamar S.E., Hiller K.A., Jung H., et al. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 2005, 9(3):161-167.
42. Hikita K., Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., et al. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007, 23(1):71-80.
43. De Munck J., Vargas M., Van Landuyt K., et al. Bonding of an autoadhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004, 20(10):963-971.
44. Al-Assaf K., Chakmakchi M., Palaghias G., et al. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater 2007, 23(7):829-839.
45. Flury S., Lussi A., Peutzfeldt A., et al. Push-out bond strength of CAD/CAM-ceramic luted to dentin with self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2010, 26(9):855-863.
46. Guarda G.B., Goncalves L.S., Correr A.B., et al. Luting glass ceramic restorations using a self-adhesive resin cement under different dentin conditions. J Appl Oral Sci 2010, 18(3):244-248.
47. Tanoue N., Koishi Y., Atsuta M., et al. Properties of dual-curable luting composites polymerized with single and dual curing modes. J Oral Rehabil 2003, 30(10):1015-1021.
48. Fan P.L., Edahl A., Leung R.L., et al. Alternative interpretations of water sorption values of composite resins. J Dent Res 1985, 64(1):78-80.
49. Ortengren U., Elgh U., Spasenoska V., et al. Water sorption and flexural properties of a composite resin cement. Int J Prosthodont 2000, 13(2):141-147.
50. Oysaed H., Ruyter I.E. Composites for use in posterior teeth: mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1986, 20(2):261-271.
51. Ferracane J.L., Berge H.X., Condon J.R. In vitro aging of dental composites in water-effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res 1998, 42(3):465-472.
52. Huang M., Niu X., Shrotriya P., et al. Contact damage of dental multilayers: viscous deformation and fatigue mechanisms. J Eng Mater Technol 2005, 127(33):33-39.
53. Braden M., Clarke R.L. Water absorption characteristics of dental microfine composite filling materials. I. Proprietary materials. Biomaterials 1984, 5(6):369-372.
54. Pearson G.J., Longman C.M. Water sorption and solubility of resin-based materials following inadequate polymerization by a visible-light curing system. J Oral Rehabil 1989, 16(1):57-61.
55. Vrochari A.D., Eliades G., Hellwig E., et al. Water sorption and solubility of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2010, 12(1):39-43.
56. Scherrer S.S., de Rijk W.G., Belser U.C., et al. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 1994, 10(3):172-177.
57. Magne P., Kwon K.R., Belser U.C., et al. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: a simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1999, 81(3):327-334.
58. Silva N.R., de Souza G.M., Coelho P.G., et al. Effect of water storage time and composite cement thickness on fatigue of a glass-ceramic trilayer system. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008, 84(1):117-123.
59. Cekic-Nagas I., Canay S., Sahin E. Bonding of resin core materials to lithium disilicate ceramics: the effect of resin cement film thickness. Int J Prosthodont 2010, 23(5):469-471.
60. Van Noort R. Introduction to dental materials 2007, Mosby Elsevier, London. 3rd edition.
61. Raigrodski A.J., Chiche G.J. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part I: in vitro studies. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002, 14(3):188-191.
62. Raigrodski A.J., Chiche G.J., Potiket N., et al. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006, 96(4):237-244.
63. Raigrodski A.J., Chiche G.J., Swift E.J. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Part III: clinical studies. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002, 14(5):313-319.
64. Sailer I., Feher A., Filser F., et al. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2007, 20(4):383-388.
65. Sailer I., Philipp A., Zembic A., et al. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009, 20(Suppl 4):4-31.
66. Sailer I., Pjetursson B.E., Zwahlen M., et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007, 18(Suppl 3):86-96.
67. Tinschert J., Schulze K.A., Natt G., et al. Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2008, 21(3):217-222.
68. Clelland N.L., Warchol N., Kerby R.E., et al. Influence of interface surface conditions on indentation failure of simulated bonded ceramic onlays. Dent Mater 2006, 22(2):99-106.
69. Blatz M.B., Sadan A., Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2003, 89(3):268-274.
70. Barghi N., Chung K., Farshchian F., et al. Effects of the solvents on bond strength of resin-bonded porcelain. J Oral Rehabil 1999, 26(11):853-857.
71. Hooshmand T., van Noort R., Keshvad A. Bond durability of the resin-bonded and silane-treated ceramic surface. Dent Mater 2002, 18(2):179-188.
72. Meng X.F., Yoshida K., Gu N. Chemical adhesion rather than mechanical retention enhances resin bond durability of a dental glass-ceramic with leucite crystallites. Biomed Mater 2010, 5(4):044101.
73. Ishida H. Structural gradient in the silane-coupling agent layers and its influence on the mechanical and physical properties of composites 1985, New York (NY): Plenum Press, p. 25-50.
74. Hooshmand T., van Noort R., Keshvad A. Storage effect of a preactivated silane on the resin to ceramic bond. Dent Mater 2004, 20(7):635-642.
75. Derand T., Molin M., Kvam K. Bond strength of composite luting cement to zirconia ceramic surfaces. Dent Mater 2005, 21(12):1158-1162.
76. Kern M., Wegner S.M. Bonding to zirconia ceramic: adhesion methods and their durability. Dent Mater 1998, 14(1):64-71.
77. Ozcan M., Vallittu P.K. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003, 19(8):725-731.
78. Wegner S.M., Kern M. Long-term resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2000, 2(2):139-147.
79. Della Bona A., Kelly J.R. The clinical success of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008, 139:8S-13S.
80. Scherrer S.S., De Rijk W.G., Belser U.C. Fracture resistance of human enamel and three all-ceramic crown systems on extracted teeth. Int J Prosthodont 1996, 9(6):580-585.
81. Blatz M.B. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramic posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002, 33(6):415-426.
82. Casucci A., Mazzitelli C., Monticelli F., et al. Morphological analysis of three zirconium oxide ceramics: effect of surface treatments. Dent Mater 2010, 26(8):751-760.
83. Qeblawi D.M., Munoz C.A., Brewer J.D., et al. The effect of zirconia surface treatment on flexural strength and shear bond strength to a resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 2010, 103(4):210-220.
84. Ural X.C., Külünk T., Külünk S., et al. Determination of resin bond strength to zirconia ceramic surface using different primers. Acta Odontol Scand 2010, 69:48-53.
85. Guazzato M., Quach L., Albakry M., et al. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 2005, 33(1):9-18.
86. Kosmac T., Oblak C., Jevnikar P., et al. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 1999, 15(6):426-433.
87. Kosmac T., Oblak C., Jevnikar P., et al. Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000, 53(4):304-313.
88. Lawn B.R., Deng Y., Lloyd I.K., et al. Materials design of ceramic-based layer structures for crowns. J Dent Res 2002, 81(6):433-438.
89. Zhang Y., Lawn B.R., Rekow E.D., et al. Effect of sandblasting on the long-term performance of dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004, 71(2):381-386.
90. Guess P.C., Zhang Y., Kim J.W., et al. Damage and reliability of Y-TZP after cementation surface treatment. J Dent Res 2010, 89(6):592-596.
91. Kern M., Barloi A., Yang B. Surface conditioning influences zirconia ceramic bonding. J Dent Res 2009, 88(9):817-822.
92. Yang B., Barloi A., Kern M. Influence of air-abrasion on zirconia ceramic bonding using an adhesive composite resin. Dent Mater 2010, 26(1):44-50.
93. Aboushelib M.N., Feilzer A.J., Kleverlaan C.J. Bonding to zirconia using a new surface treatment. J Prosthodont 2010, 19(5):340-346.
94. Oyague R.C., Monticelli F., Toledano M., et al. Effect of water aging on microtensile bond strength of dual-cured resin cements to pretreated sintered zirconium-oxide ceramics. Dent Mater 2009, 25(3):392-399.
95. Tanaka R., Fujishima A., Shibata Y., et al. Cooperation of phosphate monomer and silica modification on zirconia. J Dent Res 2008, 87(7):666-670.
96. Blatz M.B., Sadan A., Martin J., et al. In vitro evaluation of shear bond strengths of resin to densely sintered high-purity zirconium oxide ceramic after long-term storage and thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2004, 91(4):356-362.
97. Kitayama S., Nikaido T., Takahashi R., et al. Effect of primer treatment on bonding of resin cements to zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 2010, 26(5):426-432.
98. Yun J.Y., Ha S.R., Lee J.B., et al. Effect of sandblasting and various metal primers on the shear bond strength of resin cement to Y-TZP ceramic. Dent Mater 2010, 26(7):650-658.
99. Magne P., Paranhos M.P., Burnett L.H. New zirconia primer improves bond strength of resin-based cements. Dent Mater 2010, 26(4):345-352.
100. Kern M., Thompson V.P. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: volume loss, morphology, and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994, 71(5):453-461.
101. Kim B.K., Bae H.E., Shim J.S., et al. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005, 94(4):357-362.
102. de Paula Eduardo C., Bello-Silva M.S., Moretto S.G., et al. Microtensile bond strength of composite resin to glass-infiltrated alumina composite conditioned with Er, Cr:YSGG laser. Lasers Med Sci 2010, [Epub ahead of print].
103. Land M.F., Hopp C.D. Survival rates of all-ceramic systems differ by clinical indication and fabrication method. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010, 10(1):37-38.
104. Schley J.S., Heussen N., Reich S., et al. Survival probability of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses up to 5 yr: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Sci 2010, 118(5):443-450.
105. Al-Amleh B., Lyons K., Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010, 37(8):641-652.